Customs duties and common customs tariff as an instrument for the protection of the European Union internal Market: An economic and financial dimension

Authors

  • Małgorzata Czermińska Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24136/ceref.2025.015

Keywords:

common trade policy, Common Customs Tariff, tariff rate, most favored nation clause

Abstract

Customs duties and common tariffs remain a traditional instrument for protecting the European Union (EU) common market. The customs tariff embraces the customs nomenclature (a systematised list of goods) with the applicable duty rates, on the basis of which the duty payable on imports into the European Union is calculated. The customs tariff and the customs duties it contains not only have a protective function, but also possess an economic and fiscal dimension, as they ensure the EU budget revenue. The main objective of this study is to show the role played by customs duties and tariffs in the protection of the internal market and EU producers, including the economic and fiscal dimension of these market protection tariff instruments. The specific objective is to verify the research hypothesis that the role of customs duties and the common customs tariff in the protection of the EU common market is decreasing. The analysis of the level, types and changes of customs duties in the EU customs tariff confirmed the research hypothesis that customs duties generally no longer play a major role in the protection of the internal market. For more than twenty years, they showed a downward trend, starting in the mid-1990s. However, for some goods, mainly agricultural ones (dairy products, sugar and confectionery, cereals), but also textiles, clothing and motor vehicles, customs duties are still a barrier to access to the EU market, so they perform an important protective function and have a significant fiscal dimension. The study relies on traditional research methods: deductive reasoning and comparative analysis. For the purpose of the analysis, various sources were used, such as domestic and foreign literature, legal acts of the EU secondary legislation in the form of regulations, statistical data of the Eurostat, the World Trade Organization and the World Bank.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bown Ch. P., (ed.) (2011), The great Recession and Import Protection: The Role of Temporary Trade Barriers, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank, Washington.

Bungay F., (2012), EU Agricultural Protection: Tariffs and the CAP, Research Paper, Policy Research Centre, London.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1821 of 6 October 2016 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff ,OJ L 294, 28.10.2016, 1-956.

Council Decision No 2014/335/EU, Euratom of 26 May 2014 on the system of own resources of the European Union, OJ L 168, 7.6.2014, 105-111.

Council Decision (EU, EURATOM) 2020/2053 of 14 December 2020 on the system of own resources of the European Union and repealing Decision 2014/335/EU, Euratom, OJ L 424, 15.12.2020, 1-10.

Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, 1-675.

Czermińska M., (2019), Wspólna polityka handlowa Unii Europejskiej. Znaczenie dla ochrony jednolitego rynku wewnętrznego i międzynarodowego bezpieczeństwa ekonomicznego, Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek, Toruń.

European Commission (2023), https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/customs-4/calculation-customs-duties/customs-tariff/eu-customs-tariff-taric_en [Access: 28.01.2024]

European Communities, Financial report for the years 1989-2023, http://ec.europa.eu/budget/financialreport [Access: 28.01.2024].

European Parliament, (2019), Die Handelspolitik der EU. Häufig gestellte Fragen, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2019/642229/EPRS_IDA(2019)642229_DE.pdf [Access: 28.01.2024]DOI:10.2861/942236

Eurostat (2023), Online data code: DS-1262672.

Kaliszuk, E., (2016), Rozszerzenie porozumienia w sprawie handlu towarami technologii informatycznych, Unia Europejska.pl, No. 2, 7-10.

Kee H.L., Neaguz C., Nicita A., (2013), Is Protectionism on the Rise? Assessing National Trade Policies during the Crisis of 2008, The Review of Economics and Statistics, No. 95(1), 342-346.

Limbach, K., (2015), Uniformity of Customs Administration in the European Union, Bloomsbury, London.

Lux M., (2004), Prawo celne Unii Europejskiej, Podręcznik dla praktyków z przykładami i pożytecznymi wskazówkami, Wydawnictwo BW Szczecin, Szczecin.

Messerlin P., (2010), The European Community commercial policy, Sciences PoGroupe d'Economie Mondiale “Working Paper” 2010, 1-31.

Naruszewicz S., Laszuk M., (2004), Wspólnotowe prawo celne, Wydawnictwo Prawnicze Lexis Nexis, Warszawa.

Nilsson L., (2009), Inside the world of EU import tariff regimes: From concepts to practical application, European Commission, Directorate General for Trade Brussels, Brussels.

Office of the United States Trade Representative, (2023), National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade, https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/2023-03/2023%20NTE%20Report.pdf [Access: 28.01.2024].

Pelkmans J., (2006), European integration: methods and economic analysis, Harlow, Pearson Education Ltd., London.

Reiwer-Kaliszewska, A., (2018), The Impact of the Traditional Own Resources on the Budget of the European Union, in: Lotko E., Zawadzka-Pąk U., Radvan M., (eds.), Optimization of Organization and Legal Solutions concerning Public Revenues and Expenditures in Public Interest (Conference Proceedings), Temida 2, Bialystok-Vilnius 2018,147-155.

Reiwer-Kaliszewska, A., (2017), The Issue of Modernization of the XXI Century, in: Radvan, M., Gliniecka, J., Sowiński, T., Mrkyvka, P., (eds.), The Financial Law Towards Challenges of the XXI Century, Masaryk University, Brno.

Vandenbussche H., Viegelahn Ch. (2011), European Union: No Protectionist Surprise, in: Brown ChP, (ed.), The Great Recession and Import Protection. The Role of Temporary Trade Barriers, World Bank The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, 85-131.

Weerth, C., (2008), Structure of Customs Tariffs Worldwide and in the European Community, Global Trade and Customs Journal, No. 3(6), 221-225.

Weerth C., (2023), Zolltarif, Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon, Online-Lexikon https://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/definition/zolltarif-50220 [Access: 28.01.2024]

World Bank (2023), www.worldbank.org [Access: 28.01.2024]

WTO (2004), Trade Policy Review: European Communities 2004, European Communities, WT/TPR/S/136.

WTO (2006), Trade Policy Review: Report by the Secretariat, European Communities, WT/TPR/S/177.

WTO (2009). Trade Policy Review: Report by the Secretariat WTO, European Communities, WT/TPR/S/214.

WTO (2013), Trade Policy Review: Report by the Secretariat WTO, European Union, WT/TPR/S/284.

WTO (2015), Trade Policy Review: Report by the Secretariat WTO, European Union, WT/TPR/S/317.

WTO (2017), Trade Policy Review: Report by the Secretariat WTO, European Union, WT/TPR/S/357.

WTO, (2023),Trade Policy Review: Report by the Secretariat WTO, European Union, WT/TPR/S/442

Downloads

Published

2025-12-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Customs duties and common customs tariff as an instrument for the protection of the European Union internal Market: An economic and financial dimension. (2025). Central European Review of Economics & Finance, 50(4), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.24136/ceref.2025.015