The 2026 CMDI framework and the persistence of host-state asymmetry: the case of Poland

Authors

  • Aneta Kosztowniak SGH Warsaw School of Economics
  • Mateusz Toczyski Society of Polish Economists

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24136/ceref.2026.008

Keywords:

banking groups, crisis management, deposit guarantee, CMDI, SRMR, BRRD, Banking Union, financial supervision

Abstract

The aim of this study is to review the regulatory provisions of the 2026 Crisis Management and Deposit Insurance (CMDI) framework, the conditions for its implementation in the Polish banking sector, and its potential effects.  In doing so, the following thesis is advanced: the 2026 CMDI framework harmonises the legal framework for crisis management across all Member States of the European Union, but it shifts the existing asymmetry between the Member State of the parent undertaking and the Member State of the subsidiary in cross-border banking groups from supervision to resolution and further entrenches it, raising the cost borne by a host Member State that remains outside the Banking Union (a non-participating Member State). In the Polish banking sector, this asymmetry generates a regulatory and supervisory cost: Poland takes on the obligations of harmonisation without the reciprocal benefit, namely risk-sharing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Legal acts and documents

Directive (EU) 2026/806 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 March 2026 amending Directive 2014/59/EU as regards early intervention measures, conditions for resolution and funding of resolution action and Directive 2014/24/EU as regards valuation services in resolution (BRRD), OJ L, 2026/806, 20.4.2026, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2026/806/oj.

Directive (EU) 2026/804 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 March 2026 amending Directive 2014/49/EU as regards the scope of deposit protection, the use of deposit guarantee scheme funds, cross-border cooperation, and transparency (DGSD), OJ L, 2026/804, 20.4.2026, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2026/804/oj.

Regulation (EU) 2026/808 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 March 2026 amending Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 as regards early intervention measures, conditions for resolution and funding of resolution action (SRMR), OJ L, 2026/808, 20.4.2026, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2026/808/oj.

Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms (BRRD), OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 190.

Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund (SRMR), OJ L 225, 30.7.2014, p. 1.

Directive 2014/49/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on deposit guarantee schemes (DGSD), OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 149.

Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (CRR), OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1.

Ustawa z dnia 10 czerwca 2016 r. o Bankowym Funduszu Gwarancyjnym, systemie gwarantowania depozytów oraz przymusowej restrukturyzacji (Dz.U. z 2016 r. poz. 996; tekst jednolity Dz.U. z 2025 r. poz. 643 ze zm.).

Ustawa z dnia 28 lutego 2003 r. — Prawo upadłościowe (Dz.U. z 2003 r. Nr 60 poz. 535; tekst jednolity Dz.U. z 2025 r. poz. 614 ze zm.).

European Commission, Crisis Management and Deposit Insurance (CMDI) framework — Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2014/59/EU and 2014/49/EU, COM(2023) 226 final, Brussels 2023.

Single Resolution Board, Annual Report (various years) and SRB Vision 2028 — Building a robust resolution framework for all banks, Brussels 2022.

European Banking Authority, EBA Report on the implementation of the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive, EBA/Op/2021/10, Paris 2021.

Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF), Dane miesięczne sektora bankowego (Monthly data on the banking sector), position as at 30 November 2025, Warsaw 2025.

Literature

Alexander K. (2015), European Banking Union: A Legal and Institutional Analysis of the Single Supervisory Mechanism and the Single Resolution Mechanism, European Law Review, 40(2), pp. 154–187.

Arnal J., Lannoo K., Lastra R. (2024), Is CMDI what the Banking Union needs?, CEPS Policy Brief 2024-01, Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels.

Asimakopoulos I. G., Tröger T. H. (2024), Reform of the CMDI Framework — Driving Off With the Brakes On, European Company and Financial Law Review, 21(5–6), pp. 531–562, https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2024-0018.

Eurofi (2025), EU bank crisis management framework, The Eurofi Magazine, September 2025, Eurofi.

Freixas X., Rochet J.-C. (2008), Microeconomics of Banking, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).

Goodhart C., Avgouleas E. (2016), A Critical Evaluation of Bail-in as a Bank Recapitalisation Mechanism, [in:] Evanoff D. D., Haldane A., Kaufman G. G. (eds.), The New International Financial System: Analyzing the Cumulative Impact of Regulatory Reform, World Scientific Publishing Co., pp. 267–305, https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/65164/.

Gortsos C. V. (2023), The Commission’s 2023 proposals to reform the CMDI framework supporting the completion of the Banking Union, European Parliament, Economic Governance and EMU Scrutiny Unit (EGOV), PE 741.493.

Hagendorff J., Nieto M. J. (2015), The Safety and Soundness Effects of Bank M&A in the EU: Does Prudential Regulation Have any Impact?, European Financial Management, 21(3), pp. 462–490.

Hardy D. C., Nieto M. J. (2011), Cross-border coordination of prudential supervision and deposit guarantees, Banco de España Working Paper No. 1126, pp. 1–30, https://ssrn.com/abstract=1942158, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1942158.

Hellwig M. F. (2014), Yes, Virginia, There is a European Banking Union! But It May Not Make Your Wishes Come True, MPI Collective Goods Preprint, No. 2014/12, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2487757, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2487757.

Iwanicz-Drozdowska M., Kerlin J., Kozłowska A., Malinowska-Misiąg E., Nowak A., Smaga P., Wiśniewski P., Witkowski B. (2016), European Bank Restructuring During the Global Financial Crisis, Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions, Palgrave Macmillan.

Kosztowniak A. (2022), Changes in the quality of bank loan portfolios in EU countries – with the particular case of Poland, Managerial Economics, 23(1), pp. 27–48.

Kosztowniak A. (2023), Changes in the lending activity of banks in Poland, including the portfolio of non-financial corporate loans, [in:] Irving Fischer Committee on Central Bank Statistics, BIS, Data science in central banking: applications and tools, IFC Bulletin No 59, pp. 407–428, https://www.bis.org/ifc/publ/ifcb59.htm.

Méró K., Piroska D. (2016), Banking Union and banking nationalism — Explaining opt-out choices of Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic, Policy and Society, 35(3), pp. 215–226, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2016.10.001.

Nieto M. J. (2015), Banking on single supervision in the Eurozone: scepticism and a reform proposal, European Business Organization Law Review, 16(4), pp. 539–546.

Schoenmaker D. (2017), The Banking Union: An Overview and Open Issues, [in:] Beck T., Casu B. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of European Banking, Palgrave Macmillan, London, https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52144-6_17.

Schoenmaker D., Véron N. (2016), European Banking Supervision: The First Eighteen Months, Bruegel Blueprint Series, Volume XXV, Bruegel.

Toczyski M. Anchoring, Absorption, Bifurcation: How Institutional Regimes Filter Sovereign Debt Risk into Heterogeneous Financial Flows in a Polycrisis; International Business and Global Economy; after review – forthcoming 2026.

Véron N. (2024b), Back to the future: main financial services themes for European Commissioner designate Maria Luís Albuquerque, Bruegel, Analysis 34/2024, Brussels, https://www.bruegel.org/analysis/back-future-main-financial-services-themes-european-commissioner-designate-maria-luis.

Véron N. (2024a), Europe’s Banking Union at Ten: Unfinished Yet Transformative, Bruegel, Brussels.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The 2026 CMDI framework and the persistence of host-state asymmetry: the case of Poland. (2026). Central European Review of Economics & Finance, 55(2), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.24136/ceref.2026.008