Bitcoin: an alternative to fiat money? A post-Keynesian perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24136/cxy.2024.002

Keywords:

Bitcoin, fiat currency, MMT, endogenous money supply, El Salvador

Abstract

Motivation: This paper addresses the ongoing debate surrounding Bitcoin’s potential to function as an alternative to state-issued fiat currencies. With the advent of Bitcoin and its increasing global prominence, it is essential to explore its viability, particularly in light of its formal adoption in El Salvador as legal tender. The limited supply and decentralized nature of Bitcoin present a significant departure from traditional monetary systems, which raises questions regarding its capacity to fulfill the roles of money under Modern Monetary Theory (MMT).
Aim: The primary goal of this paper is to critically examine whether Bitcoin can serve as a functional replacement for fiat money. Using a post-Keynesian analytical framework, this study investigates Bitcoin’s ability to meet the requirements of sovereign money, particularly within the theoretical framework of MMT. The analysis focuses on Bitcoin’s decentralized issuance, limited supply, and its role in fiscal policy and credit creation.
Materials and methods: This research employs a critical literature review and a case study analysis, using the framework of MMT and post-Keynesian endogenous money theory to assess Bitcoin’s economic implications and its real-world application in El Salvador’s Bitcoin Law. The study analyzes Bitcoin’s economic implications based on the endogenous money supply model and evaluates its impact on government fiscal policy, credit markets, and economic stability in both theoretical and practical contexts, with a special focus on El Salvador’s Bitcoin Law.
Results: The analysis reveals significant limitations in Bitcoin’s ability to function as a fiat currency. Its rigid supply and speculative nature hinder its capacity to serve as a medium of exchange, store of value, and unit of account, as envisaged by MMT. The study concludes that Bitcoin’s decentralized nature and deflationary design pose challenges for its broader adoption as state money, particularly in managing aggregate demand and economic crises.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alonso, S. L. N., Fernández, M. Á. E., Bas, D. S., & Rico, C. P. (2023). El Salvador: an analysis of the monetary integration law and the bitcoin law. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 44(1), 189–209.

Bernanke, B. (2013). The Federal Reserve and the Financial Crisis. Princeton University Press.

Bitcoin.org. (2023). Genesis Block. Retrieved from https://bitcoin.org/en/developer-guide#block-chain

Blockchain.com. (2024). Bitcoin Circulation Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.blockchain.com/charts/total-bitcoins.

Chaum, D. (1983). Blind signatures for untraceable payments. In D. Chaum, R.L. Rivest, A.T. Sherman (Eds.), Advances in Cryptology (pp. 199–203) Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0602-4_18.

Dow, S. C. (1993). Money and the Economic Process. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Friedman, M. (2009). Money Mischief: Episodes in Monetary History. Harcourt.

Kaldor, N. (1982). The Scourge of Monetarism. Oxford University Press.

Keynes, J. M. (1930). A Treatise on Money: The Pure Theory of Money. Macmillan.

Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. Palgrave Macmillan.

Knapp, G. F. (1924). The State Theory of Money. Macmillan.

Krugman, P. (2018). Bubble, Bubble, Fraud and Trouble. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com.

Lavoie, M. (1984). The Endogenous Flow of Credit and the Post-Keynesian Theory of Money. Journal of Economic Issues, 18(3), 771–797.

Lavoie, M. (1992). Foundations of Post-Keynesian Economic Analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Minsky, H. P. (1986). Stabilizing an Unstable Economy. Yale University Press.

Mitchell, W., Wray, L. R., & Watts, M. (2019). Macroeconomics. Macmillan International Higher Education.

Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies. Princeton University Press.

Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Retrieved from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.

Nuthall, K., Magaa, S., & Nogueira, R. (2021). El Salvador and the Bitcoin Law: Legal and Economic Implications. International Financial Review, 44(4), 198–219.

Quotidiano, P. (2022). The 2017 Catalan Independence and Cryptocurrency. El País, March 19.

Saiedi, E., Broström, A., & Ruiz, F. (2021). Global Drivers of Cryptocurrency Infrastructure Adoption. Global Finance Journal, 48, 100518.

Swanson, T. (2015). The Anatomy of a Hypothetical Coin: A Thought Experiment. Retrieved from https://www.ofnumbers.com.

Tymoigne, E., & Wray, L. R. (2013). Modern Money Theory: A Primer on Macroeconomics for Sovereign Monetary Systems. Palgrave Macmillan.

Wray, L. R. (2012). Modern Money Theory: A Primer on Macroeconomics for Sovereign Monetary Systems. Palgrave Macmillan.

Wray, L. R. (2015). Modern Money Theory: A Primer on Macroeconomics for Sovereign Monetary Systems. Palgrave Macmillan.

Yermack, D. (2015). Is Bitcoin a Real Currency? An Economic Appraisal. In D. Lee (Ed.), Handbook of Digital Currency (pp. 31–43). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802117-0.00002-3.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-23

How to Cite

Golacik, K. (2024). Bitcoin: an alternative to fiat money? A post-Keynesian perspective. Catallaxy, 9(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.24136/cxy.2024.002

Issue

Section

Articles