Influence of business support organizations on innovation activity in manufacturing companies in the Masovian Voivodeship in Poland

Abstract

Research background: The first business support organizations (BSO) appeared in Poland in the 90s of the last century. They were transferred from Western Europe and the United States, where they provided system solutions and played an important role in stimulating innovation activity. However, the latter regions are economically developed, while Poland is playing catch-up. The important question is whether business support organizations will significantly increase the innovative potential of  Polish enterprises.

Purpose of the article: The purpose of this paper is to probe the impact of business support organizations on innovation activity in Polish industrial companies. It remains to be determined whether enterprises which use BSO services are more likely to engage in innovation activities than enterprises which do not use such services.

Methods: To carry out the study, a multi-factor logit regression method was used. In this study, the method allows the determination of the odds ratio for the likely occurrence of innovation activity in companies that used the services of BSOs compared to enterprises that did not do so. The attributes of innovation activity have been singled out in accordance with the international standards of the Oslo methodology. The study was conducted in 2015 for the years 2012?2014 based on a sample of 951 manufacturing companies in the Masovian Voivodeship.

Findings & Value added: In the Masovian Voivodeship it is the technological parks and training and consulting centres which have the most advanced degree of influence on the innovation activity of enterprises. The roles of technology incubators, and loan and guarantee funds are also significant. With regard to cooperation on innovation, there is a much better arrangement in sectoral systems, i.e., with suppliers, customers and competitors, than with scientific institutions.

Keywords

business support organization, innovation activity, cooperation, spillover of knowledge, logistic regression

References

1. Arauzo-Carod, J. M., Segarra-Blasco, A., & Teruel, M. (2018). The role of science and technology parks as firm growth boosters: an empirical analysis in Catalonia. Regional Studies, 52(5). doi: 10.1080/00343404.2018.1447098. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1447098
   View in Google Scholar
2. Balcerzak, A. P. (2015). Europe 2020 Strategy and structural diversity between old and new member states. Application of zero unitarization method for dynamic analysis in the years 2004-2013. Economics and Sociology, 8(2). doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2015/8-2/14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2015/8-2/14
   View in Google Scholar
3. Castillo, F., Gilless, J. K., Heiman, A., & Zilberman, D. (2018). Time of adoption and intensity of technology transfer: an institutional analysis of offices of technology transfer in the United States. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(1). doi: 10.1007/s10961-016-9468-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9468-5
   View in Google Scholar
4. Cesaroni, F., & Piccaluga A. (2016). The activities of university knowledge transfer offices: towards the third mission in Italy. Journal of Technology Transfer 41(4). doi: 10.1007/s10961-015-9401-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9401-3
   View in Google Scholar
5. Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 31(7). doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333 (01)00178-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00178-0
   View in Google Scholar
6. Danieluk, B. (2010). Application of logistic regression in experimental research. Psychologia społeczna, 5(2-3(14)).
   View in Google Scholar
7. Diez-Vial, I., & Montoro-Sanchez, A. (2016). How knowledge links with universities may foster innovation: the case of a science park. Technovation, 50-51(SI). doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.001
   View in Google Scholar
8. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and ‘‘Mode 2’’ to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2). doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99) 00055-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
   View in Google Scholar
9. Hülsbeck, M., Erik, E., Lehmann, E .E., & Starnecker, A. (2013). Performance of technology transfer offices in Germany. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(3). doi: 10.1007/s10961-011-9243-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-011-9243-6
   View in Google Scholar
10. Koprowska-Skalska E. (2010). Training and consulting centers. In K.B. Matusiak (Eds.). Ośrodki innowacji i przedsiębiorczości w Polsce. Raport 2010. Warszawa: PARP.
    View in Google Scholar
11. Kuczewska, L. (2015). Business services in raising abilities to compete by enterprises using them (research findings). Handel wewnętrzny, 358(5).
    View in Google Scholar
12. Liberati, D., Marinucci, M., & Tanzi, G. M. (2016). Science and technology parks in Italy: main features and analysis of their effects on the firms hosted. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(4). doi: 10.1007/s10961-015-9397-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9397-8
    View in Google Scholar
13. Maddala, G. S. (2006). Econometrics. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
    View in Google Scholar
14. Morawczyński, R. (2014). Investment criteria used by business angels. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego nr 803, „Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia”, 66.
    View in Google Scholar
15. OECD/Eurostat (2005). Oslo manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, 3rd edition. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787 /9789264013100-en.
    View in Google Scholar
16. Piekunko-Mantiuk, I. (2014). Business angels and their role in the financing of start-up’s. Economics and Management, 4. doi: 10.12846/j.em.2014.04.26.
    View in Google Scholar
17. Rocio Vasquez-Urriago, A., Barge-Gil, A., & Modrego Rico, A. (2016). Science and technology parks and cooperation for innovation: empirical evidence from Spain. Research Policy, 45(1). doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.006
    View in Google Scholar
18. Soetanto, D. P., & Jack, S. L. (2013). Business incubators and the networks of technology-based firms. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(4). doi: 10.1007/ s10961-011-9237-4.
    View in Google Scholar
19. Stanisz, A. (2007). Easy statistics course, Volume 2. Linear and nonlinear models. Kraków: Statsoft.
    View in Google Scholar
20. Stokan, E., Thompson, L., & Mahu, R. J. (2015). Testing the differential effect of business incubators on firm growth. Economic Development Quarterly, 29(4). doi: 10.1177/0891242415597065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242415597065
    View in Google Scholar
21. Świadek, A. (2011). Regional innovations systems in Poland. Warszawa: Difin.
    View in Google Scholar
22. Warsaw Statistical Office (2015). Statistical yearbook. Mazowieckie Voivodeship 2015. Warszawa: Warsaw Statstical Office.
    View in Google Scholar
23. Vienna Initiative Working Group (2014). Credit guarantee schemes for SME lending in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. A report by the Vienna Initiative Working Group on credit guarantee schemes. Retrieved from http://vienna-initiative.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/2014_credit_guarant ee_schemes_report_en.pdf (13.02.2017).
    View in Google Scholar