The impact of the diversification of revenues on NGOs? commercialization: evidence from Poland

Abstract

Research background: The commercialization of non-governmental organizations through undertaking an activity based on the commercial sale of services and products is a phenomenon which raises controversy among numerous researchers. Traditionally, NGOs act in a sector of social services to solve problems, such as homelessness, exclusion or social pathologies. They also provide different services which cannot be provided by the market, for instance in education, the healthcare system, culture, or art. Driven by a social mission, NGOs introduce their concepts, strongly relying on fees to perform their activity. They also obtain funds in the form of public donations or payments from private or institutional donors. Growing social needs and changes in the governmental policy aimed at reducing social-aid spending have put pressure on NGOs to develop entrepreneurial strategies to gain financial support.

Purpose of the article: The aim of the paper is to investigate how particular funding sources affect the probability of non-governmental organizations? commercialization.

Methods: Data for the analyses have been collected from a national survey of Polish non-governmental organizations. In the analysis of logistic regression, a specially-developed model was used to estimate the probability of NGOs? commercialization, depending on the selected categories of funding sources.

Findings & Value added: An analysis of the results indicates clearly that the likelihood of NGOs? commercialization slightly decreases as a greater number of private external financial sources is used. In contrast with existing literature, which claims that government funding is crowding out commercial activity, this research finds that, to some extent, public funds positively stimulate the commercialization of NGOs. The contribution of this research is that it introduces the category of internal financing sources of non-profit organizations, which have been overlooked in previous studies. The article provides clear statistical arguments demonstrating that private internal revenues strongly affect the commercialization of the organizations surveyed. The paper is the first to present a model that comprehensively considers the probability of NGOs? commercialization, including private external and internal, as well as public, sources of funding.

Keywords

commercialization, NGOs, financial sources, revenue diversification

References

1. Carmin, J. (2010). NGO capacity and environmental governance in Central and Eastern Europe. Acta Politica, 45(1-2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2009.21
   View in Google Scholar
2. Carroll, D. A., & Stater, K. J. (2009). Revenue diversification in nonprofit organizations: does it lead to financial stability? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4). doi: 10.1093/jopart/mun025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun025
   View in Google Scholar
3. Chabotar, K. J. (1989). Financial ratio analysis comes to nonprofits. Journal of Higher Education, 60(2). doi: 10.1080/00221546.1989.11775021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1982176
   View in Google Scholar
4. Chang, C. F., & Tuckman, H. P. (1994). Revenue diversification among nonprofits. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 5(3). doi: 10.1007/BF02354036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354036
   View in Google Scholar
5. Chikoto, G. L., & Neely, D. G. (2014). Building nonprofit financial capacity: the impact of revenue concentration and overhead costs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(3). doi: 10.1177/0899764012474120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012474120
   View in Google Scholar
6. Dart, R. (2004). The legitimacy of social enterprise. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(4). doi: 10.1002/nml.43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.43
   View in Google Scholar
7. Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.x
   View in Google Scholar
8. Enjolras, B. (2002). The commercialization of voluntary sport organizations in Norway. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(3). doi: 10.1177/0899 764002313003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764002313003
   View in Google Scholar
9. Evans, J. L., & Archer, S. H. (1968). Diversification and the reduction of dispersion: an empirical analysis. Journal of Finance, 23(5). doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00315.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2325905
   View in Google Scholar
10. Fafchamps, M., & Owens, T. (2009). The determinants of funding to Ugandan nongovernmental organizations. World Bank Economic Review, 23(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhp001
    View in Google Scholar
11. Fischer, R. L., Wilsker, A., & Young, D. R. (2011). Exploring the revenue mix of nonprofit organizations: does it relate to publicness? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010363921
    View in Google Scholar
12. Foster, W., & Bradach, J. (2005). Should nonprofits seek profits? Harvard Business Review, 83.
    View in Google Scholar
13. Foster, W., & Fine, G. (2007). How nonprofits get really big. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(2).
    View in Google Scholar
14. Froelich, K. A. (1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(3). doi: 10.1177/0899764099283002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764099283002
    View in Google Scholar
15. Frumkin, P., & Keating, E. K. (2011). Diversification reconsidered: the risks and rewards of revenue concentration. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2(2). doi: 10.1080/19420676.2011.614630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2011.614630
    View in Google Scholar
16. Greenlee, J., & Trussel J. (2000). Estimating the financial vulnerability of charitable organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.11205
    View in Google Scholar
17. Guo, B. (2006). Charity for profit? Exploring factors associated with the commercialization of human service nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(1). doi: 10.1177/0899764005282482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764005282482
    View in Google Scholar
18. Hager, M. (2001). Financial vulnerability among arts organizations: a test of the Tuckman-Chang measures. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(2). doi: 10.1177/0899764001302010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764001302010
    View in Google Scholar
19. Han, J. (2017). Social marketisation and policy influence of third sector organisations: evidence from the UK. Voluntas, 28. doi: 10.1007/s11266-017-9853-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9853-1
    View in Google Scholar
20. Keating, E., Fischer, M., Gordon, T. P., & Greenlee, J. S. (2005). Assessing financial vulner - ability in the nonprofit sector. KSG Working Paper Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations Paper, RWP05-002. doi:10.2139/ssrn.647662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.647662
    View in Google Scholar
21. Kerlin, J. A., & Pollak, T. (2011). Nonprofit commercial revenue: a replacement for declining government grants and private contributions? American Review of Public Administration, 41(6). doi: 10.1177/0275074010387293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074010387293
    View in Google Scholar
22. Khieng, S. (2014). Funding mobilization strategies of nongovernmental organizations in Cambodia. Volunas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9400-7
    View in Google Scholar
23. Kilby, P. (2006). Accountability for empowerment: dilemmas facing non-governmental organizations. World Development, 34(6). doi: 10.1016/j.world dev.2005.11.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.009
    View in Google Scholar
24. Larose, D. T. (2008). Metody i modele eksploracji danych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
    View in Google Scholar
25. LeRoux, K. M. (2005). What drives nonprofit entrepreneurship? A look at budget trends of metro Detroit social service agencies. American Review of Public Administration, 35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005278813
    View in Google Scholar
26. Mayer, W. J., Wang, H. C., Egginton, J. F., & Flint, H. S. (2012). The impact of revenue diversification on expected revenue and volatility for nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(2). doi: 10.1177/08997 64018807080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012464696
    View in Google Scholar
27. McCleary, R. M., & Barro, R. J. (2008). Private voluntary organizations engaged in international assistance, 1939-2004. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37. doi: 1177/0899764007313719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764007313719
    View in Google Scholar
28. McKay, S., Moro, D., Teasdale, S., & Clifford, D. (2015). The marketisation of charities in England and Wales. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9417-y
    View in Google Scholar
29. Mikołajczak, P. (2017a). Źródła i instrumenty finansowego wsparcia przedsiębiorstw społecznych. Poznań: Wydawnictwo UEP.
    View in Google Scholar
30. Mikołajczak, P. (2017b). Importance of funding sources to the scale of activity of social enterprises, Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 4(88). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18276/frfu.2017.88/2-14
    View in Google Scholar
31. Mikołajczak, P., & Czternasty, W. (2015). Social enterprises versus globalization. Intercathedra, 31(2).
    View in Google Scholar
32. Nikolova, M., (2014). Government funding of private voluntary organizations: is there a crowding-out effect. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(3). doi: 10.1177/0899764013520572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013520572
    View in Google Scholar
33. Nunnenkamp, P., Weingarth, J., & Weisser, J. (2009). Is NGO aid not so different after all? Comparing the allocation of Swiss aid by private and official donors. European Journal of Political Economy, 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2009.01.001
    View in Google Scholar
34. Paśko, Ł., & Setlak, G. (2016). An examination of the quality of predictive market segmentaton. Studia Informatica, 37(1).
    View in Google Scholar
35. Plaček, M., Schmidt, M., Ochrana, F., & Půček, M. (2016). Impact of selected factors regarding the efficiency of public procurement (the case of Czech Republic) with emphasis of decentralization. Ekonomický časopis, 64(1).
    View in Google Scholar
36. Salamon, L. M. (2002). The state of nonprofit America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution/Aspen Institute.
    View in Google Scholar
37. Salamon, L. M., Hems, L. C., & Chinnock, K. (2000). The nonprofit sector: for what and for whom? Working Papers of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, 37.
    View in Google Scholar
38. Segal, L., & Weisbrod, B. (1998). Interdependence of commercial and donative revenues. In B. Weisbrod (Ed.). To profit or not to profit: the commercial transformation of the nonprofit sector. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625947.008
    View in Google Scholar
39. Simpson, M., & Cheney, G. (2007). Marketization, participation, and communication within New Zealand retirement villages: a critical-rhetorical and discursive analysis. Discourse & Communication, 1(2). doi: 10.1177/1750481307076006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307076006
    View in Google Scholar
40. Stankiewicz, J., & Seiler, B. (2013). The professionalization of nongovernmental organizations as a factor of their success. Zarządzanie i Finanse, 4(2).
    View in Google Scholar
41. Stone, M. M., Hager, M. A., & Griffin, J. J. (2001). Organizational characteristics and funding environments: a study of a population of United Way-affiliated nonprofits. Public Administration Review, 61(3). doi: 10.1111/0033-3352. 00030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00030
    View in Google Scholar
42. Svidroňová, M., & Vaceková, G. (2012). Current state of self-financing of private non-profit organizations in the conditions of the Slovak Republic. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18(3). doi: 10.3846/20294913. 2012.702695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.702695
    View in Google Scholar
43. Vaceková, G., Valentinov, V., & Nemec, J. (2016). Rethinking non-profit commercialization: the case of the Czech Republic. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Voluntas, 28(5). doi: 10.1007/s11266-016-9772-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9772-6
    View in Google Scholar
44. Weisbrod, B. A. (1998). The nonprofit mission and its financing. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199821)17:2<165::AID-PAM3>3.0.CO;2-F
    View in Google Scholar
45. Yan, W., Denison, D.V., & Butler, J.S. (2009). Revenue structure and nonprofit borrowing. Public Finance Review, 37(1). doi: 10.1177/1091142108321239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142108321239
    View in Google Scholar
46. Young, D., & Grinsfelder, M. (2011). Social entrepreneurship and the financing of third sector organizations. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 17(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2011.12001661
    View in Google Scholar
47. Zielińska, A. (2011). Management strategies for non-governmental organizations. Master of Business Administration, 19(4).
    View in Google Scholar