Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Determinants of outward FDI from emerging economies

Abstract

Research background: The last four decades have witnessed an upsurge of multi-nationals from emerging markets alongside a narrowed gap in growth prospects between developed and emerging economies. UNCTAD statistics show that FDI flows from emerging economies have gone steady since 1980 and occupied more than one fifth of global FDI stock in 2015. Japan led the reverse FDI trend when it started to invest abroad in the 1960s and 1970s. Two decades later, in the 1980s-1990s, the reverse FDI trend was continued by so-called Asian tigers, then recently by those rapidly-industrializing economies in Southeast Asia as well as China and India in East and South Asia.

Purpose of the article: The main goal of this paper is to contribute empirically to the study of the determinants of FDI outflows from emerging economies.

Methods: In order to derive empirically testable hypotheses this paper refers to theoretical Knowledge-Capital model developed by Markusen (2002). The model is estimated using the Poisson-Pseudo Maximum Likelihood estimation technique. The specific research hypotheses derived from the theory are verified using a panel dataset of 38 home emerging countries and 134 host countries over the period 2001?2012.

Findings & Value added: In this paper, we distinguish between horizontal and vertical reasons for FDI. Our estimation results support the hypothesis that main-stream theory of multinational enterprise can explain FDI flows from emerging economies, implying the significant roles of total market size, skilled-labor abundance, investment cost, trade cost as well as geographical distance between two countries.

Keywords

foreign direct investment, knowledge-capital model, emerging multinationals, pseudo-Poisson maximum likelihood

PDF

References

  1. Amal, M. (2011). Foreign direct investment from emerging economies: determinants and strategies. In P. Pachura (Ed.). The economic geography of globalization. London: InTech. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/18285
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Amal, M., Raboch, H., & Tomio, B. (2009). Strategies and determinants of foreign direct investment (FDI) from developing countries: case study of Latin America. Latin American Business Review, 10(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10978520903212532
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Arbix, G. (2010). Structural change and the emergence of the Brazilian MNEs. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 5(3/4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17468801011058389
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Bano, S., & Tabbada, J. (2015). Foreign direct investment outflows: Asian developing countries. Journal of Economic Integration, 30(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2015.30.2.359
    View in Google Scholar
  5. BCG (2009). The 2008 BCG 100 new global challengers: how top companies from rapidly developing economies are changing the world. Boston: Boston Consultancy Group.
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Bonaglia, F., Goldstein, A., & Mathews, J. (2007). Accelerated internationalization by emerging markets’ multinationals: the case of the white goods sector. Journal of World Business, 42(4). doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2007.06.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2007.06.001
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Chittoor, R., Ray, S., Aulakh, P., & Sarkar, M. (2008). Strategic responses to institutional changes: ‘Indigenous growth’ model of the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Journal of International Management, 14(3). doi: 10.1016/j.intman. 2008.05.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2008.05.001
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Cieślik, A. (2013). Horizontally integrated MNE and plant heterogeneity. Bank i Kredyt, 44(6).
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Cieślik, A. (2015a). North-North FDI, exporting and the first mover advantage. Bank i Kredyt, 46(2).
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Cieślik, A. (2015b). Imperfect competition, productivity differences and proximity-concentration trade-offs. Ekonomia, 40.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Cieślik, A. (2016). Exports versus FDI in Smith-Motta framework. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 11(2). doi: 10.12775/ EQUIL.2016.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/EQUIL.2016.009
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Cieślik, A. (2018). Leader-follower model of reciprocal FDI and international trade. Argumenta Oeconomica, 41(2). doi: 10.15611/aoe.2018.2.04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15611/aoe.2018.2.04
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Collie, D. R. (2011). Multilateral trade liberalization, foreign direct investment and the volume of world trade. Economics Letters, 113(1). doi: 10.1016/j.econlet. 2011.05.032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.05.032
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Genc, M. (2008). Transforming disadvantages into advantages: developing-country MNEs in the least developed countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6). doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400390
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Dunning, J. (1981). Explaining the international direct investment position of countries: towards a dynamic or developmental approach. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 117(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02696577
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Dunning, J. (1986). The investment development cycle revisited. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 122(4). doi: 10.1007/BF02707854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707854
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Dunning, J., & Narula, R. (1996). The investment development path revisited: some emerging issues. In J. Dunning & R. Narula (Eds.). Foreign direct investment and governments. London: Routledge.
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Eicker, F. (1963). Asymptotic normality and consistency of the least squares estimators for families of linear regressions. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177704156
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Enderwick, P. (2009). Large emerging markets (LEMs) and international strategy. International Marketing Review, 26(1). doi: 10.1108/02651330910933177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330910933177
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Faria, A., & Mauro, P. (2009). Institutions and the external capital structure of countries. Journal of International Money and Finance, 28(3). doi: 10.1016/j. jimonfin.2008.08.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2008.08.014
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Frenkel, M., Funke, K., & Stadtmann, G. (2004). A panel analysis of bilateral FDI flows to emerging economies. Economic Systems, 28(3). doi: 10.1016/j.ecosys. 2004.01.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2004.01.005
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Gammeltoft, P. (2008). Emerging multinationals: outward FDI from the BRICS countries. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 4(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTG.2008.016184
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Gourieroux, C., Monfort, A., & Trognon, A. (1984). Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Methods: Applications to Poisson Models. Econometrica, 52(3). doi: 10.2307/ 1913472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1913472
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Helpman, E. (1984). A simple theory of trade with multinational corporations. Journal of Political Economy, 92(3). doi: 10.1086/261236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261236
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Helpman, E., & Krugman, P. (1985). Market structure and foreign trade: increasing returns, imperfect competition and the international economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., & Yeaple, S. R. (2004). Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. American Economic Review, 94(1). doi: 10.1257/00028280 4322970814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/000282804322970814
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Helpman, E., Melitz, M., & Rubinstein, Y. (2008). Estimating trade flows: trading partners and trading volumes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2). doi: 10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.441
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Horstmann, I., & Markusen, J. R. (1987). Strategic investments and the development of multinationals. International Economic Review, 28(1). doi: 10.2307/ 2526862. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2526862
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Krugman, P. (1983). The ‘new theories’ of international trade and multinational enterprise. In D. B. Audretsch & Ch. P. Kindleberger (Eds.). The multinational corporation in the 1980s. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Kyrkilis, D., & Pantelidis, P. (2005). A cross country analysis of outward foreign direct investment patterns. International Journal of Social Economics, 32(6). doi: 10.1108/03068290510596998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290510596998
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Luo, Y., & Tung, R. (2007). International expansion of emerging market enterprises: a springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4). doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400275
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Luo, Y., Xue, Q., & Han, B. (2010). How emerging market governments promote outward FDI: experience from China. Journal of World Business, 45(1). doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2009.04.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.04.003
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Markusen, J. R. (1984). Multinationals, multi-plant economies and the gains from trade. Journal of International Economics, 16(3-4). doi: 10.1016/S0022-1996 (84)80001-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(84)80001-X
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Markusen, J. (2002). Multinational firms and the theory of international trade. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4797.001.0001
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Markusen, J. R. (2013). Multinational firms. In D. Bernhofen, R. Falvey, D. Greenaway & U. Kreickemeier (Eds.). Palgrave handbook of international trade. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-30531-1_8
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Markusen, J., & Maskus, K. (2002). Discriminating among alternative theories of the multinational enterprise. Review of International Economics, 10(4). doi: 10.1111/1467-9396.00359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9396.00359
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Markusen, J. R., & Venables, A.J. (1998). Multinational firms and the new trade theory. Journal of International Economics, 46(2). doi: 10.1016/S0022-1996 (97)00052-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(97)00052-4
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Markusen, J., & Venables, A. (2000). The theory of endowment, intra-industry and multi-national trade. Journal of International Economics, 52(2). doi: 10.1016/ S0022-1996(97)00052-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(99)00055-0
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Martínez-Zarzoso, I. (2013). The log of gravity revisited. Applied Economics, 45(3). doi: 10.1080/00036846.2011.599786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.599786
    View in Google Scholar
  40. McMillan, J. (2007). Market institutions. In L. Blume & S. Durlauf, S. (Eds.). The new Palgrave dictionary of economics. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2398-1
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Mudambi, R., & Navarra, P. (2002). Institutions and international business: a theoretical overview. International Business Review, 11(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(02)00042-2
    View in Google Scholar
  42. OECD (2008). OECD benchmark definition of foreign direct investment. France.
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Pangarkar, N., & Lim, H. (2003). Performance of foreign direct investment from Singapore. International Business Review, 12(5). doi: 10.1016/S0969-5931(03) 00078-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(03)00078-7
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Peng, M., Wang, D., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5). doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400377
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Ramamurti, R., & Singh, J. (2009). Emerging multinationals from emerging markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576485
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Rasiah, R., Gammeltoft, P., & Jiang, Y. (2010). Home government policies for outward FDI from emerging economies: lessons from Asia. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 5(3/4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17468801011058415
    View in Google Scholar
  47. Seo, J., & Suh, C. (2006). An analysis of home country trade effects of outward foreign direct investment: the Korean experience with ASEAN 1987–2002. Asean Economic Bulletin, 23(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1355/AE23-2B
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Silva, J. M. C. S., & Tenreyro, S. (2006). The log of gravity. Review of Economist and Statistics, 88(4). doi: 10.1162/rest.88.4.641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.88.4.641
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Silva, J. M. C. S., & Tenreyro, S. (2011). Further simulation evidence on the performance of the Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood estimator. Economics Letters, 112(2). doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.05.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.05.008
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Silva, J. M. C. S., & Tenreyro, S. (2013). Trading partners and trading volumes: implementing the Helpman-Melitz-Rubinstein model empirically. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 77(1). doi: 10.1111/obes.12055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12055
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Sinha, U. B. (2010). Strategic licensing, exports, FDI, and host country welfare. Oxford Economic Papers, 62(1). doi: 10.1093/oep/gpp014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpp014
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Stal, E., & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2011). The investment development path and FDI from developing countries: the role of pro-market reforms and institutional voids. Latin American Business Review, 12(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10978526.2011.614174
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Stoian, C., & Mohr, A. (2016). Outward foreign direct investment from emerging economies: escaping home country regulative voids. International Business Review, 25(5). doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.02.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.02.004
    View in Google Scholar
  54. Swenson, D. (2004). Foreign investment and the mediation of trade flows. Review of International Economics, 12(4). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9396.2004.00470.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2004.00470.x
    View in Google Scholar
  55. UNCTAD (2017). World investment report 2016: investor nationality: policy Challenges. Retrieved from http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2016_ en.pdf.
    View in Google Scholar
  56. White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934
    View in Google Scholar
  57. Wu, J., & Chen, X. (2014). Home country institutional environments and foreign expansion of emerging market firms. International Business Review, 23(5). doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.01.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.01.004
    View in Google Scholar
  58. Xing, Y., & Wan, G. (2006). Exchange rates and competition for FDI in Asia. World Economy, 29(4). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2006.00791.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2006.00791.x
    View in Google Scholar
  59. Zhang, K. H., & Markusen, J. R., (1999). Vertical multinationals and host-country characteristics. Journal of Development Economics, 59(2). doi: 10.1016/S0304-3878(99)00011-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(99)00011-5
    View in Google Scholar

Similar Articles

231-240 of 326

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>