Government social spending in the EU countries: efficiency in poverty and income inequality reduction

Abstract

Research background: Income inequality and poverty attract a lot of attention among politicians, activists as well as scientists, who are trying to find a solution to these socio-economic problems. State intervention is commonly expected in this field, however, there is no agreement about the most efficient methods and instruments, as well as about the scale of public expenditure for the purpose of limiting poverty and inequality.

Purpose of the article: The aim of the paper is to specify efficiency of government social spending in reducing problems of poverty and income inequality in the EU countries. Moreover, the attention is paid to changes in the efficiency in a period of the 2007 crisis occurrence and its overcoming and to sources of the changes.

Methods: To fulfill the main goal of the paper, the DEA method is used, which enables to compare the social efficiency of the EU countries. The Malmquist index is also calculated and decomposed to identify changes in the efficiency and their sources in the crisis period. Data used in the analyses were obtained from Eurostat and OECD databases and cover the period from 2007 to 2016 year.

Findings & Value added: The main findings of the paper shed some light on the differences in social efficiency of government spending in the EU countries. Generally, the countries with a higher level of social spending are also those with lower efficiency in inequality reduction, however, the relationship doesn?t appear for poverty alleviation. Thus, the research suggests some substitution between the scale and the efficiency of social spending, at least for the inequality dimension. Moreover, some differences in a social model can be found between the countries of the  South and of the North: the countries of the South focus their social policy mainly on inequality reduction, while the Scandinavian countries as well as some other affluent societies direct their public support mainly on poverty alleviation. The research also shows that in the crisis period decreases in efficiency concerned mainly the poverty dimension. It reflects the fact that the poor were the losers of the crisis in favor of the middle classes. The efficiency losses were induced by negative changes in the current usage of public sources, while institutional reforms positively influenced the efficiency.

Keywords

government expenditure, poverty, inequality, efficiency

References

1. Adam, A., Delis, M., & Kammas, P. (2011). Public sector efficiency: leveling the playing field between OECD countries. Public Choice, 146. doi: 10.1007/ s11127-009-9588-7.
   View in Google Scholar
2. Afonso, A., & Kazemi, M. (2017). Assessing public spending efficiency in 20 OECD countries. In B. Bökemeier & A. Greiner (Eds.). Inequality and finance in macrodynamics. Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-54690-2_2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54690-2_2
   View in Google Scholar
3. Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L., & Tanzi, V. (2010). Income distribution determinants and public spending efficiency. Journal of Economic Inequality, 8(3). doi: 10.1007/s10888-010-9138-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-010-9138-z
   View in Google Scholar
4. Afonso, A., Romero, A., & Monsalve, E. (2013). Public sector efficiency: evidence for Latin America. Inter-American Development Bank Discussion Paper, No. IDB-DP-279. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2365007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2365007
   View in Google Scholar
5. Anderson, E., D’Orey, M. A. J., Duvendack, M., & Esposito, L. (2017). Does government spending affect income inequality? A meta-regression analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(4). doi: 10.1111/joes.12173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12173
   View in Google Scholar
6. Anderson, E., D’Orey, M. A. J., Duvendack, M., & Esposito, L. (2018). Does government spending affect income poverty? A meta-regression analysis. World Development, 103. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.10.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.10.006
   View in Google Scholar
7. Battisti, M., & Zeira, J. (2016). The effects of fiscal redistribution. In K. Basu & J. E. Stiglitz (Eds.). Inequality and growth: patterns and policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137554543_7
   View in Google Scholar
8. Buracom, P. (2011). The determinants and distributional effects of public education, health, and welfare spending in Thailand. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 38. doi: 10.1080/00927678.2011.565282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.2011.565282
   View in Google Scholar
9. Cantillon, B., Marx, I., & Van den Bosch, K. (2003). The puzzle of egalitarianism: the relationship between employment, wage inequality, social expenditure and poverty. European Journal of Social Security, 5(2). doi: 10.1177/1388262703 00500203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/138826270300500203
   View in Google Scholar
10. Choi, H., & Park, M. J. (2019). Evaluating the efficiency of governmental excellence for social progress: focusing on low and lower middle income countries. Social Indicators Research, 141. doi: 10.1007/s11205-018-1835-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1835-1
    View in Google Scholar
11. Clemente, J., Marcuello, C., & Montañes, A. (2012). Government social spending and GDP: has there been a change in social policy? Applied Economics, 44. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2011.568401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.568401
    View in Google Scholar
12. Coelli, T. (1996). A guide to DEAP version 2.1: a Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program. CEPA Working Paper, 96/08.
    View in Google Scholar
13. Cosmin, E. (2012). Social protection public expenditures and income inequality. “Ovidius” University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, 12(2).
    View in Google Scholar
14. Di Gioacchino, D., Sabani, L., & Tedeschi, S. (2014). Preferences for social protection: theory and empirics. Economic Modelling, 36. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod. 2013.09.055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.09.055
    View in Google Scholar
15. Eurostat [tepsr_sp110], https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init= 1&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=tepsr_sp110 (29.08.2018).
    View in Google Scholar
16. Eurostat [tespm050], https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1& plugin=1&language=en&pcode=tespm050 (29.08.2018).
    View in Google Scholar
17. Ferrer, J. G., Rigla, F. R., Rozas, G. C., & Figueroa, C. V. (2014). Comparison of social spending and tax policy before and after the crisis: the cases of Spain and Chile. Global Studies Journal, 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-4432/CGP/v06i02/40890
    View in Google Scholar
18. Fiszbein, A., Kanbur, R., & Yemtsov, R. (2014). Social protection and poverty reduction: global patterns and some targets. World Development, 61. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.04.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.04.010
    View in Google Scholar
19. Haile, F., & Niño-Zarazúa, M. (2018). Does social spending improve welfare in low-income and middle-income countries? Journal of International Development, 30. doi: 10.1002/jid.3326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3326
    View in Google Scholar
20. Heimberger, Ph. (2018). The dynamic effects of fiscal consolidation episodes on income inequality: evidence for 17 OECD countries over 1978–2013. Empirica. Advance Online Publication. doi: 10.1007/s10663-018-9404-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-018-9404-z
    View in Google Scholar
21. Hauner, D., & Kyobe, A. (2010). Determinants of government efficiency. World Development, 38(11). doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.04.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.04.004
    View in Google Scholar
22. Herrera, S., & Pang, (2005). Efficiency of public spending in developing countries: an efficiency frontier approach. Policy Research Working Paper, no. 3645. Washington: World Bank. doi: 10.1596/1813-9450-3645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3645
    View in Google Scholar
23. Joumard, I., Pisu, M., & Bloch, D. (2012). Less income inequality and more growth – are they compatible? Part 3. Income redistribution via taxes and transfers across OECD countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 926. doi: 10.1787/5k9h296b1zjf-en. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814518529_0004
    View in Google Scholar
24. Kiendrebeogo, Y., Assimaidou, K., & Tall, A. (2017). Social protection for poverty reduction in times of crisis. Journal of Policy Modeling, 39. doi: 10.1016/j. jpolmod.2017.09.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.09.003
    View in Google Scholar
25. Marx, I., Nolan, B., & Olivera, J. (2015). The welfare state and antipoverty policy in rich countries. In A. B. Atkinson & F. Bourguignon (Eds.). Handbook of income distribution. Volume 2B. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-59429-7.00024-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59429-7.00024-8
    View in Google Scholar
26. OECD, http://www.oecd.org/social/income-distribution-database.htm (3.09.2018).
    View in Google Scholar
27. Prasetyo, A. D., & Zuhdi, U. (2013). The government expenditure efficiency towards the human development. Procedia Economics and Finance, 5. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(13)00072-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(13)00072-5
    View in Google Scholar
28. Savage, L. (2019). The politics of social spending after the Great Recession: the return of partisan policy making. Governance, 32. doi: 10.1111/gove.12354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12354
    View in Google Scholar
29. World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People (2003). Washington, D.C.: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
    View in Google Scholar