The evaluation of competitive position of EU-28 economies with using global multi-criteria indices

Abstract

Research background: Under the current conditions of increasing competitiveness and interdependence, national economies are more influenced by the global business environment and its development. Constantly changing economic, social, political aspects, and many other factors, cause the differences in the global competitiveness of economies, so the economies are forced to analyze their competitive level more complexly. Despite that, there is a lack of research studies analyzing the international competitiveness of EU-28 economies from the point of view various multi-criteria indices.

Purpose of the article: The paper investigates the relations between the Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) and other selected multi-criteria indices, namely the Global Innovation Index (GII), the Doing Business Index (DBI), the Economic Freedom Index (EFI) and the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) in the case of EU?28 economies.

Methods: In order to investigate the relations between the global competitiveness and selected multi-criteria indices affecting the EU?28 economies, the multiple linear regression analyses were applied. The multiple regression model was quantified for every single year, as well as, the regression model using the average score of all analyzed indices. The secondary data concerning the scores of individual indices were collected based on annually published online reports over the period of 2014?2018.

Findings & Value added: The research confirmed that there is a statistically significant dependence between the global competitiveness, corruption and the level of innovation potential within the EU?28 economies. Besides, we identified the worst results in the context of competitiveness evaluation especially in the area of corruption and innovation activities. In this regard, the issue of insufficient innovation development and inappropriate corruption perception is considered to be key determinants influencing the assessment of the global competitiveness of the EU?28 member states. In our opinion, to improve the competitiveness of these countries, targeted activities should be implemented in the frame of national competitive strategies, programs, and policies.

Keywords

Global Competitiveness Index, multi-criteria indices, EU-28 economies, multiple linear regression analyses

References

1. Abrham, J., & Herget, J. (2013). Approaches to the assessment of the factors of competitiveness and long-term growth. Politické Vedy, 16(2).
   View in Google Scholar
2. Akin, C. S., Aytun, C., & Aktakas, B. G. (2014). The impact of economic freedom upon economic growth: An application on different income groups. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 4(8).
   View in Google Scholar
3. Alexy, M., Kacer, M., & Rehak, S. (2018). Creative capacity of European countries. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 67(3). doi: 10.15201/hungeobull. 67.3.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.67.3.1
   View in Google Scholar
4. Ani, T. G. (2015). Effect of ease of doing business to economic growth among selected countries in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(5).
   View in Google Scholar
5. Bacik, R., Kmeco, L., Fedorko, R., Olearova, M., & Rigelsky, M. (2019). Marketing instrument of improving hotel management service: Evidence of Visegrad group countries. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1. doi: 10.21272 /mmi.2019.1-17.
   View in Google Scholar
6. Balcerzak, A. P., & Pietrzak, M. B. (2016). Quality of institutions for knowledge-based economy within new institutional economics framework. multiple criteria decision analysis for European countries in the years 2000–2013. Economics & Sociology, 9(4). doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-4/4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-4/4
   View in Google Scholar
7. Belas, J., Misankova, M., Schönfeld, J., & Gavurova, B. (2017). Credit risk management: Financial safety and sustainability aspects. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 7(1). doi: 10.9770/jssi.2017.7.1(7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2017.7.1(7)
   View in Google Scholar
8. Bucher, S. (2018). The Global Competitiveness Index as an indicator of sustainable development. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 88(1). doi: 10.1134 /S1019331618010082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331618010082
   View in Google Scholar
9. Di Fatta, D., Musotto, R., & Vesperi, W. (2018). Government performance, ethics and corruption in the Global Competitiveness Index. In Governing Business Systems: Theories and Challenges for Systems Thinking in Practice: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-66036-3_8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66036-3_8
   View in Google Scholar
10. Dobrovic, J., Gallo, P., Mihalcova, B., Stofova, L., & Szaryszova, P. (2018). Competitiveness measurement in terms of the Europe 2020 strategy. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(4). doi: 10.7441/joc.2018.04.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2018.04.02
    View in Google Scholar
11. Dobrovic, J., Kmeco, Ľ., Gallo, P., & Gallo, P. Jr. (2019). Implications of the Model EFQM as a strategic management tool in practice: a case of Slovak tourism sector. Journal of Tourism and Services, 10(18). doi: 10.29036/jots.v10 i18.91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29036/jots.v10i18.91
    View in Google Scholar
12. Dudas, T., & Cibula, A. (2018). The changing methodology of the Global Competitiveness Index and its impact on Slovakia. Ad Alta-Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 8(2).
    View in Google Scholar
13. Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2018). The Global Innovation Index 2018. Geneva: Cornell University, INSEAD, the World Intellectual Property Organization.
    View in Google Scholar
14. Ficeac, B. (2013). The "culture of corruption" in the post-communist space. economic indicators, transition indices and cultural dimensions vs. the perception of corruption. Revista De Cercetare Si Interventie Sociala, 43.
    View in Google Scholar
15. Gallo, P., & Tomčíková, Ľ. (2019). The analytical view of the methods of strategy creation and involvement of managers of individual control levels in the production of strategies in strategic management in manufacturing companies in the conditions of the Slovak Republic. Quality - Access to Success, 20(170).
    View in Google Scholar
16. Hossain, M. T., Hassan, Z., Shafiq, S., & Basit, A. (2018). Ease of doing business and its impact on inward FDI. Indonesian Journal of Management and Business Economics, 1(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32455/ijmbe.v1i1.52
    View in Google Scholar
17. Chapcakova, A., Heckova, J., Gira, D., Valentiny, T. & Zbihlejova, L. (2019). Quantification of the selected macroeconomic impacts on the EEA countries competitiveness assessment. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 15(1). doi: 10.14254/1800-5845/2019.15-1.12.
    View in Google Scholar
18. Ivanova, E., Kordos, M., & Habanik, J. (2015). The competitiveness of V-4 countries within the European Union. Actual Problems in Economics, 167(5).
    View in Google Scholar
19. Jankowska, B., Matysek-Jedrych, A., & Mroczek-Dabrowska, K. (2017). Efficiency of national innovation systems – Poland and Bulgaria in the context of the Global Innovation Index. Comparative Economic Research-Central and Eastern Europe, 20(3). doi: 10.1515/cer-2017-0021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2017-0021
    View in Google Scholar
20. Kharlamova, G., & Vertelieva, O. (2013). The international competitiveness of countries: Economic-mathematical approach. Economics & Sociology: Recent Issues in Economic Development, 6(2). doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2013/6-2/4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2013/6-2/4
    View in Google Scholar
21. Kljucnikov, A., Belas, J. & Smrcka, L. (2016). The role of risk-taking and competitive aggressiveness in management of SMEs. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 14(1). doi: 10.17512/pjms.2016.14.1.12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2016.14.1.12
    View in Google Scholar
22. Komarova, V., Lonska, J., Lavrienenko, O., & Menshikov, V. (2018). Influence of Existing social and economic interactions on sustainable territory development: The case of Iceland. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(3). doi: 10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3(1)
    View in Google Scholar
23. Kot, S. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management in small and medium enterprises. Sustainability, 10(4). doi: 10.3390/su10041143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041143
    View in Google Scholar
24. Lietuvniké, M. M., Vasilis Vasiliauskas, A., Vasiliene-Vasiliauskiene, V., & Sabaityte, J. (2018). Peculiarities of illegal immigrant's intrusions into road freight transport units in the France - UK corridor. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(3). doi: 10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3(16). DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3(16)
    View in Google Scholar
25. Miller, T., Kim, A. B., Roberts, J. M., & Tyrrell, P.. (2018). 2018 Index of Economic Freedom Report. The Heritage Foundation.
    View in Google Scholar
26. Mishchuk, H., Samoliuk, N., Bilan, Y., & Streimikiene, D. (2018). Income inequality and its consequences within the framework of social justice. Problemy Ekorozwoju – Problems of Sustainable Development, 13(2).
    View in Google Scholar
27. Morkūnas, M., Volkov, A., Bilan, Y., & Raišienė, A. G. (2018). The role of government in forming agricultural policy: economic resilience measuring index exploited. Administratiesi Management Public, (31). doi: 10.24818/amp/2018 .31-08.
    View in Google Scholar
28. Mushtaq, S., & Ali Khan, R. E. (2018). Economic freedom and sustainable development: A panel data analysis. Pakistan Journal of Social Issues, Special Issue (June).
    View in Google Scholar
29. Ngoc, B. H., Hai, D. B., & Chinh, T. H. (2018). Assessment of the should be effects of Corruption Perception Index on foreign direct investment in ASEAN countries by spatial regression method. Econometrics for Financial Applications, 760. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-73150-6_33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73150-6_33
    View in Google Scholar
30. Oveshnikova, L., Lebedinskaya, O., Timofeev, A., Mikheykina, L., Sibirskaya, E., & Lula, P. (2019). Studying the sector of the Russian high-tech innovations on the basis of the Global Innovation Index INSEAD. In E. G. Popkova & V. N. Ostrovskaya (Eds.) Perspectives on the use of new information and communication technology (ICT) in the modern economy. Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-90835-9_11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90835-9_11
    View in Google Scholar
31. Petrarca, F., & Terzi, S. (2018). The Global Competitiveness Index: an alternative measure with endogenously derived weights. Quality & Quantity, 52(5). doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0655-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0655-8
    View in Google Scholar
32. Roy, S. (2018). Impact of competitiveness drivers on Global Competitiveness Index. Pacific Business Review International, 11(2).
    View in Google Scholar
33. Rubio, D. F. (2018). Corruption Perceptions Index 2018. Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org/cpi2018.
    View in Google Scholar
34. Rusu, V. D., & Dornean, A. (2019). The quality of entrepreneurial activity and economic competitiveness in European Union countries: a panel data approach. Administrative Sciences, 9(2). doi: 10.3390/admsci9020035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9020035
    View in Google Scholar
35. Rusu, V. D., & Roman, A. (2018). An empirical analysis of factors affecting competitiveness of CEE countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 31(1). doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2018.1480969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1480969
    View in Google Scholar
36. Sala-i-Martín, X., & Schwab, K. (2017). The Global Competitiveness Report 2017-2018. World Economic Forum.
    View in Google Scholar
37. Stefko, R., Vasanicova, P., Litavcova, E., & Jencova, S. (2018). Tourism intensity in the NUTS III regions of Slovakia. Journal of Tourism and Services, 9(16). doi: 10.29036/jots.v9i16.43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29036/jots.v9i16.43
    View in Google Scholar
38. Tan, K. G., Gopalan, S., & Nguyen, W. (2018). Measuring ease of doing business in India's sub-national economies: A novel index. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 7(3). doi: 10.1108/SAJBS-02-2018-0010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-02-2018-0010
    View in Google Scholar
39. Vevere, V., Zvirgzdina, R., & Linina I. (2017). Indexes as business environment characterizing instruments. European Integration Studies, 11. doi: 10.5755/j01. eis.0.11.18645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eis.0.11.18645
    View in Google Scholar
40. Vlasova, V., Kuznetsova, T., & Roud, V. (2017). Drivers and limitations of Russia's development based on the evidence provided by the Global Innovation Index. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 8. doi: 10.32609/0042-8736-2017-8-24-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-8-24-41
    View in Google Scholar
41. World Bank Group (2019). Doing Business Report 2019. World Bank.
    View in Google Scholar
42. Yevdokimov, Y., Melnyk, L., Lyulyov, O., Panchenko, O., & Kubatko, V. (2018). Economic freedom and democracy: determinant factors in increasing macroeconomic stability. Business Perspectives – Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(2). doi: 10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.26
    View in Google Scholar
43. Zouaoui, A., Al Qudah, A., & Arab, M. B. (2017). World corruption perception index analysis. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 8(24).
    View in Google Scholar