Real interest rate differentials between Central and Eastern European countries and the euro area

Abstract

Research background: The question of changes in real interest rates differentials between the Euro Area and the CEE countries in the last years is raised because of two main reasons. The first rationale is related to the growing importance of external financial factors for the CEE economies and their monetary autonomy. The second reason is associated with the unprecedented shift in monetary conditions in the EMU, brought about by negative interest rates policy and unconventional policies, and the way it impacts the real rates in the CEE economies.

Purpose of the article: This paper aims at exploring the relationship between real interest rates in the Euro Area and ten countries: Albania, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, North Macedonia, Moldova, Poland, Romania, Turkey, and Ukraine. The analysis covers the years of 1999-2018, including periods before and after the financial and economic crisis.

Methods: We employ Markov-switching regression to construct the ex-ante real interest rates series in each country, using monthly data on short-term interest rates and CPI inflation rates. A battery of unit root and stationarity test, both standard and panel ones, is applied to examine the real interest rate parity, also allowing for a structural break in the rate differentials.

Findings & Value added: We provide detailed evidence on the real interest rates differentials for all of the CEE countries vis-?-vis the Euro Area. We find that, while panel stationarity tests point to the stability of real rate differentials, there are significant dissimilarities across the countries, and the results of the univariate tests are often mixed. At least half of the economies, however, reveal similar patterns of stationarity in real rates relationships. At the same time, we find differentials for the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland, countries highly integrated into the EMU economy, to be unstable over time.

Keywords

real interest rates, Central and Eastern Europe, Economic and Monetary Union, financial integration

References

1. Albulescu, C. T., Pépin, D., & Tiwari, A. K. (2016). A re-examination of real interest parity in CEECs using “old” and “new” second-generation panel unit root rests. Bulletin of Economic Research, 68(2). doi: 10.1111/boer.12052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.12052
   View in Google Scholar
2. Arghyrou, M. G., Gregoriou, A., & Kontonikas, A. (2009). Do real interest rates converge? Evidence from the European union. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 19(3). doi: 10.1016/J.INTFIN. 2008.05.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2008.05.004
   View in Google Scholar
3. Baharumshah, A. Z., Soon, S.-V., & Boršič, D. (2013). Real interest parity in Central and Eastern European countries: evidence on integration into EU and the US markets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 25. doi: 10.1016/J.INTFIN.2013.02.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2013.02.001
   View in Google Scholar
4. Beck, K., & Janus, J. (2016). Podobieństwo wstrząsów podażowych i popytowych w Polsce i innych krajach Unii Europejskiej. Ekonomista, 1.
   View in Google Scholar
5. Bhatti, R. H., & Moosa, I. A. (1997). International parity conditions: theory, econometric testing and empirical evidence. Palgrave Macmillan.
   View in Google Scholar
6. Camarero, M., Carrion-I-Silvestre, J. L., & Tamarit, C. (2009). Testing for real interest rate parity using panel stationarity tests with dependence: a note. Manchester School, 77(1). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9957.2008.02090.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2008.02090.x
   View in Google Scholar
7. Chang, H.-L. (2014). Revisiting real interest rate parity in Central and Eastern European countries: the Sequential Panel Selection Method. Acta Oeconomica, 64(2). doi: 10.1556/AOecon.64.2014.2.3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/aoecon.64.2014.2.3
   View in Google Scholar
8. Chang, M.-J., & Su, C.-Y. (2015). Does real interest rate parity really hold? New evidence from G7 countries. Economic Modelling, 47. doi: 10.1016/J. ECONMOD.2015.03.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.03.005
   View in Google Scholar
9. Chinn, M. D., & Frankel, J. A. (1995). Who drives real interest rates around the Pacific Rim: the USA or Japan? Journal of International Money and Finance, 14(6). doi: 10.1016/0261-5606(95)00038-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-5606(95)00038-0
   View in Google Scholar
10. Cuestas, J. C., & Harrison, B. (2010). Further evidence on the real interest rate parity hypothesis in Central and East European countries: unit roots and nonlinearities. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 46(6). doi: 10.2753/ REE1540-496X460602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X460602
    View in Google Scholar
11. Engel, C. (2016). Exchange rates, interest rates, and the risk premium. American Economic Review, 106(2). doi: 10.1257/aer.20121365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20121365
    View in Google Scholar
12. Ferreira, A. L., & León-Ledesma, M. A. (2007). Does the real interest parity hypothesis hold? Evidence for developed and emerging markets. Journal of International Money and Finance, 26(3). doi: 10.1016/J.JIMONFIN. 2006.11.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2006.11.003
    View in Google Scholar
13. Hadri, K., & Rao, Y. (2008). Panel stationarity test with structural breaks. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70(2). doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008. 00502.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00502.x
    View in Google Scholar
14. Holston, K., Laubach, T., & Williams, J. C. (2017). Measuring the natural rate of interest: international trends and determinants. Journal of International Economics, 108. doi: 10.1016/J.JINTECO.2017.01.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.01.004
    View in Google Scholar
15. Kim, C.-J. (1994). Dynamic linear models with Markov-switching. Journal of Econometrics, 60(1–2). doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(94)90036-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)90036-1
    View in Google Scholar
16. Mark, N. C. (1985). Some evidence on the international inequality of real interest rates. Journal of International Money and Finance, 4(2). doi: 10.1016/0261-5606(85)90043-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-5606(85)90043-9
    View in Google Scholar
17. Meese, R., & Rogoff, K. (1986). Was it real? The exchange rate - interest differential relation: 1973-1984. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 10(1–2). doi: 10.1016/0165-1889(86)90053-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(86)90053-9
    View in Google Scholar
18. Öge Güney, P., & Hasanov, M. (2014). Real interest rate parity hypothesis in post-Soviet countries: evidence from unit root tests. Economic Modelling, 36. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2013.09.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.09.017
    View in Google Scholar
19. Perron, P. (1989). The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica, 57(6). doi: 10.2307/1913712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1913712
    View in Google Scholar
20. Ranjbar, O., Li, X. L., Chang, T., & Lee, C. C. (2015). Stability of long-run growth in East Asian countries: new evidence from panel stationarity test with structural breaks. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 24(4). doi: 10.1080/09638199.2014.937352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2014.937352
    View in Google Scholar
21. Sonora, R. J., & Tica, J. (2014). Real interest parity in New Europe. Eastern European Economics, 52(1). doi: 10.2753/eee0012-8775520102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/EEE0012-8775520102
    View in Google Scholar
22. Zivot, E., & Andrews, D. W. K. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10(3). doi: 10.1080/07350015.1992.10509904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1391541
    View in Google Scholar