The impact of research and development activity on the TFP level in manufacturing in Poland

Abstract

Research background: The paper presents the issue of total factor productivity in the manufacturing industry in Poland. It has been assumed that total factor productivity (TFP) is a synthetic measure of efficiency of the production process and a measure of the impact of technical progress on the rate of economic growth.

Purpose of the article: The main aim of the paper is to assess the differentiation in the level of total factor productivity (TFP) occurring among the Section C manufacturing divisions in Poland. In particular, the paper raises the issue of measuring and analysing the relationship between expenditure on research and development and the level of TFP in manufacturing divisions in Poland.

Methods: In the presented research, the TFP level was determined by using the two-factor Cobb-Douglas production function, while econometric panel models were used to assess the studied relationship.

Findings & Value added: The presented considerations show that manufacturing divisions in Poland are diversified in terms of total factor productivity. Generally, manufacturing divisions with high R&D intensity, i.e. divisions classified as so-called high-tech ones, are characterised by a high TFP level. The econometric analysis carried out allows us to conclude that expenditure on R&D incurred in manufacturing enterprises significantly affects the level of TFP.

Keywords

total factor productivity, research and development activity, Cobb-Douglas function, manufacturing divisions, panel models

References

1. Abdih, Y., & Joutz, F. (2005). Relating the knowledge production function to total factor productivity: an endogenous growth puzzle. IMF Working Paper, WP/05/74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451860931.001
   View in Google Scholar
2. Aghion, P., Akcigit, U., Deaton, A., & Roulet, A. (2015). Creative destruction and subjective wellbeing. NBER Working Paper Series, 21069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w21069
   View in Google Scholar
3. Aghion, P., & Howitt P. (1998). Endogenous growth theory. London: MIT Press.
   View in Google Scholar
4. Ascari, G., & Di Cosmo, V. (2004). Determinants of total factor productivity in the Italian regions. University of Pavia, Department of Economics, Working Paper, 170(12-04).
   View in Google Scholar
5. Artige, L., & Nicolini, R. (2006). Labor productivity in Europe: evidence from a sample of regions. CREPP Working Paper, 2006/08.
   View in Google Scholar
6. Barrett, A., & O’Connell, P. J. (1999). Does training generally work? The returns to in-company training. IZA Working Paper, 51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.125268
   View in Google Scholar
7. Bronzini, R., & Piselli, P. (2009). Determinants of long-run regional productivity with geographical spillovers: the role of R&D, human capital and public infrastructure. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.07.002
   View in Google Scholar
8. Brzozowski, M. (2018). Credit volatility and productivity growth. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(2). doi: 10.24136/eq. 2018.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.011
   View in Google Scholar
9. Cameron, G., Proudman, J., & Redding, S. (1999). Technology transfer, R&D, trade and productivity growth. Working paper, London: London School of Economics.
   View in Google Scholar
10. Cameron, G., Proudman, J., & Redding, S. (2005). Technological convergence, R&D, trade and productivity growth. European Economic Review, 49(3). doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(03)00070-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(03)00070-9
    View in Google Scholar
11. Caselli, F., & Coleman, W. J. (2006). The world technology frontier. American Economic Review, 96(3). doi: 10.1257/aer.96.3.499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.3.499
    View in Google Scholar
12. Chen, D. H. C., & Dahlman, C. J. (2004). Knowledge and development: a cross-section approach. Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank, 3366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3366
    View in Google Scholar
13. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1). doi: 10.2307/2393553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
    View in Google Scholar
14. Conway, P., & Nicoletti, G. (2006). Product market regulation in the non-manufacturing sectors of OECD countries: measurement and highlights. OECD Economics Department Working Paper, 530.
    View in Google Scholar
15. Crispolti, V., & Marconi, D. (2005). Technology transfer and economic growth in developing countries: an econometric analysis. Bank of Italy, Temi di discussione, 564.
    View in Google Scholar
16. Dańska-Borsiak, B. (2011). Zróżnicowanie łącznej produktywności czynników produkcji według województw. Wiadomości Statystyczne, 12(607).
    View in Google Scholar
17. Dańska-Borsiak, B., & Laskowska, I. (2012). The determinants of total factor productivity in Polish subregions. Panel data analysis. Comparative Economic Research, 15(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10103-012-0023-9
    View in Google Scholar
18. Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (2001). It’s not factor accumulation: stylized facts and growth model – what have we learned from a decade of empirical research on growth? World Bank Economic Review, 15(2). doi: 10.1093/wber/15.2.177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/15.2.177
    View in Google Scholar
19. Eatwell, J. M., & Newman, P. (1991). The new Palgrave: a dictionary of economics. vol. 3, 4 & 12. Tokyo: Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230279803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230279803
    View in Google Scholar
20. Fernández-Arias, E. (2017). On the role of productivity and factor accumulation in economic development in Latin America and the Caribbean:2017 update. Technical Note Nº IDB-TN-1329. Inter-American Development Bank. Department of Research and Chief Economist. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18235/0000919
    View in Google Scholar
21. Fleisher, B, Li, H., & Zhao, M.Q. (2010). Human capital, economic growth, and regional inequality in China. Journal of Development Economics, 92. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.01.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.01.010
    View in Google Scholar
22. Florczak, W., & Welfe, W. (2000). Wyznaczanie potencjalnego PKB i łącznej produktywności czynników produkcji. Gospodarka Narodowa, 11–12.
    View in Google Scholar
23. Florczak, W. (2011). Ekonometryczna analiza makro-uwarunkowań wzrostu gospodarczego Polski. Prace i Materiały Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, 4(8).
    View in Google Scholar
24. Griffith, R., Redding, S., & Simpson, H. (2003). Productivity convergence and foreign ownership at the establishment level. Discussion Paper. Centre for Economic Performance, 572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1920/wp.ifs.2002.0222
    View in Google Scholar
25. Griffith, R., Redding, S., & Van Reenen, J. (2004). Mapping the two faces of R&D: productivity growth in a panel of OECD countries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86. doi: 10.1162/0034653043125194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/0034653043125194
    View in Google Scholar
26. Griliches, Z. (1981). A market value, R&D and patents. Economic Letters, 7(2). doi: 10.1016/0165-1765(87)90114-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(87)90114-5
    View in Google Scholar
27. Griliches, W., & Mairesse, J. (1984). R&D and productivity growth: comparing Japanese and US manufacturing firms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w1778
    View in Google Scholar
28. Guellec, D., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2001). R&D and productivity growth: panel data analysis of 16 OECD countries. OECD Economic Studies, 33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-v2001-art12-en
    View in Google Scholar
29. GUS (2019). Nauka i technika w 2017 r.. Warszawa.
    View in Google Scholar
30. Helpman, E. (2004). The mystery of economic growth. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. doi: 10.2307/20034157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20034157
    View in Google Scholar
31. Hulten, C. (2000). Total factor productivity: a short biography. NBER Working Paper, 7471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w7471
    View in Google Scholar
32. Hulten, C. R., & Isaksson, A. (2007). Why development levels differ: the sources of differential economic growth in a panel of high and low income countries. NBER Working Paper, 13469. doi: 10.3386/w13469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w13469
    View in Google Scholar
33. Jorgenson, D. W., & Stiroh, K. J. (2000). Raising the speed limit: U.S. economic growth in the information age. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1. doi: 10.1353/eca.2000.0008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2000.0008
    View in Google Scholar
34. Keller, W., & Yeaple, S. R. (2003). Multinational enterprises, international trade, and productivity growth: firm-level evidence from the United States. NBER Working Paper, 9504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w9504
    View in Google Scholar
35. Klenow, P., & Rodriguez, C. A. (1997). The neoclassical revival in growth economics: has it gone too far? NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/654324
    View in Google Scholar
36. Krugman, P. (1990). The age of diminished expectations. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
    View in Google Scholar
37. Kuosmanen, T., & Sipiläinen, T. (2004). On the anatomy of productivity growth: a decomposition of the Fisher ideal TFP index. MTT Economic Research. Discussion Papers, 17.
    View in Google Scholar
38. Maddala, G. S. (2006). Ekonometria. Warszawa: PWN.
    View in Google Scholar
39. Nicoletti, G., & Scarpetta S. (2003). Regulation, productivity and growth: OECD evidence. Economic Policy, 18(36). doi: 10.1111/1468-0327.00102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.00102
    View in Google Scholar
40. Meister, Ch., & Verspagen, B. (2004). European productivity gaps: is R&D the solution. Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, “Working Paper”, 01/04.
    View in Google Scholar
41. Nishimure, K. (2004). Determinants of potential growth: productivity dynamics of entry, exit, innovation and diffusion in Japanese industries. Final Report to Economic and Social Research Institute. Tokyo: University of Tokyo.
    View in Google Scholar
42. Prescott, E. C. (1998). Needed: a theory of total factor productivity. International Economic Review, 39. doi: 10.2307/2527389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2527389
    View in Google Scholar
43. Próchniak, M. (2018). Zmiany łącznej produktywności czynników wytwórczych, In M. A. Weresa (Ed.). Polska. Raport o konkurencyjności 2018. Rola miast w kształtowaniu przewag konkurencyjnych Polski. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
    View in Google Scholar
44. Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 96. doi: 10.1086/261725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w3210
    View in Google Scholar
45. Roszko-Wójtowicz, E., Grzelak, M. M., & Laskowska, I. (2018). The importance of research and development expenditure for the competitiveness of manufacturing enterprises in Poland. The application of panel models. Ekonometria, 22(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15611/eada.2018.3.01
    View in Google Scholar
46. Solow, R. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 70. doi: 10.2307/1884513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
    View in Google Scholar
47. Solow, R. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1926047
    View in Google Scholar
48. Syverson, C. (2011). What determines productivity? Journal of Economic Literature, 49(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.2.326
    View in Google Scholar
49. Świadek, A. (2018). Sales range and innovative activity in the manufacturing system of Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(4). doi: 10.24136/eq.2018.035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.035
    View in Google Scholar
50. Świeczewska, I. (2007). Łączna produktywność czynników produkcji. Ucieleśniony kapitał wiedzy. In W. Welfe (Ed.). Gospodarka oparta na wiedzy. Warszawa: PWE.
    View in Google Scholar
51. Świeczewska, I. (2013). Modele sektorów przemysłu według stopnia zaawansowania techniki. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis: Folia Oeconomica, 294.
    View in Google Scholar
52. Tokarski, T. (2008). Oszacowanie regionalnych funkcji produkcji. Wiadomości Statystyczne, 10.
    View in Google Scholar
53. Tokarski, T. (2010). Przestrzenne zróżnicowanie łącznej produktywności czynników produkcji w Polsce. Gospodarka Narodowa, 3.
    View in Google Scholar
54. Ulku, H. (2004). R&D, innovation, and economic growth: an empirical analysis. IMF Working Paper, WP/04/185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451859447.001
    View in Google Scholar
55. Welfe, W. (2000). Empiryczne modele wzrostu gospodarczego. Ekonomista, 4.
    View in Google Scholar
56. Welfe, W. (2001). Czynniki wzrostu potencjału gospodarczego Polski. Ekonomista, 2.
    View in Google Scholar
57. Welfe, W. (2002). Łączna produktywność czynników produkcji a postęp techniczny. Studia Ekonomiczne, 36-37(1-2).
    View in Google Scholar
58. Vandenbussche, J., Aghion P., & Meghir C. (2006). Growth, distance to the frontier and composition of human capital. Journal of Economic Growth, 11. doi: 10.1007/s10887-006-9002-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-006-9002-y
    View in Google Scholar
59. Yadav, P., & Marwah, C. S. (2015). The concept of productivity. International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research (IJETR), 3(5).
    View in Google Scholar