Decoupling economic growth from greenhouse gas emissions: the case of the energy sector in V4 countries
Abstract
Research background: The production and use of energy satisfies human needs, but also gives rise to a host of adverse environmental pressures, such as air pollution and waste generation. The issue of energy efficiency and climate chance resonates in the energy sector as one of the main producers of green-house gas emissions (GHG). While the European Union in general is doing well in reducing emissions and increasing the share of renewables, unfortunately, there are countries that are still far from reaching their goal.
Purpose of the article: The paper is focused on the quantitative assessment of the link between the economic growth of the energy sector and the production of GHG emissions by the energy sector in V4 countries during the period 1995?2016. For this purpose, decoupling analysis will be realized.
Methods: The decoupling of economic growth and the environmental pressures caused by this growth has a rich tradition within the sustainable development literature. The decoupling method was chosen for its ability to link economic and environmental indicators. Decoupling elasticity will be calculated with the aim of assessing the relationship between the economic growth of the energy sector (measured in GVA) and GHG emissions produced by the energy sector in V4 countries within the research period. Decoupling elasticity indicates different forms of the decoupling and coupling of the two variables.
Findings & Value added: The results of the analysis suggest the prevailing strong decoupling of the economic growth of the energy sector and GHG emissions produced by the energy sector, which can be considered a positive trend. The findings of this paper are relevant for the government, state and public institutions and stakeholders in general, who play important roles in the preparation of programs, projects and policies to make energy generation, transport and use more efficient and environmentally sustainable.
Keywords
greenhouse gas emissions, energy sector, Gross Value Added, decoupling, V4 countries
References
- Adamišin, P., & Vavrek, R. (2015). Analysis of the links between selected socio-economic indicators and waste man-agement at the regional level in the Slovak republic. In P. Nijkamp (Ed.) 5th Central European conference in regional science - conference proceedings. Košice: Technical University of Košice.
View in Google Scholar - Ayres, R. U., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2005). A theory of economic growth with material/energy resources and dematerialization: interaction of three growth mechanisms. Ecological Economics, 55(1). doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon. 2004.07.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.07.023
View in Google Scholar - Ballingall, J., Steel, D., & Briggs, P. (2003). Decoupling economic activity and transport growth : the state of play in New Zealand. In T. Brennand (Ed). 26th Australasian transport research forum Wellington New Zealand. Wellington: Institute of Highway Technology
View in Google Scholar - Berkhout, P. H. G., Muskens, J. C., & Velthuijsen, W. J. (2000). Defining the rebound effect. Energy Policy, 28(6-7). doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00022-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00022-7
View in Google Scholar - Binswanger, M. (2001). Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? Ecological Economics, 36(1). doi: 10.1016 /S0921-8009(00)00214-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00214-7
View in Google Scholar - Bruyn, S. de, Markowska, A., Jong, F. de, & Blom, M. (2009). Resource productivity, competitiveness and environmental policies. Delft report. Retrieved from http://cedelft.eu (1.04.2019).
View in Google Scholar - Chovancová, J., & Vavrek, R. (2020). (De) coupling analysis with focus on energy consumption in EU countries and its spatial evaluation. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 29(3). doi: 10.15244/pjoes/110613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/110613
View in Google Scholar - Daly, H. E. (1993). Steady-state economics: a new paradigm. New Literary History, 24(4). doi: 10.2307/469394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/469394
View in Google Scholar - Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (European Commission) (2018). The Strategic Energy Technology (SET) Plan. Joint Research Centre. doi: 10.2777/48982
View in Google Scholar - EC (1988). The greenhouse effect and the Community. Communication to the Council. Commission work programme concerning the evaluation of policy options to deal with the "Greenhouse Effect." Draft Council Resolution on the greenhouse effect and the Community. COM (88) 656 final, 16 November 1988.
View in Google Scholar - EEA (2013). Final energy consumption by sector (CSI 027/ENER 016). Retrieved form http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/final-energy-consum ptionby-sector-5/assessment-1 (28.10.2018).
View in Google Scholar - Finel, N., & Tapio, P. (2012). Decoupling Transport Co2 From GDP. In Finland futures research centre ebook. Helsinki: University of Turku.
View in Google Scholar - Greening, L. A., Greene, D. L., & Difiglio, C. (2000). Energy efficiency and consumption - the rebound effect - a survey. Energy Policy, 28(6-7). doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00021-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00021-5
View in Google Scholar - Herring, H., & Roy, R. (2007). Technological innovation, energy efficient design and the rebound effect. Technovation, 27(4). doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2006 .11.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2006.11.004
View in Google Scholar - Huttmanová, E. (2015). Evaluation of sustainability in the EU countries using selected indicators of sustainable development. In Environmental economics, education and accreditation in geosciences: ecology, economics, education and legislation. Vol. 3 : Conference proceedings : 15th international multidisciplinary scientific geoconference SGEM. doi: 10.5593/SGEM2015/ B53/S21.036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5593/SGEM2015/B53/S21.036
View in Google Scholar - Kan, S., Chen, B., & Chen, G. (2019). Worldwide energy use across global supply chains: Decoupled from economic growth? Applied Energy, 250. doi: 10.1016 /j.apenergy.2019.05.104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.104
View in Google Scholar - Kotulič, R., & Adamišin, P. (2012). Economic effects of the foreign direct investments management on the development of Slovak regions. In V. Klímová & V. Žítek (Eds.). International colloquium on regional sciences:15th international colloquium on regional sciences. Brno: Masaryk University.
View in Google Scholar - Mazzanti, M. (2008). Is waste generation de-linking from economic growth? Empirical evidence for Europe. Applied Economics Letters, 15(4). doi: 10.108 0/13504850500407640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850500407640
View in Google Scholar - Naminse, E., & Zhuang, J. (2018). Economic growth, energy intensity, and carbon dioxide emissions in China. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 27(5). doi: 10.15244/pjoes/78619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/78619
View in Google Scholar - Nečadová, M. (2012). Is GDP an appropriate indicator of economic performance and social progress in the context of globalization? Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 20(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18267/j.aop.377
View in Google Scholar - OECD (2002). Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure from economic growth. In The OECD Environment Programme. OECD.
View in Google Scholar - Panayotou, T. (2016). Economic growth and the environment. In N. Haenn, R. Wilk & A. Harnish (Eds.). The environment in anthropology: a reader in ecology, culture, and sustainable living. NYU Press.
View in Google Scholar - Schipper, L., & Grubb, M. (2000). On the rebound? Feedback between energy intensities and energy uses in IEA countries. Energy Policy, 28(6-7). 10.1016/ S0301-4215(00)00018-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00018-5
View in Google Scholar - Sorrell, S. (2007). The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. UK Energy research centre.
View in Google Scholar - Steger, S., & Bleischwitz, R. (2017). Decoupling GDP from resource use, resource productivity and competitiveness: a cross-country comparison. In R. Bleischwitz, P. Welfens & Z. X. Zhang (Eds). Sustainable growth and Resource productivity: economic and global policy issues. Taylor & Francis. doi: 10.4324/9781351279208-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351279208
View in Google Scholar - Stern, D. I. (2004). The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development, 32(8). doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.004
View in Google Scholar - Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Retrieved form http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf (3.11.2018).
View in Google Scholar - Tapio, P. (2005). Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transport Policy, 12(2). doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.001
View in Google Scholar - UN (1992). United Nations framework convention on climate change. United Nations, 1992. Retrieved form https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/ conveng.pdf (2.11.2018).
View in Google Scholar - UNEP (2011). Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth. Retrieved form https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500. 11822/9816 (25.11.2018).
View in Google Scholar - Vavrek, R., & Chovancova, J. (2016). Decoupling of greenhouse gas emissions from economic growth in V4 countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39. doi: 10.1016/s2212-5671(16)30295-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30295-7
View in Google Scholar - Zhou, X., Zhang, M., Zhou, M., & Zhou, M. (2017). A comparative study on decoupling relationship and influence factors between China’s regional economic development and industrial energy–related carbon emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.115
View in Google Scholar