Institutional efficiency versus stability of local governments in basic areas of activity: the case of Poland

Abstract

Research background: In the last decade, the importance of institutions in determining economic processes and the economic growth is increasingly emphasized. Only a few papers deal with the efficiency of institutions, especially at a local level. Thus, a question arises whether the local authorities, in their pursuit of performing the assigned tasks, make every effort to attain a high level of efficiency?

Purpose of the article: The aim of the paper was to determine the relationships between institutional efficiency and identified areas of stability achieved by local governments in their basic roles. Supplementary aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between the type of a municipality (urban, rural or mixed urban-rural) and the efficiency and stability of undertaken tasks. A research hypothesis was put forth, assuming that the institutional efficiency of municipal governments depends on the level of stability in basic areas of activity pursued by a given municipality. Supplementary aim of this study was to analyze and assess the relationship between the type of a municipality (urban, rural or mixed urban-rural) and the efficiency and stability of undertaken tasks.

Methods: An accumulated synthetic index of institutional efficiency and partial indices of efficiency in five areas: economic and spatial, financial, administrative, human resources management in municipal offices, provision of social, cultural and educational services, were derived from data acquired from public statistics (Local Data Bank) and from direct investigations conducted in 2015/2016 in 1220 municipalities out of 2479 ones present in Poland. The method for obtaining the index was linear ordering of multi-feature objects.

Findings & Value added: The analyses have confirmed the hypothesis assuming that there is a relationship between the institutional efficiency of local governments and stability of the tasks they performed. These dependences varied in individual provinces of Poland. It is more beneficial for local governments to raise stability by attaining some improvement in these areas where it is low, but not at the expense of those areas where it is high. A specific group of municipalities consisted of urban-rural communities. Their complex and diverse structure must meet the challenge of performing their tasks in specific conditions (urban and rural areas).

Keywords

institutional efficiency of local governments, stability of tasks, activity of local government, synthetic measure

References

1. Acemoglu, D. (2008). Introduction to modern economic growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   View in Google Scholar
2. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5). doi: 10.1257/aer.91.5.1369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1369
   View in Google Scholar
3. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as the fundamental cause of long-run growth. In P. Aghion & S. N. Durlauf (Eds.). Handbook of economic growth. Amsterdam: North Holland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w10481
   View in Google Scholar
4. Afonso, A., & Fernandes, S. (2008). Assessing and explaining the relative efficiency of local government. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(5). doi: 10.1016/j. socec.2007.03.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2007.03.007
   View in Google Scholar
5. Álvarez-Díaz, M., & Miguez, G. C. (2008). The quality of institutions: a genetic programming approach. Economic Modelling, 25(1). doi: 10.1016/j.econmod. 2007.05.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2007.05.001
   View in Google Scholar
6. Andreula, N., & Chong, A. (2016). Do good institutions improve fiscal transparency? Economics of Governance, 17. doi: 10.1007/s10101-015-0175-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-015-0175-8
   View in Google Scholar
7. Balcerzak, A. P. & Pietrzak, M. B. (2017). Human development and quality of institutions in highly developed countries. In M. H. Bilgin, H. Danis, E. Demir, and U. Can (Eds.). Financial environment and business development. Proceedings of the 16th Eurasia Business and Economics Society. Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-31939919-5_18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39919-5_18
   View in Google Scholar
8. Balcerzak, A. P., & Pietrzak, M. B. (2016). Quality of institutions for knowledge-based economy within new institutional economics framework. Multiple criteria decision analysis for European countries in the years 2000–2013. Economics & Sociology, 9(4). doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-4/4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-4/4
   View in Google Scholar
9. Balcerzak, A. P. (2020). Quality of institutions in the European Union countries. Application of TOPSIS based on entropy measure for objective weighting. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 17(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.17.1.2020.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.17.1.2020.1.6
   View in Google Scholar
10. Bel, G., & Fegeda, X. (2007). Why do local government privatise public services? A survey of empirical studies. Local Government Studies, 33(4). doi: 10.1080/ 03003930701417528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930701417528
    View in Google Scholar
11. Breen, M., & Gillanders, R. (2012). Corruption, institutions and regulation. Economics of Governance, 13. doi: 10.1007/s10101-012-0111-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-012-0111-0
    View in Google Scholar
12. Chong, A., & Calderón, C. (2000). Institutional quality and poverty measures in a cross-section of countries. Economics of Governance, 1. doi: 10.1007/PL0002 1678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s101010050002
    View in Google Scholar
13. Chousa, J. P., Khan, H. A., Melikyan, D., & Tamazian A. (2005). Assessing institutional efficiency, growth and integration. Emerging Markets Review, 6(1). doi: 10.1016/j.ememar.2004.09.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2004.09.004
    View in Google Scholar
14. Evans, R., & Harding, A. (1997). Regionalisation, regional institutions and economic development. Policy and Politics, 25(1). doi: 10.1332/03055739778221 3765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/030557397782213765
    View in Google Scholar
15. Faguet, J. P. (2004). Does decentralization increase government responsiveness to local needs? Evidence from Bolivia. Journal of Public Economics, 88(3-4). doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00185-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00185-8
    View in Google Scholar
16. Fried, R. C., & Rabinovitz, F. F. (1980). Comparative urban politics: a performance approach. Prentice Hall.
    View in Google Scholar
17. Geys, B. (2006). Looking across borders: a test of spatial policy interdependence using local government efficiency ratings. Journal of Urban Economics, 60(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2006.04.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2006.04.002
    View in Google Scholar
18. Gibbs, D., Jonas, A., Reimer, S., & Spooner, D. (2001). Governance, institutional capacity and partnerships in local economic development: theoretical issues and empirical evidence from the Humber sub-region. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26(1). doi: 10.1111/1475-5661.00008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5661.00008
    View in Google Scholar
19. Gómes, G. M., Knorringa, P., & Corradi, A. A. (2016). Introduction. In G. M. Gomez & P. Knorringa (Eds.). Local governance, economic development and institution. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137557599_1
    View in Google Scholar
20. Grigoli, F., & Mills, Z. (2014). Institutions and public investment: an empirical analysis. Economics of Governance, 15. doi: 10.1007/s10101-013-0137-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-013-0137-y
    View in Google Scholar
21. Hall, R., & Jones, C.I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1). doi: 10.1162/003355399555954. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399555954
    View in Google Scholar
22. Hardt, Ł. (2013). The idea of good (enough) governance. The view from complexity economics. Argumenta Oeconomica, 2(31). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2171721
    View in Google Scholar
23. Herrera, E. W. (2016). Governance and development: the importance of legitimacy and institutional change. In G. M. Gomez & P. Knorringa (Eds.). Local governance, economic development and institution. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137557599_2
    View in Google Scholar
24. Ignacy, J., & Kopyściański, T. (2011). Selection criteria of strategic goals for local governments. Argumenta Oeconomica, 2(27).
    View in Google Scholar
25. Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2002). Growth without governance. Washington DC: The World Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/eco.2002.0016
    View in Google Scholar
26. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2003). Governance matters III. Governance indicators for 1996-2002. Washington DC: The World Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3106
    View in Google Scholar
27. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Zoido-Lobaton, P. (1999). Governance matters. Policy research. Working Paper, 2196, doi: 10.1596/1813-9450-2196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2196
    View in Google Scholar
28. Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics, 7(3). doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0343.1995.tb00111.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.1995.tb00111.x
    View in Google Scholar
29. Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic pay-off? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4). doi: 10.1162/003355300555475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555475
    View in Google Scholar
30. Law, S. H., & Azman-Saini, W. N. W. (2012). Institutional quality, governance, and financial development. Economics of Governance, 13. doi: 10.1007/s10101 -012-0112-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-012-0112-z
    View in Google Scholar
31. MacLeod, G., & Goodwin, M. (1999). Reconstructing an urban and regional political economy: on the state, politics, scale and explanation. Political Geography, 18(6). doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00014-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00014-1
    View in Google Scholar
32. Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3). doi: 10.2307/2946696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2946696
    View in Google Scholar
33. Miłek, D. (2018). Spatial differentiation in the social and economic development level in Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(3). doi: 10.24136/eq.2018.024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.024
    View in Google Scholar
34. Nowak, P. (2018). Regional variety in quality of life in Poland. Oeconomia Copernicana, 9(3). doi: 10.24136/oc.2018.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2018.019
    View in Google Scholar
35. Piersiala, L. (2019). The usage pattern of development method to assess the functioning of special economic zones: the case of Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 14(1). doi: 10.24136/eq.2019.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2019.008
    View in Google Scholar
36. Pomianek, I. (2014). Socio-economic development of agricultural problem areas in Poland. Economics & Sociology, 7(2). doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2014/7-2/18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2014/7-2/18
    View in Google Scholar
37. Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R. & Nanetti R. Y. (1995). Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton New Jersey: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820740
    View in Google Scholar
38. Rodric, D. (2003). In search of prosperity. Analytic narratives on economic growth. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400845897
    View in Google Scholar
39. Rodric, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: the primacy of institution over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2). doi: 10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85
    View in Google Scholar
40. Rodrik, D. (1999). Where did all the growth go? External shocks, social conflict, and growth collapses. Journal of Economic Growth, 4(4). doi: 10.1023/A: 1009863208706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w6350
    View in Google Scholar
41. Savitch, H. V. (1998). Global challenge and institutional capacity or, how we can refit local administration for the next century. Administration & Society, 30(3). doi: 10.1177/0095399798303002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399798303002
    View in Google Scholar
42. Scott, W. R. (2008). Approaching adulthood: the maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society, 37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-008-9067-z
    View in Google Scholar
43. Stoker, G. (2011). Was local governance such a good idea? A global comparative perspective. Public Administration, 89(1). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.019 00.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01900.x
    View in Google Scholar
44. Tatarczak, A., & Boichuk, O. (2018). The multivariate techniques in evaluation of unemployment analysis of Polish regions. Oeconomia Copernicana, 9(3). doi: 10.24136/oc.2018.018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2018.018
    View in Google Scholar
45. Ter Bogt, H. J. (2008). Recent and future management changes in local government: continuing focus on rationality and efficiency? Financial Accountability & Management, 24(1). doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2008.00442.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2008.00442.x
    View in Google Scholar
46. Torres, L., Pina, V., & Yetano, A. (2011). Performance measurement in Spanish local governments. A cross-case comparison study. Public Administration, 89(3). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01919.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01919.x
    View in Google Scholar
47. Vetter, A., & Kersting, N. (2003). Democracy versus efficiency? comparing local government reform across Europe. In N. Kersting & A. Vetter (Eds.). Reforming local government in Europe. Closing the gap between democracy and efficiency. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. doi: 10.1007/978-3-663-11258-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11258-7_1
    View in Google Scholar
48. Vincent, C., & Stephen, C. (2015). Local government capacity building and development: lessons, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs, 3(149). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2332-0761.1000149
    View in Google Scholar
49. Williams, D. (1997). Strategies of multinational enterprises and the development of the central and eastern European economies. European Business Review, 97(3). doi: 10.1108/09555349710167549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09555349710167549
    View in Google Scholar
50. Wollmann, H. (2012). Local government reforms in (seven) European countries: between convergent and divergent, conflicting and complementary developments. Local Government Studies, 38(1). doi: 10.1080/0300393042000318030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2011.638710
    View in Google Scholar
51. Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: implication for development theory, research and policy. World Bank Research Observer, 15(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.2.225
    View in Google Scholar