Relationship between corporate sustainability performance and corporate financial performance: evidence from U.S. companies

Abstract

Research background: Sustainable development at the enterprise level is understood as the integration of economic, environmental and social dimensions aimed at meeting the needs of all firm?s stakeholders in the present and in the future. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate the relationship between economic, environmental and social sustainability performance of a company and its financial performance.

Purpose of the article: Considering the business model for sustainability as well as the debatable results of empirical research on the relationship between corporate sustainability performance (CSP) and corporate financial performance (CFP), the essential aim of the paper is to answer the question whether the improvement of corporate sustainability performance in its all particular dimensions brings about higher total revenues (TR) of a company.

Methods: The main method of empirical research is panel regression models based on Cobb-Douglas production function, which has been extended to include variables of corporate sustainability scores. The selection between pooled OLS model, random-effects model and fixed-effects model has been made with the use of the F test, the Breusch-Pagan test and the Hausman test. Additionally, descriptive statistics and the Pearson correlation coefficients have been analyzed. The empirical studies were conducted in the period 2014?2019 among the 59 largest U.S. companies listed in the Fortune 500 ranking between 2015?2020.

Findings & value added: The research hypothesis assuming the existence of positive relationship between corporate sustainability performance (CSP) at both aggregate and disaggregate levels and corporate financial performance (CFP) expressed by TR cannot be positively verified. It means that the improvement of corporate sustainability performance in environmental, social and governance dimensions does not lead to an increase in TR of a company, as some empirical studies suggest.

Keywords

sustainable development, corporate sustainability, CSP–CFP relationship

References

1. Ashafi, M., Adams, M., Walker T. R., & Magnan, G. (2018). How corporate social responsibility can be integrated into corporate sustainability: a theoretical review of their relationship. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 25(8), 672?682. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2018.1471628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2018.1471628
   View in Google Scholar
2. Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794?816. doi: 10.5465/amr.2007.25275520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275520
   View in Google Scholar
3. Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1304?1320. doi: 10.1002/smj.1980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1980
   View in Google Scholar
4. Conte, M. A., & Svejnar, J. (1988). Productivity effects of worker participation in management, profit-sharing, worker ownership of assets and unionization in U.S. firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 6(1), 139?151. doi: 10.1016/0167-7187(88)90011-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7187(88)90011-2
   View in Google Scholar
5. Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130?141. doi: 10.1002/bse.323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323
   View in Google Scholar
6. Fooladi, M. (2012). Board characteristics and firm performance. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 8(5), 688?694.
   View in Google Scholar
7. Fortune 500 (2020). Retrieved from https://fortune.com/fortune500/ (10.03.2021).
   View in Google Scholar
8. Giovannoni, E., &Fabietti, G. (2013). What is sustainability? A review of the concept and its applications. In C. Busco, M. L. Frigo, P. Quattrone & A. Riccaboni (Eds.). Integrated reporting. Concepts and cases that redefine corporate accountability. Berlin: Springer, 21?40. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-02168-3_2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02168-3_2
   View in Google Scholar
9. Gond, J., Grubnic, S., Herzig, C., & Moon, J. (2012). Configuring management control systems: theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability. Management Accounting Research, 23(3), 205?223. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2012.0 6.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.06.003
   View in Google Scholar
10. Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability...and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47?62. doi: 10.1080/0969160X.2011.556420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006
    View in Google Scholar
11. Jha, M. K., & Rangarajan, K. (2020). Analysis of corporate sustainability performance and corporate financial performance causal linkage in the Indian context. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 5(1), 1?30. doi: 10.1186/s41180-020-00038-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41180-020-00038-z
    View in Google Scholar
12. Kantabutra, S., & Ketprapakorn, N. (2020). Toward a theory of corporate sustainability: a theoretical integration and exploration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 270, 1?22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122292
    View in Google Scholar
13. Lu, L., & Taylor, M. (2016). Which factors moderate the relationship between sustainability performance and financial performance? A meta-analysis study. Journal of International Accounting Research, 15(1), 1?15. doi: 10.2308/jiar-51103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-51103
    View in Google Scholar
14. Nizam, E., Ng, A., Dewandaru, G., Nagayev, R., & Nikoba, M. A. (2019). The impact of social and environmental sustainability on financial performance: a global analysis of the banking sector. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 49, 35?53. doi: 10.1016/j.mulfin.2019.01.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2019.01.002
    View in Google Scholar
15. Oželien?, D. (2017). A review of enterprise sustainable development models: critical appraisal. International Scientific Journal ?Science. Business. Society?, 2(2), 97?103.
    View in Google Scholar
16. Perrini, F., Russo, A., Tencati, A., & Vurro, C. (2011). Deconstructing the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 59?76. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-1194-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1194-1
    View in Google Scholar
17. Sarvaes, H., & Tomayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firms value: the role of customers awareness. Management Science, 59(5), 1045?1061. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.ll20.163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1630
    View in Google Scholar
18. Soana, M-G. (2011). The relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance in the bank sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 133?148. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0894-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0894-x
    View in Google Scholar
19. Tang, Z., Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2012). How corporate social responsibility engagement strategy moderates the CSR-financial performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1274?1303. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2 012.01068.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01068.x
    View in Google Scholar
20. Tuppura, A., Arminen, H., Pätäri, S., & Jantunen, A. (2016). Corporate social and financial performance in different industry contexts: the chicken or the egg? Social Responsibility Journal, 12(4), 672?686. doi: 10.1108/SRJ-12-2015-01 81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-12-2015-0181
    View in Google Scholar
21. United Nations (UN) (2012). Future we want. Rio de Janeiro: UN.
    View in Google Scholar
22. United Nations Sustainable Development Solution Network (UNSDSN) (2013). An action agenda for sustainable development. New York: UN.
    View in Google Scholar
23. Wagner, M. (2010). The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance: a firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecological Economics, 69(7), 1553?1560. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.017
    View in Google Scholar
24. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    View in Google Scholar
25. Xiao, C., Wang, Q., van der Vaart, T., & van Donk, D. P. (2018). When does corporate sustainability performance pay off? The impact of country-level sustainability performance. Ecological Economics, 146, 325?333. doi: 10.1016/j.e colecon.2017.11.025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.025
    View in Google Scholar
26. Ziegler, A., Schröder, M., & Rennings, K. (2007). The effects of environmental and social performance on the stock performance of European corporations. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37(4), 661?680. doi: 10.1007/s10640-007-9082-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9082-y
    View in Google Scholar