Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Ecological and economic multicriteria optimization of operating alternative propulsion vehicles within the city of Ostrava in the Czech Republic

Abstract

Research background: Individual car transport significantly burdens the environment, especially in the centres of large cities. There is pollution, traffic jams and an increase in overall noise. In the area of passenger car transport, legislation is being significantly tightened. Therefore, there are also increasing demands on public transport operators in the Czech Republic. Previously, most of the fleet consisted of diesel vehicles. These have been gradually replaced by drives that are significantly more environmentally friendly, such as the Compressed natural gas drive. The requirements defined in relation to the reduction of vehicle emissions are increasingly stricter. A number of cities, not only within the European Union, are addressing significant issues concerning the future of public transport.

Purpose of the article: The main objective of the article is to demonstrate an in-depth analysis of the operation of transport vehicles in the Statutory City of Ostrava, both from the cost and environmental point of view. The comparison of transport means using CNG, electric and diesel propulsion is made. Specific factors such as the route profile or the environmental impact of the mode of transport are also taken into account. The extent of the data processed and the multidimensional nature of the assessment offer a unique analysis of the problem. The article provides an exact view of the advantages and disadvantages of operating specific means of transport. Everything is based on data on transport operations in the city of Ostrava (the Czech Republic, EU).

Methods: The comprehensive evaluation is based on the application of methods from the field of financial accounting, evaluation of measured data from the operation of transport means and, last but not least, on the analysis of empirical data from the given area. The analysed data set is unique due to the time period, as is the multi-criteria evaluation methodology. 

Findings & value added: The analysis performed demonstrated the economic viability of operating CNG vehicles. The main added value of the article is the unique multi-criteria evaluation procedure for the vehicles. The paper shows the evaluation of a complex decision problem in the transport field in the form of a case study implemented in the city of Ostrava. The evaluation results then consider both cost and environmental factors, which can be described as a comprehensive and highly innovative approach. The defined assessment can then be applied to other European and world metropolises.

Keywords

electric drive, compressed natural gas, environment and cost sustainability, transport optimization, multicriteria decision making

PDF

References

  1. Aslam, M. U., Masjuki, H. H., Kalam, M. A., & Amalina, M. A. (2005). Comparative evaluation of the performance and emissions of a retrofitted spark ignition car engine. Journal of Energy and Environment, 4, 97?110.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Bahadori, A. (2014). Natural gas processing: technology and engeneering design. Oxford: Gulf Professional Publishing.
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Bertaccini, B., & Biagi, G. (2018). Public infromation and perception of the environmental risk about the works for the city high speed railroa underpass in Florence, Italy. Journal of Tourism and Services, 9(17), 1?22. doi: 10.29036/jot s.v9i17.45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29036/jots.v9i17.45
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Daukšys, V., Račkus, M., & Zamiatina, N. (2017). Energy efficiency improvement adding various amounts of CNG in the naturally aspirated compression ignition engine. Procedia Engineering, 187, 222?228. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04 .368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.368
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Demirbas, A. (2010). Methane gas hydrate. Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978-1-84882-872-8_4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-872-8
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Dohányos, M., Štambaský, J., Matějka, J., Kajan, M., & Prokopec, Z. (2014). Czech Biogas Association. Retrieved from https://www.czba.cz/files/ceska-bioplynova-asociace/uploads/files/SVA_CzBA_2014_FINAL.pdf.
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Gallivan, F. (2013). Energy savings strategies for transit agencies. Washington, D.C: Transportation Research Board. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/22528
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Jones, K. B., Jervey, B. B., Roche, M., & Barnowski, S. (2017) The electric battery: charging forward to a low-carbon future. Praeger: Univesity of Richmond.
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Jiříček, P. (2019). Fleet replacement in transport company. Ostrava, Retrieved from https://moravskoslezsky.denik.cz/zpravy_region/odepisuji-stare-kupuji-nove-vozovy-park-dpo-se-rychle-meni-20190731.html.
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Kakaee, A. H., & Paykani, A. (2013). Research and development of natural-gas fuelled engines in Iran. Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews, 26, 805?821. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.048
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Kato, K., Igarashi, M., Masuda, K., Otsubo, A., & Takeda, Y. K. (1999). Development of engine for natural gas vehicle. Journal of Engines, 108(3). 939?947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/1999-01-0574
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Khan, I. M., & Shakor, A. (2015). Technical overview of compressed natural gas (CNG) as a transportation fuel. Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews, 51(C), 785?797. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.053
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Kumar, S., Kwon, H. T., Choi, K. H., Lim, W., Cho, J. H., Tak, K., & Moon, I. (2011). LNG: an eco-friendly cryogenic fuel for sustainable development. Applied Energy, 88(12), 4264?4273. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.06.035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.06.035
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Langshaw, L., Ainalis, D., Acha, S., Shah, N., & Stettler, M. E. J. (2020). Environmental and economic analysis of liquefied natural gas (LNG) for heavy goods vehicles in the UK: a well-to-wheel and total cost of ownership evaluation. Energy Policy, 137(C). doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111161
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Milojević, S., & Pešić, R. (2011). CNG buses for clean and economical city transport. International Journal Mobility and Vehicle Mechanics (MVM), 37(4), 57?71.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Ministry of Industrial and Trades (2019). Proposal plan of energy and climate of the Czech republic. Retrieved from https://www.mpo.cz/cz/energetika/strateg icke-a-koncepcni-dokumenty/navrh-vnitrostatniho-planu-v-oblasti-energetiky-a-klimatu-ceske-republiky--243377/
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Mulligan, J. P. (2010). Carbon dioxide emissions. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Najar, Y. S. H. (2013). Protection of the environment by using innovative greening technologies in land transport. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 26(C), 480?491. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.060
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Nijaguna, B. T. (2006). Biogas technology. New-Dheli: New Age International.
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Nikoobakht, A., Aghaei, J., Shafie-khah, M., & Catalao, J. (2020) Co-operation of electricity and natural gas systems including electric vehicles and variable renewable energy sources based on a continuous-time model approach. Energy, 200, 117484. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117484
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Pietrzak, O., & Pietrzak, K. (2021). The economic effects of elektromobility in sustainable urban public transport. Energies, 14(4), 878. 1?28. doi: 10.3390/e n14040878 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14040878
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Piwowar, A. (2020). Challenges associated with environmental protection in rural areas of Poland: empirical studies? results. Economics and Sociology, 13(1), 217?229. doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-1/14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-1/14
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Price of natural gas (2020). Retrieved from https://www.kurzy.cz/komodity/zemni-plyn-graf-vyvoje-ceny/
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Ristovski, Z., Morawska, L., Avoko, G. A., Johnson, G., & Greenaway, C. (2004). Emissions from a vehicle fitted to operate on either petrol or compressed natural gas. Science of Total Environment, 323, 179?194. doi: 10.1016/j.scitot env.2003.10.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.10.023
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Sangeeta, M. S., Pande, M., Rani, M., Gakhar, R., Sharma, M., & Rani, J. (2014) Alternative fuels: an overview of current trends and scope for future. Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27(C), 697?712. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.20 14.01.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.023
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Sansyzbayeva, G., Temerbulatova, Z., Zhidebekkyzy, A., & Ashirbekova, L. (2020). Evaluating the transition to green economy in Kazakhstan: a synthetic control approach. Journal of International Studies, 13(1), 324?341. doi: 10.142 54/2071- 8330.2020/13-1/21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-1/21
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Semin, & Bakar, R. A. (2008). A technical review of compressed natural gas as an alternative fuel for internal combustion engines. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 1(4), 302?311. doi: 10.3844/ajeassp.2008. 302.311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2008.302.311
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Scholl, F., Neher, D., Kettner, M., Hugel, P., Kubach, H., & Klaissle, M. (2012). Development and analysis of a controlled hot surface ignition system for lean burn gas engines. In Proceedings of ASME internal combustion engine division spring technical conference. The American Association of Society of Mechanical Engineers. doi: 10.1115/ICES2012-81059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/ICES2012-81059
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Singh, A. P., Agarwal, R. A., Agarwal, A .K., Dhar, A., & Shukla, M. K. (2017). Prospects of alternative transportation fuels. Singapore: Springer Nature. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7518-6
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Vaškevič, Š. (2019). Transport company of Brno - greening of transport. Retrieved from https://zajimej.se/prvni-autobus-na-bioplyn-z-odpadu-se-osvedcil-nyni-dpmb-hleda-cestu-k-ekologizaci-dopravy/.
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Wavhal, V. M., Patil, P. S., Jangada, P. S., Dubal, A. K., Vivek, V. K., Totala, N. B., & Thipse, S. S. (2016). Performance characteristics of compressed natural gas as an alternative fuel for internal combustion engine: a review. International Journal of Advance Research in Science and Engineering, 5(4), 151?161.
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Yeh, S. (2007). An empirical analysis on the adoption of alternative fuel vehicles: the case of natural gas vehicles. Energy Policy, 35(11), 5865?5875. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.06.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.06.012
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Zilvar, J. (2016). Perspective of fosil fuels in middle europe. Retrieved from https://energetika.tzb-info.cz/13693-perspektiva-fosilnich-paliv-ve-stredni-evrope (16.01.2016).
    View in Google Scholar

Similar Articles

11-20 of 179

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.