Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Barriers to gaining support: a prospect of entrepreneurial activity of family and non-family firms in Poland

Abstract

Research background: This paper explores the approach that focuses on entrepreneurial activities suppressed by restraining forces or different barriers. We investigated a particular type of obstacles reported by entrepreneurs, i.e., those which prevented their gaining access to support instruments. This paper delved into the specificity of family businesses and explained why perceptions of access to support could differ between family and non-family firms.

Purpose of the article: This paper seeks to identify the differences between family and non-family businesses in terms of their perceptions of different barriers that hinder access to support instruments.

Methods: The main research processes were based on logistic regression models with a dependent variable: 0 for a non-family firm and 1 for a family firm.  As dependent variables 13 barriers to the access of public support instruments were adopted. The study was conducted on a sample of 386 Polish business entities.

Findings & value added: The results confirmed the existence of differences between family and non-family businesses in perceptions of barriers towards gaining support in entrepreneurial endeavours. Obstacles, such as overly-complex bureaucratic procedures and requirements, lack of access to information disseminated by business support institutions, and complicated support settlement procedures, were perceived as far less crucial by family businesses than non-family businesses. Family businesses demonstrated a lower propensity to use real property as collateral for transactions. Additionally, family businesses with financial resources that overlap with their own familial resources declared that they found it easier to make their own contributions to satisfy the requirements for support programmes or services. This paper makes several novel and significant contributions to the field. First, we add to existing research focusing exclusively on family entrepreneurial activity by drawing a comparison between family and non-family firms in terms of the perceived barriers towards gaining support. Second, we address different types of barriers. Our findings provide further evidence that different types of businesses perceive certain types of barriers differently. Third, we extend current knowledge on family businesses study in Poland.

Keywords

family firms, support entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial activity

PDF

References

  1. Acs, Z., & Armington, C. (2004). Employment growth and entrepreneurial activity in cities. Regional Studies, 38(8), 911?927. doi: 10.1080/0034340042000280 938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000280938
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Aguiló, T. I. E., & Aguiló, N. F. E. (2012). Family business and firm performance: evidence from the Mexican stock exchange. International Journal of Management Practice, 5(4), 304?325. doi: 10.1504/IJMP.2012.050312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMP.2012.050312
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Akehurst, G., Simarro, E., & Mas?Tur, A. (2012). Women entrepreneurship in small service firms: motivations, barriers and performance. Service Industries Journal, 32(15), 2489?2505. doi: 10.1080/02642069.2012.677834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2012.677834
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Ahlstrom, D., & Ding, Z. (2014). Entrepreneurship in China: an overview. International Small Business Journal, 32(6), 610?618. doi: 10.1177/0266242 613517913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613517913
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Ahmad, N., & Seymour R. G. (2008). Defining entrepreneurial activity: definitions supporting frameworks for data collection. OECD Statistics Working Papers 2008/01. doi: 10.1787/243164686763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1090372
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Akbar, F., Khan, R. A., Wadood, F., & Bin Bon, A. T. (2020). Entrepreneurial orientation dimension affects firm performance: a perspective from the Malaysian furniture industry. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(4), 157?181. doi: 10.15678/EBER.2020.080409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080409
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Aldrich, H. E., & Cliff, J. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 573?596. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(1-2), 11?26. doi: 10.1002/sej.4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.4
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Allouche, J., Amann, B., Jaussaud, J., & Kurashina, T. (2008). The impact of family control on the performance and financial characteristics of family versus nonfamily businesses in Japan: a matched-pair investigation. Family Business Review, 21(4), 315?330. doi: 10.1177/08944865080210040104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865080210040104
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Anderson, R. C., Mansi, S. A., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 68(2), 263?285. doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00067-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00067-9
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding?family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301?1328. doi: 10.1111/1540-6261.00567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00567
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Andres, C. (2008). Large shareholders and firm performance?an empirical examination of founding-family ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(4), 431?445. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.05.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.05.003
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Basco, R., & Pérez Rodríguez, M. J. (2009). Studying the family enterprise holistically: evidence for integrated family and business systems. Family Business Review, 22(1), 82?95. doi: 10.1177/0894486508327824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486508327824
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Bazan, C., Datta, A., Gaultois, H., Shaikh, A., Gillespie, K., & Jones, J. (2019). Effect of the university in the entrepreneurial intention of female students. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, 7(2), 73?97. doi: 10.1234 5-0012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37335/ijek.v7i2.95
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Bennedsen, M., Pérez-González, F., & Wolfenzon, D. (2010). The governance of family firms. Corporate Governance: A Synthesis of Theory, Research and Practice, 8, 371?389. doi: 10.1002/9781118258439.ch19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118258439.ch19
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (1995). Relationship lending and lines of credit in small firm finance part of the finance and financial management commons. Journal of Business, 68(3), 351?381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/296668
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258?279. doi: 10.1177/089448 6511435355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. (2006). The role of family in family firms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 73?96. doi: 10.1257/jep.20.2.73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.20.2.73
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Blanco-Mazagatos, V., de Quevedo-Puente, E., & Castrillo, L. A. (2007). The trade-off between financial resources and agency costs in the family business: an exploratory study. Family Business Review, 20(3), 199?213. doi: 10.1111/j.1 741-6248.2007.00095.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00095.x
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Břečková, P. (2016a). SMEs export activities in the Czech Republic and export risk insuring. European Research Studies Journal, 19(1), 84?92. doi: 10.35808 /ersj/508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/508
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Břečková, P. (2016b). Family business in the Czech Republic. European Research Studies Journal, 19(4), 3?16. doi: 10.35808/ersj/576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/576
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H. L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421?440. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00390.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00390.x
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Cacciotti, G., Hayton, J. C., Mitchell, J. R., & Giazitzoglu, A. (2016). A reconceptualization of fear of failure in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(3), 302?325. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.02.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.02.002
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Carayannis, E. G., Evans, D., & Hanson, M. (2003). A cross-cultural learning strategy for entrepreneurship education: outline of key concepts and lessons learned from a comparative study of entrepreneurship students in France and the US. Technovation, 23(9), 757?771. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00030-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00030-5
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Carletti, E. (2004). The structure of bank relationships, endogenous monitoring, and loan rates. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 13(1), 58?86. doi: 10.1016 /j.jfi.2003.04.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2003.04.001
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Carlock, R. S., & Ward, J. L. (2010). When family businesses are best. Hampshire/New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294516
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Cassia, L., De Massis, A., & Kotlar, J. (2012). Exploring the effect of family control on the characteristics of SMEs in Northern Italy. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 4, 4?16. doi: 10.5772/53988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/53988
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Steier, L. (2005). Sources and consequences of distinctive familiness: an introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 237?247. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00080.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00080.x
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Choo, S., & Wong, M. (2006). Entrepreneurial intention: triggers and barriers to new venture creations in Singapore. Singapore Management Review, 28(2), 47?64.
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behaviour. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19?39. doi: 10.1177/ 104225879902300402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300402
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Coleman, S., & Carsky, M. (1999). Sources of capital for small family?owned businesses: evidence from the national survey of small business finances. Family Business Review, 12(1), 73?85. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.0007 3.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00073.x
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Corbetta, G., & Salvato, C. A. (2004). Self-serving or self-actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms: a commentary on ?Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: conceptual issues and exploratory evidence?. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 355?362. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00050.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00050.x
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Cornelissen, J. P., Clarke, J. S., & Cienki, A. (2012). Sensegiving in entrepreneurial contexts: the use of metaphors in speech and gesture to gain and sustain support for novel business ventures. International Small Business Journal, 30(3), 213?241. doi: 10.1177/0266242610364427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242610364427
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Cromie, S., Stephenson, B., & Monteith, D. (1995). The management of family firms: an empirical investigation. International Small Business Journal, 13(4), 11?34. doi: 10.1177/0266242695134001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242695134001
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Daily, C. M., & Dollinger, M. J. (1992). An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally managed firms. Family Business Review, 5(2), 117?136. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1992.00117.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1992.00117.x
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2001). Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 81?100. doi: 10.1177/104225870 102500406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104225870102500406
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Degryse, H., & Van Cayseele, P. (2000). Relationship lending within a bank-based system: evidence from European small business data. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9(1), 90?109. doi: 10.1006/jfin.1999.0278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jfin.1999.0278
    View in Google Scholar
  38. De Leeuw, E. D. (2005). To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 21(5), 233?255.
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Dekker, J., Lybaert, N., Steijvers, T., & Depaire, B. (2015). The effect of family business professionalization as a multidimensional construct on firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(2), 516?538. doi: 10.1111 /jsbm.12082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12082
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Demsetz, H., & Villalonga, B. (2001). Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(3), 209?233. doi: 10.1016/S0929-119 9(01)00020-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00020-7
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Dewald, J., & Bowen, F. (2010). Storm clouds and silver linings: responding to disruptive innovations through cognitive resilience. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(1), 197?218. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00312.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00312.x
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The law and economics of self-dealing. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 430?465. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.02.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.02.007
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Domańska, A. (2013). Causes and effects of cooperation between enterprises and business support institutions. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio H Oeconomia, 47(2), 63?72. doi: 10.17951/h.2013.47.2.63.
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Donga, G., Ngirande, H., & Shumba, K. (2016). Perceived barriers to the development of small, medium and microenterprises: a case study of Thulamela Municipality in the Limpopo Province. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 14(4), 61?66. doi: 10.21511/ppm.14(4).2016.07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.14(4).2016.07
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Dyer Jr, W. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2006). Family firms and social responsibility: preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 785?802. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00151.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00151.x
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Donnelley, R. (1964). The family business. Harvard Business Review, 12(4), 93?105.
    View in Google Scholar
  47. Eddleston, K. A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: a stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 545?565. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.06.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.06.004
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Eijdenberg, E. L., Thompson, N. A., Verduijn, K., & Essers, C. (2019). Entrepreneurial activities in a developing country: an institutional theory perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25(3), 414?432. doi: 10.1108/IJEBR-12-2016-0418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-12-2016-0418
    View in Google Scholar
  49. European Commission (2009). Overview of family?business?relevant issues: research, networks, policy measures and existing studies. European Commission, Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General.
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Family Enterprise USA (2011). Annual family business survey general results & conclusions. Minneapolis: Family Enterprise USA.
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Fort, T. C., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., & Miranda, J. (2013). How firms respond to business cycles: the role of firm age and firm size. IMF Economic Review, 61(3), 520?559. doi: 10.1057/imfer.2013.15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/imfer.2013.15
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Gallo, M. Á., T?pies, J., & Cappuyns, K. (2004). Comparison of family and nonfamily business: financial logic and personal preferences. Family Business Review, 17(4), 303?318. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2004.00020.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2004.00020.x
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Gedajlovic, E., Lubatkin, M. H., & Schulze, W. S. (2004). Crossing the threshold from founder management to professional management: a governance perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5), 899?912. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-648 6.2004.00459.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00459.x
    View in Google Scholar
  54. Głodowska, A., Maciejewski, M., & Wach, K. (2019). How entrepreneurial orientation stimulates different types of knowledge in the internationalisation process of firms from Poland? Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(1), 61?73. doi: 10.15678/EBER.2019.070104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2019.070104
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Gnyawali, D. R., & Fogel, D. S. (1994). Environments for entrepreneurship development: key dimensions and research implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(4), 43?62. doi: 10.1177/104225879401800403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879401800403
    View in Google Scholar
  56. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653?707. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2011.593320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.593320
    View in Google Scholar
  57. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Nunez-Nickel, M., & Gutierrez, I. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 81?95. doi: 10.2307/3069338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3069338
    View in Google Scholar
  58. Hadjielias, E., & Poutziouris, P. (2015). On the conditions for the cooperative relations between family businesses: the role of trust. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 6, 867?897. doi: 10.1108/IJEBR-07-201 4-0132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-07-2014-0132
    View in Google Scholar
  59. Henry, C., Foss, L., & Ahl, H. (2016). Gender and entrepreneurship research: a review of methodological approaches. International Small Business Journal, 34(3), 217?241. doi: 10.1177/0266242614549779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242614549779
    View in Google Scholar
  60. Hernández-Linares, R., Sarkar, S., & Cobo, M. J. (2018). Inspecting the Achilles heel: a quantitative analysis of 50 years of family business definitions. Scientometrics, 115(2), 929?951. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2702-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2702-1
    View in Google Scholar
  61. Hillemane, B. S. M., Satyanarayana, K., & Chandrashekar, D. (2019). Technology business incubation for start-up generation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25(7), 1471?1493. doi: 10.1108/IJEBR-02-2019-0087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-02-2019-0087
    View in Google Scholar
  62. Hoogendoorn, B., van der Zwan, P., & Thurik, R. (2011). Social entrepreneurship and performance: the role of perceived barriers and risk. ERIM Report Series, ERS-2011-016-ORG.
    View in Google Scholar
  63. Hoogendoorn, B., Van der Zwan, P., & Thurik, R. (2019). Sustainable entrepreneurship: the role of perceived barriers and risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(4), 1133?1154. doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3646-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3646-8
    View in Google Scholar
  64. Hottenrott, H., Lopes-Bento, C., & Veugelers, R. (2017). Direct and cross scheme effects in a research and development subsidy program. Research Policy, 46(6), 1118?1132. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.04.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.04.004
    View in Google Scholar
  65. Hulsink, W., & Koek, D. (2014). The young, the fast and the furious: a study about the triggers and impediments of youth entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 18(2-3), 182?209. doi: 10.15 04/IJEIM.2014.062876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2014.062876
    View in Google Scholar
  66. Iturralde, T., Maseda, A., & San-Jose, L. (2010). Empirical evidence of banking relationships for Spanish SMEs. International Small Business Journal, 28(3), 274?295. doi: 10.1177/0266242609360706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242609360706
    View in Google Scholar
  67. James, H. S. (1999). Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 6(1), 41?55. doi: 10.1 080/13571519984304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13571519984304
    View in Google Scholar
  68. Jiménez-Valverde, A., & Lobo, J. M. (2007). Threshold criteria for conversion of probability of species presence to either?or presence?absence. Acta Oecologica, 31(3), 361?369. doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2007.02.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2007.02.001
    View in Google Scholar
  69. Johannisson, B. (2002). Energizing entrepreneurship: ideological tensions in the medium-sized family business. In D. Fletcher (Ed.). Understanding the small family business. London: Routledge, 46?57.
    View in Google Scholar
  70. Johnson, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2000). Tunneling. American Economic Review, 90(2), 22?27. doi: 10.1257/aer.90.2.22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.2.22
    View in Google Scholar
  71. Jones, P., Jones, A. Packham, G., & Miller, G. (2008). Student attitudes towards enterprise education in Poland: a positive impact. Education + Training, 50(7), 597?614. doi: 10.1108/00400910810909054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910810909054
    View in Google Scholar
  72. Kellermanns, F. W., & Eddleston, K. A. (2004). Feuding families: when conflict does a family firm good. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(3), 209?228. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00040.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00040.x
    View in Google Scholar
  73. Kellermanns, F. W., & Eddleston, K. A. (2006). Corporate entrepreneurship in family firms: a family erspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 809?830. 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00153.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00153.x
    View in Google Scholar
  74. Kellermanns, F. W., Eddleston, K. A., Barnett, T., & Pearson, A. (2008). An exploratory study of family member characteristics and involvement: effects on entrepreneurial behavior in the family firm. Family Business Review, 21(1), 1?14. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00107.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00107.x
    View in Google Scholar
  75. Kellermanns, F. W., Eddleston, K. A., & Zellweger, T. M. (2012). Article commentary: extending the socioemotional wealth perspective: a look at the dark side. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1175?1182. doi: 10.1111/j. 1540-6520.2012.00544.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00544.x
    View in Google Scholar
  76. Khayri, S., Yaghoubi, J., & Yazdanpanah, M. (2011). Investigating barriers to enhance entrepreneurship in agricultural higher education from the perspective of graduate students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2818?2822. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.195
    View in Google Scholar
  77. Krisnaresanti, A., Julialevi, K. O., Naufalin, L. R., & Dinanti, A. (2020). Analysis of entrepreneurship education in creating new entrepreneurs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, 8(2), 67?76. doi: 10.37335/ijek.v8i 2.112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37335/ijek.v8i2.112
    View in Google Scholar
  78. Lam, T. Y., & Lee, S. K. (2012). Family ownership, board committees and firm performance: evidence from Hong Kong. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 12(3), 353?366. doi: 10.1108/147207012 11234609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701211234609
    View in Google Scholar
  79. Le Breton?Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2013). Socioemotional wealth across the family firm life cycle: a commentary on ?Family Business Survival and the Role of Boards?. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1391?1397. doi: 10.111 1/etap.12072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12072
    View in Google Scholar
  80. Lee, L., Wong, P. K., Der Foo, M., & Leung, A. (2011). Entrepreneurial intentions: the influence of organizational and individual factors. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 124?136. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.04.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.04.003
    View in Google Scholar
  81. Lofstrom, M., Bates, T., & Parker, S. C. (2014). Why are some people more likely to become small-businesses owners than others: entrepreneurship entry and industry-specific barriers. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(2), 232?251. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.01.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.01.004
    View in Google Scholar
  82. Lin, H. K., & Chen, H. (2012). Family management and firm value: the moderating influence of founder-CEO and outside directorships. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 85(4), 40?54.
    View in Google Scholar
  83. Luo, Y., & Junkunc, M. (2008). How private enterprises respond to government bureaucracy in emerging economies: the effects of entrepreneurial type and governance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(2), 133?153. doi: 10.1002/s ej.46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.46
    View in Google Scholar
  84. Lüthje, C., & Franke, N. (2003). The ?making?of an entrepreneur: testing a model of entrepreneurial intent among engineering students at MIT. R&D Management, 33(2), 135?147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00288
    View in Google Scholar
  85. Machek, O., Brabec, M., & Hnilica, J. (2013). Measuring performance gaps between family and non-family businesses: a meta-analysis of existing evidence. International Academic Research Journal of Business and Management, 2(3), 17?30.
    View in Google Scholar
  86. Maury, B. (2006). Family ownership and firm performance: empirical evidence from Western European corporations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(2), 321?341. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.02.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.02.002
    View in Google Scholar
  87. McKevitt, D., & Marshall, D. (2015). The legitimacy of entrepreneurial mentoring. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 21(2), 263?280. doi: 10.1108/IJEBR-05-2014-0089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-05-2014-0089
    View in Google Scholar
  88. Michiels, A., Uhlaner, L., & Dekker, J. (2017). The effect of family business professionalization on dividend payout. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24(4), 971?990. doi: 10.1108/JSBED-01-2017-0023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2017-0023
    View in Google Scholar
  89. Mikołajczak, P. (2021). What affects employment by NGOs? Counteraction to precarious employment in the Polish non-profit sector in the perspective of COVID-19 pandemic crises. Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(3), 761?788. doi: 10.24136/oc.2021.025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2021.025
    View in Google Scholar
  90. Minola, T., Criaco, G., & Obschonka, M. (2016). Age, culture, and self-employment motivation. Small Business Economics, 46(2), 187?213. doi: 10.10 07/s11187-015-9685-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9685-6
    View in Google Scholar
  91. Miller, M. B. (1995). Coefficient alpha: a basic introduction from the perspectives of classical test theory and structural equation modelling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(3), 255?273. doi: 10.1080/10705519 509540013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519509540013
    View in Google Scholar
  92. Miller, T. L., Wesley, C. L., & Williams, D. E. (2012). Educating the minds of caring hearts: comparing the views of practitioners and educators on the importance of social entrepreneurship competencies. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 349?370. doi: 10.5465/amle.2011.0017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0017
    View in Google Scholar
  93. Minniti, M. (2008). The role of government policy on entrepreneurial activity: productive, unproductive, or destructive? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5), 779?790. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00255.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00255.x
    View in Google Scholar
  94. Moores, K., & Mula, J. (2000). The salience of market, bureaucratic, and clan controls in the management of family firm transitions: some tentative Australian evidence. Family Business Review, 13(2), 91?106. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2000.00091.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2000.00091.x
    View in Google Scholar
  95. Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F., Schindehutte, M., & Spivack, A. J. (2012). Framing the entrepreneurial experience. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(1), 11?40. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00471.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00471.x
    View in Google Scholar
  96. Mura, L., (2020). Innovations and marketing management of family businesses: results of empirical study. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, 8(2), 56?66. doi: 10.37335/ijek.v8i2.118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37335/ijek.v8i2.118
    View in Google Scholar
  97. Mwatsika, C. (2021). Perceptions of entrepreneurship in Malawi: a country context understanding of entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, 9(2), 49?62. doi: 10.37335/ijek.v9i2.134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37335/ijek.v9i2.134
    View in Google Scholar
  98. Naldi, L., Cennamo, C., Corbetta, G., & Gomez?Mejia, L. (2013). Preserving socioemotional wealth in family firms: asset or liability? The moderating role of business context. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1341?1360. doi: 10.1111/etap.12069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12069
    View in Google Scholar
  99. Nawaser, K., Khaksar, S. M. S., Shakhsian, F., & Jahanshahi, A. A. (2011). Motivational and legal barriers of entrepreneurship development. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(11), 112. doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v6n11p 112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n11p112
    View in Google Scholar
  100. Nguyen, T. T. (2020). The impact of access to finance and environmental factors on entrepreneurial intention: the mediator role of entrepreneurial behavioural control. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(2), 127?140. doi: 10.15678/EBER.2020.080207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080207
    View in Google Scholar
  101. Nikodemska-Wołowik, A., Bednarz, J., Wach, D., Little, J., & Kubik, M. (2020). Building aware and unaware consumers? trust towards family business: evidence from Poland. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(3), 135?154. doi: 10.15678/EBER.2020.080308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080308
    View in Google Scholar
  102. Nordqvist, M., & Melin, L. (2010). Entrepreneurial families and family firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22(3-4), 211?239. doi: 10.1 080/08985621003726119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985621003726119
    View in Google Scholar
  103. Osorio, A. E., Settles, A., & Shen, T. (2017). Does family support matter? The influence of support factors on entrepreneurial attitudes and intentions of college students. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 23(1), 24?43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2017.10901abstract
    View in Google Scholar
  104. Oswald, S. L., Muse, L. A., & Rutherford, M. W. (2009). The influence of large stake family control on performance: Is it agency or entrenchment? Journal of Small Business Management, 47(1), 116?135. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2008 .00264.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2008.00264.x
    View in Google Scholar
  105. Ovaska, T., & Sobel, R. S. (2005). Entrepreneurship in post-socialist economies. Journal of Private Enterprise, 21(1), 8?28.
    View in Google Scholar
  106. Peng, M. W. (2000). Business strategies in transition economies. CA: Sage, Thousand Oaks. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231358
    View in Google Scholar
  107. Perenyi, A., Zolin, R., & Maritz, A. (2018). The perceptions of Australian senior entrepreneurs on the drivers of their entrepreneurial activity. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(1), 81?103. doi: 10.1108/ IJEBR-12-2016-0424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-12-2016-0424
    View in Google Scholar
  108. Puffer, S. M., McCarthy, D. J., & Boisot, M. (2010). Entrepreneurship in Russia and China: the impact of formal institutional voids. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 441?467. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00353.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00353.x
    View in Google Scholar
  109. Rutherford, M. W., Kuratko, D. F., & Holt, D. T. (2008). Examining the link between ?familiness? and performance: can the F?PEC untangle the family business theory jungle? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 1089?1109. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00275.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00275.x
    View in Google Scholar
  110. Sarasvathy, S. D. (2004). The questions we ask and the questions we care about: reformulating some problems in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(5), 707?717. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.09.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.09.006
    View in Google Scholar
  111. Scott, W. R. (2008). Approaching adulthood: the maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society, 37(5), 427. doi: 10.1007/s11186-008-9067-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-008-9067-z
    View in Google Scholar
  112. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217?226. doi: 10.5465/ amr.2000.2791611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611
    View in Google Scholar
  113. Shahverdi, M., Ismail, K., & Qureshi, M. (2018). The effect of perceived barriers on social entrepreneurship intention in Malaysian universities: the moderating role of education. Management Science Letters, 8(5), 341?352. doi: 10.5267/j. msl.2018.4.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2018.4.014
    View in Google Scholar
  114. Shinnar, R. S., Giacomin, O., & Janssen, F. (2012). Entrepreneurial perceptions and intentions: the role of gender and culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(3), 465?493. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00509.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00509.x
    View in Google Scholar
  115. Shinnar, R., Pruett, M., & Toney, B. (2009). Entrepreneurship education: attitudes across campus. Journal of Education for Business, 84(3), 151?159. doi: 10.320 0/JOEB.84.3.151-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.84.3.151-159
    View in Google Scholar
  116. Smith, S., Hamilton, M., & Fabian, K. (2020). Entrepreneurial drivers, barriers and enablers of computing students: gendered perspectives from an Australian and UK university. Studies in Higher Education, 45(9), 1892?1905. doi: 10.1080/0 3075079.2019.1637840. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1637840
    View in Google Scholar
  117. Songini, L. (2006). The professionalization of family firms: theory and practice. In P. Z. Poutziouris, K. X. Smyrnios & S. B. Klein (Eds.). Handbook of research on family business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 269?297.
    View in Google Scholar
  118. The Polish Agency for Enterprise Development (2015). Raport o stanie sektora MSP w latach 2013?2014. Warsaw.
    View in Google Scholar
  119. Thornton, P. H., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Urbano, D. (2011). Socio-cultural factors and entrepreneurial activity: an overview. International Small Business Journal, 29(2), 105?118. doi: 10.1177/0266242610391930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242610391930
    View in Google Scholar
  120. Tagiuri, R., & Davis, J. (1996). Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9(2), 199?208. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1996.00199.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1996.00199.x
    View in Google Scholar
  121. Virglerova, Z., Ivanova, E., Dvorsky, J., Belas, J., & Krulický, T. (2021). Selected factors of internationalisation and their impact on the SME perception of the market risk. Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(4), 1011?1032. doi: 10.24136/oc.202 1.033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2021.033
    View in Google Scholar
  122. Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385?417. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005
    View in Google Scholar
  123. Voithofer, P., & Mandl, I. (2004). Transfer and succession in Austrian family firms. Vienna: KMU Forschung Austria, Austrian Institute for SME Research.
    View in Google Scholar
  124. Wach, K. (2014). Familiness and born globals: rapid internationalisation among Polish family firms. Journal of Intercultural Management, 6(3), 177?186. doi: 10.2478/joim-2014-0028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2014-0028
    View in Google Scholar
  125. Webb, J. W., Ketchen Jr, D. J., & Ireland, R. D. (2010). Strategic entrepreneurship within family-controlled firms: opportunities and challenges. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(2), 67?77. doi: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2010.04.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2010.04.002
    View in Google Scholar
  126. Węcławski, J., & Pernsteiner, H. (2019). Why family firms in Poland choose to diversify their banking relationships. Argumenta Oeconomica, 2(43), 67?83. doi: 10.15611/aoe.2019.2.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15611/aoe.2019.2.03
    View in Google Scholar
  127. Węcławski, J., & Żukowska, B. (2019). Refreshing typologies based on family firms? goals: the perspective of ?first-generation enterprises?. Central European Management Journal, 27(3), 128?146. doi: 10.7206/cemj.2658-084 5.6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.6
    View in Google Scholar
  128. Whisler, T. L. (1988). The role of the board in the threshold firm. Family Business Review, 1(3), 309?321. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00309.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00309.x
    View in Google Scholar
  129. Williams, R. I. Jr, (2015). Measuring family business performance: a holistic, idiosyncratic approach. Kennesaw State University. Doctor of Business Administration Dissertations. Working paper, 13.
    View in Google Scholar
  130. Zahra, S. A., Hayton, J. C., & Salvato, C. (2004). Entrepreneurship in family vs. non?family firms: a resource?based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 363?381. doi: 10.1111/j.15 40-6520.2004.00051.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00051.x
    View in Google Scholar
  131. Zachary, R. K. (2011). The importance of the family system in family business. Journal of Family Business Management, 1(1), 26?36. doi: 10.1108/204362311 11122263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/20436231111122263
    View in Google Scholar
  132. Zajkowski, R., & Domańska, A. (2019). Differences in perception of regional pro-entrepreneurial policy: does obtaining support change a prospect? Oeconomia Copernicana, 10(2), 359?384. doi: 10.24136/oc.2019.018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2019.018
    View in Google Scholar
  133. Zajkowski, R., & Żukowska, B. (2020). Family Businesses during the COVID-19 crisis?evidence from Poland. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio H?Oeconomia, 54(3), 101?116. doi: 10.17951/h.2020.54.3.101-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/h.2020.54.3.101-116
    View in Google Scholar
  134. Zellweger, T. M., & Astrachan, J. H. (2008). On the emotional value of owning a firm. Family Business Review, 21(4), 347?363. doi: 10.1177/0894486508021 0040106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865080210040106
    View in Google Scholar
  135. Zellweger, T. M., Kellermanns, F. W., Eddleston, K. A., & Memili, E. (2012). Building a family firm image: how family firms capitalize on their family ties. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3(4), 239?250. doi: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.1 0.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.10.001
    View in Google Scholar
  136. Zhang, J., & Ma, H. (2009). Adoption of professional management in Chinese family business: a multilevel analysis of impetuses and impediments. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(1), 119?139. doi: 10.1007/s10490-008-9099-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9099-y
    View in Google Scholar

Similar Articles

81-90 of 169

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.