Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Catering to investor sentiment for dividends: contestability or collusion of the largest shareholders?

Abstract

Research background: Dividend payouts have been the subject of scientific research for many years. Although many studies focus on the impact of ownership on dividend payouts, there is still a lack of research on the influence of the contestability and collusion of the largest shareholders on the catering effect of dividends. This research gap motivated us to investigate this issue and determine whether the interactions between large shareholders have an impact on aligning dividends with investor sentiment.

Purpose of the article: The article assesses the impact of the relationship between the largest shareholders (i.e., contestability or collusion) on the adjustment of dividend payouts to investor sentiment. The following research hypothesis has been formulated: If there is contestability between the first and second-largest shareholders, the strength of the catering effect of the dividend is greater than in the case of collusion, both in the years of positive and negative dividend premiums.

Methods: The main research method is a panel regression model (pooled OLS and fixed effects). We use the F test, the Breusch-Pagan test, and the Hausman test. Our research is supplemented with descriptive statistics and the Pearson correlation coefficient. The research sample consists of Polish companies from the electromechanical industry sector listed on the main market of the Warsaw Stock Exchange (WSE) in the years 2009?2020.

Findings & value added: The main findings are as follows: a) if a dividend premium is positive and the second-largest shareholder holds many shares, the strong catering effect of dividends is observed; b) there are only two years of negative premium, which does not allow to conclude that both the catering effect and the impact of interactions between the largest shareholders on dividend payouts do not exist when dividend premium is negative. We propose pioneering research concerning the catering effect in the context of interactions between the largest shareholders. Its long-term theoretical value added is the original and interdisciplinary research combining financial, behavioral and governance aspects. Our research results may be of particular interest to foreign investors looking for new opportunities to invest their capital abroad, also in Poland.

Keywords

dividend payout, the catering effect of dividends, contestability & collusion of the largest shareholders, investor sentiment for dividends

PDF

References

  1. Agrawal, A. (2021). Impact of elimination of dividend distribution tax on Indian corporate firms amid Covid disruptions. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(9), 1?38. doi: 10.3390/jrfm14090413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14090413
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Aluchna, M., Berent, T., & Kamiński, B. (2019). Dividend payouts and sharehold-er structure: evidence from the Warsaw Stock Exchange. Eastern European Economics, 57(3), 227?250. doi: 10.1080/00128775.2019.1568196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2019.1568196
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Anidjar, L. H. (2019). Toward relative corporate governance regimes: rethinking concentrated ownership structure around the world. Stanford Law & Policy Review, 30(1), 197?261. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3153995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3153995
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Armour, J., Cheffins, B. R., & Skeel, D. A. (2003). Corporate ownership structure and the evolution of bankruptcy law: lessons from the United Kingdom. Vanderbilt Law Review, 55(6), 1699?1785.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Baker, H. K., Dewasiri, N. J., Koralalage, W., & Azeez, A. A. (2019). Dividend policy determinants of Sri Lankan firms: a triangulation approach. Manageri-al Finance, 45(1), 2?20. doi: 10.1108/MF-03-2018-0096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-03-2018-0096
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Baker, H. K., & Jabbouri, I. (2017). How Moroccan institutional investors view dividend policy. Managerial Finance, 43(12), 1332?1347. doi: 10.1108/MF-06-2017-0215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-06-2017-0215
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Baker, H. K., Kapoor, S., & Jabbouri, I. (2018). Institutional perspectives of divi-dend policy in India. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 10(3), 324?342. doi: 10.1108/QRFM-07-2017-0067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-07-2017-0067
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2004). A catering theory of dividends. Journal of Finance, 59, 1125?1165. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00658.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00658.x
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Becht, M., & Delong, J. B. (2005). Why has there been so little block holding in America? In R. Morck (Eds.). A history of corporate governance around the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 613?666.
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Ben-Nasr, H., Boubaker, S., & Rouatbi, W. (2015). Ownership structure, control contestability, and corporate debt maturity. Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, 265?285. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.001
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Bilel, H. (2020). Does entrenchment of managers affect entrepreneurial dividend decision and investor sentiment? Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 40(3), 275?288. doi: 10.1108/APJIE-10-2019-0072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-10-2019-0072
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Bloch, F., & Hege, U. (2003). Multiple shareholders and control contests. SSRN Electronic Journal, 29, 1?34. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2273211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2273211
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Boubaker, S., Manita, R., & Rouatbi, W. (2021). Large shareholders, control con-testability and firm productive efficiency. Annals of Operations Research, 296, 591?614. doi: 10.1007/s10479-019-03402-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03402-z
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Bradford, W., Chen, C., & Zhu, S. (2013). Cash dividend policy, corporate pyra-mids, and ownership structure: evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 27, 445?464. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2013.01.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2013.01.003
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Byun, J., Kim, K., Liao, R. C., & Pan, C. (2021). The impact of investor sentiment on catering incentives around the world. Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions & Money, 71, 1?15. doi: 10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101285
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Cao, F, Pengb, S., & Ye, K. (2019). Multiple large shareholders and corporate social responsibility reporting. Emerging Markets Review, 38, 287?309. doi: 10.1016/j.ememar.2019.02.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2019.02.004
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Cheng, M., Lin, B., Lu, R., & We, M. (2020). Non-controlling large shareholders in emerging markets: evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 63(C), 1?22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.09.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.09.010
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Eije, H., & Megginson, W. E. (2008). Dividends and share repurchases in the European Union. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(2), 347?374. doi: 10.1016/j. jfineco.2007.11.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.11.002
    View in Google Scholar
  19. ElBannan, M. A. (2020). Does catering behavior persist? Evidence on dividend sentiment in emerging financial markets. International Review of Economics and Finance, 69, 350?373. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2020.06.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.06.016
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Ferris, S. P., Sen, N., & Unlu E. (2009). An international analysis of dividend payment behavior. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 36(3), 496?522. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02126.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02126.x
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Florackis, C., Kanas, A., & Kostakis, A. (2015). Dividend policy, managerial ownership and debt financing: a non-parametric perspective. European Jour-nal of Operational Research, 241(3), 783?795. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.08.031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.08.031
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Fooladi, M. (2012). Board characteristics and firm performance. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 8(5), 688?694.
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Gugler, K., & Yurtoglu, B. B. (2003). Corporate governance and dividend pay-out policy in Germany. European Economic Review, 47(4), 731?758. doi: 10.1016/ S0014-2921(02)00291-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00291-X
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Gyimah, D., & Gyapong, E. (2021). Managerial entrenchment and payout policy: a catering effect. International Review of Financial Analysis, 73, 1?18. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101600
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Harada, K., & Nguyen, P. (2011). Ownership concentration and dividend policy in Japan. Managerial Finance, 37(4), 362?379. doi:10.1108/03074351111115313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03074351111115313
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of panel data. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge Uni-versity Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754203
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Jara, M., López-Iturriaga, F., San-Martín, P., & Saona, P. (2019). Corporate gov-ernance in Latin American firms: contestability of control and firm value. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 22(4), 257?274. doi: 10.1016/j.brq.2018.10.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2018.10.005
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305?360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Jensen, G. R., Solberg, D. P., & Zorn, T. S. (1992). Simultaneous determination of insider ownership, debt and dividend policies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27(2), 247?263. doi: 10.2307/2331370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2331370
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Jentsch, V. (2019). Board composition, ownership structure and firm value: em-pirical evidence from Switzerland. European Business Organization Law Re-view, 20(2), 203?254. doi: 10.1007/s40804-018-00128-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-018-00128-6
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Jiang, F, Cai, X., Jiang, Z., & Nofsinger, J. R. (2019). Multiple large shareholders and dividends: evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 57, 1?19. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.101201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.101201
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Jiang, Z., Kim, K. A., Lie, E., & Yang, S. (2013). Share repurchases, catering, and dividend substitution. Journal of Corporate Finance, 21, 36?50. doi: 10.1016/ j.jcorpfin.2013.01.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.01.004
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Khalfan, T. M., & Wendt, S. (2020). The impact of ownership concentration on payout across Nordic firms. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 56, 1?18. doi: 10.1016/j.mulfin.2020.100640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2020.100640
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Kim, W. S., Kiymaz, H., & Oh, S. (2020). Do country-level legal, corporate gov-ernance, and cultural characteristics influence the relationship between insider ownership and dividend policy? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 64, 1?16. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101457
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Kowerski, M. (2010). The impact of economic sentiment of entrepreneurs and consumers on dividend decisions of capital companies. Regional Barometer, 2(20), 19?34.
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Kraiger, N., & Anderson, W. (2019). Characteristics of New Zealand dividend omissions and resumptions. Managerial Finance, 46(1), 40?55. doi: 10.1108/ MF-01-2019-0039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-01-2019-0039
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Leary, M. T., & Michaely, R. (2011). Determinants of dividend smoothing: em-pirical evidence. Review of Financial Studies, 24(10), 3197?3249. doi: 10.1093/ rfs/hhr072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhr072
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Li, W., & Lie, E. (2006). Dividend changes and catering incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 293?308. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.03.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.03.005
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Lin, S. H., Lai, H. H., & Hsu, A .C. (2018). How does asymmetric information affect catering behavior? Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(11), 2433?2454. doi: 10.1080/1540496X.2018.1458611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1458611
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Lintner, J. (1956). Distribution of income of corporation among dividends, re-tained earnings, and taxes. American Economic Review, 46, 97?113.
    View in Google Scholar
  41. López-Iturriaga, F. J., & Santana-Martín, D. J. (2015). Do shareholder coalitions modify the dominant owner?s control? The impact on dividend policy. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(6), 519?533. doi: 10.1111 /corg.12126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12126
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Maury, B., & Pajuste, A. (2004). Multiple controlling shareholders and firm val-ue. Journal of Banking and Finance, 29, 1813?1834. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004 .07.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.07.002
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Michaely, R., Thaler, R. H., & Womack, K. L. (1995). Price reactions to dividend initiations and omissions: overreaction or drift? Journal of Finance, 50(2), 573?608. doi: 10.2307/2329420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb04796.x
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Moscu, R., Grigorescu, C., &. Prodan, L. (2015). Does ownership structure affect firm performance? Knowledge Horizons ? Economics, 7(3), 194?197.
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Neves, E. (2014). Ownership structure and investor?s sentiments for dividends. International Journal of Financial Research, 5(2), 35?58. doi: 10.5430/ijfr.v 5n2p35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v5n2p35
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Pieloch-Babiarz, A. (2020). Managerial ownership and catering to investor senti-ment for dividends: evidence from the electromechanical industry sector on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. Oeconomia Copernicana, 11(3), 467?483. doi: 10.24 136/oc.2020.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2020.019
    View in Google Scholar
  47. Ramli, N. M. (2009). Large shareholders, payout policy and agency problems in Malaysian companies. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 11(3), 97?112.
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Renneboog, L., & Szilagyi, P. G. (2020). How relevant is dividend policy under low shareholder protection? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 64, 1?18. doi: 10.1016/j.intfin.2015.01.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2015.01.006
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Rossi, F., Boylan, R., & Cebula, J. R. (2018). Financial decisions and ownership structure as control mechanisms of agency problems: evidence from Italy. Corporate Governance, 18(3), 531?563. doi: 10.1108/CG-01-2017-0014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2017-0014
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Safii, A. A., & Asyik, N. F. (2019). The role of blockholders on dividends policy of Indonesian public listed companies. In Proceeding book 7th Asian Academ-ic Society international conference. Indonesian Student Association in Thai-land (PERMITHA), 454-458.
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Takmaz, S., Mandaci, P., E., & Durukan, M. B. (2021). The impact of catering incentives on the dividend policy: evidence from Turkish firms. Managerial Finance, 47(7), 897?914. doi: 10.1108/MF-04-2020-0215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-04-2020-0215
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Trabelsi, D., Aziz, S., & Lilti, J. J. (2019). A behavioral perspective on corporate dividend policy: evidence from France. Corporate Governance-The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(1), 102?119. doi: 10.1108/CG-02-2018-0077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2018-0077
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Truong, T., & Heaney, R. (2007). Largest shareholder and dividend policy around the world. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 47(5), 667?687. doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2007.09.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2007.09.002
    View in Google Scholar
  54. Tsuji, C. (2010). A test of the catering theory of dividends: the case of the Japa-nese electric appliances industry. Journal of Management Research, 2(2), 1?16. doi: 10.5296/jmr.v2i2.371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v2i2.371
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Wrońska-Bukalska, E., & Kaźmierska-Jóźwiak, B. (2017). Signaling hypotheses of share repurchase ? life cycle approach. The case of Polish listed companies. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 12(2), 245?257. doi: 10.24136/eq.v12i2.13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.v12i2.13
    View in Google Scholar

Similar Articles

91-100 of 116

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.