The impact of bequest taxation on savings and transfers

Abstract

Research background: The paper investigates the impact of bequest taxation on saving and transfers when parents and children make decisions consistently. It complements the predictions of Gale and Perozek's life-cycle modeling (2001) when decisions of parents and children are set independently and can be time-inconsistent.

Purpose of the article: The paper strives to answer the question of whether taxation of bequest harms savings and inter vivos transfers. The previous results indicated that this is possible for some bequest motives. Our results show that this is not likely for the most typical values of parameters.

Methods: The analysis involves economic modeling of four bequest motives: altruistic, paternalistic, accidental, and exchange. The method is based on the overlapping generation approach and life-cycle approach in the case of a paternalistic bequest. The results are supplemented with numerical simulations.

Findings & value added: For the altruistic motive, savings are smaller if interest rates are low relative to the tax rate and the utility of one's consumption is more valuable than the utility of the next generations. For the accidental motive, savings decrease with small interest rates, high taxation and long-life expectancy. For the paternalistic motive, savings decrease when the interest rate and the value of future utility are low. For the exchange motive, savings are higher after a tax increase, but it depends on the value of attention and life expectancy. The general conclusion is that higher bequest taxation hamper saving behavior and may disturb the intergenerational exchange process. The bequest tax should, therefore, be set low, especially for aging populations, in order to induce higher savings and force the young to provide the elderly with higher attention.

Keywords

saving, inheritance tax, bequest, overlapping generation, life cycle

References

1. Abel, A. B. (1985). Precautionary saving and accidental bequests. The American Economic Review 75(4), 777-791.
   View in Google Scholar
2. Abraham, M., Lorek, K. Richter, F. & Wrede, M. (2018). Breaking the norms: when is evading inheritance taxes socially acceptable? European Journal of Political Economy 52, 85-102. doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.05.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.05.003
   View in Google Scholar
3. Altonji, J. G., Hayashi, F. & Kotlikoff, L. J. (1992). Is the extended family altruisti-cally linked? Direct tests using microdata. American Economic Review 105(6), 1121-1166.
   View in Google Scholar
4. Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving? Economic Journal 100(401), 464-477. doi.org/10.2307/2234133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2234133
   View in Google Scholar
5. Bastani, S. & Waldenström, D. (2020). Perceptions of inherited wealth and the support for inheritance taxation. Economica 88(350), 532-569. doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12359
   View in Google Scholar
6. Becker, G. S. (1974). A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy 82(6), 1063 93. doi.org/10.1086/260265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260265
   View in Google Scholar
7. Becker, G. S. & Tomes, N. (1979). An equilibrium theory of the distribution of income and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Political Economy 87(6), 1153-89. doi.org/10.1086/260831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260831
   View in Google Scholar
8. Bernheim, B. D., Shleifer, A. & Summers, L. H. (1985). The strategic bequest mo-tive. Journal of Political Economy 93(6), 1045-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261351
   View in Google Scholar
9. Bernheim, B. D. (1989). Intergenerational altruism, dynastic equilibria and social welfare. Review of Economic Studies 56(1), 119-128. doi.org/10.2307/2297753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297753
   View in Google Scholar
10. Bevan, D. L. & Stiglitz, J. E. (1979). Intergenerational transfers and inequality. Greek Economic Review 1(1), 8-26.
    View in Google Scholar
11. Boadway, R. & Cuff, K. (2015). Tax treatment of bequests when donor benefits are discounted. International Tax and Public Finance 22, 604?634. doi.org/10.1007/s10797-015-9366-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-015-9366-z
    View in Google Scholar
12. Bricker, J., Dettling. L. J., Henriques, A., Hsu, J. W., Jacobs, L., Moore, K. B., Pack, S., Sabelhaus, J., Thompson, J. & Windle, R. A. (2017). Changes in U.S. family finances from 2013 to 2016: evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances. Federal Reserve Bulletin 103(3), 1-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17016/bulletin.2017.103-3
    View in Google Scholar
13. Casamatta, G. (2022). On the desirability of taxing bequests. Journal of Econom-ics (2022). doi.org/10.1007/s00712-022-00809-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-022-00809-4
    View in Google Scholar
14. Causa, O. & Hermansen, M. (2019). Income redistribution through taxes and transfers across OECD countries. Economic department working papers No. 1453, p. 14 Retrieved from www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=ECO/WKP(2017)85&docLanguage=En. (13.01.2023).
    View in Google Scholar
15. Cox, D. (1987). Motives for private income transfers. Journal of Political Econo-my 95(3), 508 46. doi.org/10.1086/261470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261470
    View in Google Scholar
16. Cremer, H. & Pestieau, P. (2011). The tax treatment of intergenerational wealth transfers. CESifo Economic Studies 57(2), 365-401. doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifr014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifr014
    View in Google Scholar
17. Davies, J. B. (1981). Uncertain lifetime, consumption, and dissaving in retirement. Journal of Political Economy 89(3), 561-77. doi.org/10.1086/260986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260986
    View in Google Scholar
18. Davies, J. B. & Shorrocks, A. F. (2000). The distribution of wealth, In Atkinson A. B. and Bourguignon F. (Eds). Handbook of Income Distribution, vol. 1, Oxford: Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0056(00)80014-7
    View in Google Scholar
19. Drometer, M., Frank, M., Pérez, M. F., Rhode, C., Schworm, S. & Stitteneder, T. (2018). Wealth and inheritance taxation: An overview and country comparison. Ifo DICE Report 16(02), 45-54.
    View in Google Scholar
20. Ferrara, I. & Missios, P. (2020). Trust, ability?to?pay, and charitable giving. Journal of Public Economic Theory 22(3), 583-629. doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12393
    View in Google Scholar
21. Gale, W. G., Perozek, M. G. (2001). Do estate taxes reduce saving? In W. G. Gale J. R. Hines & J. Slemrod (Eds.) Rethinking estate and gift taxation (pp. 216-257). Brookings Institution Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.251722
    View in Google Scholar
22. Glazer, A., Kanniainen, V. & Niskanen, E. (2003). Bequests, control rights, and cost?benefit analysis. European Journal of Political Economy 19, 71-82. doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00130-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00130-1
    View in Google Scholar
23. Glomm, G. & Ravikumar, B. (1992). Public versus private investment in human capital: Endogenous growth and income inequality. Journal of Political Economy 100(4), 818-834. doi.org/10.1086/261841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261841
    View in Google Scholar
24. Gross, C., Lorek, K. & Richter, F. (2017). Attitudes towards inheritance taxation?results from a survey experiment. Journal of Economic Inequality 15(1), 93-112. doi.org/10.1007/s10888-016-9344-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-016-9344-4
    View in Google Scholar
25. Hines, J. R., Potrafke, N., Riem, M. & Shinke, C. (2019) Inter vivos transfers of ownership in family firms. International Tax and Public Finance 26, 225?256 doi.org/10.1007/s10797-018-9508-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-018-9508-1
    View in Google Scholar
26. Hurd, M. D. (1987). Savings of the elderly and desired bequests. The American Economic Review 77(3), 298-312.
    View in Google Scholar
27. Hurd, M. D. (1989). Mortality risk and bequests. Econometrica 57(4), 779-813. doi.org/10.2307/1913772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1913772
    View in Google Scholar
28. Klevmarken, N. A. (2004). On the wealth dynamics of Swedish families, 1984?98. The Review of Income and Wealth 50(4), 469-491. doi.org/10.1111/j.0034-6586.2004.00136.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0034-6586.2004.00136.x
    View in Google Scholar
29. Kopczuk, W. (2009). Economics of estate taxation: A brief review of theory and evidence. Tax Law Review 63(1), 139-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w15741
    View in Google Scholar
30. Kopczuk, W. (2013). Taxation of intergenerational transfers and wealth. In: Auer-bach A. J., Chetty, R. & Saez, E. (Eds.) Handbook of Public Economics 5, (pp. 329-390), Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53759-1.00006-6
    View in Google Scholar
31. Kotlikoff, L. J. & Spivak, A. (1981). The family as an incomplete annuities mar-ket. Journal of Political Economy 89(2), 372-391. doi.org/10.1086/260970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260970
    View in Google Scholar
32. Leroux, M. L. & Pestieau, P. (2022). Age-related taxation of bequests in the pres-ence of a dependency risk. Journal of Public Economic Theory 24(1), 92-119. doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12539
    View in Google Scholar
33. Niimi, Y. (2019). The effect of the recent inheritance tax reform on bequest behav-iour in Japan. Fiscal Studies 40(1), 45-70. doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12181
    View in Google Scholar
34. Nordblom, K. & Ohlsson, H. (2006). Tax avoidance and intra-family transfers. Journal of Public Economics 90(8-9), 1669-80. doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.10.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.10.005
    View in Google Scholar
35. Piketty, T. (2011). On the long-run evolution of inheritance: France 1820-2050. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(3), 1071-1131. doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr020
    View in Google Scholar
36. Piketty, T. & Saez, E. (2013) A theory of optimal inheritance taxation, Economet-rica 81(5), 1851-1886. doi.org/10.3982/ECTA10712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA10712
    View in Google Scholar
37. Saez, E. & Zucman, G. (2016). Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: evidence from capitalized income tax data. Quarterly Journal of Economics 131(2), 519-578. doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw004
    View in Google Scholar
38. Takaaki, A., Nishimura, K. & Makoto, Y. (2019). Two-sided altruism and time inconsistency. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics 23(4), 1-10 doi.org/10.1515/snde-2019-0022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2019-0022
    View in Google Scholar
39. Tsoutsoura, M. (2015). The effect of succession taxes on family firm investment: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Finance 70, 649?688. doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12224
    View in Google Scholar
40. Uchida, Y. & Ono, T. (2021). Political economy of taxation, debt ceilings, and growth. European Journal of Political Economy 68. doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101996
    View in Google Scholar
41. Yaari, M. E. (1965). Uncertain lifetime, life insurance, and the theory of the con-sumer. Review of Economic Studies 32(2), 137-150. doi.org/10.2307/2296058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2296058
    View in Google Scholar