The impact of bequest taxation on savings and transfers

Abstract

Research background: The paper investigates the impact of bequest taxation on saving and transfers when parents and children make decisions consistently. It complements the predictions of Gale and Perozek's life-cycle modeling (2001) when decisions of parents and children are set independently and can be time-inconsistent.

Purpose of the article: The paper strives to answer the question of whether taxation of bequest harms savings and inter vivos transfers. The previous results indicated that this is possible for some bequest motives. Our results show that this is not likely for the most typical values of parameters.

Methods: The analysis involves economic modeling of four bequest motives: altruistic, paternalistic, accidental, and exchange. The method is based on the overlapping generation approach and life-cycle approach in the case of a paternalistic bequest. The results are supplemented with numerical simulations.

Findings & value added: For the altruistic motive, savings are smaller if interest rates are low relative to the tax rate and the utility of one's consumption is more valuable than the utility of the next generations. For the accidental motive, savings decrease with small interest rates, high taxation and long-life expectancy. For the paternalistic motive, savings decrease when the interest rate and the value of future utility are low. For the exchange motive, savings are higher after a tax increase, but it depends on the value of attention and life expectancy. The general conclusion is that higher bequest taxation hamper saving behavior and may disturb the intergenerational exchange process. The bequest tax should, therefore, be set low, especially for aging populations, in order to induce higher savings and force the young to provide the elderly with higher attention.

Keywords

saving, inheritance tax, bequest, overlapping generation, life cycle

References

1. Abel, A. B. (1985). Precautionary saving and accidental bequests. American Economic Review, 75(4), 777–791.
   View in Google Scholar
2. Abraham, M., Lorek, K. Richter, F., & Wrede, M. (2018). Breaking the norms: When is evading inheritance taxes socially acceptable? European Journal of Political Economy, 52, 85–102. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.05.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.05.003
   View in Google Scholar
3. Altonji, J. G., Hayashi, F., & Kotlikoff, L. J. (1992). Is the extended family altruisti-cally linked? Direct tests using micro data. American Economic Review, 82(5), 1177–1198.
   View in Google Scholar
4. Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving? Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477. doi: 10.2307/2234133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2234133
   View in Google Scholar
5. Bastani, S., & Waldenström, D. (2021). Perceptions of inherited wealth and the support for inheritance taxation. Economica, 88(350), 532–569. doi: 10.1111/ecca. 12359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12359
   View in Google Scholar
6. Becker, G. S. (1974). A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1063–1093. doi: 10.1086/260265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260265
   View in Google Scholar
7. Becker, G. S., & Tomes, N. (1979). An equilibrium theory of the distribution of income and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Political Economy, 87(6), 1153–89. doi: 10.1086/260831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260831
   View in Google Scholar
8. Bernheim, B. D., Shleifer, A., & Summers, L. H. (1985). The strategic bequest mo-tive. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1045–1076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261351
   View in Google Scholar
9. Bernheim, B. D. (1989). Intergenerational altruism, dynastic equilibria and social welfare. Review of Economic Studies, 56(1), 119–128. doi: 10.2307/2297753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297753
   View in Google Scholar
10. Bevan, D. L., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1979). Intergenerational transfers and inequality. Greek Economic Review, 1(1), 8–26.
    View in Google Scholar
11. Boadway, R., & Cuff, K. (2015). Tax treatment of bequests when donor benefits are discounted. International Tax and Public Finance, 22, 604–634. doi: 10.1007/s10797-015-9366-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-015-9366-z
    View in Google Scholar
12. Bricker, J., Dettling. L. J., Henriques, A., Hsu, J. W., Jacobs, L., Moore, K. B., Pack, S., Sabelhaus, J., Thompson, J., & Windle, R. A. (2017). Changes in U.S. family finances from 2013 to 2016: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances. Federal Reserve Bulletin, 103(3), 1–42. doi: 10.17016/bulletin.2017.103-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17016/bulletin.2017.103-3
    View in Google Scholar
13. Casamatta, G. (2023). On the desirability of taxing bequests. Journal of Economics, 138, 195–219. doi: 10.1007/s00712-022-00809-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-022-00809-4
    View in Google Scholar
14. Causa, O., & Hermansen, M. (2019). Income redistribution through taxes and trans-fers across OECD countries. Economic Department Working Papers, 1453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1049-258520200000028002
    View in Google Scholar
15. Cox, D. (1987). Motives for private income transfers. Journal of Political Economy, 95(3), 508–546. doi: 10.1086/261470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261470
    View in Google Scholar
16. Cremer, H., & Pestieau, P. (2011). The tax treatment of intergenerational wealth transfers. CESifo Economic Studies, 57(2), 365–401. doi: 10.1093/cesifo/ifr014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifr014
    View in Google Scholar
17. Davies, J. B. (1981). Uncertain lifetime, consumption, and dissaving in retirement. Journal of Political Economy, 89(3), 561–77. doi: 10.1086/260986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260986
    View in Google Scholar
18. Davies, J. B., & Shorrocks, A. F. (2000). The distribution of wealth. In A. B. Atkin-son & F. Bourguignon (Eds). Handbook of income distribution, vol. 1 (pp. 605–675). Oxford: Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0056(00)80014-7
    View in Google Scholar
19. Drometer, M., Frank, M., Pérez, M. F., Rhode, C., Schworm, S., & Stitteneder, T. (2018). Wealth and inheritance taxation: An overview and country comparison. Ifo DICE Report, 16(02), 45–54.
    View in Google Scholar
20. Ferrara, I., & Missios, P. (2020). Trust, ability‐to‐pay, and charitable giving. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 22(3), 583–629. doi: 10.1111/jpet.12393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12393
    View in Google Scholar
21. Gale, W. G., & Perozek, M. G. (2001). Do estate taxes reduce saving? In W. G. Gale, J. R. Hines & J. Slemrod (Eds.). Rethinking estate and gift taxation (pp. 216–257). Washington: Brookings Institution Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.251722
    View in Google Scholar
22. Glazer, A., Kanniainen, V., & Niskanen, E. (2003). Bequests, control rights, and cost–benefit analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 71–82. doi: 10.1016 /S0176-2680(02)00130-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00130-1
    View in Google Scholar
23. Glogowsky, U. (2021). Behavioral responses to inheritance and gift taxation: Evi-dence from Germany. Journal of Public Economics, 193, 104309. doi: 10.1016/ j.jpubeco.2020.104309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104309
    View in Google Scholar
24. Glomm, G., & Ravikumar, B. (1992). Public versus private investment in human capital: Endogenous growth and income inequality. Journal of Political Economy, 100(4), 818–834. doi: 10.1086/261841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261841
    View in Google Scholar
25. Gross, C., Lorek, K., & Richter, F. (2017). Attitudes towards inheritance taxation–results from a survey experiment. Journal of Economic Inequality, 15(1), 93–112. doi: 10.1007/s10888-016-9344-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-016-9344-4
    View in Google Scholar
26. Hines, J. R., Potrafke, N., Riem, M., & Shinke, C. (2019). Inter vivos transfers of ownership in family firms. International Tax and Public Finance, 26, 225–256 doi: 10.1007/s10797-018-9508-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-018-9508-1
    View in Google Scholar
27. Hurd, M. D. (1987). Savings of the elderly and desired bequests. American Economic Review, 77(3), 298–312.
    View in Google Scholar
28. Hurd, M. D. (1989). Mortality risk and bequests. Econometrica, 57(4), 779–813. doi: 10.2307/1913772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1913772
    View in Google Scholar
29. Klevmarken, N. A. (2004). On the wealth dynamics of Swedish families, 1984–98. Review of Income and Wealth, 50(4), 469–491. doi: 10.1111/j.0034-6586.2004.00136.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0034-6586.2004.00136.x
    View in Google Scholar
30. Kopczuk, W. (2009). Economics of estate taxation: A brief review of theory and evidence. Tax Law Review, 63(1), 139–157. doi: 10.3386/w15741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w15741
    View in Google Scholar
31. Kopczuk, W. (2013). Taxation of intergenerational transfers and wealth. In A. J. Auerbach, R. Chetty & E. Saez (Eds.). Handbook of public economics 5 (pp. 329–390). Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53759-1.00006-6
    View in Google Scholar
32. Kotlikoff, L. J., & Spivak, A. (1981). The family as an incomplete annuities market. Journal of Political Economy, 89(2), 372–391. doi: 10.1086/260970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260970
    View in Google Scholar
33. Leroux, M. L., & Pestieau, P. (2022). Age-related taxation of bequests in the pres-ence of a dependency risk. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 24(1), 92–119. doi: 10.11 11/jpet.12539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12539
    View in Google Scholar
34. Niimi, Y. (2019). The effect of the recent inheritance tax reform on bequest behav-iour in Japan. Fiscal Studies, 40(1), 45–70. doi: 10.1111/1475-5890.12181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12181
    View in Google Scholar
35. Nordblom, K., & Ohlsson, H. (2006). Tax avoidance and intra-family transfers. Journal of Public Economics, 90(8-9), 1669–1680. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.10.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.10.005
    View in Google Scholar
36. Piketty, T. (2011). On the long-run evolution of inheritance: France 1820-2050. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(3), 1071–1131. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjr020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr020
    View in Google Scholar
37. Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2013). A theory of optimal inheritance taxation. Econometri-ca, 81(5), 1851–1886. doi: 10.3982/ECTA10712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA10712
    View in Google Scholar
38. Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2016). Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from capitalized income tax data. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(2), 519–578. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjw004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw004
    View in Google Scholar
39. Spiteri, J., & von Brockdorff, P. (2022). Household wealth and inheritance transfers: Evidence from the Euro Area. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s10834-022-09861-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-022-09861-0
    View in Google Scholar
40. Takaaki, A., Nishimura, K., & Makoto, Y. (2019). Two-sided altruism and time inconsistency. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 23(4), 1–10. doi: 10.1515/snde-2019-0022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2019-0022
    View in Google Scholar
41. Tsoutsoura, M. (2015). The effect of succession taxes on family firm investment: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Finance, 70, 649–688. doi: 10.1111/jofi.12224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12224
    View in Google Scholar
42. Uchida, Y., & Ono, T. (2021). Political economy of taxation, debt ceilings, and growth. European Journal of Political Economy, 68, 101996. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco. 2020.101996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101996
    View in Google Scholar
43. Yaari, M. E. (1965). Uncertain lifetime, life insurance, and the theory of the con-sumer. Review of Economic Studies, 32(2), 137–150. doi: 10.2307/2296058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2296058
    View in Google Scholar