Structural change and economic growth: Causality relationships in the case of Poland
Abstract
Research background: Structural change and economic growth characterise any process of economic development and have relevant research background. However, the research on identification of a character of relationships between the phenomena are not conclusive. Researchers either find that economic growth induces structural change and the process is demand-driven or that structural change determines economic growth and the dependencies are supply-driven or that the relation is two-directional with overlapping interdependencies. Moreover, the association may be shaped differently depending on specific development conditions of each economy and transform over time.
Purpose of the article: The aim of the study is to investigate the relationships between economic growth and structural change in the sectional composition of employment in Poland using state-level quarterly data for 2008–2022. It empirically verifies whether economic growth determines structural change or changes in economic structure influence growth in this specific national context, giving insights into a character of the developmental interdependencies. However, the Polish case is only an example of developmental feedbacks that may specify any catching-up economy. Diagnosing the dominating character of the economic relation is of high importance for any modern transforming country and identifying any limitations to the interdependencies may make it possible to avoid the middle-income trap.
Methods: The paper examines the causality using Granger-test and analyses the relationships with VAR models. It uses some alternative measures of structural change, namely Norm of Absolute Value (NAV), Modified Lilien Index (MLI), and Clark Index (CI) to catch labour reallocation across sections of economic activity (NACE Rev. 2). They are then adopted in lead-lag models of relationships with economic growth.
Findings & value added: The study browses the classical three-sectoral approach to structural transformation using a more detailed structural layout to capture its modern character. Moreover, it compares alternative measures of structural change to derive more detailed conclusions. Methodologically, the study highlights the need for in-depth research into structural change with finer aggregation and measures with different properties. The paper is focused on a specific situation in the Polish economy, for which the relationships have not yet been verified. However, the findings are more universal and may be interesting for any catching-up economy that plans its development policy and needs to focus either on demand- or supply side-relationships. The results suggest rather unidirectional causality running from economic growth to structural change and thus a demand-driven character of the structural modernisation of the Polish economy. This implies the necessity to build stronger inter-sectoral linkages that enable spillover effects that can accelerate growth and induce mutually reinforcing mechanisms of development.
Keywords
structural change, sections of economic activity, economic growth, employment, Granger causality
References
- Aiginger, K. (2001). Speed of change and growth of manufacturing. In M. Peneder, K. Aiginer & M. Marterbauer (Eds.). Structural change and economic growth (pp. 53–86). Vienna: Austrian Institute of Economic Research.
View in Google Scholar - Akhter, N., Malik, A. M., Yasir, M., & Ayub, A. (2022). Key sectors and GDP: Cointegration and causality analysis for Pakistan economy. Webology, 19(3), 1501–1524.
View in Google Scholar - Ansari, M. I. (1992). Growth effects of recent structural changes in the Canadian economy: Some empirical evidence. Applied Economic, 24, 1233–1240.
View in Google Scholar - Baumol, W. J. (1967). Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: The anatomy of urban crisis. American Economic Review, 57(3), 415–426.
View in Google Scholar - Bondarev, A., & Greiner, A. (2022). How ongoing structural change creates a double dividend: Outdating of technologies and green growth. Portuguese Economic Journal, 21, 125–160.
View in Google Scholar - Chenery, H. B. (1971). Growth and structural change. Finance and Development, 8(3), 17–27.
View in Google Scholar - Clark, C. (1940). The conditions of economic progress. London: Macmillan.
View in Google Scholar - Comin, D., Lashkari, D., & Mestieri, M. (2021). Structural change with long-run income and price effects. Econometrica, 89(1), 311–374.
View in Google Scholar - Ćorović, E., Gligorijević, Ž., & Manasijević, A. (2021). Structural changes and economic growth of the Republic of Serbia: the effects of applied structural adjustment models. Еkonomika, 67(1), 1–16.
View in Google Scholar - Dietrich, A. (2009). Does growth cause structural change, or is it the other way round? A dynamic panel data analyses for seven OECD countries. JENA Economic Research Papers, 2009–034.
View in Google Scholar - Duernecker, G., & Sanchez-Martinez, M. (2021). Structural change and productivity growth in the European Union: Past, present and future. JRC Working Papers on Territorial Modelling and Analysis, 09/2021.
View in Google Scholar - Echevarria, C. (1997). Changes in sectoral composition associated with economic growth. International Economic Review, 38, 431–452.
View in Google Scholar - Eurostat, Employment by sex, age and economic activity (from 2008 onwards, NACE Rev. 2) - 1 000 [LFSQ_EGAN2__custom_4600417]. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database (19.01.2023).
View in Google Scholar - Eurostat, Main GDP aggregates per capita [NAMQ_10_PC__custom_4600201]. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.
View in Google Scholar - Fisher, A. B. G. (1935). The clash of progress and security. London: Macmillan.
View in Google Scholar - Fourastié, J. (1949). Le grand espoir du XXème siècle. Paris: PUF.
View in Google Scholar - Fuchs, V. R. (1965). The growing importance of the service industries. Journal of Business, 38(4), 344–373.
View in Google Scholar - Gabardo, F. A., Porcile, G., & Pereima, J. B. (2018). On the determinants of structural change: An exploratory model. ANPEC. Retrieved from https://escueladevera no.cepal.org/2018/sites/escver-2018/files/gabardo_e_porcile_2018_-_on_the_dete rminants_of_structural_change_an_exploratory_model_0.pdf (31.01.2023).
View in Google Scholar - Gabardo, F. A., Porcile, G., & Pereima, J. B. (2020). Sectoral labour reallocation: An agent-based model of structural change and growth. EconomiA, 21, 209–232.
View in Google Scholar - Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438.
View in Google Scholar - Hartwig, J. (2010). Testing the growth effects of structural change. KOF Working Papers, 264.
View in Google Scholar - Hartwig, J., & Krämer, H. M. (2023). Revisiting Baumol’s disease: Structural change, productivity slowdown and income inequality. Intereconomics. Review of European Economic Policy, 58(6), 320–325.
View in Google Scholar - Herrendorf, B., Rogerson, R., & Valentinyi, Á. (2013). Growth and structural transformation. NBER Working Paper, 18996.
View in Google Scholar - Iordan, M., Chilian, M.-N., & Ciurariu, G. (2017). Post-crisis changes in the sectoral and occupational employment structures of the Romanian labor market. Economy Transdisciplinarity Cognition, 20(2), 35–41.
View in Google Scholar - Jena, D., & Barua, A. (2020). Trade, structural transformation and income convergence: The case of EU. Journal of Public Affairs, e2565.
View in Google Scholar - Jia, W., Collins, A., & Liu, W. (2023). Digitalization and economic growth in the new classical and new structural economics perspectives. Digital Economy and Sustainable Development, 1, 5.
View in Google Scholar - Kallioras, D., & Petrakos, G. (2010). Industrial growth, economic integration and structural change: Evidence from the EU new member-states regions. Annals of Regional Science, 45(3), 667–680.
View in Google Scholar - Klodt, H. (1995). Productivity growth in service and non-service industries: Implications for convergence. In E. Felli, F. C. Rosati & G. Tria (Eds.). The service sector: Productivity and growth (pp. 285–301). Rome: Physica-Verlag.
View in Google Scholar - Kong, L., Sofuoğlu, E., Ishola, B. D., Abbas, S., Guo, Q., & Khudoykulov, K. (2024). Sustainable development through structural transformation: A pathway to economic, social, and environmental progress. Economic Change and Restructuring, 57, 27.
View in Google Scholar - Kongsamut, P., Rebelo, S., & Xie, D. (2001). Beyond balanced growth. Review of Economic Studies, 68, 869–882.
View in Google Scholar - Krüger, J. J. (2008). Productivity and structural change: a review of the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(2), 330–363.
View in Google Scholar - Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499.
View in Google Scholar - Kuosmanen, N., & Kuosmanen, T. (2024). Inter-industry and intra-industry switching as sources of productivity growth: Structural change of Finland’s ICT industries. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 61, 107–120.
View in Google Scholar - Kuusk, A., Staehr, K., & Varblane, U. (2017). Sectoral change and labour productivity growth during boom, bust and recovery in Central and Eastern Europe. Economic Change and Restructuring, 50, 21–43.
View in Google Scholar - Kuznets, S. (1966). Modern economic growth: Rate, structure and spread. New Haven–London: Yale University Press.
View in Google Scholar - Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, 22, 139–191.
View in Google Scholar - Linden, M., & Mahmood, T. (2007). Long run relationships between sector shares and economic growth. A panel data analysis of the Schengen region. Keskustelualoitteita #50 Joensuun yliopisto, Taloustieteet, 50.
View in Google Scholar - Loubassou Nganga, M. (2021). The impact of structural change on the economic development of CEMAC member states: A comparative analysis of Congo and Cameroon. Theoretical Economics Letters, 11, 338–362.
View in Google Scholar - Mahmood, T., & Linden, M. (2017). Structural change and economic growth in Schengen region. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(1), 303–311.
View in Google Scholar - Margarian, A. (2024). Analysing evolutionary growth regimes of regional economies and transformative shocks: Proposal for a regression-based counterfactual simulation approach to local inter-industry structural change. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 70, 18–32.
View in Google Scholar - Margarian, A., & Hundt, C. (2023). One economy, but different growth regimes: Why Germany’s rural east is still lagging. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 33(7), 1–21.
View in Google Scholar - Meckl, J. (2002). Structural change and generalized balanced growth. Journal of Economics, 77(3), 241–266.
View in Google Scholar - Mendoza, M. A. M. (2023). An analysis of economic growth using input–output tables. Journal of Economic Structures, 12, 21.
View in Google Scholar - Mihnenoka, A., & Senfelde, M. (2017). The impact of national economy structural transformation on regional employment and income: The case of Latvia. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 12(2), 47–60.
View in Google Scholar - Norbu, N. P., Tateno, Y., & Bolesta, A. (2021). Structural transformation and production linkages in Asia-Pacific least developed countries: An input-output analysis. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 59, 510–524.
View in Google Scholar - Nordhaus, W. D. (2006). Baumol’s diseases: a macroeconomic perspective. NBER Working Paper, 12218.
View in Google Scholar - Peneder, M. (2002). Industrial structure and aggregate growth. WIFO Working Papers, 182.
View in Google Scholar - Ray, P., & Subhasankar, Ch. (2021). Sectoral imbalance, structural change and growth: How different are India and China?. NIBM Working Paper Series, WP02.
View in Google Scholar - Ren, Q., Gu, G., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Research on the economic effect of employment structure change in heterogeneous regions: Evidence from resource-based cities in China. Economic Research – Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 6364–6384.
View in Google Scholar - Riaz, U., Hussain, B., & Bhatti, A. A. (2020). Role of structural change in economic growth: An empirical evidence from a panel of Asian countries. Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ), 4(2), 345–360.
View in Google Scholar - Rijesh, R. (2023). Economic liberalisation, structural change and productivity growth in Indian organised manufacturing sector, 1991–2016. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 66, 131–154.
View in Google Scholar - Rosenstein-Rodan, P. (1943). Problems of industrialisation of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. Economic Journal, 53, 202–211.
View in Google Scholar - Rostow, W. W. (1990). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar - Sahadevan, K. G. (2020). Services activity, economic growth and regional equality – some empirical evidence on their relationship. Prajnan, 49(1), 45-65.
View in Google Scholar - Sassi, M. (2011). Convergence across the EU regions: Economic composition and structural transformation. International Advances in Economic Research, 17(1), 101–115.
View in Google Scholar - Saviotti, P. P., Pyka, A., & Jun, B. (2020). Diversification, structural change, and economic development. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 30, 1301–1335,
View in Google Scholar - Schettkat, R., & Yocarini, L (2003). The shift to services: A review of the literature. Institute for the Study of Labor Discussion Paper, 964.
View in Google Scholar - Sengupta, A., Chattopadhyay, S., & Serletis, A. (2023). Structural change and unbalanced economic growth in open developing economies. Journal of Economics and Finance, 47, 844–858.
View in Google Scholar - Silva, E. G., & Teixeira, A. A. C. (2008). Surveying structural change: Seminal contributions and a bibliometric account. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 19(4), 273–300.
View in Google Scholar - Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
View in Google Scholar - Soni, S., & Subrahmanya, M. H. B. (2020). Growth and structural change in the Indian economy. An analysis of pattern, determinants, and outcomes. Economic & Political Weekly, 55(26-27), 65–70.
View in Google Scholar - Stamer, M. (1998), Interrelation between subsidies, structural change and economic growth in Germany. A vector autoregressive analysis. Konjunkturpolitik, 44(3), 231–253.
View in Google Scholar - Tasneem, F., & Khan, M. A. (2024). Growth and structural transformation – Options for Pakistan. Research in Globalization, 8, 100190.
View in Google Scholar - Trofimov, I. D. (2024). The effects of structural change on economic growth: A panel data analysis. Panoeconomicus.
View in Google Scholar - Turgot, A. R. J. (1973). Reflections on the formation and the distribution of wealth. In R. L. Meek (Ed.). Turgot on progress, sociology and economics (pp. 119–134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar - Velichkov, N., & Damyanov, D. (2021). Structural convergence of selected south-east European economies to the eurozone. In A. Aleksic, V. Ruzic & Z. Baracskai (Eds.). Economic and social development, book of proceedings: 65th international scientific conference on economic and social development, 19 February, 2021 (pp. 50–60). Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency, Varazdin, University North, Koprivnica, University of Warsaw, University in Rabat, Polytechnic of Medimurje in Cakovec.
View in Google Scholar - Vu, K. M. (2017). Structural change and economic growth: Empirical evidence and policy insights from Asian economies. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 14, 64–77.
View in Google Scholar - Wacziarg, R. (2001). Structural convergence. Stanford University CDDRL Working Paper, 8.
View in Google Scholar - Wolfe, M. (1955). The concept of economic sectors. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(3), 402–420.
View in Google Scholar - Yakymova, L. (2020). General patterns and drivers of changes in employment structure: Evidence from five European countries. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 67(3), 333–362.
View in Google Scholar - Yoruk, E., Radosevic, S., & Fischer, B. (2023). Technological profiles, upgrading and the dynamics of growth: Country-level patterns and trajectories across distinct stages of development. Research Policy, 52(8), 104847.
View in Google Scholar - Zeira, J., & Zoabi, H. (2015). Economic growth and sector dynamics. European Economic Review, 79, 1–15.
View in Google Scholar