Innovativeness of the European economies in the context of the modified European Innovation Scoreboard
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.3063Keywords:
innovation of the economy, innovation assessment, European Innovation ScoreboardAbstract
Research background: Innovation is an important determinant of economic development, and its importance is growing with the advancement of digitization and the development of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. In turn, the assessment of the innovativeness of a country’s economy affects its investment attractiveness and international image.
Purpose of this study: Given the factors presented above, the main aim of this study is to explore and compare the innovativeness of European economies in the context of the modified European Innovation Scoreboard.
Methods: To achieve this goal, the authors propose two key modifications of the existing innovation assessment methodology contained in the European Innovation Scoreboard. The first concerns the principles of the normalization of assessment indicators and aims to eliminate extreme assessment values. The second proposes to remove the indicators which are difficult to measure, subjective, and not always useful: (1) those related to sustainable development (resource productivity; emissions of fine particulates; and environment-related technologies) and (2) those that take into account only small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs introducing product innovations; SMEs introducing business process innovations; and innovative SMEs collaborating with others).
Findings & value added: An alternative approach to assessing the innovativeness of the analyzed countries — as proposed by the authors — resulted in changes in the ranking of countries in relation to the European Innovation Scoreboard, but the changes were not significant. The major changes concerned Serbia (down four places), Belgium (down two places), Hungary (up three places), and Poland (up two places). In addition, five countries moved up one place in the ranking (the UK, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Estonia, Slovenia, Spain, and Slovakia), and five lost one place in the ranking (Norway, Italy, Portugal, Greece, and Croatia). Thirteen countries had no changes. The obtained results allowed us to conclude that the countries with the best and the worst innovativeness maintained the assessment level regardless of changes in the methodology of its implementation. The objectification of rules had the strongest impact on the countries in the middle of the ranking. This study draws attention to the problem of the subjectivity of the innovation rankings. It has also been documented that modifying the selection of evaluation criteria may change the final position in the ranking, which, in the case of emerging and developing economies, may affect investor assessment and economic growth opportunities. Such considerations are important because they are outside the often uncritical mainstream approach to the assessment of the innovativeness of economies. The conclusions imply the need for a multisource analysis of innovation and a critical look at the proposed methodologies.
Downloads
References
Amdaoud, M., Hanel, P., & Le Bas, Ch. (2022). Firm patenting and types of innovation. An empirical investigation on patenting determinants in developing countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 32(4), 579–601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2021.2024074
View in Google Scholar
Anu, A. K., Singh, S. A., Nakonieczny, J., & Shahzad, U. (2023). Role of financial inclusion, green innovation, and energy efficiency for environmental performance? Evidence from developed and emerging economies in the lens of sustainable development. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 64, 213–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.12.008
View in Google Scholar
Baxter, D., & Chipulu, M. (2023). Developing a new scale for measuring sustainability-oriented innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 429, 139590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139590
View in Google Scholar
Belanova, A. (2021). Innovation performance of the Slovak Republic. Balkan and Near Eastern Journal of Social Sciences, 07 (Special Issue), 24–28.
View in Google Scholar
Bielińska-Dusza, E., & Hamerska, M. (2021). Methodology for calculating the European Innovation Scoreboard—proposition for modification. Sustainability, 13, 2199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042199
View in Google Scholar
Bong, K. H., & Park, J. (2021). Expanding organic relationships between R&D, innovation, and productivity: Evidence from Korean SMEs. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 29(1), 52–69. https:// DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2020.1780927
View in Google Scholar
Brink, T. (2017). SME routes for innovation collaboration with larger enterprises. Industrial Marketing Management, 64, 122–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.01.010
View in Google Scholar
Brodny, J., & Tutak, M. (2023a). The level of implementing sustainable development goal "Industry, innovation and infrastructure" of Agenda 2030 in the European Union countries: Application of MCDM methods. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(1), 47–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.002
View in Google Scholar
Brodny, J., & Tutak, M. (2023b). Assessing regional implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 9 “Build resilient infrastructure, promote sustainable industrialization and foster innovation” in Poland. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 195, 122773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122773
View in Google Scholar
Broström, A., Buenstorf, G., & McKelvey, M. (2021). The knowledge economy, innovation and the new challenges to universities: Introduction to the special issue. Innovation, 23(2), 145–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2020.1825090
View in Google Scholar
Calik, E. (2024). A validated measurement scale for sustainable product innovation performance. Technovation, 129, 102882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102882
View in Google Scholar
Calik, E., & Bardudeen, F. (2016). A measurement scale to evaluate sustainable innovation performance in manufacturing organizations. Procedia CIRP 40, 449–454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.091
View in Google Scholar
Carboni, O. A., & Medda, G. (2020). Linkages between R&D, innovation, investment and export performance: Evidence from European manufacturing firms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(12), 1379–1392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1769841
View in Google Scholar
Casadella, V., & Tahi, S. (2022). Innovation policy for economic development: The difficult but promising adequacy in the case of Senegal. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 14(6), 1520–1533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2021.1966971
View in Google Scholar
Chen, S., & Guo, Q. (2023). Fintech, strategic incentives and investment to human capital, and MSEs innovation. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 68, 101963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2023.101963
View in Google Scholar
Chen, W., & Song, H. (2024). National innovation system: Measurement of overall effectiveness and analysis of influencing factors. Technology in Society, 102514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102514
View in Google Scholar
Chen, X., Teng, L., & Chen, W. (2022). How does FinTech affect the development of the digital economy? Evidence from China. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 61, 101697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2022.101697
View in Google Scholar
Costantiello, A., Laureti, L., & Leogrande, A., (2021). The innovation-friendly environment in Europe. SSRN. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3933553
View in Google Scholar
Coutinho, E. M. O., & Au-Yong-Oliveira, M. (2023). Factors influencing innovation performance in Portugal: A cross-country comparative analysis based on the Global Innovation Index and on the European Innovation Scoreboard. Sustainability, 15, 10446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310446
View in Google Scholar
Cruz-Cázares, C., Bayona-Sáez, C., & García-Marco, T. (2013). You can’t manage right what you can’t measure well: Technological innovation efficiency. Research Policy, 42(6–7), 1239–1250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.012
View in Google Scholar
De Silva, M., Gokhberg, L., Meissner, D., & Russo, M. (2021). Addressing societal challenges through the simultaneous generation of social and business values: A conceptual framework for science-based co-creation. Technovation, 104, 102268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102268
View in Google Scholar
Derevianko, O. (2019). Reputation stability vs anti-crisis sustainability: Under what circumstances will innovations, media activities and CSR be in higher demand?. Oeconomia Copernicana, 10(3), 511–536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2019.025
View in Google Scholar
Domadenik, P., Koman, M., & Redek, T. (2019). Innovation in Slovenia. In P. Domadenik, M. Koman & T. Redek (Eds.). Innovation governance: Leading the winners (pp. 195–211). Ljubljana: Časnik Finance, d. o. o.
View in Google Scholar
Dworak, E. (2020). The innovation gap between the Polish economy and the European. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, 23, 63–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.23.20
View in Google Scholar
Dworak, E. (2023). Assessment of innovativeness of the EU candidate countries based on the European Innovation Scoreboard. Ekonomia Międzynarodowa, 41, 22–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/2082-4440.41.02
View in Google Scholar
Dziallas, M., & Blind, K. (2018). Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis. Technovation, 88-81, 3–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.005
View in Google Scholar
Dzikowski, P. (2022). Product and process innovation patterns in Polish low and high technology systems. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 17(3), 747–773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.026
View in Google Scholar
Edison, H., Bin Ali, N., & Torkar, R. (2013). Towards innovation measurement in the software industry. Journal of Systems and Software, 86, 1390–1407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.01.013
View in Google Scholar
European Commission (2019). EIS 2019 methodology report. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/policy/innovation/scoreboards_en.
View in Google Scholar
Gavkalova, N., Gładysz, B., Quadrini, W., Sassanelli, C., Asplund, F., Ramli, M. R., & Terzi, S. (2024). Digital innovation hubs and portfolio of their services across European economies. Oeconomia Copernicana, 15(1), 59–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2757
View in Google Scholar
Gifford, E., McKelvey, M., & Saemundsson, R. (2021). The evolution of knowledge-intensive innovation ecosystems: Co-evolving entrepreneurial activity and innovation policy in the West Swedish maritime system. Industry and Innovation, 28(5), 651–676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1856047
View in Google Scholar
Gouvea, R., Kapelianis, D., Montoya, M.-J., R., & Vora, G. (2021). The creative economy, innovation and entrepreneurship: An empirical examination. Creative Industries Journal, 14(1), 23–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17510694.2020.1744215
View in Google Scholar
Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2021). Looking inside the determinants and the effects of entrepreneurial innovation projects in an emerging economy. Industry and Innovation, 28(3), 365–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1753021
View in Google Scholar
Hasselbalch, J. A. (2018). Innovation assessment: Governing through periods of disruptive technological change. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(12), 1855–1873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1363805
View in Google Scholar
Huang, N., & Liu, Y. (2024). Structural tax reduction, financing constraint relief and enterprise innovation efficiency. Finance Research Letters, 60, 104848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104848
View in Google Scholar
Huarng, K.-H., & You, T. H.-K. (2022). Analysis of Global Innovation Index by structural qualitative association. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121850
View in Google Scholar
Janger, J., Schubert, T., Andries, P., Rammer, C., & Hoskens, M. (2017). The EU 2020 innovation indicator: A step forward in measuring innovation outputs and outcomes? Research Policy, 46, 30–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.001
View in Google Scholar
Jonek-Kowalska, I. (2023). Innovation in the economies of Central and Eastern Europe – long-term benchmarking. Journal of International Studies, 16(4), 27–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2023/16-4/2
View in Google Scholar
Khan, H. H., Khan, S., & Ghafoor, A. (2023). Fintech adoption, the regulatory environment and bank stability: An empirical investigation from GCC economies. Borsa Istanbul Review, 23(6), 1263–1281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2023.10.010
View in Google Scholar
Kleszcz, A. (2021). Principal components of innovation performance in European Union countries. Wiadomości Statystyczne. The Polish Statistician, 66, 24–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.2305
View in Google Scholar
Kolupaieva, I., & Tiesheva, L. (2023). Asymmetry and convergence in the development of digital technologies in the EU countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 18(3), 687–716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2023.022
View in Google Scholar
Lai, K. P. Y., & Langley, P. (2023). Playful finance: Gamification and intermediation in FinTech economies. Geoforum, 10384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103848
View in Google Scholar
Lema, R., Kraemer-Mbula, E., & Rakas, M. (2021). Innovation in developing countries: Examining two decades of research. Innovation and Development, 11(2-3), 189–210. https:// DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2021.1989647
View in Google Scholar
Leogrande, A. (2022). Export of medium and high-tech products in Europe. University Library of Munich, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 112619. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/112619.html.
View in Google Scholar
Lewandowska, A., Berniak-Woźny, J., & Ahmad, N. (2023). Competitiveness and innovation of small and medium enter-prises under Industry 4.0 and 5.0 challenges: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 18(4), 1045–1074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2023.033
View in Google Scholar
Liang, R., Wen, X., & Zhu, S. (2023). The impact of emission charges on the quality of corporate innovation: Based on the perspective of breakthrough technological innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 404, 136830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136830
View in Google Scholar
Liu, Q., Sun, H., & Luo, H. (2022). Resource-richness, technological innovation, and sustainable development: Evidence from emerging economies. Resources Policy, 79, 103047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103047
View in Google Scholar
Mayerhoffer, M. (2019). Cultural diversity and innovation: The case of the Czech Republic in comparison to the EU. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference ionnovation management, entrepreneurship and sustainability, May 30 – 31, 2019, Prague (pp. 678–600). Parque: University of Economics.
View in Google Scholar
Medase, S. K., & Wyrwich, M. (2022). The role of innovation for employment growth among firms in developing countries: Evidence from Nigeria. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 14(3), 610–619, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2021.1877417
View in Google Scholar
Mitkus, T., & Maditinos, D. I. (2017). Analysis of state aid policy to stimulate innovation and internationalization in Lithuanian animation industry. Oeconomia Copernicana, 8(3), 433–446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.v8i3.27
View in Google Scholar
Müller, J. M., Buliga, O., & Voigt, K.-I. (2021). The role of absorptive capacity and innovation strategy in the design of industry 4.0 business Models - A comparison between SMEs and large enterprises. European Management Journal, 39(1), 333–343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.01.002
View in Google Scholar
Nastacă, C. C., & Nastaseanu, A. (2021). A comparative analysis of national strategies to underpin innovation progress in Romania and Portugal. Revista de Management Comparat Internațional, 22, 4–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/RMCI.2021.1.4
View in Google Scholar
Natário, M. M., & Couto, J. (2022). Drivers, enablers, and conditions for public sector innovation in European countries. Innovar, 32(83), 5–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v32n83.99255
View in Google Scholar
Obrimah, O. A. (2024). Measuring innovativeness: A ranking of the ordinal utility from consumption is more robust than either of ‘outcomes of commercialization’ or patent counts. Economic Analysis and Policy, 81, 603–616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.12.024
View in Google Scholar
Onea, I. A. (2020). Innovation indicators and the innovation process - Evidence from the European Innovation Scoreboard. Management & Marketing, 15(4), 605–620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2020-0035
View in Google Scholar
Pavlik, T., Jakab, F., & Fedák, V. (2022). Potential areas of the V 4 to improve its position in the European innovation ecosystem. In 20th international conference on emerging eLearning technologies and applications (ICETA) (pp. 502–507). IEEE: Stary Smokovec. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA57911.2022.9974958
View in Google Scholar
Pohulak-Żołędowska, E. (2016). Innovation in contemporary economies. Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(3), 451–466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/OeC.2016.026
View in Google Scholar
Rizvi, S. K. A., Rahat, B., Naqvi, B., & Umar, M. (2024). Revolutionizing finance: The synergy of fintech, digital adoption, and innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 200, 123112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123112
View in Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Gulías, M., Fernández-López, S., & Rodeiro-Pazos, D. (2024). Foreign knowledge sources and innovation: Differences across large and small and medium-size multinational enterprises (MNEs). International Review of Economics & Finance, 92, 741–757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.02.036
View in Google Scholar
Świadek, A., Dzikowski, P., Gorączkowska, J., & Tomaszewski, M. (2022). The National Innovation System in a catching-up country: Empirical evidence based on micro data of a Triple Helix in Poland. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(2), 511–540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.016
View in Google Scholar
Szopik-Depczyńska, K., Cheba, K., Bąk, I., Kędzierska-Szczepaniak, A., Szczepaniak, K., & Ioppolo, G. (2020). Innovation level and local development of EU regions. A new assessment approach. Land Use Policy, 99, 104837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104837
View in Google Scholar
Tang, M., Liu, Y., Hu, F., & Wu, B. (2023). Effect of digital transformation on enterprises' green innovation: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China. Energy Economics, 128, 107135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107135
View in Google Scholar
Teirlinck, P., & Spithoven, A. (2023). Improving the Regional Innovation Scoreboard for policy: How about innovation efficiency? Science and Public Policy, 50(6), 1001–1017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad043
View in Google Scholar
Tu, Y.-T. (2024). Drivers of environmental performance in Asian economies: Do natural resources, green innovation and Fintech really matter? Resources Policy, 90, 104832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104832
View in Google Scholar
Vieira, E.S. (2023). The influence of research collaboration on citation impact: The countries in the European Innovation Scoreboard. Scientometrics, 128, 3555–3579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04715-4
View in Google Scholar
von Schönfeld, K., & C. Ferreira, A. (2021). Urban planning and European innovation policy: Achieving sustainability. Social inclusion, and economic growth? Sustainability, 13, 1137. https:// DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031137
View in Google Scholar
Wang, H., Li, M., Wang, Z., Deng, W., & Zhang, Z. (2024b). Technological innovation strategies of information and communication technology enterprises: A comparative study of China, US, and Europe. Finance Research Letters, 61, 105023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105023
View in Google Scholar
Wang, H., Zheng, L. J., Zhang, J. Z., Kumar, A., & Srivastava. P. R. (2024a). Unpacking complementarity in innovation ecosystems: A configurational analysis of knowledge transfer for achieving breakthrough innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 198, 122974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122974
View in Google Scholar
Wu, F.-S., Tsai, Ch.-Ch.,Wu, Ch.-H., & Lo, T.-H. (2023). An exploratory study of breakthrough innovations in digital businesses: The case of the perfect Corporation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201, 123233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123233
View in Google Scholar
Wu, L., Zhu, Ch., & Wang, G. (2024). The impact of green innovation resilience on energy efficiency: A perspective based on the development of the digital economy. Journal of Environmental Management, 355, 120424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120424
View in Google Scholar
Xu, Ch., Li, L. (2024). The dynamic relationship among green logistics, technological innovation and green economy: Evidence from China. Heliyon, 10(4), e26534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26534
View in Google Scholar
Yang, S., Wang, W., & Ding, T. (2023). Intelligent transformation and sustainable innovation capability: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 55, Part B, 103963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103963
View in Google Scholar
You, X., Monahan, K., Yang, W., Wei, S., & Chen, Z. (2022). How long do we wait to innovate? understanding causal relationships between economic and innovation performance with temporal lags: evidence from a dynamic panel of 282 cities in China. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(5), 841–855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2061343
View in Google Scholar
Zamora-Torres, A. I. (2014). Countries’ competitiveness on innovation and technology. Global Journal of Business Research, 8(5), 73–83.
View in Google Scholar
Zhang, T., Li, S., Li, Y., & Wang, W. (2023). Evaluation of technology innovation efficiency for the listed NEV enterprises in China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 80, 1445–1458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.10.006
View in Google Scholar
Zheng, Y., & Wu, X. (2024). Fostering fintech innovation: A tripartite evolutionary game analysis of regulatory sandbox experiments. International Review of Economics & Finance, 92, 1302–1320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.02.060
View in Google Scholar
Zhou, D., Lu, Z., & Qiu,Y. (2023). Do carbon emission trading schemes enhance enterprise green innovation efficiency? Evidence from China's listed firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414, 137668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137668
View in Google Scholar
Zor, A. (2023). A neural network-based measurement of corporate environmental attention and its impact on green open innovation: Evidence from heavily polluting listed companies in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 432, 139815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139815
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
