Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Relationship between trade openness, innovation, and total factor productivity in BRICS and D-8 countries

Abstract

Research Background: Understanding how trade openness (TO) and innovation interact to drive total factor productivity (TFP) growth is a critical debate. Policymakers in BRICS and    D-8 countries require evidence-based insights to formulate strategies that effectively integrate trade and innovation policies.

Purpose of the article: The purpose is to assess whether and how TO contributes to TFP growth, emphasizing interaction with innovation, and to provide insights to policymakers in BRICS and D-8 countries in formulating strategies that integrate trade and innovation policies.

Methods: The study employs robust econometric techniques to address panel data challenges and ensure reliable results. These techniques help to accurately capture the effects of TO on TFP while considering the moderating role of innovation. The study also includes a heterogeneous analysis to account for differences in the developmental contexts between BRICS and     D-8 countries.

Findings & value added: The findings reveal that TO positively and significantly impacts TFP, driven by improved resource allocation and access to new markets. Innovation significantly enhances the productivity benefits of TO, particularly in BRICS. The heterogeneous analysis indicates consistent TFP improvements across both groups, although the impact of innovation varies, reflecting different developmental stages. The positive impact of TO on TFP in both groups highlights the importance of integrating trade and innovation policies. The study underscores the importance of reducing trade barriers and investing in research and development and patent protection to maximize productivity. These insights offer valuable guidance for policymakers in tailoring trade and innovation strategies for BRICS and D-8 countries.

Keywords

trade openness, total factor productivity, foreign direct investment, innovation, human capital, generalized method of moments

PDF

References

  1. Aggarwal, V., & Karwasra, N. (2024). A bibliometric analysis on trade openness and economic growth: Current dynamics and future direction. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 34(2), 446–467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-11-2022-0177
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Aman, Z., Granville, B., Mallick, S. K., & Nemlioglu, I. (2024). Does greater financial openness promote external competitiveness in emerging markets? The role of institutional quality. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 29(1), 486–510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2695
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Anakpo, G., & Oyenubi, A. (2022). Technological innovation and economic growth in southern Africa: Application of panel dynamic OLS regression. Development Southern Africa, 39(4), 543–557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2022.2052017
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Arshad, M. U. (2021). Forecasted e/p ratio and roe: Shanghai stock exchange (SSE), China. Sage Open, 11(2), 215824402110231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211023189
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Arshad, M. U., Shabbir, M. N., & Niazi, M. (2023). Trade openness and public innovation: A causality analysis. Sage Open, 13(3), 21582440231201750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231201750
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Asghar, M., Chaudhry, I. S., & Ali, S. (2024). Innovation, energy consumption and trade dynamic: Evidence from developed and developing countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(1), 4356–4382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01300-1
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Ayhan Kose, M., Prasad, E. S., & Terrones, M. E. (2009). Does openness to international financial flows raise productivity growth? Journal of International Money and Finance, 28(4), 554–580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2009.01.005
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Bagh, T., Fuwei, J., & Khan, M. A. (2024). Corporate ESG investments and firm's value under the real-option framework: Evidence from two world-leading economies. Borsa Istanbul Review, 24(2), 324–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2024.01.002
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Baltagi, B. H., Feng, Q., & Kao, C. (2012). A lagrange multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model. Journal of Econometrics, 170(1), 164–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2012.04.004
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Banday, U. J., Murugan, S., & Maryam, J. (2021). Foreign direct investment, trade openness and economic growth in BRICS countries: Evidences from panel data. Transnational Corporations Review, 13(2), 211–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19186444.2020.1851162
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Barros, L., & Martínez-Zarzoso, I. (2022). Systematic literature review on trade liberalization and sustainable development. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 33, 921–931. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.08.012
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Becker, S. O., & Muendler, M.-A. (2015). Trade and tasks: An exploration over three decades in Germany. Economic Policy, 30(84), 589–641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiv014
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Ben-David, D., & Loewy, M. B. (1998). Free trade, growth, and convergence. Journal of Economic Growth, 3(2), 143–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009705702579
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Cerulli, G., & Poti, B. (2009). Measuring intersectoral knowledge spillovers: An application of sensitivity analysis to Italy. Economic Systems Research, 21(4), 409–436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310903569216
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Chand, S., & Sen, K. (2002). Trade liberalization and productivity growth: Evidence from Indian manufacturing. Review of Development Economics, 6, 120–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9361.00145
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Coe, D., Helpman, E., & Hoffmaister, A. (1997). North-south R&D spillovers. Economic Journal, 107(440), 134–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00146
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Damasceno, A. O., & Guedes, D. R. (2024). Financial openness, capital accumulation, and productivity in emerging and developing economies. Economic Modelling, 133, 106663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106663
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Dobson, S., & Ramlogan, C. (2009). Is there an openness Kuznets curve? Kyklos, 62(2), 226–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2009.00433.x
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2004). Trade, growth, and poverty. Economic Journal, 114(493), F22–F49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-0133.2004.00186.x
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (2001). What have we learned from a decade of empirical research on growth? It's not factor accumulation: Stylized facts and growth models. World Bank Economic Review, 15(2), 177–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/15.2.177
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Elfaki, K. E., & Ahmed, E. M. (2024). Digital technology adoption and globalization innovation implications on Asian pacific green sustainable economic growth. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100221
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Feenstra, R. C., Inklaar, R., & Timmer, M. P. (2015). The next generation of the Penn World Table. American Economic Review, 105(10), 3150–3182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130954
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Godil, D. I., Yu, Z., Sharif, A., Usman, R., & Khan, S. A. R. (2021). Investigate the role of technology innovation and renewable energy in reducing transport sector co2 emission in China: A path toward sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 29(4), 694–707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2167
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Gonçalves, E., Gonçalves Taveira, J., Labrador, A., & Pio, J. G. (2021). Is trade openness a carrier of knowledge spillovers for developed and developing countries? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 58, 66–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.03.006
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Gonçalves, R., Vlačić, B., González-Loureiro, M., & Sousa, R. (2024). The impact of open innovation on the environmental sustainability practices and international sales intensity nexus: A multicountry study. International Business Review, 33(5), 102279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102279
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Griffith, R., Huergo, E., Mairesse, J., & Peters, B. (2006). Innovation and productivity across four European countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(4), 483–498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grj028
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991b). Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. European Economic Review, 35(2), 517–526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(91)90153-A
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1994). Endogenous innovation in the theory of growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 23–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.1.23
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Gupta, A., Boas, I., & Oosterveer, P. (2020). Transparency in global sustainability governance: To what effect? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(1), 84–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1709281
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Herzer, D. (2022). The impact of domestic and foreign R&D on TFP in developing countries. World Development, 151, 105754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105754
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Hicks, J. R. (1939). The foundations of welfare economics. Economic Journal, 49(196), 696–712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2225023
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Hong, W., Cao, L., & Hao, N. (2010). Trade liberalization, domestic input and sustainability of agricultural TFP growth: A new perspective based on TFP growth structure. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 1, 376–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2010.09.047
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Ibrahim, M. D. (2023). Efficiency and productivity analysis of innovation, human capital, environmental, and economic sustainability nexus: Case of MENA countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(12), 34394–34405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24494-4
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Iftikhar, K., Bagh, T., & Khan, M. A. (2024). The role of corporate governance in the nexus between litigation risk and corporate innovation. Borsa Istanbul Review, 24(4), 732–746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2024.04.005
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Impullitti, G., & Licandro, O. (2018). Trade, firm selection and innovation: The competition channel. Economic Journal, 128(608), 189–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12466
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Islam, M. A., Khan, M. A., Popp, J., Sroka, W., & Oláh, J. (2020). Financial development and foreign direct investment—the moderating role of quality institutions. Sustainability, 12(9). 3556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093556
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Jorgenson, D. W., Ho, M. S., & Stiroh, K. J. (2008). A retrospective look at the U.S. Productivity growth resurgence. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(1), 3–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.1.3
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Kalapouti, K., Petridis, K., Malesios, C., & Dey, P. K. (2020). Measuring efficiency of innovation using combined data envelopment analysis and structural equation modeling: Empirical study in EU regions. Annals of Operations Research, 294(1), 297–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2728-4
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 90(1), 1–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00023-2
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Kijek, T., & Matras-Bolibok, A. (2019). The relationship between TFP and innovation performance: Evidence from EU regions. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 14(4), 695–709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2019.032
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Kim, S., Lim, H., & Park, D. (2009). Imports, exports and total factor productivity in Korea. Applied Economics, 41(14), 1819–1834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840601032243
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Kong, Q., Peng, D., Ni, Y., Jiang, X., & Wang, Z. (2021). Trade openness and economic growth quality of China: Empirical analysis using ARDL model. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101488
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Kraus, S., Jones, P., Kailer, N., Weinmann, A., Chaparro-Banegas, N., & Roig-Tierno, N. (2021). Digital transformation: An overview of the current state of the art of research. Sage Open, 11(3), 21582440211047576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211047576
    View in Google Scholar
  47. Krugman, P. (1994). Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession. Foreign Affairs, 73, 28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20045917
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Mastromarco, C., & Zago, A. (2012). On modeling the determinants of TFP growth. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(4), 373–382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2012.04.001
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Melitz, M. J., & Trefler, D. (2012). Gains from trade when firms matter. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(2), 91–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.2.91
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Miller, S. M., & Upadhyay, M. P. (2000). The effects of openness, trade orientation, and human capital on total factor productivity. Journal of Development Economics, 63(2), 399–423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00112-7
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Mohamed Sghaier, I. (2023). Trade openness, financial development and economic growth in North African countries. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 28(2), 1729–1740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2503
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff, K. (2000). New directions for stochastic open economy models. Journal of International Economics, 50(1), 117–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(99)00034-3
    View in Google Scholar
  54. Ottaviano, G. I. P., Peri, G., & Wright, G. C. (2018). Immigration, trade and productivity in services: Evidence from U.K. firms. Journal of International Economics, 112, 88–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2018.02.007
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Department of Economics Working Paper, 2004-15. Retrieved from https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/wilwileco/2004-15.htm. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604203073
    View in Google Scholar
  56. Qiao, H., Kang, Y., Yan, J., Zhang, J., Zheng, Z., & Liang, Q. (2023). What role does trade expansion play in the natural resource sustainability of highly resource-consuming countries? Testing moderating role of exports and innovation. Resources Policy, 82, 103424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103424
    View in Google Scholar
  57. Raghupathi, V., & Raghupathi, W. (2017). Innovation at country-level: Association between economic development and patents. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 6(1), 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-017-0065-0
    View in Google Scholar
  58. Raghutla, C. (2020). The effect of trade openness on economic growth: Some empirical evidence from emerging market economies. Journal of Public Affairs, 20(3), e2081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2081
    View in Google Scholar
  59. Ramzan, M., Sheng, B., Shahbaz, M., Song, J., & Jiao, Z. (2019). Impact of trade openness on GDP growth: Does TFP matter? Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 28(8), 960–995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2019.1616805
    View in Google Scholar
  60. Rehman, F. U., & Islam, M. M. (2023). Financial infrastructure—total factor productivity (TFP) nexus within the purview of FDI outflow, trade openness, innovation, human capital and institutional quality: Evidence from BRICS economies. Applied Economics, 55(7), 783–801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2022.2094333
    View in Google Scholar
  61. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
    View in Google Scholar
  62. Rouvinen, P. (2002). R&D—productivity dynamics: Causality, lags, and ‘dry holes’. Journal of Applied Economics, 5(1), 123–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2002.12040573
    View in Google Scholar
  63. Sakyi, D., Villaverde, J., & Maza, A. (2015). Trade openness, income levels, and economic growth: The case of developing countries, 1970–2009. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 24(6), 860–882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2014.971422
    View in Google Scholar
  64. Shabbir, M. N., Arshad, M. U., Alvi, M. A., & Iftikhar, K. (2023). Impact of trade policy uncertainty and sustainable development on medical innovation for developed countries: An application of did approach. Sustainability, 15(1), 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010049
    View in Google Scholar
  65. Sohag, K., Begum, R. A., Abdullah, S. M. S., & Jaafar, M. (2015). Dynamics of energy use, technological innovation, economic growth and trade openness in Malaysia. Energy, 90, 1497–1507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.101
    View in Google Scholar
  66. Solow, R. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
    View in Google Scholar
  67. Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1926047
    View in Google Scholar
  68. Trejos, S., & Barboza, G. (2015). Dynamic estimation of the relationship between trade openness and output growth in Asia. Journal of Asian Economics, 36, 110–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2014.10.001
    View in Google Scholar
  69. Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel cointegration tests of the fisher effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2), 193–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.967
    View in Google Scholar
  70. Widman, T., Jasko, S. A., & Pilotta, J. J. (1988). Technology transfer: Theory and outline of a research model for managing cultural change. Howard Journal of Communications, 1(1), 88–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10646178809359671
    View in Google Scholar
  71. Wu, M., & Han, X. (2022). Influence of economic openness on total factor productivity: Evidence from China’s belt and road initiative. Sustainability, 14(20), 13375; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013375
    View in Google Scholar
  72. Zhao, Z., Gozgor, G., Lau, M. C. K., Mahalik, M. K., Patel, G., & Khalfaoui, R. (2023). The impact of geopolitical risks on renewable energy demand in OECD countries. Energy Economics, 122, 106700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106700
    View in Google Scholar

Similar Articles

1-10 of 371

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.