Digital twin-based virtual factory and cyber-physical production systems, collaborative autonomous robotic and networked manufacturing technologies, and enterprise and business intelligence algorithms for industrial metaverse

Abstract

Research background: Cognitive computing and robotic technologies, enterprise digital twin system modeling, and sensory perception algorithms optimize industrial big data exchange and production collaboration, production floor management, and smart device 3D simulation and visualization in the Industry 5.0 metaverse and virtual shop floor environments. Enterprise metaverse business operations, multi-granularity cognitive computing, and industrial big data fusion simulation integrate virtual and augmented reality technologies, collaborative robotic and industrial cyber-physical production systems, and artificial intelligence-enabled edge computing and Internet of Everything devices in mobile edge computing environments. Cloud-based production and digital twin Internet of Things networks, 3D immersive virtual reality and realistic 3D scene construction technologies, and cyber-physical production and business process management systems articulate smart production engineering and management, artificial intelligence-driven physics simulation, and Internet of Things-based robotic manufacturing in highly realistic industrial product representations and 3D virtual spaces with regard to big data-driven business decisions.

Purpose of the article: We show that 3D immersive virtual reality and digital twin metaverse technologies, spatial scanning modeling, and autonomous robotic and virtual factory simulation systems are pivotal in immersive 3D process management, industrial manufacturing production value, and knowledge accumulation in synthetic simulated environments. 3D simulation-based industrial processes and immersive experiences can be attained through cognitive computing and robotic technologies, multi-modal information fusion, autonomous intelligence generation, and multiple production process management in immersive 3D metaverse environments. Immersive, multisensory, and augmented digital experiences can be attained through 3D factory simulation and immersive extended reality technologies, cognitive robotic process automation, autonomous robotic and industrial machine learning systems, and task allocation optimization in computer-generated 3D virtual environments.

Methods: We analyzed and synthesized common operations for the first 60 companies in industrial metaverse on ensun (AI-based supplier sourcing tool’s) website in terms of key takeaway, working industry, type of company, and specialized areas, and identified three main topics.

Findings & value added: The main value added derived from our research is that industrial metaverse 3D simulation and modeling, digital twin and remote fault diagnosis technologies, multiphysics simulation and predictive maintenance tools assist industrial big data monitoring and management, Internet of Things-based robotic manufacturing, and multiple processing tasks in 3D digital twin factories. Collaborative autonomous manufacturing operations, artificial intelligence-driven physics simulation, and smart industrial devices and processes necessitate industrial metaverse decentralized federated learning, cognitive computing and robotic technologies, and cognitive digital twins in virtual shop floor environments, generating economic value. 3D simulation and visualization technologies, business intelligence and digital twin-based cyber-physical production systems, and big data-driven forecasting and real-time collision detection algorithms can be harnessed in robotic automation processes, intelligent manufacturing upgrading, and sustainable industrial value creation across 3D digital twin factories and distributed computing environments.

Keywords

digital twin, industrial metaverse, virtual factory, cyber-physical production, networked manufacturing, enterprise and business intelligence

References

1. Agarwal, A., & Alathur, S. (2023). Metaverse revolution and the digital transformation: Intersectional analysis of Industry 5.0. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 17, 688‒707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-03-2023-0036
   View in Google Scholar
2. Al-Sharafi, M. A., Al-Emran, M., Al-Qaysi, N., Iranmanesh, M., & Ibrahim, N. (2023). Drivers and barriers affecting metaverse adoption: A systematic review, theoretical framework, and avenues for future research. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(20), 7043‒7064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2260984
   View in Google Scholar
3. Andronie, M., Lăzăroiu, G., Iatagan, M., Uță, C., Ștefănescu, R., & Cocoșatu, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms, Internet of Things sensing networks, and deep learning-assisted smart process management in cyber-physical production systems. Electronics, 10(20), 2497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10202497
   View in Google Scholar
4. Andronie, M., Lăzăroiu, G., Iatagan, M., Hurloiu, I., Ștefănescu, R., Dijmărescu, A., & Dijmărescu, I. (2023a). Big data management algorithms, deep learning-based object detection technologies, and geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools in the Internet of Robotic Things. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(2), 35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12020035
   View in Google Scholar
5. Andronie, M., Lăzăroiu, G., Karabolevski, O. L., Ștefănescu, R., Hurloiu, I., Dijmărescu, A., & Dijmărescu, I. (2023b). Remote big data management tools, sensing and computing technologies, and visual perception and environment mapping algorithms in the Internet of Robotic Things. Electronics, 12(1), 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12010022
   View in Google Scholar
6. Aung, N., Dhelim, S., Chen, L., Ning, H., Atzori, L., & Kechadi, T. (2024). Edge-enabled metaverse: The convergence of metaverse and mobile edge computing. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 29(3), 795‒805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26599/TST.2023.9010052
   View in Google Scholar
7. Awan, K. A., Din, I. U., Almogren, A., & Seo-Kim, B. (2023). Blockchain-based trust management for virtual entities in the metaverse: A model for avatar and virtual organization interactions. IEEE Access, 11, 136370‒136394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3337806
   View in Google Scholar
8. Bellalouna, F., & Puljiz, D. (2023). Use case for the application of the industrial metaverse approach for engineering design review. Procedia CIRP, 119, 638‒643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.03.116
   View in Google Scholar
9. Calandra, D., Oppioli, M., Sadraei, R., Jafari-Sadeghi, V., & Biancone, P. P. (2024). Metaverse meets digital entrepreneurship: A practitioner-based qualitative synthesis. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 30(2/3), 666‒686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2023-0041
   View in Google Scholar
10. Cao, J., Zhu, X., Sun, S., Wei, Z., Jiang, Y., Wang, J., & Lau, V. K. N. (2023). Toward industrial metaverse: Age of information, latency and reliability of short-packet transmission in 6G. IEEE Wireless Communications, 30(2), 40‒47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2001.2200396
    View in Google Scholar
11. Chai, Y., Qian, J., & Younas, M. (2023). Metaverse: Concept, key technologies, and vision. International Journal of Crowd Science, 7(4), 149‒157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26599/IJCS.2023.9100024
    View in Google Scholar
12. Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., & Vrontis, D. (2022). Examining the impact of adoption of emerging technology and supply chain resilience on firm performance: moderating role of absorptive capacity and leadership support. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 10373‒10386. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3134188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3134188
    View in Google Scholar
13. Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Gupta, S., Sivarajah, U., & Bag, S. (2023). Assessing the impact of big data analytics on decision-making processes, forecasting, and performance of a firm. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, 122824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122824
    View in Google Scholar
14. Chen, C., Fu, H., Zheng, Y., Tao, F., & Liu, Y. (2023a). The advance of digital twin for predictive maintenance: The role and function of machine learning. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 71, 581‒594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.10.010
    View in Google Scholar
15. Chen, Y., Huang, W., Jiang, X., Zhang, T., Wang, Y., Yan, B., Wang, Z., Chen, Q., Xing, Y., Li, D., & Long, G. (2023b). UbiMeta: A ubiquitous operating system model for metaverse. International Journal of Crowd Science, 7(4), 180‒189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26599/IJCS.2023.9100028
    View in Google Scholar
16. Chowdhury, M. (2023). Icon: An intelligent resource slicing and task coordination framework for Web 3.0 and metaverse-based service execution over 6G-based immersive edge computing network. International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, 44(3), 167‒202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAHUC.2023.134763
    View in Google Scholar
17. Cui, Z., Yang, X., Yue, J., Liu, X., Tao, W., Xia, Q., & Wu, C. (2023). A review of digital twin technology for electromechanical products: Evolution focus throughout key lifecycle phases. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 70, 264‒287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.07.016
    View in Google Scholar
18. Erman, B., & Martino, C. D. (2023). Generative network performance prediction with network digital twin. IEEE Network, 37(2), 286‒292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.002.2200515
    View in Google Scholar
19. Ferrari, F., & McKelvey, F. (2023). Hyperproduction: A social theory of deep generative models. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 24(2), 338‒360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2022.2137546
    View in Google Scholar
20. Fu, M., Wang, Z., Wang, J., Wang, Q., Wu, J., Sun, L., Ma, Z., Huang, R., Li, X., Wang, D., & Liang, Q. (2023). Environmental intelligent perception in the industrial Internet of Things: A case study analysis of a multicrane visual sorting system. IEEE Sensors Journal, 23(19), 22731‒22741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2023.3294962
    View in Google Scholar
21. Gattullo, M., Laviola, E., Evangelista, A., Fiorentino, M., & Uva, A. E. (2022). Towards the evaluation of augmented reality in the metaverse: Information presentation modes. Applied Sciences, 12(24), 12600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app122412600
    View in Google Scholar
22. Grieves, M. (2023). Digital twin certified: Employing virtual testing of digital twins in manufacturing to ensure quality products. Machines, 11(8), 808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11080808
    View in Google Scholar
23. Han, J., Yang, M., Chen, X., Liu, H., Wang, Y., Li, J., Su, Z., Li, Z., & Ma, X. (2023). ParaDefender: A scenario-driven parallel system for defending metaverses. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 53(4), 2118‒2127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2022.3228928
    View in Google Scholar
24. Hou, J., Chen, G., Li, Z., He, W., Gu, S., Knoll, A., & Jiang, C. (2024a). Hybrid residual multiexpert reinforcement learning for spatial scheduling of high-density parking lots. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 54(5), 2771‒2783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2023.3312647
    View in Google Scholar
25. Hou, X., Wang, J., Jiang, C., Meng, Z., Chen, J., & Ren, Y. (2024b). Efficient federated learning for metaverse via dynamic user selection, gradient quantization and resource allocation. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 42(4), 850‒866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2023.3345393
    View in Google Scholar
26. Huawei, H., Qinnan, Z., Taotao, L., Qinglin, Y., Zhaokang, Y., Junhao, W., Xiong, Z., Jianming, Z., Wu, J., & Zheng, Z. (2023). Economic systems in the metaverse: Basics, state of the art, and challenges. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(4), 99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3626315
    View in Google Scholar
27. Jagatheesaperumal, S. K., Yang, Z., Yang, Q., Huang, C., Xu, W., Shikh-Bahaei, M., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Semantic-aware digital twin for metaverse: A comprehensive review. IEEE Wireless Communications, 30(4), 38‒46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.003.2200616
    View in Google Scholar
28. Jamshidi, M., Dehghaniyan Serej, A., Jamshidi, A., & Moztarzadeh, O. (2023). The meta-metaverse: Ideation and future directions. Future Internet, 15(8), 252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15080252
    View in Google Scholar
29. Jim, J. R., Hosain, M. T., Mridha, M. F., Kabir, M. M., & Shin, J. (2023). Toward trustworthy metaverse: Advancements and challenges. IEEE Access, 11, 118318‒118347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3326258
    View in Google Scholar
30. Kaarlela, T., Pitkäaho, T., Pieskä, S., Padrão, P., Bobadilla, L., Tikanmäki, M., Haavisto, T., Blanco Bataller, V., Laivuori, N., Luimula, M. (2023). Towards metaverse: Utilizing extended reality and digital twins to control robotic systems. Actuators, 12(6), 219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/act12060219
    View in Google Scholar
31. Kaigom, E. G. (2024). Metarobotics for industry and society: Vision, technologies, and opportunities. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 20(4), 5725‒5736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2023.3337380
    View in Google Scholar
32. Khalaj, O., Jamshidi, M., Hassas, P., Hosseininezhad, M., Mašek, B., Štadler, C., & Svoboda, J. (2023). Metaverse and AI digital twinning of 42SiCr steel alloys. Mathematics, 11(1), 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math11010004
    View in Google Scholar
33. Kshetri, N. (2023). The economics of the industrial metaverse. IT Professional, 25(1), 84‒88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2023.3236494
    View in Google Scholar
34. Laviola, E., Gattullo, M., Manghisi, V. M., Fiorentino, M., & Uva, A. E. (2022). Minimal AR: Visual asset optimization for the authoring of augmented reality work instructions in manufacturing. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 119, 1769–1784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08449-6
    View in Google Scholar
35. Lăzăroiu, G., Andronie, M., Iatagan, M., Geamănu, M., Ștefănescu, R., & Dijmărescu, I. (2022). Deep learning-assisted smart process planning, robotic wireless sensor networks, and geospatial big data management algorithms in the Internet of Manufacturing Things. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11(5), 277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11050277
    View in Google Scholar
36. Leng, J., Sha, W., Wang, B., Zheng, P., Zhuang, C., Liu, Q., Wuest, T., Mourtzis D., & Wang, L. (2022). Industry 5.0: Prospect and retrospect. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 65, 279‒295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.09.017
    View in Google Scholar
37. Li, Q., Kong, L., Min, X., & Zhang, B. (2023). DareChain: A blockchain-based trusted collaborative network infrastructure for metaverse. International Journal of Crowd Science, 7(4), 168‒179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26599/IJCS.2023.9100025
    View in Google Scholar
38. Liu, J., Ma, C., & Wang, S. (2023). Thermal-structure finite element simulation system architecture in a cloud-edge-end collaborative environment. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 36, 1063‒1094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-023-02269-z
    View in Google Scholar
39. Lyu, Z., & Fridenfalk, M. (2023). Digital twins for building industrial metaverse. Journal of Advanced Research, 66, 31‒38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2023.11.019
    View in Google Scholar
40. Magalhães, L. C., Magalhães, L. C., Ramos, J. B., Moura, L. R., de Moraes, R. E. N., Gonçalves, J. B., Hisatugu, W. H., Souza, M. T., de Lacalle, L. N. L., & Ferreira, J. C. E. (2022). Conceiving a digital twin for a flexible manufacturing system. Applied Sciences, 12(19), 9864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199864
    View in Google Scholar
41. Maier, M., Hosseini, N., & Soltanshahi, M. (2024). INTERBEING: On the symbiosis between INTERnet and human BEING. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 13(3), 98‒106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCE.2023.3319849
    View in Google Scholar
42. Meng, Z., Chen, K., Diao, Y., She, C., Zhao, G., Imran, M. A., & Vucetic, B. (2024). Task-oriented cross-system design for timely and accurate modelling in the metaverse. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 42(3), 752‒766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2023.3345398
    View in Google Scholar
43. Mourad, N., Alsattar, H. A., Qahtan, S., Zaidan, A. A., Deveci, M., Sangaiah, A. K., & Pedrycz, W. (2023). Optimising control engineering tools using digital twin capabilities and other cyber-physical metaverse manufacturing system components. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 70(1), 3212‒3221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCE.2023.3326047
    View in Google Scholar
44. Mourtzis, D., Angelopoulos, J., & Panopoulos, N. (2023). Blockchain integration in the era of industrial metaverse. Applied Sciences, 13(3), 1353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031353
    View in Google Scholar
45. Mourtzis, D., Angelopoulos, J., & Panopoulos, N. (2024). Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) path planning and control assisted by augmented reality (AR): The case of indoor drones. International Journal of Production Research, 62(9), 3361‒3382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2232470
    View in Google Scholar
46. Nagy, M., Lăzăroiu, G., & Valaskova, K. (2023). Machine intelligence and autonomous robotic technologies in the corporate context of SMEs: Deep learning and virtual simulation algorithms, cyber-physical production networks, and Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Applied Sciences, 13(3), 1681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031681
    View in Google Scholar
47. Nair, M. R., Bindu, N., Jose, R., & Satheesh Kumar, K. (2024). From assistive technology to the backbone: The impact of blockchain in manufacturing. Evolutionary Intelligence, 17(3), 1257–1278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-023-00872-w
    View in Google Scholar
48. Negri, E., & Abdel-Aty, T. A. (2023). Clarifying concepts of metaverse, digital twin, digital thread and AAS for CPS-based production systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 56(2), 6351‒6357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2023.10.818
    View in Google Scholar
49. Ooi, K.-B., Wei-Han Tan, G., Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Arpaci, I., Zaidan, A. A., Lee, V.-H., Wong, L.-W., Deveci, M., & Iranmanesh, M. (2023). The metaverse in engineering management: Overview, opportunities, challenges, and future research agenda. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 13882‒13889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3307562
    View in Google Scholar
50. Özkal, İ., Özkan, İ. A., & Başçiftçi, F. (2024). Metaverse token price forecasting using artificial neural networks (ANNs) and Adaptive neural fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). Neural Computing and Applications, 36, 3267–3290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-09228-y
    View in Google Scholar
51. Park, A., Wilson, M., Robson, K., Demetis, D., & Kietzmann, J. (2023). Interoperability: Our exciting and terrifying Web3 future. Business Horizons, 66(4), 529‒541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2022.10.005
    View in Google Scholar
52. Reiman, A., Kaivo-oja, J., Parviainen, E., Takala, E.-P., & Lauraeus, T. (2023). Human work in the shift to Industry 4.0: A road map to the management of technological changes in manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2291814
    View in Google Scholar
53. Ritterbusch, G. D., & Teichmann, M. R. (2023). Defining the metaverse: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 11, 12368‒12377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3241809
    View in Google Scholar
54. Schmitt, M. (2023). Securing the digital world: Protecting smart infrastructures and digital industries with artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled malware and intrusion detection. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 36, 100520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2023.100520
    View in Google Scholar
55. Siriweera, A., & Naruse, K. (2023). QoS-aware federated crosschain-based modeldriven reference architecture for IIoT sensor networks in distributed manufacturing. IEEE Sensors Journal, 23(23), 29630‒29644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2023.3325342
    View in Google Scholar
56. Stary, C. (2023). Digital process twins as intelligent design technology for engineering metaverse/XR applications. Sustainability, 15(22), 16062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216062
    View in Google Scholar
57. Stodt, F., Stodt, J., & Reich, C. (2023). Blockchain secured dynamic machine learning pipeline for manufacturing. Applied Sciences, 13(2), 782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13020782
    View in Google Scholar
58. Striffler, N., & Voigt, T. (2023). Concepts and trends of virtual commissioning – A comprehensive review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 71, 664‒680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.10.013
    View in Google Scholar
59. Theodoropoulos, N., Kampourakis, E., Andronas, D., & Makris, S. (2023). Cyberphysical systems in non-rigid assemblies: A methodology for the calibration of deformable object reconstruction models. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 70, 525‒537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.08.022
    View in Google Scholar
60. Truong, V. T., Le, L., & Niyato, D. (2023). Blockchain meets metaverse and digital asset management: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Access, 11, 26258‒26288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257029
    View in Google Scholar
61. Wan, Z., Gao, Z., Di Renzo, M., & Hanzo, L. (2022). The road to Industry 4.0 and beyond: A communications-, information-, and operation technology collaboration perspective. IEEE Network, 36(6), 157‒164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.008.2100484
    View in Google Scholar
62. Wang, H., Ning, H., Lin, Y., Wang, W., Dhelim, S., Farha, F., Ding, J., & Daneshmand, M. (2023a). A survey on the metaverse: The state-of-the-art, technologies, applications, and challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10(16), 14671‒14688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2023.3278329
    View in Google Scholar
63. Wang, Y., Su, Z., Guo, S., Dai, M., Luan, T. H., & Liu, Y. (2023b). A survey on digital twins: Architecture, enabling technologies, security and privacy, and future prospects. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10(17), 14965‒14987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2023.3263909
    View in Google Scholar
64. Wang, P., Wei, Z.; Qi, H., Wan, S., Xiao, Y., Sun, G., & Zhang, Q. (2024). Mitigating poor data quality impact with federated unlearning for human-centric metaverse. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 42(4), 832‒849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2023.3345388
    View in Google Scholar
65. Wu, D., Yang, Z., Zhang, P., Wang, R., Yang, B., & Ma, X. (2023). Virtual-reality interpromotion technology for metaverse: A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10(18), 15788‒15809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2023.3265848
    View in Google Scholar
66. Xiang, W., Yu, K., Han, F., Fang, L., He, D., & Han, Q.-L. (2024). Advanced manufacturing in Industry 5.0: A survey of key enabling technologies and future trends. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 20(2), 1055‒1068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2023.3274224
    View in Google Scholar
67. Xinyi, T., Juuso, A., Riku, A.-L., Chao, Y., Pauli, S., & Kari, T. (2023). TwinXR: Method for using digital twin descriptions in industrial eXtended reality applications. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 4, 1019080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2023.1019080
    View in Google Scholar
68. Yang, J., Wang, X., & Zhao, Y. (2022). Parallel manufacturing for industrial metaverses: A new paradigm in smart manufacturing. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 9(12), 2063‒2070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2022.106097
    View in Google Scholar
69. Ying, K., Gao, Z., Chen, S., Zhou, M., Zheng, D., Chatzinotas, S., Ottersten, B., & Poor, H. V. (2023). Quasi-synchronous random access for massive MIMO-based LEO satellite constellations. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 41(6), 1702‒1722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2023.3273699
    View in Google Scholar
70. Zaidan, A. A., Alsattar, H. A., Qahtan, S., Deveci, M., Pamucar, D., & HajiaghaeiKeshteli, M. (2023). Uncertainty decision modelling approach for control engineering tools to support industrial cyber-physical metaverse smart manufacturing systems. IEEE Systems Journal, 17(4), 5303‒5314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2023.3266842
    View in Google Scholar
71. Zhang, L., Du, Q., Lu, L., & Zhang, S. (2023). Overview of the integration of communications, sensing, computing, and storage as enabling technologies for the metaverse over 6G networks. Electronics, 12(17), 3651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12173651
    View in Google Scholar