Entrepreneurial activity drivers in the transition economies. Evidence from the Visegrad countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.005Keywords:
entrepreneurship, transition economies, the Visegrad countriesAbstract
Research background: Entrepreneurship issues in the transition economies have attracted growing attention from scholars in recent years. However, the debate over the value of entrepreneurship in reinforcing structural change is still incomplete. The need for a more thorough approach is noticeable, taking into account drivers which determine entrepreneurial activity in the transition economies. The findings may be useful for recognising opportunities and threats of the development of these economies.
Purpose of the article: This paper extends research on entrepreneurship in the transition economies by considering drivers of entrepreneurial activity. The aim of the paper is to investigate what drivers have their consequences for entrepreneurial activity in the Visegrad countries. As the Visegrad countries represent a unique context, because they faced a similar structure at the beginning of the transition process, a valuable insight can be gained by focusing on them.
Methods: Hypothesis development is based on the literature review. Fixed effects panel regression was employed for hypothesis testing. Panel data consists of 440 observations for the Visegrad countries for the 2004?2014 period. To control for autocorrelation and hetero-scedasticity, Durbin-Watson test and Wald statistic were used, respectively.
Findings & Value added: This paper contributes to the existing literature by pre-senting an analysis of drivers having their impact on entrepreneurial activity in the Visegrad countries. It provides new insights on understanding of the entrepreneur-ship issues in the transition economies. The main finding is that entrepreneurial activity in the Visegrad countries is determined significantly by the economy struc-ture and human capital. However, the signif-icance and the intensity of these effects are different. The findings may be interesting for policymakers in particular. Shifting from general entrepreneurship support towards a focus on promoting entrepreneurial behaviour among high-skilled workers should be considered. Fostering networking, collaboration and internalisation should be regarded for knowledge transfer and spillover enhancement.
Downloads
References
Adamowicz, M., & Machla, A. (2016). Small and medium enterprises and the support policy of local government. Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(3). doi: 10.12775/OeC.2016.024.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/OeC.2016.024
View in Google Scholar
Armington, C., & Acs, Z. C.( 2002). The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Regional Studies, 36(1). doi: 10.1080/00343400120099843.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400120099843
View in Google Scholar
Audretsch, D. B., Bönte, W., & Keilbach, M. (2008). Entrepreneurship capital and its impact on knowledge diffusion and economic performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 23. doi: doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.01.006.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.01.006
View in Google Scholar
Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2004). Entrepreneurship and regional growth: an evolutionary interpretation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(5). doi: 10.1007/s00191-004-0228-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0228-6
View in Google Scholar
Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34(8). doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.012.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.012
View in Google Scholar
Bartosiewicz, S. (Ed.) (1980). Metody ekonometryczne. Przykłady i zadania. Warszawa: PWE.
View in Google Scholar
Benneworth, P. (2004). In what sense ‘regional development?’: entrepreneurship, underdevelopment and strong tradition in the periphery. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(6). doi: 10.1080/0898562042000249786.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0898562042000249786
View in Google Scholar
Bosma, N., Van Stel, A., & Suddle, K. (2008). The geography of new firm formation: evidence from independent startups and new subsidiaries in the Netherlands. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(2). doi: 10.1007/s11365-007-0058-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-007-0058-8
View in Google Scholar
Bosma, N., & Schutjens, V. (2011). Understanding regional variation in entrepreneurial activity and entrepreneurial attitude in Europe. Annals of Regional Studies, 47(3). doi 10.1007/s00168-010-0375-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-010-0375-7
View in Google Scholar
Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Obloj, K. (2008). Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: where are we today and where should the research go in the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1). doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007. 00213.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00213.x
View in Google Scholar
Drejer, I., & Vinding, A.L. (2007). Searching near and far: determinants of innovative firms’ propensity to collaborate across geographical distance. Industry and Innovation, 14(3). doi: 10.1080/13662710701369205.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710701369205
View in Google Scholar
Dvouletý, O., & Mareš, J. (2016). Relationship between unemployment and entrepreneurial activity: evidence found among Visegrad countries. In Innovation Management, Entrepreneurship and Corporate Sustainability (IMECS 2016). Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze.
View in Google Scholar
Erkut, B. (2016). Entrepreneurship and economic freedom: do objective and subjective data reflect the same tendencies? Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(3). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040302.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040302
View in Google Scholar
Fabuš, M. 2017. Current development of business environment in Slovakia and Czech Republic. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(1). doi: 10.9770/jesi.2017.5.1(10).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.5.1(10)
View in Google Scholar
Fritsch, M. (1997). New firms and regional employment change. Small Business Economics, 9(5). doi: 10.1023/A:1007942918390.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007942918390
View in Google Scholar
Fritsch, M., Bublitz, E., Sorgner, A., & Wyrwich, M. (2014). How much of a socialist legacy? The re-emergence of entrepreneurship in the East German transformation to a market economy. Small Business Economics, 43(2). doi: 10.1007/s11187-014-9544-x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9544-x
View in Google Scholar
Fritsch, M. & Falck, O. (2007). New business formation by industry over space and time: a multidimensional analysis. Regional Studies, 41(2). doi: 10.1080/00343400600928301.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400600928301
View in Google Scholar
Fritsch, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2016). The effect of entrepreneurship on economic development — an empirical analysis using regional entrepreneurship culture. Journal of Economic Geography, 17(1). doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbv049.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbv049
View in Google Scholar
Gubik, A. S., & Wach, K. (Ed.) (2014). International entrepreneurship and corporate growth in Visegrad countries. Miskolc: University of Miskolc.
View in Google Scholar
Gries, T., & Naudé, W. (2010). Entrepreneurship and structural economic transformation. Small Business Economics, 34(1). doi: 10.1007/s11187-009-9192-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9192-8
View in Google Scholar
Holienka, M., Jančovičová, Z., & Kovačičová, Z. (2016). Drivers of women entrepreneurship in Visegrad countries: GEM evidence. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 220. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.476.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.476
View in Google Scholar
Huggins, R., Prokop, D., & Thompson, P. (2017). Entrepreneurship and the determinants of firm survival within regions: human capital, growth motivation and locational conditions. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29(3-4). doi: 10.1080/08985626.2016.1271830.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2016.1271830
View in Google Scholar
Huggins, R., & Thompson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional growth: a network theory. Small Business Economics, 45(1). doi: 10.1007/ s11187-015-9643-3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9643-3
View in Google Scholar
Ireland, R. D., Tihanyi, L., & Webb, J. W. (2008). A tale of two politico-economic systems: implications for entrepreneurship in Central and Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1). doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00218.x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00218.x
View in Google Scholar
Ivanová, E. (2017). Barriers to the development of SMEs in the Slovak Republic. Oeconomia Copernicana, 8(2), doi: 10.24136/oc.v8i2.16.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.v8i2.16
View in Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3). doi: 10.1086/261763.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261763
View in Google Scholar
Kshetri, N. (2009). Entrepreneurship in post-socialist economies: a typology and institutional contexts for market entrepreneurship. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 7(3). doi: 10.1007/s10843-009-0039-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-009-0039-9
View in Google Scholar
Manolova, T. S., Eunni, R. V., & Gyoshev, B. S. (2008). Institutional environments for entrepreneurship: Evidence from emerging economies in Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1/9). doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00222.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00222.x
View in Google Scholar
McMillan, J., & Woodruff, C. (2002). The central role of entrepreneurs in transition economies. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(3).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/089533002760278767
View in Google Scholar
Pietrzak, M. B., Balcerzak, A. P., Gajdos, A., & Arendt, Ł.(2017a). Entrepreneurial environment at regional level: the case of Polish path towards sustainable socio-economic development. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(2), doi: 10.9770/jesi.2017.5.2(2).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.5.2(2)
View in Google Scholar
Reynolds, P., Miller, B., & Maki, W. R. (1995). Explaining regional variation in business births and deaths: U.S. 1976–88. Small Business Economics, 7(5). doi: 10.1007/BF01302739.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01302739
View in Google Scholar
Smallbone, D., & Welter, F. (2001). The distinctiveness of entrepreneurship in transition economies. Small Business Economics, 16(4), doi: 10.1023/A: 1011159216578.
View in Google Scholar
Smallbone, D., Welter, F., Voytovich, A., & Egorov, I. (2010). Government and entrepreneurship in transition economies: the case of small firms in business services in Ukraine. Service Industries Journal, 30(5). doi: 10.1080/026420 60802253876.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060802253876
View in Google Scholar
Stoica, C. A. (2004). From good communists to even better capitalists? Entrepreneurial pathways in post-socialist Romania. East European Politics and Societies, 18(2). doi: 10.1177/0888325403259864.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325403259864
View in Google Scholar
Sukiassyan, G. (2007). Inequality and growth: what does the transition economy data say? Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(1). doi: 10.1016/j.jce. 2006.11.002.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2006.11.002
View in Google Scholar
Valliere, D., & Peterson, R. (2009). Entrepreneurship and economic growth: evidence from emerging and developed countries. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 21(5-6). doi: 10.1080/08985620802332723.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620802332723
View in Google Scholar
Van Stel, A., & Storey, D.J. (2004). Link between firm births and job creation: is there a Upas Tree effect? Regional Studies, 38(8). doi: 10.1080/003434 0042000280929.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000280929
View in Google Scholar
Wąsowska, A. (2016). Who doesn't want to be an entrepreneur? The role of need for closure in forming entrepreneurial intention of Polish students. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(3). doi: 10.15678/EBER. 2016.040303.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040303
View in Google Scholar
Wyrwich, M. (2013). Can socioeconomic heritage produce a lost generation with regard to entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing, 28(5). doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.09.001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.09.001
View in Google Scholar
Zygmunt, A. (2017). Innovation activities of Polish firms. Multivariate analysis of the moderate innovator countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 8(4). doi: 10.24136/oc.v8i4.31.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.v8i4.31
View in Google Scholar
Zygmunt, J. (2017). Enterprises’ development in peripheral regions: patterns and determinants. Problemy Zarządzania, 15(65). doi: 10.7172/1644-9584.65.14.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7172/1644-9584.65.14
View in Google Scholar
