Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Culture of organization in conditions of changes as an ability of efficient transformations: the case of gas transportation companies in Ukraine

Abstract

Research background: The relevance of the research on corporate culture in the conditions of changes is substantiated and its elements, which are important for effective transformations, are defined. The influence of corporate culture on the company performance and its elements is identified. The article deals with hierarchical levels of corporate culture which identify elements of corporate culture and "hidden" factors that allow establishing relationships with the outside world and promote productive work.

Purpose of the article: The objective of the article is to identify the elements of the organizational culture at the enterprise level, which influence the effectiveness of its activities under the changes and generalization of its components that determine its ability to transform the existing state in accordance with the established world experience and practice. The research is based on the experience of gas transportation companies in Ukraine.

Methods: The McKinsey 7S model was used to describe the enterprise to assess the state of the proposed levels of formation and to change its corporate culture. The McKinsey 7S Framework used in this study as analytical tool to explore a system of interrelated elements which improve the organization's work, raising the level of employee culture and generating common values. The expert method was used to assess the qualitative indices of enterprise internal environment, including "style/culture" and "common values", based on the questionnaire of the experts' group. The survey was conducted at three levels of management for the gas transportation companies, located in different regions of Ukraine. The three levels of management for the mentioned above enterprises ? top, middle and low managers were taken into account. The use of the fuzzy logic method makes it possible to investigate the influence of the corporate culture elements on the results of the enterprises and to identify those elements which are important for the implementation of changes at the enterprise and without which it is impossible to achieve effective transformations.

Findings & Value added: Taking into account the results of the assessment of corporate culture elements at the investigated companies, the directions of corporate culture development for enterprises that are in a state of changes are pointed out, namely: use of different management styles; support of employees in making innovative decisions; development of cooperation and elimination of conflicts between workers; formation of general corporate values; creating trust between employees and top managers; promoting the development of young workers; use of the mechanisms of education and maintenance of a high level of morality and culture of workers.

Keywords

enterprise, corporate culture, changes, transformation, enterprise efficiency, fuzzy logic method

PDF

References

  1. Alshaher, A. (2013). The McKinsey 7S Model framework for e–learning system readiness assessment. International Journal of Advances in Engineering & Technology, 6(5).
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Bhatti, O. (2011). Strategy implementation: an alternative choice of 8S’S. Annals of Management Research, 1(2).
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Cameron, K., & Quinn, R. (2006). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: based on the competing values framework. John Wiley & Sons.
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Davis, R., & Cates, S. (2018). The implementation of the organizational culture assessment instrument in creation of a successful organizational cultural change. IJBPA, 15(1).
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Denison, D., & Mishra, A. (1989). Organizational culture and organizational effectiveness: a theory and some preliminary empirical evidence. doi:10.5465/ ambpp.1989.4980714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.1989.4980714
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Fedulova, I. (2011). Approaches to the assessment of the level of readiness of the enterprise for innovation development. Bulletin of the Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University. Economics, 124(125).
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Frolova, Y., & Mahmood, M. (2019). Variations in employee duty orientation: impact of personality, leadership styles and corporate culture. Eurasian Business Review, 9. doi: 10.1007/s40821-019-00135-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-019-00135-8
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2014). The value of corporate culture. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1). doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.05.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.05.010
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Gyepi-Garbray, F., & Binfor, F (2013). An analysis of internal environment of a commercialoriented research organization: using Mckinsey 7S framework in a Ghanaian context. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(9). doi: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v3-i9/192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v3-i9/192
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Hanafizadeh, P., & Ravasan, A. (2011). A McKinsey 7S Model–based framework for ERP readiness assessment. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 7(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/jeis.2011100103
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: the Hofstede Model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). doi: 10.9707/2307-0919.1014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
    View in Google Scholar
  12. House, R., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., & Dorfman, P. (2002). Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: an introduction to project GLOBE. Journal of World Business, 37(1). doi: 10.1016/S1090-9516(01) 00069-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9516(01)00069-4
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Kilmann, R. (1985). Corporate culture. Psychology Today, April.
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Klein, A., Horak, S., Bacouël-Jentjens, S., & Li, X. (2018). Does culture frame technological innovativeness? A study of millennials in triad countries. European Journal of International Management. doi: 10.1504/EJIM.2019. 10016816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2019.10016816
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Neethling, S. (2017). The elusiveness of organizational culture: a descriptive model for 19 understanding a much-abused concept. Available at: https://beingstrategy.com/.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Pashkina, T. (2018a). How Ukrainian companies take care of their employees: poll results. Retrieved form https://thepoint.rabota.ua/kak-ukraynskye-kompanyy-zabotyatsya-o-svoyh-sotrudnykah-rezultaty-oprosa/.
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Pashkina, T. (2018b). What employees are thinking about the corporate culture of their companies: survey results. Retrieved form https://thepoint.rabota.ua/kak-ukraynskye-kompanyy-zabotyatsya-o-svoyh-sotrudnykah-rezultaty-oprosa/.
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Peters, T. J., & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In search of excellence. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Peters, T., & Waterman, R. (2004). In search of perfection. Lessons from America's most successful companies. Profile Books.
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Schein, E. (2009). The corporate culture survival guide. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Schwartz, S. (2007). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48(1). doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1999.tb00047.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1999.tb00047.x
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Shin, D., Hasse, V., Schotter, A. (2016). Multinational enterprises within cultural space and place: integrating cultural distance and tightness–looseness. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3). doi: 10.5465/amj.2015.0423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0423
    View in Google Scholar
  23. The Organizational Strategist (2011). Retrieved form http://whittblog.wordpress .com/2011/04/24/mckinsey-7s-model-a-strategic-assessment-andalignment-model (17.02.19).
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1997). Riding the waves of culture: understan cultural diversity in business. London & Santa Rosa, Nicholas Brealey Publishing Limit.
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Weeteh, D. (2013). Strategic implementation of organizational eco–sustainability policy & strategy – A McKinsey Seven S’s approach. Australia: CPA.
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Wilson, R., & Gilligan, C. (1997). Strategic marketing management: planning, implementation and control. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Zadeh, L. (1988). Fuzzy Logic. IEEE Computer, April. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/2.53
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Zapuhlyak, I. (2017). Theoretical and methodological bases of development of gas transportation enterprises in conditions of instability of the environment of their functioning: diss. ... Doctoral dissertation, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas.
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Zapukhliak, I. Zaiachuk, Y., Polyanska, A. & Kinash, I. (2019). Applying fuzzy logic to assessment of enterprise readiness for changes. Management Science Letters, 9. doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2019.7.026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.7.026
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

11-20 of 243

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.