Compensation due to land use restrictions: the case of limited use area in the vicinity of Polish airports
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2019.031Keywords:
P43, R38, R41Abstract
Research background: The economic benefits that arise with the development of airport infrastructure are accompanied by negative externalities. Legal, technical and institutional instruments are used to mitigate or limit these effects. It involves state intervention in the use of real estate located in the vicinity of the airport, and the cost of such an intervention. On the other hand, as a result of state interventions, real estate market mechanisms are distorted. The balance on the market, prices and as a result the number of transactions is changing.
Purpose of the article: The study evaluates adaptive efficiency, which is known as the ability of the real estate market system to adapt to the purpose of public intervention. The effectiveness of state intervention is measured as the difference between market transaction costs and costs after intervention. The former means the full coverage of all individual claims of property owners at market prices. However, after the intervention, these are costs of compensation and litigation (judicial, expert opinions, provisions for payment of damages), as well as the risk of the airport's insolvency. The state intervention system is also assessed through the prism of the lack of a methodology for assessing damages and subjective claims of property owners. The article focuses on the effects of the negative impact of airport noise resulting in limitations to residential buildings? usability and depreciation of their market value. The study is based on the example of one regional airport.
Methods: The study evaluates the current compensation model related to the introduction of Limited Land Use Areas around airports in Poland, based on Poznan-Lawica airport case study. In the empirical part of the paper, we use regression analysis to examine the value of compensations for loss of property value ruled by courts, and duration analysis to explore court procedure duration time.
Findings & Value added: This research is one of the important basic research on socio-spatial connection near an airport in Poland. We argue that the current prac-tice related to compensation ruled by courts has substantial flaws (including the methodical error regarding the valuation of claims, where acoustic damage and value loss claims are treated as unrelated, thus both compensations are independently assessed). With the help of the Cox model, we demonstrate that the long distance from the airport and the location within the LUA increase the likelihood of court proceedings ending. The results are important due to the pending disputes and the costs threatening the functioning of airports in Poland.
Downloads
References
Acocella, N. (2002). Rules of economic policy: values and methods of analysis. Warszawa: PWN.
View in Google Scholar
Agboola, A. O. (2016). Neoclassical economics and new institutional economics, Property Management, 33(5). doi: 10.1108/PM-12-2014-0055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-12-2014-0055
View in Google Scholar
Batog, J., Foryś, I., Gaca, R., Gluszak M., & Konowalczuk, J. (2019). Investigating the impact of airport noise and land use restrictions on house prices: evidence from selected regional airports in Poland. Sustainability, 11(2). doi: 10.3390/ su11020412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020412
View in Google Scholar
Blossfeld, H. P., Hamerle, A., Mayer, K. U. (1989). Event history analysis, statistical theory and application in the social sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publ.
View in Google Scholar
Bowers, N. L., Gerber, H. U., Hivkman, J. C., Jones, D. A., & Nesbitt, C. J. (1986). Actuarial mathematics. The Society of Actuaries, USA. doi: 10.1017/S007 1368600009812
View in Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1969). Cost and choise. Chicago: Markham Publishing Company.
View in Google Scholar
Case, K. E., & Shiller, R. J. (1989). Association the efficiency of the market for single-family homes. American Economic Review, 79(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w2506
View in Google Scholar
Coase, R. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/466560
View in Google Scholar
Coase, R. (2013). The firm, the market and the law. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
View in Google Scholar
Cox, D. R., & Oakes, D. (1984). Analysis of survival data. New York: Chapman & Hall.
View in Google Scholar
De Soto, J. H. (2010). Justice and efficiency. Warszawa: Fijorr Publisching.
View in Google Scholar
Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. M. (2013). The economics of green building, Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00291
View in Google Scholar
Habdas, M., & Konowalczuk, J. (2018). Objectives and conditions for effective state intervention in areas of limited use of airports. Real Estate World 105(3). doi: 10.14659/WOREJ.2018.105.001.
View in Google Scholar
Habdas, M., & Konowalczuk, J. (2019). Noisy skies and crowded cities – comparative remarks on the dilemmas in compensating homeowners for airport nuisance. Conference paper, 13th Annual PLPR Conference - Preparing for Climate Change in the Planned and Unplanned City, 18-22 February, College of Architecture Texas A&M University, College Station.
View in Google Scholar
Herath, S., & Maier, G. (2015). Informational efficiency of the real estate market: a meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Research, 20(117). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17256/jer.2015.20.2.001
View in Google Scholar
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (1999). Applied survival analysis. Regression modeling of time to event data. John Wiley and Sons Inc.
View in Google Scholar
Keogh, G., & D’Arcy, E. (1999). Property market efficiency: an institutional economics perspective. Urban Studies, 36(13). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098992485
View in Google Scholar
Kirzner, I., (2010). Competition and entrepreneurship. Warszawa: Fijorr Publisching.
View in Google Scholar
Lu, C., & Morrell, P. (2006). Determination and applications of environmental costs at different sized airports – aircraft noise and engine emissions. Transportation, 33(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-005-2300-y
View in Google Scholar
Mahashabde, A. (2011). Assessing the environmental impacts of aircraft noise and emissions. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 47(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2010.04.003
View in Google Scholar
Mayers, R. H. (1990). Classical and modern regression with application. Duxbury, Pacific Grove.
View in Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511808678.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678.008
View in Google Scholar
Posner, R. A. (2014). Economic analysis of law. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
View in Google Scholar
Rothbard, M. N. (2009). Interventionism or power and the market. Chicago-Warszawa: Fijorr Publishing.
View in Google Scholar
Sayce, S. (2006). Property appraisal: from value to worth. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
View in Google Scholar
Trojanek, R., & Huderek-Glapska, S. (2018). Measuring the noise cost of aviation – the association between the limited use area around Warsaw Chopin Airport and property values. Journal of Air Transport Management, 67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.12.002
View in Google Scholar
Waitz, A., & Ian, A. U. (2014). Estimation of the global impacts of aviation-related noise using an income-based approach. Journal of Transport Policy, 34. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.02.020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.02.020
View in Google Scholar
Wolfe, P., Yim, S. H. L., Lee, G., Ashok, A., Barrett, S. R. H., Waitz, I. A. (2014). Near-airport distribution of the environmental costs of aviation. Transport Policy, 34. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.02.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.02.023
View in Google Scholar
