Evaluation of economic potential of business environment development by comparing sector differences: perspective of SMEs in the Czech Republic and Slovakia

Abstract

Research background: Improving business conditions and SME development are signs of a country?s macroeconomic stability. The issue of identifying and removing barriers to the development of firms in the SME segment is a priority in all countries with developed economies and its importance is currently increasing.

Purpose of the article: The main aim of this paper is to explore possible differences in entrepreneurs? perception of the business environment based on the industry in which the company operates. The analysis contains also a national view, where a comparison between the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic is performed.

Methods: Correspondence analysis was used to achieve the research objectives in order to examine the relations between the categorical variables. Its application is beneficial in cases where the graphic output is clearer than the numerical one.

Findings & Value added: The presented research makes it possible to identify problematic aspects of doing business in each sector and to create support mechanisms for the creation of effective structural policies. Entrepreneurs from the Czech Republic?s Production and Transport sectors agree with the statement that the business environment in the country is suitable for starting a business. As for business environment?s suitability for doing business, neither Slovak nor Czech entrepreneurs sector-wide agreed with the given statement. Czech entrepreneurs from the Services, Trade and Construction sectors, respectively, agree, fully agree with the statement that the business environment in the country is reasonably risky and allows for doing business. In the case of entrepreneurs from Slovakia, no significant correspondence is observed. Findings regarding the statement that the business conditions in the country have improved over the past five years are the following: In the Czech Republic, there is a perfect correspondence of the Transport sector and the agreement with the given statement. In the Slovak Republic, agreement was found with the given statement in the Transport sector and neutral position in the Production sector.

Keywords

business environment, business risks, business support, correspondence analysis, sector analysis

References

1. Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (2006). A more complete conceptual framework for SME finance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(11). doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin .2006.05.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.05.008
   View in Google Scholar
2. Belás, J., Dvorský, J., Tyll, L., & Zvaríková, K. (2017). Entrepreneurship of University Students: Important Factors and the Propensity for Entrepreneurship. Administratie si Management Public, 28.
   View in Google Scholar
3. Belás, J., Nguyen, A., Smrčka, L., Kolembus, J., & Cipovová, E. (2016). Financial literacy of secondary school students. Case study from the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Economics and Sociology, 9(4). doi: 10.14254/2071- 789X.2016/9-4/12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-4/12
   View in Google Scholar
4. Blajer-Gołębiewska, A., Wach, D., & Kos, M. (2018). Financial risk information avoidance. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1). doi: 10.1080/ 1331677X.2018.1439396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1439396
   View in Google Scholar
5. Borg, I., & Groenen, P. J. F. (2010). Modern multidimensional scaling: theory and applications. New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
   View in Google Scholar
6. Greenacre, M. J. (1984). Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. London: Academic Press.
   View in Google Scholar
7. Bruns, V., & Fletcher, M. (2008). Banks' risk assessment of Swedish SMEs. Venture Capital, 10(2). doi:10.1080/13691060801946089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691060801946089
   View in Google Scholar
8. Caplinska, A., & Ohotina, A. (2019). Analysis of financial literacy tendencies with young people. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(4). doi: 10.9770/ jesi.2019.6.4(13). DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.4(13)
   View in Google Scholar
9. Corazza, M., Funari, S., & Gusso, R. (2016). Creditworthiness evaluation of Italian SMEs at the beginning of the 2007–2008 crisis: an MCDA approach. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 38. doi: 10.1016/j.najef. 2016.05.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2016.05.008
   View in Google Scholar
10. Cepel, M., Stasiukynas, A., Kotaskova, A., & Dvorsky, J. (2018). Business environment quality index in the SME segment. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(1). doi: 10.7441/joc.2018.02.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2018.02.02
    View in Google Scholar
11. Dallago, B. (2014). The role of universities in local development. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 5. doi: 10.14267/cjssp.2014.01.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14267/cjssp.2014.01.02
    View in Google Scholar
12. Eggers, F., Kraus, S., Hughes, M., Laraway, S., & Snycerski, S. (2013). Implications of customer and entrepreneurial orientations for SME growth. Management Decision, 5. doi: 10.1108/00251741311309643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741311309643
    View in Google Scholar
13. Fairlie, R. W., & Holleran, W. (2012). Entrepreneurship training, risk aversion and other personality traits: evidence from a random experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(2). doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2011.02.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.02.001
    View in Google Scholar
14. Fredriksson, A., & Moro, A. (2014). Bank–SMEs relationships and banks’ risk-adjusted profitability. Journal of Banking & Finance, 41. doi: 10.1016/j. jbankfin.2013.12.026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.12.026
    View in Google Scholar
15. Gavurova, B., Vagasova, T., & Kovac, V. (2016). Competitiveness assessment of Slovak Republic regions. In J. Krajicek, J. Nesleha & K. Urbanovsky. In European financial system 2016: proceedings of the 13th international scientific conference. Brno: Masaryk University.
    View in Google Scholar
16. Gavurova, B., Huculova, E., Kubak, M., & Cepel, M. (2017). The state of student’s financial literacy in selected Slovak universities and its relationship with active pension savings. Economics & Sociology, 10(3). doi: 10.14254/2071-789x. 2017/10-3/15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-3/15
    View in Google Scholar
17. Gluchman, V., & Gluchmanová, M. (2018). Students’ views on ethical issues in Slovak education. Journal of Educational Sciences and Psychology, 8(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/MyRes.2018.16
    View in Google Scholar
18. Ghulam, Y. (2019). SME’s credit conditions during the financial crisis in Europe. Prague Economic Papers, 28(1). doi: 10.18267/j.pep.672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.672
    View in Google Scholar
19. Grzybek, G., & Malczyńska-Biały, M. (2019). The ethical dimension of consumption in a relationship. Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 9. doi: 10.2478/ebce-2019-0004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2019-0004
    View in Google Scholar
20. Hanafi, N., Yunus J. M., Azmi R., & Othman F. M. (2018). Learning orientation entrepreneurial orientation and legal issues on women-owned SMSs’ performance. European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 52. doi: 10.15405/epsbs.2018.12.03.87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.12.03.87
    View in Google Scholar
21. Hudakova, M., Masar, M., Luskova, M., & Patak, M. R. (2018). The dependence of perceived business risks on the size of SMEs. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(4). doi: 10. 10.7441/joc.2018.04.04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2018.04.04
    View in Google Scholar
22. Ivanová, E., & Čepel, M. (2018). The impact of innovation performance on the competitiveness of the Visegrad 4 Countries. Journal of Competitiveness, 10. doi: 10.7441/joc.2018.01.04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2018.01.04
    View in Google Scholar
23. Jayaraman, J. D., & Jambunathan, S. (2018). Financial literacy among high school students: evidence from India. Citizenship. Social and Economics Education, 17. doi: 10.1177/2047173418809712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2047173418809712
    View in Google Scholar
24. Polishchuk, V., Kelemen, M., Gavurova, B., Varotsos, C., Andoga, R., Gera, M., Christodoulakis, J., Soušek, R., Kozuba, J., Blišťan, P., & Szabo, S. (2020). A fuzzy model of risk assessment for environmental start-up projects in the air transport sector. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(23). doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193573
    View in Google Scholar
25. Kelemen, M., Polishchuk, V., Gavurova, B., Szabo, S., Rozenberg, R., Gera, M., Kozuba, J., Andoga, R., Divokova, A., & Blišťan, P. (2020). Fuzzy model for quantitative assessment of environmental start-up projects in air transport. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(24). doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193585
    View in Google Scholar
26. Ključnikov, A., Kozubíková, L., & Sopková, G. (2017). The payment discipline of small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Competitiveness, 9(2). doi: 10.7441/joc.2017.02.04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2017.02.04
    View in Google Scholar
27. Ključnikov, A. (2016). Uncover SMEs finance through the impact of the specific factors. Evidence from Slovakia. Transformations in Business & Economics, 15(2B).
    View in Google Scholar
28. Li, K., Niskanen, J., Kolehmainen, M., & Niskanen, M. (2016). Financial innovation: credit default hybrid model for SME lending, 61(C) Expert Systems with Applications. doi: 61. 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.05.029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.05.029
    View in Google Scholar
29. Mura, L., Marchevska, M., & Dubravska, M. (2018). Slovak retail business across panel regression model. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4. doi: 4. 10.21272/mmi.2018.4-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2018.4-18
    View in Google Scholar
30. Mura, L. (2019). Entrepreneurship internationalization – case of Slovak family businesses. AD ALTA-Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 9.
    View in Google Scholar
31. Naushad, M. (2018). A study on the antecedents of entrepreneurial intentions among Saudi students. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(3). doi: 10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3(14). DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3(14)
    View in Google Scholar
32. Nguyen, T. A. N., & Rozsa, Z. (2019). Financial literacy and financial advice seeking for retirement investment choice. Journal of Competitiveness, 11. doi: 10.7441/joc.2019.01.05. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2019.01.05
    View in Google Scholar
33. Nikolic, N., Jovanovic, I., Nikolic, D., Mihajlovic, I., Schulte, P. (2019). Investigation of the factors influencing SME failure as a function of its prevention and fast recovery after failure. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 9. doi: 10.1515/erj-2017-0030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2017-0030
    View in Google Scholar
34. Oláh, J., Virglerova, Z., Popp, J., Kliestikova, J., & Kovács, S. (2019). The assessment of non-financial risk sources of SMES in the V4 countries and Serbia. Sustainability, 11. doi: 10.3390/su11174806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174806
    View in Google Scholar
35. Pérez-Gómez, P., Arbelo-Pérez, M., & Arbelo, A. (2018). Profit efficiency and its determinants in small and medium-sized enterprises in Spain. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 21. doi: 10.1016/j.brq.2018.08.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2018.08.003
    View in Google Scholar
36. Rahman, A., Belas, J., Kliestik, T., Tyll, L. (2017). Collateral requirements for SME loans: empirical evidence from the Visegrad countries. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(4). doi: 10.3846/16111699.2017. 1357050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2017.1357050
    View in Google Scholar
37. Remeikiene, R., Rozsa, Z., Ligita, G., & Penčik, J. (2018). Assessment of the impact of the international trade in agricultural products on the EU economic growth. E&M Economics and Management, 21. doi: 10.15240/tul/001/2018-4-003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2018-4-003
    View in Google Scholar
38. Ryan, R. M., O’Toole, C. M., & McCann, F. (2014). Does bank market power affect SME financing constraints? Journal of Banking & Finance, 49. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.12.024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.12.024
    View in Google Scholar
39. Salimi, N., & Rezaei, J. (2018). Evaluating firms’ R&D performance using best worst method. Evaluation and Program Planning, 66. doi: 10.1016/j. evalprogplan.2017.10.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.10.002
    View in Google Scholar
40. Wang, Y. (2016). What are the biggest obstacles to growth of SMEs in developing countries? – an empirical evidence from an enterprise survey. Borsa Istanbul Review, 16. doi: 16. 10.1016/j.bir.2016.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2016.06.001
    View in Google Scholar