Perception of non-financial risk determinants in SMEs in Visegrad countries

Abstract

Research background: The identification of risks and their management is a key task of strategic management. The right and early identification of risk sources can help companies to survive not only during a crisis period. However, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) underestimate the necessity to analyze risks and implement the enterprise risk management (ERM).

Purpose of the article: The primary aim of the contribution is to identify the most important non-financial risks and their causes in the V4 countries and to analyze the perception of these risks by SME owners.

Methods: The results are based on the survey conducted in 2018. The valid questionnaire of 1781 owners of SMEs from four countries was evaluated and analyzed to fulfil the main objective. The statistical hypotheses were con-firmed through statistical methods such as Z-score and Chi-square test. The SPSS Statistics was used for data evaluation.

Findings & Value added: The results can be interesting not only for research organizations investigating the development of SMEs, but also for state institutions or private agencies seeking to adapt national support for SMEs. It was discovered that the entrepreneur?s country is the most important factor for the perception of the sources of safety risk, legal risk, and other business risks. There are differences in managers? perception in case of other risk sources (corruption and clientelism) between entrepreneurs from the Czech Republic and other countries of the Visegrad Group. The SMEs? country of origin is an important factor for the evaluation of the source of non-financial risks (safety risk, legal risk and other business risks). Differences in the perception of safe-ty risk sources between entrepreneurs from the Czech Republic and Poland were confirmed. More than 25% of SMEs in the Visegrad Group perceive frequent changes of the legal regulation as a legal risk.

Keywords

non-financial risks, legal risk, safety risk, SMEs, Visegrad Group

References

1. Anderson, B. S., & Eshima, Y. (2013). The influence of firm age and intangible resources on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm growth among Japanese SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 28. doi: 10.1016 /j.jbusvent.2011.10.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.10.001
   View in Google Scholar
2. Ballinger, G., Craig, E., Cross, R., & Gray, P. (2011). A stitch in time saves nine: Leveraging networks to reduce the costs of turnover. California Management Review, 53(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.111
   View in Google Scholar
3. Battisti, M., & Vallanti, G. (2013). Flexible wage contracts, temporary jobs, and firm performance: evidence from Italian firms. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society. 52(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12031
   View in Google Scholar
4. Belás, J., Bilan, Y., Demjan, V., & Sipko, J. (2015). Entrepreneurship in SME segment: a case study from the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Amfiteatru Economic, 17(38).
   View in Google Scholar
5. Belas, J., Belas, L., Cepel, M., & Rozsa, Z. (2019). The impact of the public sector on the quality of the business environment in the SME segment. Administratie Si Management Public, 32. doi: 10.24818/amp/2019.32-02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2019.32-02
   View in Google Scholar
6. Belas, J., Dvorsky, J., Strnad, Z., Valaskova, K., & Cera, G. (2019a). Improvement of the Quality of Business Environment Model: Case of the SME Segment. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 30(5). doi: 10.5755/j01.ee.30. 5.24490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.30.5.24490
   View in Google Scholar
7. Blackburn, R. A., Hart, M., & Wainwright, T. (2013). Small business performance: business, strategy and owner-manager characteristics. Journal of Small Business And Enterprise Development, 20(1). doi: 10.1108/14626001311298394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001311298394
   View in Google Scholar
8. Bluff, L. (2019). How SMEs respond to legal requirements to provide information, training, instruction and supervision to workers about work health and safety matters. Safety Science, 116(1). doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.036
   View in Google Scholar
9. Buganová, K., & Moricová, V. (2017). Innovation of education in risk and crisis management. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, November Special Issue INTE.
   View in Google Scholar
10. Cepel, M., Stasiukynas, A., Kotaskova, A., & Dvorsky, J. (2018). Business environment quality index in the SME segment. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(2). doi: 10.7441/joc.2018.02.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2018.02.02
    View in Google Scholar
11. Djankov, S., McLiesh, C., & Shleifer, A. (2007). Private credit in 129 countries. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.03.004
    View in Google Scholar
12. Dobeš, K., Kot, S., Kramoliš, J., & Sopková, G. (2017). The perception of governmental support in the context of competitiveness of SMEs in the Czech Republic. Journal of Competitiveness, 9(3). doi: 10.7441/joc.2017.03.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2017.03.03
    View in Google Scholar
13. Dvorský, J., Petráková, Z., Zapletalíková, E., & Rózsa, Z. (2019). Entrepreneurial propensity index of university students. The case study from the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland. Oeconomia Copernicana, 10(1). doi: 10.24136/oc. 2019.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2019.009
    View in Google Scholar
14. FERMA (2019). European Risk Manager Report 2018. Retrieved from https://www.ferma.eu/publication/2018-european-risk-manager-report/ (3.1.2020).
    View in Google Scholar
15. Ferreira de Araújo Lima, P., Crema, M., & Verbano, C. (2020).
    View in Google Scholar
16. Risk management in SMEs: a systematic literature review and future directions. European Management Journal, 38(1). doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.005
    View in Google Scholar
17. Fiala, R., & Hedija, V. (2015). The relationship between firm size and firm growth: the case of the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(5). doi: 10.11118/actaun201563051639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563051639
    View in Google Scholar
18. Gaganis, Ch., Pasiouras, F., & Voulgari, F. (2019). Culture, business environment and SMEs´ profitability: evidence from European countries. Economic Modelling, 78(1). doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2018.09.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.09.023
    View in Google Scholar
19. Global Risk Alliance (2005). Risk management guide for small businesses. NSW Department of State and Regional Development. Retrieved from: https://www.significanceinternational.com/Portals/0/Documents/2005-sme-risk-management-guide-global-risk-alliance-nsw-dsrd.pdf (30.11.2019).
    View in Google Scholar
20. Hanggraeni, D., Ślusarczyk, B., Sulung, L. A. K., & Subroto, A. (2019). The impact of internal, external and enterprise risk management on the performance of micro, small and medium enterprises. Sustainability, 11(7). doi: 10.3390/su110 72172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072172
    View in Google Scholar
21. Hashi, I., & Krasniqi, B.A. (2011). Entrepreneurship and SME growth: evidence from advanced and laggard transition economies. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 17(5). doi: 10.1108/13552551111158817. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13552551111158817
    View in Google Scholar
22. Hasle, P., & Refslund, B. (2018). Intermediaries supporting occupational health and safety improvements in small businesses: development of typology and discussion of consequences for preventive strategies. Annals of Work Exposures and Health, 62(1). doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxy046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxy046
    View in Google Scholar
23. Havierniková, K., & Kordoš, M. (2019). Selected risks perceived by SMEs related to sustainable entrepreneurship in case of engagement into cluster cooperation. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(4). doi: 10.9770/jesi.2019.6.4(9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.4(9)
    View in Google Scholar
24. Hudakova, M., & Dvorsky, J. (2018). Assessing the risks and their sources in dependence on the rate of implementing the risk management process in the SMEs. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(3). doi: 10.24136/eq.2018.027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.027
    View in Google Scholar
25. Hudakova, M., & Dvorsky, J. (2019). Analysis of the market risk sources in the small and medium-sized enterprises of transport. Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, 21(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26552/com.C.2019.4.97-103
    View in Google Scholar
26. Hudakova, M., Masar, M., Luskova, M., & Patak, M. R. (2018). The dependence of perceived business risks on the size of SMEs. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(4). doi: 10.7441/joc.2018.04.04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2018.04.04
    View in Google Scholar
27. Infopro Digital Risk (2019). Top 10 operational risks for 2019. Retrieved from https://www.risk.net/risk-management/6470126/top-10-op-risks-2019 (5.12.2019).
    View in Google Scholar
28. Kaassis, B., & Badri, A. (2018). Development of a preliminary model for evaluating occupational health and safety risk management maturity in small and medium-sized enterprises. Safety, 4(1). doi: 10.3390/safety4010005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/safety4010005
    View in Google Scholar
29. Karami, M., & Tang, J. (2019). Entrepreneurial orientation and SME international performance: the mediating role of networking capability and experiential learning. International Small Business Journal, 37(1). doi: 10.1177/0266242 618807275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242618807275
    View in Google Scholar
30. Kayes, D. C., Stirling, D., & Nielsen, T. M. (2007). Building organizational integrity. Business Horizons, 50(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2006.06.001
    View in Google Scholar
31. Kljucnikov, A., & Sobekova Majkova, M. (2018). Funding risk perception by Slovak SMEs: impact of age and size of the company. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4(1). doi: 10.21272/mmi.2018.4-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2018.4-24
    View in Google Scholar
32. Kowalska, A., Kovarnik, J., Hamplova, E., & Prazak, P. (2018). The selected topics for comparison in Visegrad four countries. Economies, 6(3). doi: 10.3390/ec onomies6030050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies6030050
    View in Google Scholar
33. Kozubíková, L., Belás, J., Bilan, Y., & Bartoš, P. (2015). Personal characteristics of entrepreneurs in the context of perception and management of business risk in the SME segment. Economics and Sociology, 8(1). doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2015/8-1/4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2015/8-1/4
    View in Google Scholar
34. Leaver, M., & Reader, T. W. (2016). Non-technical skills for managing risk and performance in financial trading. Journal of Risk Research, 19(6). doi: 10.1080/ 13669877.2014.1003319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2014.1003319
    View in Google Scholar
35. Mura, L., & Kljucnikov, A. (2018). Small businesses in rural tourism and agrotourism: study from Slovakia. Economics and Sociology, 11(3). doi: 10.14254/20 71-789X.2018/11-3/17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-3/17
    View in Google Scholar
36. Mutezo, A. (2013). Credit rationing and risk management for SMEs: the way forward for South Africa. Corporate Ownership and Control, 10(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv10i2c1art1
    View in Google Scholar
37. Oláh, J., Virglerova, Z., Popp, J., Kliestikova, J., & Kovács, S. (2019). The assessment of non-financial risk sources of SMES in the V4 countries and Serbia. Sustainability, 11(17). doi: 10.3390/su11174806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174806
    View in Google Scholar
38. Petkovic, S., Jager, C., & Sasic, B. (2016). Challenges of small and medium sized companies at early stage of development: insights from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Management Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 21(2).
    View in Google Scholar
39. Schulte, P. A., Cunningham, T. R., Guerin, R. J., Hennigan, B., & Jacklitsch, B. (2018). Components of an occupational safety and health communication research strategy for small- and medium-sized enterprises. Annals of Work Exposures and Health, 62(1). doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxy054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxy054
    View in Google Scholar
40. Siničáková, M., Sulikova, V., & Gavurova, B. (2017). Twin deficits threat in the European Union. E&M Economics and Management, 20(1). doi: 10.15240/tul/ 001/2017-1-010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2017-1-010
    View in Google Scholar
41. Su, W., Zhang, D., Zhang, C., Abrhám, J., Simionescu, M., Yaroshevich, N., & Guseva, V. (2018). Determinants of foreign direct investment in the Visegrad group countries after the EU enlargement. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(5). doi: 10.3846/tede.2018.5487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2018.5487
    View in Google Scholar
42. Treviño, S., III, Nyberg, A., Del Genio, C. I., & Bassler, K. E. (2015). Fast and accurate determination of modularity and its effect size. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2. doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2015/02/ P02003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2015/02/P02003
    View in Google Scholar
43. Unnikrishnan, S., Iqbal, R., Singh, A., & Nimkar, I. M. (2015). Safety management practices in small and medium enterprises in india. Safety Health Work, 6(1). doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2014.10.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2014.10.006
    View in Google Scholar
44. Ušiak, J. (2018). The security environment of the V4 countries. Politics in Central Europe, 14(2). doi: 10.2478/pce-2018-0007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2018-0007
    View in Google Scholar