Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Economic competitiveness vs. green competitiveness of agriculture in the European Union countries

Abstract

Research background: Many scientists have researched the economic competitiveness of agriculture. At the same time, considerably less attention is paid to the so-called green competitiveness. Considering a global trend searching for solutions to reduce the environmental impact of the agricultural sector, it seems reasonable to explore the overlap between economic competitiveness and green competitiveness.

Purpose of the article: This study aims to answer the following questions: What is the level of economic and green competitiveness of agriculture in respective countries? What is the level of the comprehensive competitiveness of agriculture in EU member states?  Do the economic competitiveness outcomes of respective countries coincide with their green competitiveness rankings?

Methods: Taxonomic methods were applied to design synthetic indices of economic, green and comprehensive competitiveness of 27 member states of the European Union, based on multi-criteria sets of specific indicators from 2018.

Findings & value added: The results of analyses imply that, in general, the level of green competitiveness of agriculture is higher than the level of its economic competitiveness in EU member states. Simultaneously, the developed rankings show that respective countries' economic and green competitiveness are not linked. In other words, economic competitiveness outcomes do not match green competitiveness outcomes for EU agriculture. This work is a genuine contribution to studies on the methods for measuring and evaluating the competitiveness of agriculture as it designs separate synthetic measures for economic and green competitiveness and confronts both types of competitiveness in EU member states. The research findings for the first time provide clear answers to questions about the mutual relationship between economic and green competitiveness in agriculture. Furthermore, an added value of this study is that it introduces and attempts to define the notion of green competitiveness.

Keywords

competitiveness, green competitiveness, agriculture, green growth, sustainable development, zero unitarization method

PDF

References

  1. Altomonte, C., & Ottaviano, G.I.P. (2011). The role of international produc-tion sharing in EU productivity and competitiveness. European Investment Bank Papers, 16(1), 62?89.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Arisoy, H. (2020). Impact of agricultural supports on competitiveness of agricul-tural products. Agricultural Economics ? Czech, 66, 286?295. doi: 10.17221/4 16/2019-AGRICECON. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/416/2019-AGRICECON
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Bacon, C., Getz, C., Kraus, S., & Holland, K. (2012). The social dimensions of sustainability in diversified, industrial and hybrid farming systems. Ecology and Society, 17(4), 41. doi: 10.5751/ES-05226-170441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05226-170441
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Aruldoss, M., Lakshmi, M., & Venkatesan, P. (2013). A survey on multi-criteria decision making methods and its applications. American Journal of Information Systems, 1(1), 31?43. doi: 10.12691/ajis-1-1-5.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Balkyte, A., & Tvaronavičiene, M. (2010). Perception of competitiveness in the context of sustainable development: facets of ?sustainable competitiveness?. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), 341?365. doi: 10.384 6/jbem.2010.17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.17
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Ball, V. E., Butault, J.-P., San Juan, C., & Mora, R. (2010). Productivity and in-ternational competitiveness of agriculture in the European Union and the United States. Agricultural Economics, 41, 611?627. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010. 00476.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00476.x
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Baráth, L., & Fertő, I. (2016). Productivity and convergence in European agricul-ture. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(1), 228?248. doi: 10.1111/1477-9552.12157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12157
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Berger, T. (2008). Concepts on national competitiveness. Journal of International Business and Economy, 9(1), 3?17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51240/jibe.2008.1.5
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Bos, J. F. F. P., Smit, A. B. L., & Schröder J. J. (2013), Is agricultural intensifica-tion in The Netherlands running up to its limits? Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 66, 65?73. doi: 10.1016/j.njas.2013.06.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2013.06.001
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Bris, A., & Caballero, J. (2015). Revisiting the fundamentals of competitiveness: a proposal. In IMD world competitiveness yearbook. Lausanne: IMD World Competitiveness Center.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Caruso, G., Gattone, S. A., Fortuna, F., & DiBattista, T. (2018). Cluster analysis as a decision-making tool: a methodological review. In E. Bucciarelli, S. H. Chen & J. Corchado (Eds.). Decision economics: in the tradition of Her-bert A. Simon's heritage. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 48?55. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-60882-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60882-2_6
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Celata, F., & Sanna, V.S. (2019). A multi-dimensional assessment of the envi-ronmental and socioeconomic performance of community-based sustainability initiatives in Europe. Regional Environmental Change, 19, 939?952. doi: 10.1007 /s10113-019-01493-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-019-01493-9
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Chen, R., Ji, Y., Jiang, G., Xiao, H., Xie, R., & Zhu, P. (2021). Composite index construction with expert opinion. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/07350015.2021.2000418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2021.2000418
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Cristache, S.-E., Vu?ă, M., Marin, E., Cioacă, S. I., & Vuţă, M. (2018). Organic versus conventional farming - a paradigm for the sustainable development of the European countries. Sustainability, 10, 4279. doi: 10.3390/su10114279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114279
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Czarny, E., & Żmuda, M. (2018). Competitiveness as the ability to adjust: the EU?10 exports. Structure and its convergence to the German pattern. Compar-ative Economic Research, 21(1), 119?133. doi: 10.2478/cer?2018?0007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2018-0007
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Czyżewski, B., Matuszczak, A., Grzelak, A., Guth, M., & Majchrzak A. (2021). Environmental sustainable value in agriculture revisited: how does common agricultural policy contribute to eco?efficiency? Sustainability Science, 16, 137?152. doi: 10.1007/s11625-020-00834-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00834-6
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Čechura, L., Grau, A., Hockmann, H., Levkovych, I., & Kroupova, Z. (2017). Catching upon falling behind in Eastern European agriculture ? the case of milk production. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(1), 206?227. doi: 10.1111/ 1477-9552.12193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12193
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Dean, M. (2020). Chapter six - multi-criteria analysis. Advances in Transport Policy and Planning, 6, 165?224. doi: 10.1016/bs.atpp.2020.07.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.atpp.2020.07.001
    View in Google Scholar
  19. European Commission (2009). European competitiveness report 2008. Luxem-bourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
    View in Google Scholar
  20. FADN EU (2022). FADN public database. Retrieved from https://agridata.ec.euro pa.eu/extensions/FADNPublicDatabase/FADNPublicDatabase.html.
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Fura, B., Stec, M., & Miś, T. (2020). Statistical evaluation of the level of devel-opment of circular economy in European Union member countries. Energies, 13, 6401. doi: 10.3390/en13236401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13236401
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Giannakis, E., & Bruggeman, A. (2018). Exploring the labour productivity of agricultural systems across European regions: A multilevel approach. Land Use Policy, 77, 94?106. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.037
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Godlewska, J., & Sidorczuk-Pietraszko, E. (2019). Taxonomic assessment of transition to the green economy in Polish regions. Sustainability, 11, 5098. doi: 10.3390/su11185098. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185098
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Godfray, H. C. J., & Garnett, T. (2014). Food security and sustainable indenisa-tion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20120273. doi: 10.109 8/rstb.2012.0273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0273
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Gołaś, Z. (2019). Convergence of labour productivity in agriculture of the Euro-pean Union. Problems of Agricultural Economics, 1(358), 22?43. doi: 10.30858 /zer/103140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30858/zer/103140
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Guth, M., Smędzik-Ambroży, K., Czyżewski, B., & Stępień, S. (2020). The eco-nomic sustainability of farms under common agricultural policy in the Euro-pean Union countries. Agriculture, 10, 34. doi: 10.3390/agriculture10020034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10020034
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Grzebyk, M., & Stec, M. (2015). Sustainable development in EU countries: con-cept and rating of levels of development. Sustainable Development, 23, 110?123. doi: 10.1002/sd.1577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1577
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Harvey D., Hubbard C., Gorton M., & Tocco B. (2017). How competitive is the EU's agri-food sector? An introduction to a special feature on EU agri-food competitiveness. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(1), 199?205. doi: 10.1111/1477-9552.12215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12215
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Hatzichronoglou, T. (1996). Globalisation and competitiveness: relevant indica-tors. OECD Science. Technology and Industry Working Papers, 5. doi: 10.1787 /885511061376.
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Jambor A., & Babu S. (2016). Competitiveness of global agriculture: policy lessons for food security. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44876-3
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Jarocka, M. (2015). The choice of a formula of the data normalization in the comparative analysis of multivariate objects. Economics and Management, 1, 113?126. doi: 10.12846/j.em.2015.01.08.
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Jarosz-Angowska, A., Angowski, M., Kąkol, M., Nowak, A., & Różanska-Boczula, M. (2020). Agricultural competitive potential and competitive posi-tion in the international trade of agricultural and food products in the Europe-an Union. European Research Studies Journal, 23(2), 779?803. doi: 10.35808/ersj /1898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1898
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Józwiak, W. (2012). Strengthening the position of Polish agriculture - initial proposals. Warsaw: IERiGŻ-PIB.
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Kalaitzidis, I., Kyriakopoulos, G., Arabatzi, Z., Chalikias, M., Karasavvidis, G., Avramidis, N., & Apostolidis, G. (2011). Municipal education centers for sus-tainable agriculture. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 9(2), 335?340.
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Kasztelan, A. (2020). How circular are the European economies? A taxonomic analysis based on the INEC (Index of National Economies? Circularity). Sustainability, 12, 7613. doi: 10.3390/su12187613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187613
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Kasztelan, A. (2021). On the road to a green economy: how do European Union countries ?do their homework?? Energies, 14(18), 5941. doi: 10.3390/en1418 5941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185941
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Kasztelan, A., & Nowak, A. (2021). Construction and empirical verification of the Agri-Environmental Index (AEI) as a tool for assessing the green performance of agriculture. Energies, 14, 45. doi: 10.3390/en14010045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14010045
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Keogh, M., Tomlinson, A., & Henry, M. (2015). Assessing the competitiveness of Australian agriculture. Suite: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Publication.
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Kijek, A., Kijek, T., & Nowak, A. (2020). Club convergence of labour productivi-ty in agriculture: evidence from EU countries. Agricultural Economics ? Czech, 66(9), 391?401. doi: 10.17221/178/2020-AGRICECON. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/178/2020-AGRICECON
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Kijek, A., Kijek, T., Nowak, A., & Skrzypek, A. (2019). Productivity and its con-vergence in agriculture in new and old European Union member states. Agricultural Economics ? Czech, 65, 01?09. doi: 10.17221/262/2017-AGRIC ECON. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/262/2017-AGRICECON
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Kiselakova, D., Stec, M., Grzebyk, M., & Sofrankova, B. (2020). A multidimen-sional evaluation of the sustainable development of European Union countries ? an empirical study. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(4), 56?73. doi: 10.7441/ joc.2020.04.04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2020.04.04
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Kukuła, K. (2000). The zero unitarization method. Warsaw: PWN.
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Latruffe, L. (2010). Competitiveness, productivity and efficiency in the agricul-tural and agri-food sectors. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, 30. doi: 10.1787/5km91nkdt6d6-en. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/5km91nkdt6d6-en
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Lee, J., & Karpova, E. (2018). Revisiting the competitiveness theory in the new global environment: review and analysis of the competitiveness definition. International Journal of Competitiveness, 1, 189?205. doi: 10.1504/IJC.201 8.091474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJC.2018.091474
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Liu, C. (2017). International competitiveness and the fourth industrial revo-lution. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(4), 111?133. doi: 10.15678/EBER.2017.050405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050405
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Lloyd, T. (2017), Forty years of price transmission research in the food industry: Insights, challenges and prospects?, (2016 AES Presidential Address). Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(1), 3?21. doi: 10.1111/1477-9552.12205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12205
    View in Google Scholar
  47. Magrini, A. (2022). Assessment of agricultural sustainability in European Union countries: a group-based multivariate trajectory approach. Advances in Statistical Analysis. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10182-022-00437-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-022-00437-9
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Matkovski, B., Kalaš, B., Zekić, S., & Jeremić, M. (2019). Agri-food competi-tiveness in South East Europe. Outlook on Agriculture, 48(4), 326?335. doi: 10.117 7/0030727019854770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727019854770
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Materia, V. C., Pascucci, S., & Dries, L. (2017). Are in-house and outsourcing innovation strategies correlated? Evidence from the European agri-food sec-tor. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(1), 249?268. doi: 10.1111/1477-9552.1 2206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12206
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Małkowska, A., Urbaniec, M., & Kosała, M. (2021). The impact of digital transfor-mation on European countries: insights from a comparative analysis. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(2), 325?355. doi: 10.24136/eq.2021.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.012
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Matyja, M. (2016). Resources based factors of competitiveness of agricultural enterprises. Management, 20(1), 368?381. doi: 10.1515/manment-2015-0045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/manment-2015-0045
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2013). Methods for constructing composite indices: one for all or all for one? Rivista Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statisti-ca, 67(2), 67?80.
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Mizik, T. (2021). Agri-food trade competitiveness: a review of the literature. Sustainability, 13, 11235. doi: 10.3390/su132011235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011235
    View in Google Scholar
  54. Navarro, M., Gibaja, J. J., Franco, S., Murciego, A., Gianelle, C., Hegyi, F. B., & Kleibrink, A. (2014). Regional benchmarking in the smart specialisation pro-cess: identification of reference regions based on structural similarity. S3 Working Paper Series, 03/2014.
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Nowak, A., & Różańska-Boczula, M. (2022). The competitiveness of agriculture in EU member states according to the competitiveness pyramid model. Agriculture, 12, 28. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12010028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12010028
    View in Google Scholar
  56. Nowak, A., & Kamińska, A. (2016). Agricultural competitiveness: the case of the European Union countries. Agricultural Economics ? Czech, 62, 507?516. doi: 10.17221/133/2015-AGRICECON. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/133/2015-AGRICECON
    View in Google Scholar
  57. Nowak, A., Krukowski, A., & Różańska-Boczula, M. (2019). Assessment of sus-tainability in agriculture of the European Union countries. Agronomy, 9, 890. doi: 10.3390/agronomy9120890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9120890
    View in Google Scholar
  58. OECD (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators. Methodology and user guide. Paris: OECD Publishing.
    View in Google Scholar
  59. OECD (2011). Fostering productivity and competitiveness in agriculture. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264166820-en. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264166820-en
    View in Google Scholar
  60. Pawlak, K. (2022). Competitiveness of the EU agri-food sector on the US market: Worth reviving transatlantic trade? Agriculture, 12(1), 23. doi: 10.3390/agricul ture12010023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12010023
    View in Google Scholar
  61. Prandecki, K., Wrzaszcz, W., & Zieliński, M. (2021), Environmental and climate challenges to agriculture in Poland in the context of objectives adopted in the European Green Deal strategy. Sustainability, 13, 10318. doi: org/10.3390/su13 1810318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810318
    View in Google Scholar
  62. Rohila, A. K., Duhan, A., Maan, D., Kumar, A., & Kumar, K. (2017). Impact of agricultural practices on environment. Asian Journal of Microbiology Biotechnology & Environmental Sciences, 19(2), 145?148.
    View in Google Scholar
  63. Roszko-Wójtowicz, E., & Grzelak, M. M. (2021). Multi-dimensional analysis of regional investment attractiveness in Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(1), 103?138. doi: 10.24136/eq.2021.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.004
    View in Google Scholar
  64. Schindler, J., Graef, F., & König, H.J. (2015). Methods to assess farming sustain-ability in developing countries. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35, 1043?1057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0305-2
    View in Google Scholar
  65. Senyshyn, O., Kundytskyj, O., & Klepanchuk, O. (2019). An index analysis for the assessment of the competitiveness of food products in Ukraine. Journal of Competitiveness, 11(2), 130?143. doi: 10.7441/joc.2019.02.09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2019.02.09
    View in Google Scholar
  66. Siudek T., & Zawojska A. (2014). Competitiveness in the economic concepts, theories and empirical research. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Oeconomia, 13(1), 91?108.
    View in Google Scholar
  67. Sompolska-Rzechuła, A. (2021). Selection of the optimal way of linear ordering of objects: Case of sustainable development in EU countries. Statistika, 101(1), 24?36.
    View in Google Scholar
  68. Souza Piao, R., Silva, V. L., Navarro del Aguila, I., & de Burgos Jiménez, J. (2021). Green growth and agriculture in Brazil. Sustainability, 13, 1162. doi: 10.3390/su1303116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031162
    View in Google Scholar
  69. Stevens, C. (2011). Agriculture and green growth. OECD.
    View in Google Scholar
  70. Sulich, A., & Sołoducho-Pelc, L. (2021). Renewable energy producers? strategies in the Visegrád Group countries. Energies, 14, 3048. doi: 10.3390/en14113048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113048
    View in Google Scholar
  71. Roszko-Wójtowicz, E., & Grzelak, M. M. (2020). Macroeconomic stability and the level of competitiveness in EU member states: a comparative dynamic ap-proach. Oeconomia Copernicana, 11(4), 657?688. doi: 10.24136/oc.2020.027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2020.027
    View in Google Scholar
  72. Tłuczak, A. (2019). Potential and competitiveness of EU countries in terms of slaughter livestock production. Agricultural Economics ? Czech, 65(12), 550?559. doi: 10.17221/156/2019-AGRICECON. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/156/2019-AGRICECON
    View in Google Scholar
  73. Turčeková, N., Svetlanská, T., Kollár, B., & Záhorský, T. (2015). Agri-environmental performance of EU member states. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 7(4), 199?208. doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.231948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7160/aol.2015.070419
    View in Google Scholar
  74. Viira, A. H., Omel, R., Värnik, R., Luik, H., Maasing, B., & P?ldaru, R. (2015). Competitiveness of the Estonian dairy sector, 1994-2014. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2(26), 84?105.
    View in Google Scholar
  75. Voinescua, R., & Moisoiu, C. (2015). Competitiveness, theoretical and policy approaches. Towards a more competitive EU. Procedia Economics and Finance, 22, 512?521. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00248-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00248-8
    View in Google Scholar
  76. Vrabcova, P., & Urbancova, H. (2021). Implementation of voluntary instruments by Czech enterprises to meet sustainability and competitive growth. Journal of Competitiveness, 13(3), 165?184. doi: 10.7441/joc.2021.03.10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2021.03.10
    View in Google Scholar
  77. Walesiak, M. (2011). Generalized GDM distance measure in statistical multivar-iate analysis using R software. Wrocław: AE Publishing House.
    View in Google Scholar
  78. Wang, L., Qi, Z. R., Pang, Q. H., Xiang, Y. B., & Sun Y. L. (2021). Analysis on the agricultural green production efficiency and driving factors of urban ag-glomerations in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. Sustainability, 13(1), 97. doi: 10.3390/su13010097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010097
    View in Google Scholar
  79. Yang, H., Wang X. X., & Bin, P. (2022). Agriculture carbon-emission reduction and changing factors behind agricultural eco-efficiency growth in China?, Journal of Cleaner Production, 334, 130193. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130 193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130193
    View in Google Scholar
  80. Zegar, J. S. (2012). Economic competitiveness versus social competitiveness in agriculture. Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics, 246, 563?572.
    View in Google Scholar
  81. Zia, B., Rafiq, M., Saqib, S. E., & Atiq, M. (2022). Agricultural market competi-tiveness in the context of climate change: A systematic review. Sustainability, 14, 3721. doi: 10.3390/su14073721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073721
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

11-20 of 327

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.