The economic valuation of ecosystem services: bibliometric analysis
Abstract
Research background: The services provided by ecosystems are the main support for human populations and for the development of any type of activity. Today, the provision of these services is under threat. The economic valuation of ecosystem services is vital to design appropriate policies, define strategies and manage ecosystems.
Purpose of the article: The objective of this study is to analyse the evolution of research on the economic valuation of ecosystem services over the last two decades. More specifically, it aims firstly to identify the main agents driving research and, secondly, it seeks to synthesize in a single document the relevant information on the main economic valuation methods, relating them to the categories of services, ecosystems and regions where they have been employed.
Methods: A quantitative review was first carried out through a bibliometric analysis to identify the main drivers of this line of research and its development trends. Secondly, a qualitative review was conducted through a systematic review focusing on the most commonly used valuation techniques in relation to the characteristics of the service, the geographical scope and the ecosystem analysed.
Findings & value added: The main novelty of this work, compared to previous literature, is that the relationship between the study area, the type of ecosystem, the category of service and the economic valuation methodology are analysed for the first time. The results highlight the need to continue expanding knowledge in relation to the temporal and spatial scale in the economic value of ecosystem services, the subjective nature of the estimates and the heterogeneity between the different social sectors with respect to the benefit obtained.
Keywords
ecosystem services, natural resources management, sustainable development, market based valuation, revealed-stated preferences, transfer value methods
References
- Albort-Morant, G., Henseler, J., Leal-Millán, A., & Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2017). Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of green innovation. Sustainability, 9, 1011. doi: 10.3390/su9061011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061011
View in Google Scholar - Anderson, S., Ankor, B., & Sutton, P. (2017). Ecosystem service valuation of South Africa using a variety of land cover data sources and resolutions. Ecosystem Services, 27, 173?178. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.001
View in Google Scholar - Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Belmonte-Ure?a, L. J., Velasco-Mu?oz, J. F., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2018a). Economic analysis of sustainable water use: a review of worldwide research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 1120?1132. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.066
View in Google Scholar - Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Velasco-Mu?oz, J. F., García-Gómez, J. J., & López-Serrano, M. J. (2018b). The sustainable management of metals: an analysis of global research. Metals, 8, 805. doi: 10.3390/met8100805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/met8100805
View in Google Scholar - Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Belmonte-Ure?a, L. J., López-Serrano, M. J., & Velasco-Mu?oz, J. F. (2018c). Forest ecosystem services: an analysis of worldwide re-search. Forests, 9, 453. doi: 10.3390/f9080453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f9080453
View in Google Scholar - Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Velasco-Mu?oz, J. F., Belmonte-Ure?a, L. J., & Manzano- Agugliaro, F. (2019). The worldwide research trends on water ecosystem ser-vices. Ecological Indicators, 99, 310?323. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.045
View in Google Scholar - Badola, R., Hussain, S. A., & Mishra, B. K. (2010). An assessment of ecosystem services of Corbett Tiger Reserve, India. Environmentalist, 30, 320?329. doi: 10.1007/s10669-010-9278-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-010-9278-5
View in Google Scholar - Barbier, E. B. (2012). A spatial model of coastal ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 78, 70?79. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.015
View in Google Scholar - Bateman, I. J., & Kling, C. L. (2020). Revealed preference methods for nonmarket valuation: an introduction to best practices. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 14, 240?259. doi: 10.1093/reep/reaa009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/reaa009
View in Google Scholar - Bell, M. D., Phelan, J., Blett, T. F., Landers, D., Nahlik, A. M., Van Houtven, G., Davis, C., Clark, C. M., & Hewitt, J. (2017). A framework to quantify the strength of ecological links between an environmental stressor and final eco-system services. Ecosphere, 8, 01806. doi: 10.1002/ecs2.1806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1806
View in Google Scholar - Bos, F., & Ruijs, A. (2021). Quantifying the non-use value of biodiversity in cost-benefit analysis: the Dutch biodiversity points. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 12(2), 287?312. doi: doi:10.1017/bca.2020.27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2020.27
View in Google Scholar - Browne, M., Fraser, G., & Snowball, J. (2018). Economic evaluation of wetland restoration: a systematic review of the literature. Restoration Ecology, 26, 1120?1126. doi: 10.1111/rec.12889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12889
View in Google Scholar - Cascajares, M., Alcayde, A., Salmerón-Manzano, E., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2021). The bibliometric literature on Scopus and WoS: the medicine and en-vironmental sciences categories as case of study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 5851. doi: 10.3390/ijerph1 8115851. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115851
View in Google Scholar - Cheng, X., Van Damme, S., Li, L., & Uyttenhove, P. (2019). Evaluation of cultur-al ecosystem services: a review of methods. Ecosystem Services, 37, 100925. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100925. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100925
View in Google Scholar - Chitsaz, N., & Azarnivand, A. (2017). Water scarcity management in arid regions based on an extended multiple criteria technique. Water Resources Management, 31, 233?250. doi: 10.1007/s11269-016-1521-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1521-5
View in Google Scholar - Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., & Raskin, R. G. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253?260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
View in Google Scholar - Dahal, R. P., Grala, R. K., Gordon, J. S., Munn, I. A., Petrolia, D. R., & Cum-mings, J. R. (2019). A hedonic pricing method to estimate the value of water-fronts in the Gulf of Mexico. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 41, 185?194. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.04.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.04.004
View in Google Scholar - Daily, G. C. (1997). Nature?s services: societal dependence on natural ecosys-tems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
View in Google Scholar - Damkjaer, S., & Taylor, R. (2017). The measurement of water scarcity: defining a meaningful indicator. Ambio, 46, 513?531. doi: 10.1007/s13280-017-0912-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0912-z
View in Google Scholar - De Rezende, C. L., Uezu, A., & Scarano, F. R. (2015). Atlantic forest spontaneous regeneration at landscape scale. Biodiversity and Conservation, 24, 2255?2272. doi: 10.1007/s10531-015-0980-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0980-y
View in Google Scholar - De Valck, J., Broekx, S., Liekens, I., De Nocker, L., Van Orshoven, J., & Vranken, L. (2016). Contrasting collective preferences for outdoor recreation and sub-stitutability of nature areas using hot spot mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning, 151, 64?78. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.008
View in Google Scholar - Falagas, M. E., Kouranos, V. D., Arencibia-Jorge, R., & Karageorgopoulos, D. E. (2008). Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. FASEB Journal, 22, 2623?2628. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-107938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.08-107938
View in Google Scholar - Farber, S., Costanza, R., Childers, D. L., Erickson, J. O. N., Gross, K., Grove, M., & Warren, P. (2006). Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem manage-ment. Bioscience, 56, 121?133. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0121:LEAE FE]2.0.CO;2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0121:LEAEFE]2.0.CO;2
View in Google Scholar - Farr, M., & Stoeckl, N. (2018). Overoptimism and the underevaluation of ecosys-tem services: a case-study of recreational fishing in Townsville, adjacent to the Great Barrier Reef. Ecosystem Services, 31, 433?444. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.201 8.02.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.010
View in Google Scholar - Frélichová, J., Vačkář, D., Pártl, A., Loučková, B., Harmáčková, Z. V., & Loren-cová, E. (2014). Integrated assessment of ecosystem services in the Czech Re-public. Ecosystem Services, 8, 110?117. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.001
View in Google Scholar - Gan, F., Du, H., Wei, Q., & Fan, E. (2011). Evaluation of the ecosystem values of aquatic wildlife reserves: a case of Chinese Sturgeon Natural Reserve in Yi-chang reaches of the Yangtze river. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 27, 376?382. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2010.01659.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2010.01659.x
View in Google Scholar - Geijzendorffer, I. R., Cohen-Shacham, E., Cord, A. F., Cramer, W., Guerra, C., & Martín-López, B. (2017). Ecosystem services in global sustainability policies. Environmental Science & Policy, 74, 40?48. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.017
View in Google Scholar - Ghermandi, A., Agard, J., & Nunes, P. (2018). Applying geographic information systems to ecosystem services valuation and mapping in Trinidad and Tobago. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 11, 289?306. doi: 10.1007/s12076-018-0210-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-018-0210-9
View in Google Scholar - Ginsburgh, V. (2017). Contingent valuation, willingness to pay, and willingness to accept. In B. Frey & D. Iselin (Eds.). Economic ideas you should forget (pp. 65?66). Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47458-8_26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47458-8_26
View in Google Scholar - Gren, I. M. (2019). The economic value of mussel farming for uncertain nutrient removal in the Baltic Sea. PLoS One, 14, 0218023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0 218023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218023
View in Google Scholar - Groshans, G. R., Mikhailova, E. A., Post, C. J., Schlautman, M. A., Zurqani, H. A., & Zhang, L. (2018). Assesing the value of soil inorganic carbon for ecosystem services in the contiguous United States based on liming replacement costs. Land, 7, 149. doi: 10.3390/land7040149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040149
View in Google Scholar - Gusm?o-Caiado, R. G., de Freitas-Dias, R., Veiga-Mattos, L., Gonçalves-Quelhas, O. L., & Leal-Filho, W. (2017). Towards sustainable development through the perspective of eco-efficiency - a systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 890?904. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.166
View in Google Scholar - He, J., Moffette, F., & Fournier, R. (2015). Meta-analysis for the transfer of eco-nomic benefits of ecosystem services provided by wetlands within two water-sheds in Quebec, Canada. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 23, 707?725. doi: 10.1007/s11273-015-9414-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-015-9414-6
View in Google Scholar - Hekrle, M. (2022). What benefits are the most important to you, your community, and society? Perception of ecosystem services provided by nature-based solu-tions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 9(6), e1612. doi: 10.1002/wat2. 1612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1612
View in Google Scholar - Hill, B. H., Kolka, R. K., McCormick, F. H., & Starry, M. A. (2014). A synoptic survey of ecosystem services from headwater catchments in the United States. Ecosystem Services, 7, 106?115. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.12.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.12.004
View in Google Scholar - Horváthová, E., Badura, T., & Duchková, H. (2021). The value of the shading function of urban trees: a replacement cost approach. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 62, 127166. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127166
View in Google Scholar - Hossain, M. S., Pogue, S. J., Trenchard, L., Van Oudenhoven, A. P. E., Wash-bourne, C. L., Muiruri, E. W., Tomczyk, A. M., García-Llorente, M., Hale, R., Hevia,V., Adams, T., Tavallali, L., De Bell,S., Pye, M., & Resende, F. (2018). Identifying future research directions for biodiversity, ecosystem services and sustainability: perspectives from early-career researchers. International Jour-nal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 25, 249?261. doi: 10.1080/1350 4509.2017.1361480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2017.1361480
View in Google Scholar - Hynes, S., Norton, D., & Hanley, N. (2013). Adjusting for cultural differences in international benefit transfer. Environmental and Resource Economics, 56, 499?519. doi: 10.1007/s10640-012-9572-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9572-4
View in Google Scholar - Ignatyeva, M., Yurak, V., & Dushin, A. (2022). Valuating natural resources and ecosystem services: systematic review of methods in use. Sustainability, 14(3), 1901. doi: 10.3390/su14031901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031901
View in Google Scholar - Jiang, B., Wong, C. P., & Ouyang, Z. Y. (2016). Beneficiary analysis and ecologi-cal production function to measure lake ecosystem services for decision-making in China. Shengtai Xuebao, 36(8), 2422?2430. doi: 10.5846/stxb2014 10192051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201410192051
View in Google Scholar - Johnston, R. J., Besedin, E. Y., & Stapler, R. (2017). Enhanced geospatial validity for meta-analysis and environmental benefit transfer: an application to water quality improvements. Environmental and Resource Economics, 68, 343?375. doi: 10.1007/s10640-016-0021-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0021-7
View in Google Scholar - Kabil, M., Alayan, R., Lakner, Z., & Dávid, L. D. (2022). Enhancing regional tourism development in the protected areas using the total economic value ap-proach. Forests, 13(5), 727. doi: 10.3390/f13050727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f13050727
View in Google Scholar - Kecinski, M., Messer, K., & Peo, A. J. (2018). When cleaning too much pollution can be a bad thing: a field experiment of consumer demand for oysters. Ecological Economics, 146, 686?695. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.011
View in Google Scholar - Khan, J. R, Vasquez, F., & de Rezende, C. E. (2017). Choice modeling of system-wide or large scale environmental change in a developing country context: lessons from the Paraíba du Sul River. Science of the Total Environment, 598, 488?496. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.059
View in Google Scholar - Khan, S., Khan, I., Zhao, M., Khan, A., & Ali, M. (2019). Valuation of ecosystem services using choice experiment with preference heterogeneity: a benefit transfer analysis across inland river basin. Science of the Total Environment, 679, 126?135. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.049
View in Google Scholar - Koschke, L., Fürst, C., Frank, S., & Makeschin, F. (2012). A multi-criteria ap-proach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecological Indicators, 21, 54?66. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010
View in Google Scholar - Kumar, P. (Ed.) (2010). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity (TEEB) ecological and economic foundations. Oxford: Routledge.
View in Google Scholar - Li, W., & Zhao, Y. (2015). Bibliometric analysis of global environmental assess-ment research in a 20-year period. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 50, 158?166. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.09.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.09.012
View in Google Scholar - Limaei, S. M., Safari, G., & Merceh, G. M. (2017). Non-market valuation of for-est park using travel cost method (case study: Saravan forest park, north of Iran). Austrian Journal of Forest Science, 134, 53?74.
View in Google Scholar - Liu, S., Costanza, R., Troy, A., D?Aagostino, J., & Mates, W. (2010). Valuing New Jersey?s ecosystem services and natural capital: a spatially explicit bene-fit transfer approach. Environmental Management, 45, 1271?1285. doi: 10.1007/s 00267-010-9483-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9483-5
View in Google Scholar - Liu, Y., Li, J., & Zhang, H. (2012). An ecosystem service valuation of land use change in Taiyuan City, China. Ecological Modelling, 225, 127?132. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.11.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.11.017
View in Google Scholar - Liu, W., Lin, Y., & Hsieh, C. (2019a). Assessing the amenity value of forest eco-system services: perspectives from the use of sustainable green spaces. Sustainability, 11, 4500. doi: 10.3390/su11164500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164500
View in Google Scholar - Liu, W., Chen, P., & Hsieh, C. (2019b). Assesing the recreational value of a na-tional forest park from ecotourists' perspective in Taiwan. Sustainability, 11, 4084. doi: 10.3390/su11154084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154084
View in Google Scholar - Macaskill, J., & Lloyd-Smith, P. (2022). Six decades of environmental resource valuation in Canada: a synthesis of the literature. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70(1), 73?89. doi: 10.1111/cjag.12304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12304
View in Google Scholar - May, N., Guenther, E., & Haller, P. (2017). Environmental indicators for the evaluation of wood products in consideration of site-dependent aspects: a re-view and integrated approach. Sustainability, 9, 1897. doi: 10.3390/su9101897. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101897
View in Google Scholar - Mikhailova, E. A., Post, C. J., Schlautman, M. A., Groshans, G. R., Cope, M. P., & Zhang, L. (2019). A systems-based approach to ecosystem services valuation of various atmospheric calcium deposition flows. Resources, 8, 66. doi: 10.3390/r esources8020066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020066
View in Google Scholar - Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA, 2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity symthesis. Washington: World Resources Institute.
View in Google Scholar - Mitrică, B., Mitrică, E., Enciu, P., & Mocanu, I. (2017). An approach for forecast-ing of public water scarcity at the end of the 21st century, in the Timiş Plain of Romania. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 258?269. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.026
View in Google Scholar - Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2015). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Science, 106, 213?228. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
View in Google Scholar - Moondoko, P., Manson, R. H., & Pérez-Maqueo, O. (2016). Assessing the service of water quality regulation by quantifying the effects of land use on water quality and public health in central Veracruz, Mexico. Ecosystem Services, 22, 161?173. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.001
View in Google Scholar - Newton, A. C., Hodder, K., Cantarello, E., Perrella, L., Birch, J. C., Robins, J., Douglas, S., Moody, C., & Cordingley, J. (2012). Cost?benefit analysis of eco-logical networks assessed through spatial analysis of ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49, 571?580. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.021 40.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02140.x
View in Google Scholar - Nie, W., Guo, H., & Banwart, S. A. (2021). Economic valuation of earth's critical zone: framework, theory and methods. Environmental Development, 40, 100654. doi: 10.1016/j.envdev.2021.100654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2021.100654
View in Google Scholar - Mirici, M. E. (2022). The ecosystem services and green infrastructure: a system-atic review and the gap of economic valuation. Sustainability, 14(1), 517. doi: 10.33 90/su14010517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010517
View in Google Scholar - Opejin, A. K., Aggarwal, R. M., White, D. D., Jones, J. L., Maciejewski, R., Mas-caro, G., & Sarjoughian, H. S. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of food-energy-water nexus literature. Sustainability, 12, 1112. doi: 10.3390/su12031112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031112
View in Google Scholar - Paletto, A., Geitner, C., Grilli, G., Hastik, R., Pastorella, F., & Rodríguez-García, L. (2015). Mapping the value of ecosystem services: a case study from the Austrian Alps. Annals of Forest Research, 58, 157?175. doi: 10.15287/afr.2015. 335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2015.335
View in Google Scholar - Pascal, N., Brathwaite, A., Brander, L., Seidl, A., Philip, M., & Clua, E. (2018). Evidence of economic benefits for public investment in MPAs. Ecosystem Services, 30, 3?13. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.017
View in Google Scholar - Pe?uelas, J., Sardans, J., Filella, I., Estiarte, M., Llusi?, J., Ogaya, R., Carnicer, J., Bartrons, M., Rivas-Ubach, S., Grau, O., Peguero, G., Margalef, O., Pla-Rabés, S., Stefanescu, C., Asensio, D., Preece, C., Liu, L., Verger, A., Barbeta, A., Achotegui-Castells, A., Gargallo-Garriga, A., Sperlich, D., Farré-Armengol, G., Fernández-Martínez, M., Liu, D., Zhang, C., Urbina, I., Camino-Serrano, M., Vives-Ingla, M., Stocker, B. D., Balzarolo, M., Guerrieri, R., Peaucelle, M., Mara?ón-Jiménez, S., Bórnez-Mejías, K., Mu, Z., Descals, A., Castellanos, A., & Terradas, J., (2017). Impacts of global change on Mediter-ranean forests and their services. Forests, 8, 463. doi: 10.3390/f8120463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f8120463
View in Google Scholar - Pinke, Z., Vári, Á., & Kovács, E. T. (2022). Value transfer in economic valuation of ecosystem services ? some methodological challenges. Ecosystem Services, 56, 101443. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101443
View in Google Scholar - Raheem, N., Colt, S., Fleishman, E., Talberth, J., Swedeen, P., Boyle, K. J., Rudd, M., Lopez, R. D., Crockeri, D., Bohanj, D., Higginsk, T. O., Willerl, C., & Boumansm, R. M., (2012). Application of non-market valuation to California's coastal policy decisions. Marine Policy, 36, 1166?1171. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol. 2012.01.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.01.005
View in Google Scholar - Rai, K. R., Shyamsundar, P., Nepal, M., & Bhatta, L. (2015). Differences in de-mand for watershed services: understanding preferences through a choice ex-periment in the Koshi Basin of Nepal. Ecological Economics, 119, 274?283. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.013
View in Google Scholar - Randall, A., & Stoll, J. R. (1983). Existence value in a total valuation framework. In R. D. Rowe, L. G. Chestnut & R. E. Dickenson (Eds.). Managing air quality and scenic resources at national parks and wilderness areas (pp. 264?274)., New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780429050084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429050084
View in Google Scholar - Reynaud, A., & Lanzanova, D. (2017). A global meta-analysis of the value of ecosystem services provided by lakes. Ecological Economics, 137, 184?194. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.001
View in Google Scholar - Rodríguez-Osuna, V., Börner, J., Nehren, U., Bardy-Prado, R., Gaese, H., & Heinrich, J. (2014). Priority areas for watershed service conservation in the Guapi-Macacu region of Rio de Janeiro, Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Ecological Processes, 3, 16. doi: 10.1186/s13717-014-0016-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-014-0016-7
View in Google Scholar - Roebeling, P. C., Costa, L., Magalhaes-Filho, L., & Tekken, V. (2013). Ecosystem service value losses from coastal erosion in Europe: historical trends and fu-ture projections. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 17, 389?395. doi: 10.1007/s1185 2-013-0235-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-013-0235-6
View in Google Scholar - Ruiz-Agudelo, C., & Bello, L. (2014). Valuation of the ecosystem services in the Colombian Andes. The benefit transfer method: a meta-analysis. Universitas Scientiarum, 19, 301?322. doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.SC19-3.vase. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.SC19-3.vase
View in Google Scholar - Schmidt, S., Manceur, A. M., & Seppelt, R. (2016). Uncertainty of monetary valued ecosystem services?value transfer functions for global mapping. PLoS One, 11, e0148524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148524
View in Google Scholar - Siikamäki, J., Sanchirico, J. N., & Jardine, S. L. (2012). Global economic poten-tial for reducing carbon dioxide emissions from mangrove loss. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 14369?14374. doi: 10.1073/pnas.120051 9109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200519109
View in Google Scholar - Singh, N., Gourevitch, J., Wemple, B., Watson, K., Rizzo, D., Polasky, S., & Ricketts, T. (2019). Optimizing wetland restoration to improve water quality at a regional scale. Environment Research Letters, 14, 064006. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab1827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1827
View in Google Scholar - Smith, A., Yee, S. H., Russell, M., Awkerman, J., & Fisher, W. S. (2017). Linking ecosystem service supply to stakeholder concerns on both land and sea: an ex-ample from Guánica Bay watershed, Puerto Rico. Ecological Indicators, 74, 371?383. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.036
View in Google Scholar - Solomon, N., Segnon, A. C., & Birhane, E. (2019). Ecosystem service values changes in response to land-use/land-cover dynamics in Dry Afromontane Forest in northern Ethiopia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 4653. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234653
View in Google Scholar - Song, X. P. (2018). Global estimates of ecosystem service value and change: taking into account uncertainties in satellite-based land cover data. Ecological Economics, 143, 227?235. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.019
View in Google Scholar - Tardieu, L., & Tuffery, L. (2019). From supply to demand factors: what are the determinants of attractiveness for outdoor recreation? Ecological Economics, 161, 163?175. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.022
View in Google Scholar - Thompson, D., Swallow, B., & Luckert, M. (2017). Costs of lost opportunities: applying non-market valuation techniques to potential REDD+ participants in Cameroon. Forests, 8, 69. doi: 10.3390/f8030069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f8030069
View in Google Scholar - Toledo, D., Brice?o, T., & Ospina, G. (2018). Ecosystem service valuation framework applied to a legal case in Anchicaya region of Colombia. Ecosys-tem Services, 29, 352?359. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.022
View in Google Scholar - Tu, Z., Chen, Z., Ye, H., Chen, S., & Huang, J. (2022). Integrating water quality restoration cost with ecosystem service flow to quantify an ecological com-pensation standard: a case study of the Taoxi Creek Watershed. Water, 14(9), 1459. doi: 10.3390/w14091459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w14091459
View in Google Scholar - Velasco-Mu?oz, J. F., & Aznar-Sánchez, J. A. (2016). The economic valuation of ecosystem services in the agroecosystems in Spain: conceptual framework and methodology. Pecvnia, 22, 75?93. doi: 10.18002/pec.v0i22.5068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18002/pec.v0i22.5068
View in Google Scholar - Velasco-Mu?oz, J. F., Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Batlles-delaFuente, A., & Fidelibus, M. D. (2019). Rainwater harvesting for agricultural irrigation: an analysis of global research. Water, 11, 1320. doi: 10.3390/w11071320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071320
View in Google Scholar - Vermaat, J. E., Wagtendonk, A. J., Brouwer, R. Sheremet, O., Ansink, E., Brock-hoff, T., Plug, M., & Hellsten, S. (2016). Assessing the societal benefits of river restoration using the ecosystem services approach. Hydrobiologia, 769, 121?135. doi: 10.1007/s10750-015-2482-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2482-z
View in Google Scholar - Viti, M., Löwe, R., S?rup, H. J. D., Rasmussen, M., Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K., & McKnight, U. S. (2022). Knowledge gaps and future research needs for as-sessing the non-market benefits of nature-based solutions and nature-based so-lution-like strategies. Science of the Total Environment, 841, 156636. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156636
View in Google Scholar - Widney, S., Kanabrocki Klein, A., Ehman, J., Hackney, C., & Craft, C. (2018). The value of wetlands for water quality improvement: an example from the St. Johns River watershed, Florida. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 26, 265?276. doi: 10.1007/s11273-017-9569-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-017-9569-4
View in Google Scholar - Yu, Z., Liu, X., Zhang, J., Xu, D., & Cao, S. (2018). Evaluating the net value of ecosystem services to support ecological engineering: framework and a case study of the Beijing Plains afforestation. Ecological Engineering, 112, 148?152. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.12.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.12.017
View in Google Scholar - Zandi, S., Limaei, S. M., & Amiri, N. (2018). An economic evaluation of a forest park using the individual travel cost method (a case study of Ghaleh Rudkhan forest park in northern Iran). Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, 6, 48?55. doi: 10.2478/environ-2018-0014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/environ-2018-0014
View in Google Scholar - Zhang, Y., Zhou, D., Niu, Z., & Xu, F. (2014). Valuation of lake and marsh wet-lands ecosystem services in China. Chinese Geographical Science, 24, 269?278. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0648-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-013-0648-z
View in Google Scholar - Zhong, S., Geng, Y., Liu, W., Gao, C., & Chen, W. (2016). A bibliometric review on natural resource accounting during 1995?2014. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 122?132. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.039
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.