A new database on Green GDP; 1970-2019: a framework for assessing the green economy
Abstract
Research background: Numerous modern indicators are attempting to integrate better economic, political, social, and environmental ambitions to uncover potential synergy, trade-offs, and future views that center around the notion of a so-called green economy. As long as the various indicators are not bounded in one comprehensive measurement, utilizing knowledge of relevant information and statistics that are crucial for monitoring the progress will not give us answers on the progress towards green growth either. Without an adequate measurement framework and robust statistics, the evaluation of the green economy is open to subjective reasoning.
Purpose of the article: This paper aims to offer a strong standpoint for green topics by exploring the concept of Green GDP. The paper introduces a new, updated database on Green GDP for the set of 160 countries from 1970?2019.
Methods: This database is distinctive due to its balanced coverage of two components of the green economy: quantitative feature (standard methodological algorithm) and qualitative feature (opportunity costs) within a common Green GDP accounting framework.
Findings & value added: Standardizing new methodologies and procedures for estimating environmental costs with a statistical foundation provides added value, which we hope will support the creation of reliable accounting and valuation systems for the green economy on a developing "green platform."
Keywords
green economy, green GDP, environment, database as time series, methodology, sustainability, sustainable growth, sustainable green development
References
- Australian Energy Regulator (2015). National greenhouse accounts factors; Aus-tralian national greenhouse accounts. Australian energy regulator and depart-ment of environment of Australia, Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from https://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/80f603 e7-175b-4f97-8a9b-2d207f46594a/files/national-greenhouse-accounts-factors-july-2018.pdf. (11.11.2020)
View in Google Scholar - Boyd, J. (2006). The nonmarket benefits of nature: what should be counted in green GDP? Ecological Economics, 61(4), 716?723. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.20 06.06.016.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.016 - Brilhante, O., & Klaas, J. (2018). Green city concept and a method to measure green city performance over time applied to fifty cities globally: influence of GDP, population size and energy efficiency. Sustainability, 10(6), 2031. doi: 10.3390/su10062031.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10062031 - Capoor, K., & Ambrosi, P. (2007). State and trends of the carbon market 2007. World Bank Institute, World Bank. Retrieved from http://documents. worldbank.org/curated/en/416871468138574709/State-and-trends-of-the-carbo n-market-2007 (8.11.2020).
View in Google Scholar - Chakraborty, D., & Mukhopadhyay, K. (2014). Estimates of green GDP. Global Issues in Water Policy, 10, 165?187. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-8929-5.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8929-5_8 - Environmental Indicator Report (2018). Environmental indicator report 2018. EEA Report No. 19/2018. European Environment Agency. doi: 10.2800/180334.
View in Google Scholar - Eurostat (2020). Official EU statistical data. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu /eurostat (8.12.2020).
View in Google Scholar - GGEI (2018). 2018 Global green economy index. Green policy platform. Re-trieved from https://www.greengrowthknowledge.org/research/2018-global-green-econ omy-index-ggei (9.12.2020).
View in Google Scholar - GGGI (2019). Green growth index; concept, methods and applications. Global Green Growth Institute Technical Report, 5.
View in Google Scholar - Hoff, J. V., Rasmussen, M. M. B., & S?rensen, P. B. (2021). Barriers and oppor-tunities in developing and implementing a green GDP. Ecological Economics, 181(2), 106905. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106905.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106905 - Hussain, Z., Mehmood, B., Khan, M. K., & Tsimisaraka, R. S. M. (2022). Green growth, green technology, and environmental health: evidence from high-GDP Countries. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 816697. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.816 697.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.816697 - International Monetary Fund (2020). IMF Database. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Data (20.12.2020).
View in Google Scholar - Islam, S., & Asad, M. (2021). Forecasting GDP and green GDP of South Asian country for sustainable development. Himalayan Economics and Business Management, 2(5), 51?57. doi: 10.47310/Hjebm.2021.v02i05.008.
View in Google Scholar - Jacobs, M. (2013). Green growth. In R. Falkner (Ed.) The handbook of global climate and environment policy (pp. 197?214). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9781118326213.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118326213.ch12 - Kalantaripor, M., & Alamdario, H.N. (2021). Spatial effects of energy consump-tion and green GDP in regional agreements. Sustainability, 13(18), 10078, doi: 10.3390/su131810078.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810078 - Kunanuntakij, K., Varabuntoonvit, V., Vorayos, N., Panjapornpon, C., & Mungcharoen, T. (2017). Thailand green GDP assessment based on environ-mentally extended input-output model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 970?977. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.16.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.106 - Liu, D. (2021. Application and research of analytic hierarchy process in Green GDP development planning of smart city. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 147(1), 646. doi: 10.106/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000646.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000646 - Menegaki, A. (2021). Towards a global energy ? sustainable economy nexus; summing up evidence from recent empirical work. Energies, 14(16), 5074. doi: 10.3390/en14165074.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14165074 - Nahman, A., Mahumani, B. K., & de Lange, W. J. (2016). Beyond GDP: towards a green economy index. Development Southern Africa, 33(2), 215?233. doi: 10.1080/0376835X.2015.1120649.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2015.1120649 - National Statistics (2021). National statistics of all countries included in the anal-ysis.
View in Google Scholar - Nowak, A., & Kasztelan, A. (2022). Economic competitiveness vs. green com-petitiveness of agriculture in the European Union countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(2), 379?405. doi: 10.24136/oc.2022.012.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.012 - OECD (2012). Green growth and developing countries; Consultation draft. The organization for economic co-operation and development. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/green-development/greengrowthanddevelop ingcountries-consultationdraft.htm (15.12.2020).
View in Google Scholar - OECD (2017). OECD green growth studies. Green growth indicators 2017. Re-trieved from https://www.oecd.org/environment/green-growth-indicators-2017-9789264268586-en.htm (15.12.2020).
View in Google Scholar - OECD (2020). OECD database. Retrieved from https://data.oecd.org/ (8.12.2020).
View in Google Scholar - PAGE (2017). The green economy progress measurement framework. Partnership for action on green economy. United Countries environmental programme.
View in Google Scholar - Qi, S., Huang, Z., & Ji, L. (2021). Sustainable development based on green GDP accounting and cloud computing: a case study of Zheijang province. Hindawi Scientific Programming, 2021, 7953164. doi: 10.1155/2021/7953164.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7953164 - Qi, S., Xu, L., & Coggins, J.S. (2001). Integrated environmental-economic ac-counting of GDP. Annual meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association in Chicago, August 5 - 8, 2001. Agricultural and Applied Eco-nomics Association. doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.20582.
View in Google Scholar - Rauch, J. N., & Chi, Y. F. (2010). The plight of green GDP in China. Consilience: The Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(1), 102?116. doi: 10.7916/consilie nce.v0i3.4498.
View in Google Scholar - Sánchez García, J. L., & Díez Sanz, J. M. (2018). Climate change, ethics and sustainability: an innovative approach. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(2), 70?75. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2017.12.002.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.12.002 - Sonthi, C., Harnphattananusorn, S., & Santipolvut, S. (2019). Concepts and em-pirical calculation of the green GDP for Thailand. International Journal of Green Economics, 13(1), 68?85. doi: 10.1504/IJGE.2019.101453.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGE.2019.101453 - Stjepanović, S., Tomić, D., & Škare, M. (2019). Green GDP: an analysis for de-veloping and developed countries. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 22(4), 4?17. doi: 10.15240/tul/001/2019-4-001.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2019-4-001 - Stjepanović, S., Tomić, D., & Škare, M. (2017). A new approach to measuring green GDP: a cross-country analysis. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(4), 574?590. doi: 10.9770/jesi.2017.4.4(13).
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.4.4(13) - Škare, M., Tomić, D., & Stjepanović, S. (2020). Energy consumption and green GDP in Europe: a panel cointegration analysis 2008?2016. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 25(1), 46?56. doi: 10.46544/AMS.v25i1.5.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.46544/AMS.v25i1.5 - Talberth, J., & Bohara, A. K. (2006). Economic openness and green GDP. Ecological Economics, 58(4), 743?758. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.002.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.002 - UN Database (2020). United Nation UNdata. Retrieved from https://data.un.org/ (20.12.2020).
View in Google Scholar - UNEP (2012). Measuring progress towards an inclusive green economy. United Countries environmental programme.
View in Google Scholar - Veklych, O., & Shlapak, M. (2013). Green GDP as an indicator of environmental cost of economic growth in Ukraine. Retrieved from https://archive.org/stream/ GreenGdpAsAnIndicatorOfEnvironmentalC-ostOfEconomicGrowthInUkraine/ Veklych.Shlapak.GreenGdpAsAnIndicatorOfEnvironmentalCostOfEconomicGrowthOfUkraine_djvu.txt (8.11.2021).
View in Google Scholar - Vimochana, M. (2017). Green GDP calculations in developed and developing countries. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 4(6), 244?251.
View in Google Scholar - Yu, Y., Yu, M., Lin, L., Chen, J., Li, D., Zhang, W., & Cao, K. (2019). National green GDP assessment and prediction for China based on a CA-Markov land use simulation model. Sustainability, 11(3), 576. doi: 10.3390/su11030576.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030576 - Wang, F., Wang, R., & Wang, J. (2020). Measurement of China?s green GDP and its dynamic variation based on industrial perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(35), 43813?43828. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-102 36-x.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10236-x - Wu, S., & Han, H. (2020). Sectoral changing patterns of China?s green GDP con-sidering climate change: an investigation based on the economic input-output life cycle assessment model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 119764. doi: 10.1016/j.clepro.2019.119764.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119764 - Waste to Energy in Denmark (2006). The most efficient waste management sys-tem in Europe. Reno-Sam and Ramb?ll. Retrieved from https://stateofgreen.com /files/download/275 (8.11.2020).
View in Google Scholar - World Development Indicators (2020). World Bank. Retrieved from http://data. worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators (10.12.2020).
View in Google Scholar