Peer effects and the mechanisms in corporate capital structure: Evidence from Chinese listed firms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.008Keywords:
peer effects, capital structure, learning mechanisms, Chinese capital marketsAbstract
Research background: Peer effects, in which individuals learn and imitate their peers? behaviors, have been widely recognized in different contexts. Particularly, with increasingly fierce competition, firms can no longer make financial decisions in isolation when facing terrible external operational environments. In contrast, observing peers? actions in corporate policies can help reveal intentions regarding what peers are doing, which is vital for policymakers and financial managers. Studies on the existence of capital structure peer effects in the Chinese context have been conducted, but the mechanisms of peer effects are still ambiguous at present.
Purpose of the article: This study aims to examine peer effects in capital structure and discover the mechanisms in the Chinese context. Understanding the mechanisms behind peer effects can help scholars and policymakers obtain more insights into the working mechanisms of peer effects. Furthermore, how the industry- and firm-specific characteristics affect peer effects and the selection of mechanisms should be analyzed.
Methods: Using the fixed effects model (industry effect and year effect) and propensity score matching (PSM), as well as market leverage and heterogeneous stock shocks, we investigate peer effects, the mechanisms, and the effects of specific factors from industries and firms based on the sample of Chinese non-financial A-share listed firms on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets from 2014 to 2021.
Findings & value added: Study results show that peer effects exist in the corporate capital structure in the Chinese capital markets. Unlike previous studies, this analysis captures three mechanisms: the industrial average, industrial leaders, and industrial-similar firms. The intensity of peer effects and selection of mechanisms are influenced by both industry-specific characteristics (the degree of industrial competition and financing constraints) and firm-specific characteristics (firm size and market share).
Downloads
References
Adel, C., Hussain, M., Mohamed, E., & Basuony, M. (2019). Is corporate governance relevant to the quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure in large Eu-ropean companies? International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 27(2), 301?332. doi: 10.1108/ijaim-10-2017-0118.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-10-2017-0118
View in Google Scholar
AlHares, A. (2020). Corporate governance and cost of capital in OECD countries. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 28(1), 1?21. doi: 10.1108/ijaim-02-2019-0023.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-02-2019-0023
View in Google Scholar
AlHares, A., Elamer, A., Alshbili, I., & Moustafa, M. (2020). Board structure and corporate R&D intensity: Evidence from Forbes global 2000. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 28(3), 445?463. doi: 10.1108/IJAIM-11-2019-0127.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-11-2019-0127
View in Google Scholar
Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797. doi: 10.2307/2118364.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2118364
View in Google Scholar
Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1998). Learning from the behavior of others: conformity, fads and informational cascades. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), 151?170. doi: 10.1257/jep.12.3.151.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.12.3.151
View in Google Scholar
Brander, J., & Lewis, T. (1986). Oligopoly and financial structure: the limited liability effect. American Economic Review, 76(5), 956?970.
View in Google Scholar
Buchner, A., Mohamed, A., & Schwienbacher, A. (2020). Herd behaviour in buyout investments. Journal of Corporate Finance, 60, 101503. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019. 101503.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.101503
View in Google Scholar
Farrell, K. A., & Whidbee, D. A. (2003). Impact of firm performance expectations on CEO turnover and replacement decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36(1?3), 165. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.09.001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.09.001
View in Google Scholar
Grennan, J. (2019). Dividend payments as a response to peer influence. Journal of Financial Economics, 131(3), 549?570. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.01.012.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.01.012
View in Google Scholar
Gu, Y., Ben, S. L., & Lv, J. M. (2022). Peer effect in merger and acquisition activities and its impact on corporate sustainable development: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(7), 3891. doi: 10.3390/su14073891.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073891
View in Google Scholar
Han, S. K. (1994). Mimetic isomorphism and its effect on the audit services market. Social Forces, 73(2), 637?664. doi: 10.2307/2579824.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2579824
View in Google Scholar
Haveman, H. A. (1993). Follow the leader: mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 593?627. doi: 10.2307/2393338.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393338
View in Google Scholar
He, W., & Wang, Q. (2020). The peer effect of corporate financial decisions around split share structure reform in China. Review of Financial Economics, 38(3), 474?493. doi: 10.1002/rfe.1088.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.1088
View in Google Scholar
Hudson, Y., Yan, M., & Zhang, D. (2020). Herd behaviour & investor sentiment: Evidence from UK mutual funds. International Review of Financial Analysis, 71, 101494. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101494.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101494
View in Google Scholar
Im, H. J. (2019). Asymmetric peer effects in capital structure dynamics. Economics Letters, 176, 17?22. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.12.019.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.12.019
View in Google Scholar
Im, H. J. Liu, J., & Park, Y. J. (2021). Policy uncertainty and peer effects: Evidence from corporate investment in China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 77, 101834. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101834.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101834
View in Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. N., & Zingales, L. (1995). Do financing constraints explain why invest-ment is correlated with cash flow? NBER Working Papers, 5267. doi: 10.3386/w5 267.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w5267
View in Google Scholar
Kaustia, M., & Rantala, V. (2015). Social learning and corporate peer effects. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(3), 653?669. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.06.006.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.06.006
View in Google Scholar
King, B. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2008). Rethinking the relationship between reputa-tion and legitimacy: A social actor conceptualization. Corporate Reputation Review, 11(3), 192?207. doi: 10.1057/crr.2008.16.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2008.16
View in Google Scholar
Leary, M., & Roberts, M. (2014). Do peer firms affect corporate financial policy? Journal of Finance, 69(1), 139?178. doi: 10.1111/jofi.12094.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12094
View in Google Scholar
Machokoto, M., Gyimah, D., & Ntim, C. G. (2021). Do peer firms influence innova-tion? British Accounting Review, 53(5), 100988. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2021.100988.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2021.100988
View in Google Scholar
Manski, C. F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection prob-lem. Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 531. doi: 10.2307/2298123.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2298123
View in Google Scholar
Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1989). Alternative mechanisms for corporate control. American Economic Review, 79(4), 842. doi: 10.3386/w2532.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w2532
View in Google Scholar
Park, K., Yang, I., & Yang, T. (2017). The peer-firm effect on firm?s investment deci-sions. North American Journal of Economics & Finance, 40, 178?199. doi: 10.1016/ j.najef.2017.03.001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2017.03.001
View in Google Scholar
Patel, J., Zeckhauser, R., & Hendricks, D. (1991). The rationality struggle: Illustra-tions from financial markets. American Economic Review, 81(2), 232?236. doi: 10.2307/2006860.
View in Google Scholar
Samo, A., & Murad, H. (2019). Impact of liquidity and financial leverage on firm?s profitability-an empirical analysis of the textile industry of Pakistan. Research Journal of Textile Apparel, 23(4), 291?305. doi: 10.1108/RJTA-09-2018-0055.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/RJTA-09-2018-0055
View in Google Scholar
Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. (1990). Herd behavior and investment. American Economic Review, 80(3), 465?479.
View in Google Scholar
Seo, H. (2021). Peer effects in corporate disclosure decisions. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 71(1), 101364. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101364.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101364
View in Google Scholar
Shiller, R. J., Fischer, S., & Friedman, B. M. (1984). Stock prices and social dynamics. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1984(2), 457?510. doi: 10.2307/2534436.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2534436
View in Google Scholar
Stark, W., Weber, M., Roth, G., Wittich, C., & Mitzman, A. (1970). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Sociological Analysis, 31(4), 223. doi: 10.2307/3710095.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3710095
View in Google Scholar
Sumani, S., & Roziq, A. (2020). Reciprocal capital structure and liquidity policy: Im-plementation of corporate governance toward corporate performance. Journal of Asian Finance Economics and Business, 7(9), 85?93. doi: 10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VO L7.NO9.085.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no9.085
View in Google Scholar
Tian, X., Song, Y., Luo, C., Zhou, X., & Lev, B. (2021). Herding behavior in supplier innovation crowdfunding: Evidence from Kickstarter. International Journal of Production Economics, 239, 108184. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108184.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108184
View in Google Scholar
Williams, G. C., & Zimmerman, D. J. (2003). Peer effects in higher education. Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education, 39(2), 65?77. doi: 10.3386/w 9501.
View in Google Scholar
Yan, Q., & Zhu, H. (2020). Peer influence on dividend policy: Evidence from the Chinese stock market. Economics Letters, 192, 109229. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2020. 109229.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109229
View in Google Scholar
Yang, J. S., Li, J. L., & Cao, Y. J. (2022). Analysis of peer effects on consumption in rural China based on social networks. Applied Economics, 55(6), 617?635. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2022.2092592.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2022.2092592
View in Google Scholar
Zeckhauser, R., Patel, J., & Hendricks, D. (1991). Nonrational actors and financial market behavior. Theory and Decision, 31(2-3), 257?287. doi: 10.1007/BF00132995.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132995
View in Google Scholar
Zhang, A. C., Fang, J., Jacobsen, B., & Marshall, B. R. (2018). Peer effects, personal characteristics and asset allocation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 90, 76?95. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.03.001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.03.001
View in Google Scholar
Zhang, J. J., & Liu, P. (2012). Rational herding in microloan markets. Management Science, 58(5), 892?912. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1459.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1459
View in Google Scholar
Zhong, T. L., & Zhang, T. Y. (2018). ?Peer effects? in capital structure decision of Chinese firms-empirical investigation based on Chinese a-share listed firms. Nankai Business Review International, 9(3), 289?315. doi: 10.1108/NBRI-08-2017-0042.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-08-2017-0042
View in Google Scholar
Zhou, X., Gao, Y., Wang, P., Zhu, B., & Wu, Z. (2022). Does herding behavior exist in China?s carbon markets? Applied Energy, 308, 118313. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy. 2021.118313.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118313
View in Google Scholar
