Impact of enterprise ambidexterity capability and experience learning on cross-border M&A performance: evidence from China

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.034

Keywords:

ambidexterity capability, experience learning, cross-border M&A, institutional distance, M&A performance

Abstract

Research background: Through cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&A), enterprises in China can improve their technological innovation and organizational management capabilities to make up for the disadvantages of outsiders and enhance their international competitiveness. However, due to the lack of experience, the success rate of cross-border M&A of China enterprises is low, and the performance changes after M&A differ. How to maximize the advantages of cross-border M&A in obtaining technical resources and how to improve the performance of cross-border M&A are important issues that China?s cross-border M&A enterprises and academic circles need to solve.

Purpose of the research: The aim of this study is to analyze the mechanism and boundary conditions of firms? capability to exploit resources (RTC) and capability to explore resources (REC) with regard to cross-border M&A performance from the perspective of experience learning based on organizational learning theory and resource-based theory.

Methods: With 173 China A-share listed companies with cross-border M&A events from 2010 to 2020 as samples, this study uses hierarchical regression analysis to test the impact of REC and RTC on cross-border M&A performance and its mechanism. In the robustness test, this study adopts the measures of changing dependent and independent variables lagged for one year for analysis. In the mechanism test, this study uses intermediary and mediation effect models.

Findings & value added: The results show that RTC and REC have positive effects on the performance of cross-border M&A. Prior experience learning (PE) and vicarious experience learning (VE) increase the probability of companies making cross-border M&A decisions and have positive effects on cross-border M&A performance. Moreover, PE and VE play a partial mediating role in the positive impact of REC and RTC on cross-border M&A performance, respectively. Formal and informal institutional distance weaken the positive effects of REC and RTC on the performance of cross-border M&A. Enterprises in emerging economies should adapt to the institutional environment of the host country to reduce the negative impact of institutional distance while taking advantage of experience learning when carrying out cross-border M&A.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahammad, M. F., Tarba, S. Y., Liu, Y., & Glaister, K. W. (2016). Knowledge trans-fer and cross-border acquisition performance: the impact of cultural distance and employee retention. International Business Review, 25(1), 66?75. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.06.015.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.06.015
View in Google Scholar

Anand, J., Mulotte, L., & Ren, C. R. (2016). Does experience imply learning? Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1395?1412. doi:10.1002/smj.2401.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2401
View in Google Scholar

Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation. Organiza-tion Science, 20(4), 696?717. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0406.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0406
View in Google Scholar

Aybar, B., & Ficici A. (2009). Cross-border acquisitions and firm value: an analy-sis of emerging-market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(8),1317?1338. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2009.15.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.15
View in Google Scholar

Bhaumik, S. K., Owolabi, O., & Pal, S. (2018). Private information, institutional distance, and the failure of cross-border acquisitions: evidence from the bank-ing sector in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of World Business, 53(4), 504?513. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2018.02.00.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.02.005
View in Google Scholar

Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resource and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99?120. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
View in Google Scholar

Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238?256. doi: 10.5465/amr.2003.9416096 .

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.9416096
View in Google Scholar

Boateng, A., Du, M., Bi, X., & Lodorfos, G. (2019). Cultural distance and value creation of cross-border M&A: the moderating role of acquirer characteristics. International Review of Financial Analysis, 63, 285?295. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2 018.12.009.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2018.12.009
View in Google Scholar

Bruneel, J., Yli-Renko, H., & Clarysse, B. (2010). Learning from experience and learning from others: how congenital and inter-organizational learning substi-tute for experiential learning in young firm internationalization. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(2), 164?182. doi: 10.1002/sej.89.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.89
View in Google Scholar

Brouthers, K. D., & Hennart, J. F. (2007). Boundaries of the firm: insights from international entry mode research. Journal of Management, 33(3), 395?425. doi: 10.1177/0149206307300817.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300817
View in Google Scholar

Blau, P. M. (1977). A macrosociological theory of social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 83(1), 26?54. doi: 10.2307/2777762.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/226505
View in Google Scholar

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator?mediator variable distinc-tion in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical con-siderations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173?1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
View in Google Scholar

Basuil, D. A., & Datta, D. K. (2019). Effects of firm-specific and country-specific advantages on relative acquisition size in service sector cross-border acquisi-tions: An empirical examination. Journal of International Management, 25(1), 66?80. doi: 10.1016/j.intman.2018.07.001.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2018.07.001
View in Google Scholar

Carnes, C. M., Xu, K., Sirmon, D. G., & Karadag, R. (2019). How competitive action mediates the resource slack-performance relationship: a meta-analytic approach. Journal of Management Studies, 56(1), 57?90. doi: 10.1111/jom s.12391.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12391
View in Google Scholar

Castellani, D., Jimenez, A., & Zanfei, A. (2013). How remote are R&D labs? Distance factors and international innovative activities. Journal of Interna-tional Business Studies, 44(7), 649?675. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2013.30.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.30
View in Google Scholar

Chen, F., Liu, H., & Ge, Y. (2021). How does integration affect industrial innova-tion through networks in technology-sourcing overseas M&A? A comparison between China and the US. Journal of Business Research, 122, 281?292. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.040.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.040
View in Google Scholar

Child, J., & Suzana, B. R. (2005). The internationalization of Chinese firms: a case for theoretical extension? Management and Organization Review 1(3), 381?410. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2005.00020.x.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2005.0020a.x
View in Google Scholar

Cuervo C. A., & Genc, M. E. (2011). Obligating, pressuring, and supporting di-mensions of the environment and the non-market advantages of developing-country multinational companies. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2), 441?455. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00964.x.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00964.x
View in Google Scholar

Cui, L., & Jiang, F. (2012). State ownership effect on firms FDI ownership deci-sions under institutional pressure: a study of Chinese outward in vesting firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(3), 264?284. doi: 10.2307/41 472787.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2012.1
View in Google Scholar

Dakessian., L., C., & Paulo, R. F. (2013). Multilatinas and value creation from cross-border acquisitions: an event study approach. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 10, 462?489. doi: 10.1590/S1807-769220130004000 06.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-76922013000400006
View in Google Scholar

Dikova, D., Panibratov, A., & Veselova, A. (2019). Investment motives, ownership advantages and institutional distance: an examination of Russian cross-border acquisitions. International Business Review, 28(4), 625?637. doi: 10.1016/j.ib usrev.2018.12.007.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.12.007
View in Google Scholar

Dikova, D., & Sahib, P. R. (2013). Is cultural distance a bane or a boon for cross-border acquisition performance? Journal of World Business, 48(1), 77?86. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2012.06.009.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2012.06.009
View in Google Scholar

Du, M., & Boateng, A. (2015). State ownership, institutional effects and value creation in cross-border mergers & acquisitions by Chinese firms. Interna-tional Business Review, 24(3), 430?442. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.10.002.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.10.002
View in Google Scholar

Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2008). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
View in Google Scholar

Galavotti., Ilaria., Daniele, C., & Donatella, D. (2017). Experience and cross-border acquisitions: an organizational learning perspective. European Management Review,14(2), 119?131. doi: 10.1111/emre.12094.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12094
View in Google Scholar

Gallego A., I., Rodríguez D, L., & Martín, V. J. (2020). An analysis of business ethics in the cultural contexts of different religions. Business Ethics: A European Review, 29(3), 1?17. doi: 10.1111/beer.12277.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12277
View in Google Scholar

Golubov, A., Yawson, A., & Zhang, H. (2015). Extraordinary acquirers. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(2), 314?330. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.02.005.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.02.005
View in Google Scholar

Gu, Y. J., Filatotchev, I., Bell, R. G., & Rasheed, A. A. (2019). Liability of for-eignness in capital markets: institutional distance and the cost of debt. Journal of Corporate Finance, 57, 142?160. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.10.014.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.10.014
View in Google Scholar

Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. (1999). The influence of organization acquisition experience on acquisition performance: a behavioral learning theory perspec-tive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 29?56. doi: 10.2307/2667030.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2667030
View in Google Scholar

Haleblian, J., Kim, J. Y., & Rajagopalan, N. (2006). The influence of acquisition experience and performance on acquisition behavior: evidence from the US commercial banking industry. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 357?370. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.20786083.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20786083
View in Google Scholar

Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206. doi: 10.5465/amr.1984.4277628.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628
View in Google Scholar

He, X., Brouthers, K. D., & Filatotchev, I. (2018). Market orientation and export performance: the moderation of channel and institutional distance. International Marketing Review, 35(2), 258?279. doi: 10.1108/IMR-09-2015-0194.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2015-0194
View in Google Scholar

Hilmersson, M., & Johanson, M. (2020). Knowledge acquisition strategy, speed of capability development and speed of SME internationalisation. International Small Business Journal, 38(6), 536?556. doi: 10.1177/026624262090902.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242620909029
View in Google Scholar

Irwin, K., Gilstrap, C., McDowell, W., Drnevich, P., & Gorbett, A. (2022). How knowledge and uncertainty affect strategic international business investment decisions: implications for cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Business Research, 139, 831?842. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.001.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.001
View in Google Scholar

Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commit-ments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23?32. doi: 10.1057/pa lgrave.jibs.849067.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490676
View in Google Scholar

Jonsson, A., & Foss, N. (2011). International expansion through flexible replica-tion: learning from the internationalization experience of IKEA. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(9),1079?1102. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2011.32.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.32
View in Google Scholar

Kafouros, M. I., & Forsans, N. (2012). The role of open innovation in emerging economies: do companies profit from the scientific knowledge of others? Journal of World Business, 47(3), 362?370. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2011.05.004.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2011.05.004
View in Google Scholar

Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411?432. doi: 10.1057 /palgrave.jibs.8490394.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490394
View in Google Scholar

Kostova, T., Beugelsdijk, S., Scott, W. R., Kunst, V. E., Chua, C. H., & van Essen, M. (2020). The construct of institutional distance through the lens of different institutional perspectives: review, analysis, and recommendations. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(4), 467?497. doi: 10.1057/s41267-019-0029 4-w.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00294-w
View in Google Scholar

Kowalik, I., & Pleśniak, A. (2022). Marketing determinants of innovation ambi-dexterity in small and mediumsized manufacturers. A comparative study. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 10(2), 163?185. doi: 10.15678/EBER.2022.100210.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2022.100210
View in Google Scholar

Lamotte, O., Chalençon, L., Mayrhofer, U., & Colovic, A. (2021). Intangible re-sources and cross-border acquisition decisions: the impact of reputation and the moderating effect of experiential knowledge. Journal of Business Re-search, 131, 297?310. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.044.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.044
View in Google Scholar

Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 319?340. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535
View in Google Scholar

Li, J. (2022). Can technology-driven cross-border mergers and acquisitions pro-mote green innovation in emerging market firms? evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(19), 27954?27976. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18154-2.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18154-2
View in Google Scholar

Luger, J., Raisch, S., & Schimmer, M. (2018). Dynamic balancing of exploration and exploitation: the contingent benefits of ambidexterity. Organization Science, 29(3), 449?470. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2017.1189.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1189
View in Google Scholar

Madsen, P. M., & Desai, V. (2010). Failing to Learn? the effects of failure and success on organizational learning in the global orbital launch vehicle indus-try. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 451?476. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.514 67631.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51467631
View in Google Scholar

March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71?87. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
View in Google Scholar

Mehreen, H., Rammal, H. G., Pereira, V., & Del Giudice, M. (2021). Investigating the influence of absorptive capacity of recipients within cross-border transfer of knowledge: evidence from emerging markets. International Marketing Re-view, 39(3), 734?754. doi: 10.1108/IMR-11-2020-0264.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-11-2020-0264
View in Google Scholar

Mohr, A., & Batsakis, G. (2019). The contingent effect of TMT international ex-perience on firms? internationalization speed. British Journal of Management, 30(4), 869?887. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12293.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12293
View in Google Scholar

Nicholson, R. R., & Salaber, J. (2013). The motives and performance of cross-border acquirers from emerging economies: comparison between Chinese and Indian firms. International Business Review, 22, 963?980. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusre v.2013.02.003.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.02.003
View in Google Scholar

Noordin, B. A. A., Kamarudin, F., & Anwar, N. A. M. (2015). Wealth effect and macroeconomics factors of a firm?s international merger and acquisition exer-cise: empirical evidence from multinational firms. Engineering Economics, 26(5), 469?477. doi: 10.5755/j01.ee.26.5.11418.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.26.5.11418
View in Google Scholar

O'Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Organizational ambidexterity in action: how managers explore and exploit. California Management Review, 53(4), 5?22. doi: 10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.5.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.5
View in Google Scholar

Osiyevskyy, O., Shirokova, G., & Ritala, P. (2020). Exploration and exploitation in crisis environment: implications for level and variability of firm perfor-mance. Journal of Business Research, 114, 227?239. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.0 4.015.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.015
View in Google Scholar

Park, H., Han, K., & Joon, W. (2018). The impact of cultural distance on the per-formance of foreign subsidiaries: evidence from the Korean market. Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 9(1), 123?134. doi: 10.15388/omee.2018.10.00007.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/omee.2018.10.00007
View in Google Scholar

Peng, M. W. (2000). Business strategies in transition economies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1), 157?159. doi: 10.2307/259125.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231358
View in Google Scholar

Riaz, H., Saeed, A., Liedong, T. A., & Rajwani, T. (2022). Environmental man-agement, nonmarket strategy, and firm performance in emerging markets: the case of ISO 14001. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 31(1), 139?163. doi: 10.1111/beer.12402.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12402
View in Google Scholar

Scalera, V. G., Mukherjee, D., & Piscitello, L. (2020). Ownership strategies in knowledge intensive cross-border acquisitions: comparing Chinese and Indian MNEs. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37(1), 155?185. doi: 10.1007/s10 490-018-9616-6.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9616-6
View in Google Scholar

Schweizer, D., Walker, T., & Zhang, A. (2019). Cross-border acquisitions by Chi-nese enterprises: the benefits and disadvantages of political connections. Journal of Corporate Finance, 57, 63?85. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3049696.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.12.023
View in Google Scholar

Seo, E., Kang, H., & Song, J. (2020). Blending talents for innovation: team com-position for cross-border R&D collaboration within multinational corpora-tions. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(5), 851?885. doi: 10.1057/s412 67-020-00331-z.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00331-z
View in Google Scholar

Sharma, D. S., & Jonathan, H. (2002). The impact of acquisitions on operating performance: some Australian evidence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29(1?2), 155?200. doi: 10.1111/1468-5957.00428.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00428
View in Google Scholar

Shenkar, O. (2001). Cultural distance revisited: towards a more rigorous concep-tualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 519?535. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490982.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490982
View in Google Scholar

Solís-Molina, M., Hernández-Espallardo, M., & Rodríguez-Orejuela, A. (2018). Performance implications of organizational ambidexterity versus specializa-tion in exploitation or exploration: the role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Research, 91, 181?194. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.001.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.001
View in Google Scholar

Storch-De Gracia, M., Madaziego, L., Llamas-Moya, B., Cruz-Perez, N., Rodri-guez-Martin, J., & Santamarta-Cerezal, J. (2022). Studying the relationship between teamwork competences and successful innovative projects. Dyna, 97(2), 140?144. doi: 10.6036/10362.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6036/10362
View in Google Scholar

Trąpczyński, P., & Halaszovich, T. (2021). Exploitation-exploration balance and its performance outcomes: a study of FDI portfolio decisions of new multina-tional. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 9(4), 115?129. doi: 10.15678/EBER.2021.090408.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2021.090408
View in Google Scholar

Uddin, M., & Boateng, A. (2009). An analysis of short-run performance of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: evidence from the UK acquiring firms. Re-view of Accounting and Finance, 8(4), 431?453. doi: 10.1108/14757700911006967.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14757700911006967
View in Google Scholar

Uribe E., R., Igartua L., J. I., & Lizarralde, R. (2020). Open innovation in research and technology organisations: an exploration of the phenomenon. DYNA, 95(1), 74?80. doi: 10.6036/9166.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6036/9166
View in Google Scholar

Uyan?k, G. K., & Güler, N. (2013). A study on multiple linear regression analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 234?240. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro. 2013.12.027.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.027
View in Google Scholar

Van, H. A., & Maseland, R. (2016). How institutions matter for international business: institutional distance effects vs institutional profile effects. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(3), 374?381. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2016.2.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2016.2
View in Google Scholar

Venugopal, A., Krishnan, T. N., Upadhyayula, R. S., & Kumar, M. (2020). Finding the microfoundations of organizational ambidexterity-demystifying the role of top management behavioural integration. Journal of Business Research, 106, 1?11. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.049.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.049
View in Google Scholar

Wach, K. (2020). A typology of small business growth modelling: a critical lit-erature review. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(1), 159?184. doi: 10.15678/EBER.2020.080109.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080109
View in Google Scholar

Wang, C. L., & Chung, H. F. (2020). Business networking and innovation of Asian enterprises in western countries: the moderation of institutional distance. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 152?162. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2 020.05.002.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.05.002
View in Google Scholar

Wang, L., Schweizer, L., & Michaelis, B. (2020). Experiential learning for Chi-nese companies to complete cross-border acquisitions: the case of Chinese ac-quirers. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(4), 674?695. doi: 10.1108/IJO EM-12-2018-0663.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-12-2018-0663
View in Google Scholar

Wu, C. W., & Reuer, J. J. (2021). Acquirers? reception of signals in M&A markets: effects of acquirer experiences on target selection. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1237?1266. doi: 10.1111/joms.12637.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12637
View in Google Scholar

Yoon, H., Peillex, J., & Buckley, P. J. (2021). Friends or foes? bilateral relation-ships and ownership choice in cross-border acquisitions by emerging market firms. British Journal of Management, 32(3), 852?871. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12442.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12442
View in Google Scholar

Yue, Q., Deng, P., Cao, Y., & Hua, X. (2021). Post-acquisition control strategy and cross-border acquisition performance of Chinese MNEs: A fsQCA approach. Management Decision, 59(12), 2970?2991. doi: 10.1108/MD-08-2020-0986.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2020-0986
View in Google Scholar

Zhao, X., Ma, H., & Hao, T. (2019). Acquirer size, political connections and mer-gers and acquisitions performance: evidence from China. Studies in Econom-ics and Finance, 36(2), 311?332. doi: 10.1108/SEF-05-2017-0112.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-05-2017-0112
View in Google Scholar

Zhang, H., & Yang, H. (2021). Cross-border M&As and technological innovation: the moderating roles of formal and informal institutional distance. Journal of Knowledge Management,26(5), 1280?1305. doi: 10.1108/JKM-12-2020-0905.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2020-0905
View in Google Scholar

Zhang, W., Wang, K., Li, L., Chen, Y., & Wang, X. (2018). The impact of firms' mergers and acquisitions on their performance in emerging economies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 208?216. doi: 10.1016 /j.techfore.2018.05.015.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.015
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Du, J., Peng, Y., Tong , Y., & Bilan, Y. (2022). Impact of enterprise ambidexterity capability and experience learning on cross-border M&A performance: evidence from China. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(4), 1177–1214. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.034

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.