Impact of corporate social responsibility on cost of debt in Scandinavian public companies

Abstract

Research background: In recent decades, companies have paid increasing attention to corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its related performance. Scandinavian countries lead the world in CSR and sustainability. The good CSR performance of Scandinavian companies has motivated studies on this phenomenon, particularly on the connection between a company's CSR and its performance. One of the most important performance indicators and value drivers is the cost of debt.

Purpose of the article: This study assessed the impact of CSR on the cost of debt in Scandinavian public companies.

Methods: The research was divided into two stages. In the first stage, Scandinavian public companies were divided into two groups (with and without ESG (environmental, social, governance) disclosure scores) to reveal differences in the cost of debt. In the second stage, a fixed-effects regression model for balanced panel data sets was applied from 2011 to 2020 to assess the impact of ESG and its pillars on the cost of debt.

Findings & value added: The results revealed that the cost of debt of companies in Scandinavian countries with ESG disclosure scores was significantly lower. The ESG disclosure scores of these companies have increased significantly over the past 10 years. We found a positive impact of CSR on the cost of debt in Scandinavian public companies. The increase in ESG disclosure and pillar scores reduced the cost of debt. These findings are valuable from a scientific perspective. Scandinavian public companies with ESG scores have higher financial risk, but lower cost of debt. These results support the importance of investors' behavior, information asymmetry, and signaling. The findings have several implications for shareholders, managers and creditors. They suggest that creditors consider ESG disclosures when determining a borrower's creditworthiness. Additionally, it is a message to regulators that the debt market values ESG disclosures.

Keywords

corporate social responsibility, cost of debt, ESG disclosure score, ESG disclosure pillars

References

1. Apergis, N., Poufinas, T., & Antonopoulos, A. (2022). ESG scores and cost of debt. Energy Economics, 112, 106186. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106186
   View in Google Scholar
2. Bae, K. H., el Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Zheng, Y. (2019). Does corporate social responsibility reduce the costs of high leverage? Evidence from the capital structure and product market Interactions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 100, 135–150. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.11.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.11.007
   View in Google Scholar
3. Bae, K. H., Kang, J. K., & Wang, J. (2011). Employee treatment and firm leverage: A test of the stakeholder theory of capital structure. Journal of Financial Econom-ics, 100(1), 130–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.10.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.10.019
   View in Google Scholar
4. Chen, Z., Yin, M., & Zhou, M. (2022). Does environmental regulatory pressure affect corporate debt financing? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 184, 106405. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106405
   View in Google Scholar
5. Clarkson, P. M., Fang, X., Li, Y., & Richardson, G. (2013). The relevance of envi-ronmental disclosures: Are such disclosures incrementally informative? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(5), 410–431. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.06.0 08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.06.008
   View in Google Scholar
6. Dhaliwal, D., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2014). Corporate social responsi-bility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The roles of stakeholder orienta-tion and financial transparency. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(4), 328–355. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.04.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.04.006
   View in Google Scholar
7. Dobler, M., Lajili, K., & Zéghal, D. (2015). Corporate environmental sustainability disclosures and environmental risk: Alternative tests of socio-political theories. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 11(3), 301–332. doi: 10.1108/JA OC-10-2013-0081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-10-2013-0081
   View in Google Scholar
8. Fandella, P., Sergi, B. S., & Sironi, E. (2023). Corporate social responsibility per-formance and the cost of capital in BRICS countries. The problem of selectivity using environmental, social and governance scores. Corporate Social Responsibil-ity and Environmental Management, 30, 1712–1722. doi: 10.1002/csr.2447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2447
   View in Google Scholar
9. Fard, A., Javadi, S., & Kim, I. (2020). Environmental regulation and the cost of bank loans: International evidence. Journal of Financial Stability, 51, 100797. doi: 10.10 16/j.jfs.2020.100797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2020.100797
   View in Google Scholar
10. Gigante, G., & Manglaviti, D. (2022). The ESG effect on the cost of debt financing: A sharp RD analysis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 84, 102382. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102382
    View in Google Scholar
11. Gjølberg, M. (2009). Measuring the immeasurable? Constructing an index of CSR practices and CSR performance in 20 countries. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1), 10–22. doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2008.10.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2008.10.003
    View in Google Scholar
12. Goss, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(7), 1794–1810. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.12.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.12.002
    View in Google Scholar
13. Harjoto, M. A. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and degrees of operating and financial leverage. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 49(2), 487–513. doi: 10.1007/s11156-016-0598-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-016-0598-5
    View in Google Scholar
14. He, F., Qin, S., Liu, Y., & Wu, J. G. (2022). CSR and idiosyncratic risk: Evidence from ESG information disclosure. Finance Research Letters, 49, 102936. doi: 10.1016/j.frl. 2022.102936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102936
    View in Google Scholar
15. He, L., Wu, C., Yang, X., & Liu, J. (2019). Corporate social responsibility, green credit, and corporate performance: An empirical analysis based on the mining, power, and steel industries of China. Natural Hazards, 95(1–2), 73–89. doi: 10.1007/s 11069-018-3440-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3440-7
    View in Google Scholar
16. Hoepner, A., Oikonomou, I., Scholtens, B., & Schröder, M. (2016). The effects of corporate and country sustainability characteristics on the cost of debt: An in-ternational investigation. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 43(1–2), 158–190. doi: 10.1111/jbfa.12183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12183
    View in Google Scholar
17. Ho, K. C., Wang, Q., Sun, X., & Wang, L. F. S. (2021). How does corporate social responsibility affect firm leverage? Kybernetes, 51(10), 2902–2926. doi: 10.1108/K-10-2020-0708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-10-2020-0708
    View in Google Scholar
18. Jung, J., Herbohn, K., & Clarkson, P. (2018). Carbon risk, carbon risk awareness and the cost of debt financing. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 1151–1171. doi: 10.100 7/s10551-016-3207-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3207-6
    View in Google Scholar
19. Kordsachia, O. (2021). A risk management perspective on CSR and the marginal cost of debt: Empirical evidence from Europe. Review of Managerial Science, 15(6), 1611–1643. doi: 10.1007/s11846-020-00392-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00392-2
    View in Google Scholar
20. Larcker, D. F., & Rusticus, T. O. (2010). On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. Journal of accounting and economics, 49(3), 186–205. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.11.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.11.004
    View in Google Scholar
21. La Rosa, F., Liberatore, G., Mazzi, F., & Terzani, S. (2018). The impact of corporate social performance on the cost of debt and access to debt financing for listed European non-financial firms. European Management Journal, 36(4), 519–529. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2017.09.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.09.007
    View in Google Scholar
22. Lee, D. D., Faff, R. W., Langfield-Smith, K., Chan, H., Greene, W., Hensher, D., Subrahmanyam, A., Herbohn, K., & Tanewski, G. (2009). Revisiting the vexing question: Does superior corporate social performance lead to improved finan-cial performance? Australian Journal of Management, 34(1), 21–49. doi: 10.1177/031289 620903400103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/031289620903400103
    View in Google Scholar
23. Maaloul, A., Zéghal, D., ben Amar, W., & Mansour, S. (2021). The effect of envi-ronmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and disclosure on cost of debt: The mediating effect of corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Re-view, 26(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1057/s41299-021-00130-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-021-00130-8
    View in Google Scholar
24. Mbanyele, W., Huang, H., Li, Y., Muchenje, L. T., & Wang, F. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and green innovation: Evidence from mandatory CSR dis-closure laws. Economics Letters, 212, 110322. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110322
    View in Google Scholar
25. Menz, K. M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: Is it rewarded by the corpo-rate bond market? A critical note. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(1), 117–134. doi: 10.10 07/s10551-010-0452-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0452-y
    View in Google Scholar
26. Midttun, A., Gjølberg, M., Kourula, A., Sweet, S., & Vallentin, S. (2015). Public policies for corporate social responsibility in four Nordic countries: Harmony of goals and conflict of means. Business and Society, 54(4), 464–500. doi: 10.1177/0 007650312450848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650312450848
    View in Google Scholar
27. Minh, T. N., Ngoc, A. M., Tuan, A. N., & Dao, T. N. (2022). Corporate social re-sponsibility, market rivalry and firm leverage: new evidence from a fixed-effect quantile regression approach. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102794. doi: 10.1016/ j.frl.2022.102794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102794
    View in Google Scholar
28. Morrone, D., Schena, R., Conte, D., Bussoli, C., & Russo, A. (2022). Between say-ing and doing, in the end there is the cost of capital: Evidence from the energy sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 390–402. doi: 10.1002/bse.2900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2900
    View in Google Scholar
29. Morsing, M., & Strand, R. (2014). CSR and beyond. A Nordic perspective. Corpo-rate Communications: An International Journal, 19(3), 318–322. doi: 10.1108/CCIJ-04-2014–0029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2014-0029
    View in Google Scholar
30. Naimy, V., Khoury, R., Montero, J. M., & Souk, J. (2023). Post-Brexit exchange rate volatility and its impact on UK exports to eurozone countries: A bounds test-ing approach. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(1), 135–168. doi: 10.24136/oc.2023.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.004
    View in Google Scholar
31. Nikolaev, V., & Van Lent, L. (2005). The endogeneity bias in the relation between cost-of-debt capital and corporate disclosure policy. European Accounting Re-view, 14(4), 677–724. doi: 10.1080/09638180500204624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180500204624
    View in Google Scholar
32. Prasad, K., Kumar, S., Devji, S., Lim, W. M., Prabhu, N., & Moodbidri, S. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and cost of capital: The moderating role of poli-cy intervention. Research in International Business and Finance, 60, 101620. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101620
    View in Google Scholar
33. Raimo, N., Caragnano, A., Zito, M., Vitolla, F., & Mariani, M. (2021). Extending the benefits of ESG disclosure: The effect on the cost of debt financing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1412–1421. doi: 10.100 2/csr.2134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2134
    View in Google Scholar
34. Santos‐Jaén, J. M., Madrid‐Guijarro, A., & García‐Pérez‐de‐Lema, D. (2021). The impact of corporate social responsibility on innovation in small and medium‐sized enterprises: The mediating role of debt terms and human capital. Corpo-rate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1200–1215. doi: 10.1002 /csr.2125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2125
    View in Google Scholar
35. Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 569–592. doi: 10.1002/smj.678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.678
    View in Google Scholar
36. Strand, R., Freeman, R. E., & Hockerts, K. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability in Scandinavia: An overview. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2224-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2224-6
    View in Google Scholar
37. Verwijmeren, P., & Derwall, J. (2010). Employee well-being, firm leverage, and bankruptcy risk. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34(5), 956–964. doi: 10.1016/j.jb ankfin.2009.10.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.10.006
    View in Google Scholar
38. Xu, X., & Li, J. (2020). Asymmetric impacts of the policy and development of green credit on the debt financing cost and maturity of different types of enterprises in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121574. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020. 121574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121574
    View in Google Scholar
39. Yeh, C. C., Lin, F., Wang, T. S., & Wu, C. M. (2020). Does corporate social respon-sibility affect cost of capital in China? Asia Pacific Management Review, 25(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.apmrv.2019.04.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2019.04.001
    View in Google Scholar