Impact of corporate social responsibility on cost of debt in Scandinavian public companies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.016Keywords:
corporate social responsibility, cost of debt, ESG disclosure score, ESG disclosure pillarsAbstract
Research background: In recent decades, companies have paid increasing attention to corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its related performance. Scandinavian countries lead the world in CSR and sustainability. The good CSR performance of Scandinavian companies has motivated studies on this phenomenon, particularly on the connection between a company's CSR and its performance. One of the most important performance indicators and value drivers is the cost of debt.
Purpose of the article: This study assessed the impact of CSR on the cost of debt in Scandinavian public companies.
Methods: The research was divided into two stages. In the first stage, Scandinavian public companies were divided into two groups (with and without ESG (environmental, social, governance) disclosure scores) to reveal differences in the cost of debt. In the second stage, a fixed-effects regression model for balanced panel data sets was applied from 2011 to 2020 to assess the impact of ESG and its pillars on the cost of debt.
Findings & value added: The results revealed that the cost of debt of companies in Scandinavian countries with ESG disclosure scores was significantly lower. The ESG disclosure scores of these companies have increased significantly over the past 10 years. We found a positive impact of CSR on the cost of debt in Scandinavian public companies. The increase in ESG disclosure and pillar scores reduced the cost of debt. These findings are valuable from a scientific perspective. Scandinavian public companies with ESG scores have higher financial risk, but lower cost of debt. These results support the importance of investors' behavior, information asymmetry, and signaling. The findings have several implications for shareholders, managers and creditors. They suggest that creditors consider ESG disclosures when determining a borrower's creditworthiness. Additionally, it is a message to regulators that the debt market values ESG disclosures.
Downloads
References
Apergis, N., Poufinas, T., & Antonopoulos, A. (2022). ESG scores and cost of debt. Energy Economics, 112, 106186. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106186.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106186
View in Google Scholar
Bae, K. H., el Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Zheng, Y. (2019). Does corporate social responsibility reduce the costs of high leverage? Evidence from the capital structure and product market Interactions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 100, 135–150. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.11.007.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.11.007
View in Google Scholar
Bae, K. H., Kang, J. K., & Wang, J. (2011). Employee treatment and firm leverage: A test of the stakeholder theory of capital structure. Journal of Financial Econom-ics, 100(1), 130–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.10.019.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.10.019
View in Google Scholar
Chen, Z., Yin, M., & Zhou, M. (2022). Does environmental regulatory pressure affect corporate debt financing? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 184, 106405. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106405.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106405
View in Google Scholar
Clarkson, P. M., Fang, X., Li, Y., & Richardson, G. (2013). The relevance of envi-ronmental disclosures: Are such disclosures incrementally informative? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(5), 410–431. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.06.0 08.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.06.008
View in Google Scholar
Dhaliwal, D., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2014). Corporate social responsi-bility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The roles of stakeholder orienta-tion and financial transparency. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(4), 328–355. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.04.006.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.04.006
View in Google Scholar
Dobler, M., Lajili, K., & Zéghal, D. (2015). Corporate environmental sustainability disclosures and environmental risk: Alternative tests of socio-political theories. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 11(3), 301–332. doi: 10.1108/JA OC-10-2013-0081.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-10-2013-0081
View in Google Scholar
Fandella, P., Sergi, B. S., & Sironi, E. (2023). Corporate social responsibility per-formance and the cost of capital in BRICS countries. The problem of selectivity using environmental, social and governance scores. Corporate Social Responsibil-ity and Environmental Management, 30, 1712–1722. doi: 10.1002/csr.2447.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2447
View in Google Scholar
Fard, A., Javadi, S., & Kim, I. (2020). Environmental regulation and the cost of bank loans: International evidence. Journal of Financial Stability, 51, 100797. doi: 10.10 16/j.jfs.2020.100797.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2020.100797
View in Google Scholar
Gigante, G., & Manglaviti, D. (2022). The ESG effect on the cost of debt financing: A sharp RD analysis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 84, 102382. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102382.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102382
View in Google Scholar
Gjølberg, M. (2009). Measuring the immeasurable? Constructing an index of CSR practices and CSR performance in 20 countries. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1), 10–22. doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2008.10.003.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2008.10.003
View in Google Scholar
Goss, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(7), 1794–1810. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.12.002.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.12.002
View in Google Scholar
Harjoto, M. A. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and degrees of operating and financial leverage. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 49(2), 487–513. doi: 10.1007/s11156-016-0598-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-016-0598-5
View in Google Scholar
He, F., Qin, S., Liu, Y., & Wu, J. G. (2022). CSR and idiosyncratic risk: Evidence from ESG information disclosure. Finance Research Letters, 49, 102936. doi: 10.1016/j.frl. 2022.102936.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102936
View in Google Scholar
He, L., Wu, C., Yang, X., & Liu, J. (2019). Corporate social responsibility, green credit, and corporate performance: An empirical analysis based on the mining, power, and steel industries of China. Natural Hazards, 95(1–2), 73–89. doi: 10.1007/s 11069-018-3440-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3440-7
View in Google Scholar
Hoepner, A., Oikonomou, I., Scholtens, B., & Schröder, M. (2016). The effects of corporate and country sustainability characteristics on the cost of debt: An in-ternational investigation. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 43(1–2), 158–190. doi: 10.1111/jbfa.12183.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12183
View in Google Scholar
Ho, K. C., Wang, Q., Sun, X., & Wang, L. F. S. (2021). How does corporate social responsibility affect firm leverage? Kybernetes, 51(10), 2902–2926. doi: 10.1108/K-10-2020-0708.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-10-2020-0708
View in Google Scholar
Jung, J., Herbohn, K., & Clarkson, P. (2018). Carbon risk, carbon risk awareness and the cost of debt financing. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 1151–1171. doi: 10.100 7/s10551-016-3207-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3207-6
View in Google Scholar
Kordsachia, O. (2021). A risk management perspective on CSR and the marginal cost of debt: Empirical evidence from Europe. Review of Managerial Science, 15(6), 1611–1643. doi: 10.1007/s11846-020-00392-2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00392-2
View in Google Scholar
Larcker, D. F., & Rusticus, T. O. (2010). On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. Journal of accounting and economics, 49(3), 186–205. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.11.004.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.11.004
View in Google Scholar
La Rosa, F., Liberatore, G., Mazzi, F., & Terzani, S. (2018). The impact of corporate social performance on the cost of debt and access to debt financing for listed European non-financial firms. European Management Journal, 36(4), 519–529. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2017.09.007.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.09.007
View in Google Scholar
Lee, D. D., Faff, R. W., Langfield-Smith, K., Chan, H., Greene, W., Hensher, D., Subrahmanyam, A., Herbohn, K., & Tanewski, G. (2009). Revisiting the vexing question: Does superior corporate social performance lead to improved finan-cial performance? Australian Journal of Management, 34(1), 21–49. doi: 10.1177/031289 620903400103.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/031289620903400103
View in Google Scholar
Maaloul, A., Zéghal, D., ben Amar, W., & Mansour, S. (2021). The effect of envi-ronmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and disclosure on cost of debt: The mediating effect of corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Re-view, 26(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1057/s41299-021-00130-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-021-00130-8
View in Google Scholar
Mbanyele, W., Huang, H., Li, Y., Muchenje, L. T., & Wang, F. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and green innovation: Evidence from mandatory CSR dis-closure laws. Economics Letters, 212, 110322. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110322.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110322
View in Google Scholar
Menz, K. M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: Is it rewarded by the corpo-rate bond market? A critical note. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(1), 117–134. doi: 10.10 07/s10551-010-0452-y.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0452-y
View in Google Scholar
Midttun, A., Gjølberg, M., Kourula, A., Sweet, S., & Vallentin, S. (2015). Public policies for corporate social responsibility in four Nordic countries: Harmony of goals and conflict of means. Business and Society, 54(4), 464–500. doi: 10.1177/0 007650312450848.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650312450848
View in Google Scholar
Minh, T. N., Ngoc, A. M., Tuan, A. N., & Dao, T. N. (2022). Corporate social re-sponsibility, market rivalry and firm leverage: new evidence from a fixed-effect quantile regression approach. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102794. doi: 10.1016/ j.frl.2022.102794.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102794
View in Google Scholar
Morrone, D., Schena, R., Conte, D., Bussoli, C., & Russo, A. (2022). Between say-ing and doing, in the end there is the cost of capital: Evidence from the energy sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 390–402. doi: 10.1002/bse.2900.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2900
View in Google Scholar
Morsing, M., & Strand, R. (2014). CSR and beyond. A Nordic perspective. Corpo-rate Communications: An International Journal, 19(3), 318–322. doi: 10.1108/CCIJ-04-2014–0029.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2014-0029
View in Google Scholar
Naimy, V., Khoury, R., Montero, J. M., & Souk, J. (2023). Post-Brexit exchange rate volatility and its impact on UK exports to eurozone countries: A bounds test-ing approach. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(1), 135–168. doi: 10.24136/oc.2023.004.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.004
View in Google Scholar
Nikolaev, V., & Van Lent, L. (2005). The endogeneity bias in the relation between cost-of-debt capital and corporate disclosure policy. European Accounting Re-view, 14(4), 677–724. doi: 10.1080/09638180500204624.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180500204624
View in Google Scholar
Prasad, K., Kumar, S., Devji, S., Lim, W. M., Prabhu, N., & Moodbidri, S. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and cost of capital: The moderating role of poli-cy intervention. Research in International Business and Finance, 60, 101620. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101620.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101620
View in Google Scholar
Raimo, N., Caragnano, A., Zito, M., Vitolla, F., & Mariani, M. (2021). Extending the benefits of ESG disclosure: The effect on the cost of debt financing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1412–1421. doi: 10.100 2/csr.2134.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2134
View in Google Scholar
Santos‐Jaén, J. M., Madrid‐Guijarro, A., & García‐Pérez‐de‐Lema, D. (2021). The impact of corporate social responsibility on innovation in small and medium‐sized enterprises: The mediating role of debt terms and human capital. Corpo-rate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1200–1215. doi: 10.1002 /csr.2125.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2125
View in Google Scholar
Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 569–592. doi: 10.1002/smj.678.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.678
View in Google Scholar
Strand, R., Freeman, R. E., & Hockerts, K. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability in Scandinavia: An overview. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2224-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2224-6
View in Google Scholar
Verwijmeren, P., & Derwall, J. (2010). Employee well-being, firm leverage, and bankruptcy risk. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34(5), 956–964. doi: 10.1016/j.jb ankfin.2009.10.006.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.10.006
View in Google Scholar
Xu, X., & Li, J. (2020). Asymmetric impacts of the policy and development of green credit on the debt financing cost and maturity of different types of enterprises in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121574. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020. 121574.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121574
View in Google Scholar
Yeh, C. C., Lin, F., Wang, T. S., & Wu, C. M. (2020). Does corporate social respon-sibility affect cost of capital in China? Asia Pacific Management Review, 25(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.apmrv.2019.04.001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2019.04.001
View in Google Scholar
