The role of the Lendtech sector in the consumer credit market in the context of household financial exclusion

Abstract

Research background: According to the World Bank (2020), about 60% of adults in developing countries do not use formal financial services. Furthermore, according to the Polish Association of Loan Institutions (2022), about 3 million Poles use loans, most of them obtained online. Among the reasons for more than a decade of growth of interest in the non-bank consumer lending market there are the development of modern technology applications in finance and the establishment of the Lendtech sector.

Purpose of the article: The main goal of the paper is to verify the role played by the Lendtech (LT) sector in the consumer credit market in the context of household financial exclusion. The following research questions were asked: Do credit-excluded households take advantage of LT services and, if so, to what extent? What are the behaviours and preferences of those who use consumer credit offered by LT? Do socio-demographic characteristics determine consumer use of loans offered by LT and, if so, what are they? Is the use of loans offered by LT due to credit exclusion or other factors? What action should be taken by participants in the digital consumer loan market interested in its inclusive direction?

Methods: The paper uses the following methods: critical analysis of the literature, Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney test, and nonparametric regression algorithm: k-nearest neighbors, as well as inductive inference methods. The data used is primary in nature and comes from a nationwide survey, September 2022 (CAWI method) of 1,200 Poles, of whom 200 respondents are Lendtech customers. The quota selection applied made it possible to reflect characteristics corresponding to the population of customers of lending institutions registered in BIK databases.

Findings & value added: The article is a pioneering study based on an independent scientific survey, devoted to the Polish LT services market considered in terms of its relationship with one of the types of financial exclusion: credit exclusion. The most important conclusion is that people at risk of credit exclusion find a financing substitute in the LT sector, and thus it plays an important role in reducing financial exclusion, while maintaining the principle of creditworthiness verification.

Keywords

FinTech, Lendtech, credit, financial exclusion, lending platforms

References

1. Adamek, J., & Solarz, M. (2023). Adoption factors in digital lending services offered by FinTech lenders. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(1), 169–212. doi: 10.24136/oc.2023 .005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.005
   View in Google Scholar
2. Agarwal, S., & Chua, Y. H. (2020). FinTech and household finance: A review of the empirical literature. China Finance Review International, 10(4), 361–376. doi: 10.11 08/CFRI-03-2020-0024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-03-2020-0024
   View in Google Scholar
3. Agarwal, S., & Zhang, J. (2020). FinTech, lending and payment innovation: A review. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 49(3), 353–367. doi: 10.1111/ajfs. 12294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12294
   View in Google Scholar
4. Allen, F., Gu, X., & Jagtiani, J. (2021). A survey of Fintech research and policy discussion. Review of Corporate Finance, 1, 259–339. doi: 10.21799/frbp.wp.2020.21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/114.00000007
   View in Google Scholar
5. Arner, D. W., Buckley, R. P., Zetzsche, D. A., & Veidt, R. (2020). Sustainability, Fintech and financial inclusion. European Business Organization Law Review, 21(1), 7–35. doi: 10.1007/s40804-020-00183-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-020-00183-y
   View in Google Scholar
6. Arslanian, H., & Fischer, F. (2019). Financial innovation and inclusion. Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-14533-0_20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14533-0_7
   View in Google Scholar
7. Babaei, G., Giudici, P., & Raffinetti, E. (2023). Explainable FinTech lending. Journal of Economics and Business, 106126. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/jjeconb us.2023.106126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2023.106126
   View in Google Scholar
8. Baeck, P., Collins, L., & Zhang, B. (2014). Understanding alternative finance. The UK alternative finance industry report 2014. Nesta & the University of Cambridge. Retrieved from https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/understanding-alternative-finance-2014.pdf (30.09.2022).
   View in Google Scholar
9. Balyuk, T. (2019). Financial innovation and borrowers: Evidence from peer-to-peer lending. Working Paper. Retrieved from https://www.fdic.gov/bank/analytical/ fintech/papers/balyuk-paper.pdf.
   View in Google Scholar
10. Balyuk, T. (2022). FinTech lending and bank credit access for consumers. Management Science, 69(1), 555–575. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.4319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4319
    View in Google Scholar
11. Bartlett, R., Morse, A., Stanton, R., & Wallace, N. (2022). Consumer-lending discrimination in the FinTech Era. Journal of Financial Economics, 143(1), 30–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.047
    View in Google Scholar
12. Bazarbash, M., Beaton, K., & Eriksson, U. (2020). Filling the gap: Digital credit and financial inclusion. IMF Working Papers, 2020(150). doi: 10.5089/978151355247 7.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513552477.001
    View in Google Scholar
13. Berg, T., Fuster, A., & Puri, M. (2021). Fintech lending. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 14(1), 187–207. doi: 10.1146/annurev-financial-101521-112042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-101521-112042
    View in Google Scholar
14. Bollaert, H., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Schwienbacher, A. (2021). Fintech and access to finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 68, 101941. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101 941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101941
    View in Google Scholar
15. Branzoli, N., & Supino, I. (2020). Fintech credit: A critical review of empirical research literature. Bank of Italy Occasional Paper, 549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3612726
    View in Google Scholar
16. Buchak, G., Matvos G., Piskorski T., & Seru A. (2018). Fintech, regulatory
    View in Google Scholar
17. arbitrage, and the rise of shadow banks. Journal of Financial Economics, 130, 453–483. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.03.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.03.011
    View in Google Scholar
18. Burton, D. (2020). Digital debt collection and ecologies of consumer overindebtedness. Economic Geography, 96(3), 244–265. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2020.1762486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2020.1762486
    View in Google Scholar
19. Cao, L., Yang, Q., & Yu, P.S. (2021). Data science and AI in FinTech: An overview. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 12, 81–99. doi: 10.1007/s41060-021-00278-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-021-00278-w
    View in Google Scholar
20. Caplan, M. A., Birkenmaier, J., & Bae, J. (2021). Financial exclusion in OECD countries: A scoping review. International Journal of Social Welfare, 30(1), 58–71. doi: 10.1111/ijsw.12430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12430
    View in Google Scholar
21. Chivakul, M. (2008). What drives household borrowing and credit constraints? Evidence from Bosnia and Herzegovina. IMF Working Papers, 2008/202. doi: 10.5089/9781451870602.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1266535
    View in Google Scholar
22. Corrado, G., & Corrado, L. (2017). Inclusive finance for inclusive growth and development. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 24, 19–23. doi: 10.1016/j. cosust.2017.01.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.013
    View in Google Scholar
23. Croux, C., Jagtiani, J., Korivi, T., & Vulanovic M. (2020). Important factors determining fintech loan default: Evidence from LendingClub consumer platform. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 173, 270–296. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2020. 0.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.03.016
    View in Google Scholar
24. Danisewicz, P., & Elard, I. (2018). The real effects of financial technology: Marketplace lending and personal bankruptcy. SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3208908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3208908
    View in Google Scholar
25. de Roure, C., Pelizzon, L., & Thakor, A. V. (2019). P2P lenders versus banks: Cream skimming or bottom fishing? Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 11(2), 213–262. doi: 10.1093/rcfs/cfab026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfab026
    View in Google Scholar
26. Deloitte (2022). Strategia ESG w sektorze bankowych. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/pl/pl/pages/webcasty/articles/strategia-ESG-w-sekto rze-bankowym.html (30.10.2022).
    View in Google Scholar
27. Demir, A., Pesqué-Cela, V., Altunbas, Y., & Murinde, V. (2022). Fintech, financial inclusion and income inequality: A quantile regression approach. European ournal of Finance, 28(1), 86–107. doi: 10.1080/1351847X.2020.1772335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1772335
    View in Google Scholar
28. Di Maggio, M., & Yao, V. (2021). Fintech borrowers: Lax screening or cream-Skimming? Review of Financial Studies, 34(10), 4565–4618. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhaa 142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa142
    View in Google Scholar
29. Di Maggio, M., Ratnadiwakara, D., & Carmichael, D. (2022). Invisible primes: Fintech lending with alternative data. SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3937438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4056793
    View in Google Scholar
30. Domańska-Szaruga, B. (2015). Selected problems of loan exclusion in the context of assumptions for sustainable development. Research Papers of the Wroclaw University of Economics/Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 378, 91–102. doi: 10.15611/pn.2015.378.07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2015.378.07
    View in Google Scholar
31. Ebong, J., & Babu, G. (2020). Demand for credit in high-density markets in Kampala: Application of digital lending and implications for product innovation. Journal of International Studies, 13(4), 295–313. doi: 10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-4/21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-4/21
    View in Google Scholar
32. Ehrentraud, J., Garcia, O. D., Garzoni, L., & Piccolo M. (2020). Policy responses to FinTech: A cross-country overview. Basel: Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
    View in Google Scholar
33. Escobar de Nogales, X. (2018). Fintech for the financially excluded? Stanford Social Innovation Review. doi: 10.48558/K379-EY69.
    View in Google Scholar
34. Folwarski, M. (2021). Digital innovation in banking versus digital and financial inclusion of society. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
    View in Google Scholar
35. European Bank Authority (2022). Final report on response to the non-bank lending request from the CfA on digital finance. Retrieved from https://www.eba.europa.eu/eba-provides-its-advice-eu-commission-non-bank-lending (10.07.2022).
    View in Google Scholar
36. Fuster, A., Plosser, M., Schnabl, P., & Vickery, J. (2019). The role of technology in mortgage lending. Review of Financial Studies, 32, 1854–1899. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hh z018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz018
    View in Google Scholar
37. Gloukoviezoff, G. (2006). From financial exclusion to overindebtedness: The paradox of difficulties for people on low income? In L. Andeloni, M. D. Braga & E. Carloccio (Eds.). New frontiers in banking services. Emerging needs and tailored products for untapped markets (pp. 213–245). Berlin: Springer Verlag. doi: 10.1007 /978-3-540-46498-3_6.
    View in Google Scholar
38. Gomber, P., Kauffman, R. J., Parker, Ch., & Weber, B. W. (2018). On the Fintech revolution: Interpreting the forces of innovation, disruption, and transformation in financial services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(1), 220–265, doi: 10.1080/07421222.2018.1440766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1440766
    View in Google Scholar
39. Haupert, T. (2022). New technology, old patterns: Fintech lending, metropolitan segregation, and subprime credit. Race Social Problems, 14, 293–307. doi: 10.1007/ s12552-021-09353-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-021-09353-0
    View in Google Scholar
40. Havrylchyk, O., Mariotto, C., Rahim, T., & Verdier, M. (2019). The expansion of the peer-to-peer lending. SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2841316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rne-2020-0033
    View in Google Scholar
41. Hodula, M. (2022). Does Fintech credit substitute for traditional credit? Evidence from 78 countries. Finance Research Letters, 46(2), 102469. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2021 .102469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102469
    View in Google Scholar
42. Hughes, J. P., Jagtiani, J., & Moon, C. G. (2022). Consumer lending efficiency: Commercial banks versus a FinTech lender. Financial Innovation, 8(1), 1–39. doi: 10.1186/s40854-021-00326-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00326-1
    View in Google Scholar
43. Jagtiani, J., & Lemieux, C. (2017). Fintech lending: Financial inclusion, risk pricing, and alternative information. Risk Pricing, and Alternative Information, December. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3096098. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3096098
    View in Google Scholar
44. Jagtiani, J., & Lemieux, C. (2018). Do FinTech lenders penetrate areas that are underserved by traditional banks? Journal of Economics and Business, 100, 43–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2018.03.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2018.03.001
    View in Google Scholar
45. Katsamakas, E., & Sánchez-Cartas, J. M. (2022). Network formation and financial inclusion in P2P lending: A computational model. Systems, 10(5), 155. doi: 10.339 0/systems10050155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10050155
    View in Google Scholar
46. Kon, Y., & Storey, D. J. (2003). A theory of discouraged borrowers. Small Business Economics, 21(1), 37–49. doi: 10.1023/A:1024447603600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024447603600
    View in Google Scholar
47. Kowalewski, O., & Pisany, P. (2022). Bank’s consumer lending reaction to FinTech and bigtech credit emergence in the context of the versus hard credit information processing. International Review of Financial Analysis, 81, 102116. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102116
    View in Google Scholar
48. Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583–621. doi: 10.2307/ 2280779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441
    View in Google Scholar
49. Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177730491
    View in Google Scholar
50. Nguyen, L., Tran, S., & Ho, T. (2021). Fintech credit, bank regulations and bank performance: A cross-country analysis. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 14(4), 445–466. doi: 10.1108/APJBA-05-2021-0196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-05-2021-0196
    View in Google Scholar
51. Li, G., Lv, X., & Han, X. (2022). Digital financial inclusion and household debt in China. Applied Economics Letters. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/1350 4851.2022.2110560.
    View in Google Scholar
52. Odinet, C. K. (2017). Consumer bitcredit and FinTech lending. Alabama Law Review, 69, 781–858.
    View in Google Scholar
53. Omojolaibi, J. A., Okudo, A. G., & Shojobi, D. A. (2019). Are women financially excluded from formal financial services? Analysis of some selected local government areas in Lagos State, Nigeria. Journal of Economic and Social Thought, 6(1), 16–47. doi: 10.1453/jest.v6i1.1846.
    View in Google Scholar
54. Ozili P. K. (2023). Determinants of Fintech and BigTech lending: The role of financial inclusion and financial development. Journal of Economic Analysis, 2(2023), 33. doi: 10.58567/jea02030004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4526151
    View in Google Scholar
55. Ozili, P. K. (2018). Impact of digital finance on financial inclusion and stability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 18(4), 329–340. doi: 10.1016/j.bir.2017.12.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2017.12.003
    View in Google Scholar
56. Palladino, L. M., (2021). The impacts of FinTech on small business borrowing. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 33(6), 639–661. doi: 10.1080/0827633 1.2020.1796110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2020.1796110
    View in Google Scholar
57. Pluskota, P. (2020). The use of microfinance to mitigate financial exclusion. Argumenta Oeconomica Cracoviensia, 2(23), 105–123. doi: 10.15678/AOC.2020.2306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/AOC.2020.2306
    View in Google Scholar
58. Ryu, H. S. (2018). What makes users willing or hesitant use Fintech? The moderating effect of user type. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(3), 541–569. doi: 10.1108/IMDS-07-2017-0325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2017-0325
    View in Google Scholar
59. Solarz, M., & Adamek, J. (2022). Determinants of digital financial exclusion as a barrier to the adoption of mobile banking services in Poland. Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law, 21(2), 503–525. doi: 10.12775/EiP.2022.028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2022.028
    View in Google Scholar
60. Sun, N., Sun, Y., Shen, X., & Sun, S. (2023). What affects the risks of fintech lending enterprises? Applied Economics. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/0003684 6.2023.2205101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2023.2205101
    View in Google Scholar
61. Suri, T., Bharadwaj, P., & Jack, W. (2021). Fintech and household resilience to shocks: Evidence from digital loans in Kenya. Journal of Development Economics, 153, 102697. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102697
    View in Google Scholar
62. Swacha-Lech, M., & Solarz, M. (2021). Determinants of the adoption of innovative Fintech services by millennials. E & M Ekonomie a Management, 24(3), 149–166, doi: 10.15240/tul/001/2021-3-009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2021-3-009
    View in Google Scholar
63. Tang, H. (2019). Peer-to-peer lenders versus banks: Substitutes or complements? Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1900–1938. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhy137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhy137
    View in Google Scholar
64. The G20 High-Level Principles for Digital Financial Inclusion (G20-HLP-DFI). Retrieved from https://www.gpfi.org/sites/gpfi/files/documents/G20%20High%20 Level%20Principles%20for%20Digital%20Financial%20Inclusion%20-%20Full% 20version-.pdf (28.09.2022).
    View in Google Scholar
65. The UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (UN-2030-ASD). Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/ 21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf (28.09.2022).
    View in Google Scholar
66. Vives, X. (2017). The impact of FinTech on banking. European Economy, 2, 97–105.
    View in Google Scholar
67. Waliszewski, K., & Warchlewska, A. (2022). Modern technologies in financial advice and personal financial planning. Warszawa: CeDeWu.
    View in Google Scholar
68. Warchlewska, A. (2020). Around the essence of financial exclusion. Reviewing Approach, 1(25), 123–140. doi: 10.18778/2391-6478.1.25.08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.1.25.08
    View in Google Scholar
69. World Bank (2020). UFA 2020 overview: Universal financial access by 2020.
    View in Google Scholar
70. Yang, T., & Zhang, X. (2022). FinTech adoption and financial inclusion: Evidence from household consumption in China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 145, 106668. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106668
    View in Google Scholar
71. Yue, P., Korkmaz, A. G., Yin, Z., & Zhou, H. (2022). The rise of digital finance: Financial inclusion or debt trap? Finance Research Letters, 47, 102604. doi: 10.1016/ j.frl.2021.102604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102604
    View in Google Scholar
72. Zhang, S., Li, X., Zong, M., Zhu, X., & Cheng. D., (2017). Learning k for kNN classification. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 8I(312). doi: 10.1145/2990508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2990508
    View in Google Scholar
73. Zhong, W., & Jiang, T. (2021). Can internet finance alleviate the exclusiveness of traditional finance? Evidence from Chinese P2P lending markets. Finance Research Letters, 40, 101731. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101731
    View in Google Scholar
74. Polish Association of Loan Institutions (2022). Retrieved from https://biznes.newseria.pl/news/zpf-ustawa,p2125258862 (30.10.2022).
    View in Google Scholar