Economic and institutional determinants of environmental health and sustainability: Spatial and nonlinear effects for a panel of worldwide countries

Abstract

Research background: This study identifies the key factors influencing environmental health across a global panel of countries, focusing on protection from environmental hazards, as informed by the existing literature, while also shedding light on novel aspects of these causal relationships.

Purpose of the article: This study aims to reveal, through a comprehensive review of the relevant literature, the underexplored phenomena of spatial diffusion and contagion of national environmental behaviors and the nonlinear dynamics between environmental performance and its determinants, acknowledging the significant diversity in the characteristics and behaviors of the countries studied.

Methods: Spatial analysis and econometric methods, including spatial panel regression alongside dynamic panel models using threshold techniques, were employed to meet the study’s objectives.

Findings & value added: This study’s major finding is that environmental performance across nations shows significant clustering influenced by economic and institutional factors. This clustering effect arises from spatial contagion and diffusion processes, as evidenced by spatial panel regression analysis. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that variations in environmental behavior can be attributed to differing levels of development and specific internal conditions within countries. Notably, a country’s gross domestic product and the proportion of industries in its economy have a substantial effect on its environmental health practices, establishing distinct impact thresholds. This research enriches academic dialogue by illustrating, through these thresholds, that in less developed countries, an increased industrial share leads to environmental degradation. Moreover, the influence of the other examined factors varied depending on the category of the country under review, highlighting the nuanced effects of economic and institutional variables on environmental outcomes.

Keywords

contagion and diffusion, spatial panel, threshold panel, environmental health, environmental performance, environmental sustainability

References

1. Abbasi, K. R., Kirikkaleli, D., & Altuntaş, M. (2022). Carbon dioxide intensity of GDP and environmental degradation in an emerging country. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(56), 84451–84459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21679-9
   View in Google Scholar
2. Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Majeed, A., & Huang, B. (2021). An environmental impact assessment of economic complexity and energy consumption: Does institutional quality make a difference?. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 89, 106603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106603
   View in Google Scholar
3. Alshehhi, J. M., & Zervopoulos P. D. (2023). The effect of institutional factors on environmental efficiency: A cross-country analysis using a Bayesian data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 395, 136401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136401
   View in Google Scholar
4. Alvarado, R., Ponce, P., Criollo, A., Córdova, K., & Khan, M. K. (2018). Environmental degradation and real per capita output: New evidence at the global level grouping countries by income levels. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 13–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.064
   View in Google Scholar
5. Arshad, Z., Robaina, M., & Botelho, A. (2020). The role of ICT in energy consumption and environment: An empirical investigation of Asian economies with cluster analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 32913–32932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09229-7
   View in Google Scholar
6. Bali Swain, R., & Yang-Wallentin, F. (2020). Achieving sustainable development goals: Predicaments and strategies. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 27(2), 96–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2019.1692316
   View in Google Scholar
7. Bartolome, A. M., Carpio, D. A., & Urbano, B. (2022). Urban agriculture digital planning for the European Union’s Green Deal. Amfiteatru Economic, 24(59), 159–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2022/59/159
   View in Google Scholar
8. Bello, M. O., & Ch'ng, K. S. (2022). Convergence in energy intensity of GDP: Evidence from West African countries. Energy, 254, 124217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124217
   View in Google Scholar
9. Brodny, J., & Tutak, M. (2023). The level of implementing sustainable development goal" Industry, innovation and infrastructure" of Agenda 2030 in the European Union countries: Application of MCDM methods. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(1), 47–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.002
   View in Google Scholar
10. Cheng, C. Y., Chien, M. S., & Lee, C. C. (2021b). ICT diffusion, financial development, and economic growth: An international cross-country analysis. Economic modelling, 94, 662–671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.02.008
    View in Google Scholar
11. Cheng, Y., Awan, U., Ahmad, S., & Tan, Z. (2021a). How do technological innovation and fiscal decentralization affect the environment? A story of the fourth industrial revolution and sustainable growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120398
    View in Google Scholar
12. Chersan, I. C., Păunescu, M., Nichita, E. M., Dumitru, V. F., & Manea, C. L. (2023). Circular economy practices in the electrical and electronic equipment sector in the European Union. Amfiteatru Economic, 25(62), 80–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2023/62/80
    View in Google Scholar
13. Ciocan, D. M., & Milon, A. (2017). Study regarding the motives of children participation in sport activities. LUMEN Proceedings, 1, 159–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc.rsacvp2017.15
    View in Google Scholar
14. Clark, M., Andrews, J., & Hillis, V. (2022). A quantitative application of diffusion of innovations for modeling the spread of conservation behaviors. Ecological Modelling, 473, 110145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110145
    View in Google Scholar
15. de Mello Santos, V. H., Campos, T. L. R., Espuny, M., & de Oliveira, O. J. (2022). Towards a green industry through cleaner production development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(1), 349–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16615-2
    View in Google Scholar
16. Dedeurwaerdere, T., Admiraal, J., Beringer, A., Bonaiuto, F., Cicero, L., Fernandez-Wulff, P., & Vivero, J. L. (2016). Combining internal and external motivations in multi-actor governance arrangements for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Environmental Science & Policy, 58, 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.12.003
    View in Google Scholar
17. Dogan, E., & Inglesi-Lotz, R. (2020). The impact of economic structure to the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis: Evidence from European countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 12717–12724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07878-2
    View in Google Scholar
18. Downie, C. (2022). Competition, cooperation, and adaptation: The organizational ecology of international organizations in global energy governance. Review of International Studies, 48(2), 364–384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210521000267
    View in Google Scholar
19. Germani, A. R., Ker, A. P., & Castaldo, A. (2020). On the existence and shape of an environmental crime Kuznets Curve: A case study of Italian provinces. Ecological Indicators, 108, 105685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105685
    View in Google Scholar
20. Grybaitė, V., Stankevičienė, J., Lapinskienė, G., & Podvezko, A. (2022). Comparison of the environment of EU countries for sharing economy state by modern multiple criteria methods. Amfiteatru Economic, 24(59), 194–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2022/59/194
    View in Google Scholar
21. Haibo, C., Ke, D., Fangfang, W., & Ayamba, E. C. (2020). The spatial effect of tourism economic development on regional ecological efficiency. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 38241–38258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09004-8
    View in Google Scholar
22. Halleck-Vega, S., Mandel, A., & Millock, K. (2018). Accelerating diffusion of climate-friendly technologies: A network perspective. Ecological Economics, 152, 235–245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.007
    View in Google Scholar
23. Hosta, M., & Zabkar, V. (2021). Antecedents of environmentally and socially responsible sustainable consumer behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(2), 273–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04416-0
    View in Google Scholar
24. Howes, M., Wortley, L., Potts, R., Dedekorkut-Howes, A., Serrao-Neumann, S., Davidson, J., & Nunn, P. (2017). Environmental sustainability: A case of policy implementation failure? Sustainability, 9(2), 165, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020165
    View in Google Scholar
25. Hussain, Z., Mehmood, B., Khan, M. K., & Tsimisaraka, R. S. M. (2022). Green growth, green technology, and environmental health: Evidence from high-GDP countries. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 816697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.816697
    View in Google Scholar
26. Knill, C., & Liefferink, D. (2021). The establishment of EU environmental policy. In A. Jordan & V. Gravey (Eds.). Environmental policy in the EU (pp. 13–32). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429402333-3
    View in Google Scholar
27. Kopnina, H. (2020). Education for the future? Critical evaluation of education for sustainable development goals. Journal of Environmental Education, 51(4), 280–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2019.1710444
    View in Google Scholar
28. Kusano, K., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2018). Ecology of freedom: Competitive tests of the role of pathogens, climate, and natural disasters in the development of socio-political freedom. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 954. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00954
    View in Google Scholar
29. Lazăr, D., Minea, A., & Purcel, A. A. (2019). Pollution and economic growth: Evidence from Central and Eastern European countries. Energy Economics, 81, 1121–1131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.05.011
    View in Google Scholar
30. Le, H. P., & Ozturk, I. (2020). The impacts of globalization, financial development, government expenditures, and institutional quality on CO 2 emissions in the presence of environmental Kuznets curve. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 22680–22697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08812-2
    View in Google Scholar
31. Lenzen, M., Malik, A., Li, M., Fry, J., Weisz, H., Pichler, P. P., Moreira Chaves, L. S., Capon, A., & Pencheon, D. (2020). The environmental footprint of health care: A global assessment. Lancet Planetary Health, 4(7), e271–e279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30121-2
    View in Google Scholar
32. Liu, H., Alharthi, M., Atil, A., Zafar, M. W., & Khan, I. (2022). A non-linear analysis of the impacts of natural resources and education on environmental quality: Green energy and its role in the future. Resources Policy, 79, 102940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102940
    View in Google Scholar
33. Liu, Q., Wang, S., Zhang, W., & Li, J. (2018). Income distribution and environmental quality in China: A spatial econometric perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 14–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.090
    View in Google Scholar
34. Liu, X., & Wang, W. (2024). The impact of major pollution incidents on environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 139975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139975
    View in Google Scholar
35. Lubowiecki-Vikuk, A., Dąbrowska, A., & Machnik, A. (2021). Responsible consumer and lifestyle: Sustainability insights. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25, 91–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.08.007
    View in Google Scholar
36. Manolis, E. N., & Manoli, E. N. (2021). Raising awareness of the sustainable development goals through ecological projects in higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123614
    View in Google Scholar
37. Mare, C., Dragos S. L., Dragota I. M., Muresan G. M., & Urean C.A. (2016). Spatial convergence processes on the European Union’s life insurance market. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 50(4), 93–107.
    View in Google Scholar
38. Matsumoto, K. I., Makridou, G., & Doumpos, M. (2020). Evaluating environmental performance using data envelopment analysis: The case of European countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122637
    View in Google Scholar
39. McCullough, B. P., Orr, M., & Kellison, T. (2020). Sport ecology: Conceptualizing an emerging subdiscipline within sport management. Journal of Sport Management, 34(6), 509–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2019-0294
    View in Google Scholar
40. McGregor, D., Whitaker, S., & Sritharan, M. (2020). Indigenous environmental justice and sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 43, 35–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.01.007
    View in Google Scholar
41. Mello Rose, F., Thiel, J., & Grabher, G. (2022). Selective inclusion: Civil society involvement in the smart city ecology of Amsterdam. European Urban and Regional Studies, 29(3), 369–382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764221092587
    View in Google Scholar
42. Mikulčić, H., Klemeš, J. J., Vujanović, M., Urbaniec, K., & Duić, N. (2016). Reducing greenhouse gasses emissions by fostering the deployment of alternative raw materials and energy sources in the cleaner cement manufacturing process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 119–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.145
    View in Google Scholar
43. Mistur, E. M., Givens, J. W., & Matisoff, D. C. (2023). Contagious COVID‐19 policies: Policy diffusion during times of crisis. Review of Policy Research, 40(1), 36–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12487
    View in Google Scholar
44. Muhammad, S., & Long, X. (2021). Rule of law and CO2 emissions: A comparative analysis across 65 belt and road initiative (BRI) countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123539
    View in Google Scholar
45. Nemeckova, T., & Hayat, A. (2022). Does trade openness improve the quality of domestic institutions? Evidence from Africa. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 17 (4), 881–908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.030
    View in Google Scholar
46. Rahman, M. M., & Alam, K. (2022). Life expectancy in the ANZUS-BENELUX countries: The role of renewable energy, environmental pollution, economic growth and good governance. Renewable Energy, 190, 251–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.135
    View in Google Scholar
47. Sharma, A. K., Sharma, M., Sharma, A. K., Sharma, M., Sharma, M. (2023). Mapping the impact of environmental pollutants on human health and environment: A sustematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 225, 107325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2023.107325
    View in Google Scholar
48. Shi, X. (2022). Environmental health perspectives for low- and middle- income countries. Global Health Journal, 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glohj.2022.01.003
    View in Google Scholar
49. Srivastav, A. L., Dhyani, R., Ranjan, M., Madhav, S., & Sillanpää, M. (2021). Climate-resilient strategies for sustainable management of water resources and agriculture. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(31), 41576–41595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14332-4
    View in Google Scholar
50. Sun, G. Q., Zhang, H. T., Wang, J. S., Li, J., Wang, Y., Li, L., & Jin, Z. (2021). Mathematical modeling and mechanisms of pattern formation in ecological systems: A review. Nonlinear Dynamics, 104, 1677–1696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-021-06314-5
    View in Google Scholar
51. Taghvaee, V. M., Nodehi, M., Saber, R. M., & Mohebi, M. (2022). Sustainable development goals and transportation modes: Analyzing sustainability pillars of environment, health, and economy. World Development Sustainability, 1, 100018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2022.100018
    View in Google Scholar
52. Tan, Q., Yasmeen, H., Ali, S., Ismail, H., & Zameer, H. (2023). Fintech development, renewable energy consumption, government effectiveness and management of natural resources along the belt and road countries. Resources Policy, 80, 103251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103251
    View in Google Scholar
53. Tatar, M., Harati, J., Farokhi, S., Taghvaee, V., & Wilson, F. A. (2024). Good governance and natural resource management in oil and gas resource-rich countries: A machine learning approach. Resources Policy, 89, 104583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104583
    View in Google Scholar
54. Varela-Candamio, L., Novo-Corti, I., & García-Álvarez, M. T. (2018). The importance of environmental education in the determinants of green behavior: A meta-analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1565–1578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.214
    View in Google Scholar
55. Velte, P. (2023). Determinants and financial consequences of environmental performance and reporting: A literature review of European archival research, Journal of Environmental Management, 340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117916
    View in Google Scholar
56. Wallis, H., & Loy, L. S. (2021). What drives pro-environmental activism of young people? A survey study on the Fridays For Future movement. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 74, 101581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101581
    View in Google Scholar
57. Wang, K. H., Liu, L., Adebayo, T. S., Lobonț, O. R., & Claudia, M. N. (2021). Fiscal decentralization, political stability and resources curse hypothesis: A case of fiscal decentralized economies. Resources Policy, 72, 102071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102071
    View in Google Scholar
58. Wang, Q., Yang, T., & Li, R. (2023). Does income inequality reshape the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis? A nonlinear panel data analysis. Environmental Research, 216, 114575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114575
    View in Google Scholar
59. Wang, S., Zhao, D., & Chen, H. (2020). Government corruption, resource misallocation, and ecological efficiency. Energy Economics, 85, 104573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104573
    View in Google Scholar
60. World Bank - WGI (2023). World governance indicators. World Bank. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indic ators (11.12.2023).
    View in Google Scholar
61. World Bank (2023). Indicators: Economy & growth, education, environment. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator (11.12.2023).
    View in Google Scholar
62. Yale University (2023). Environmental performance index. Retrieved from https://epi.yale.edu/epi-results/2022/component/hlt (11.12.2023).
    View in Google Scholar
63. Yan, J., & Haroon, M. (2023). Financing efficiency in natural resource markets mobilizing private and public capital for a green recovery. Resources Policy, 85, 103841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103841
    View in Google Scholar
64. Yew, M.H., Molla, A.,& Cooper, V. (2022). Behavioral and environmental sustainability determinants of residential energy management information systems use, Journal of Cleaner Production, 356, 131778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131778
    View in Google Scholar
65. Yi, Q. (2023). Diffusion of environmental technology innovation through the lens of banking sector performance and human resource management: An influential step towards environmental sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(46), 102428–102437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29396-7
    View in Google Scholar
66. Yilmaz, R., & Koyuncu, C. (2023). The impact of globalization on the rate of e-waste recycling: Evidence from European countries. Amfiteatru Economic, 25(62), 180–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2023/62/180
    View in Google Scholar