AI and green credit: A new catalyst for green innovation in Chinese enterprises
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3020Keywords:
Green Finance, Machine Learning, AI, Policy EvaluationAbstract
Research background: China has invested heavily in special credit funds to promote green transformation in enterprises. While green loans have financial characteristics, their pricing is not fully market-driven. This unique environmental regulation has a significant impact on the behavior of enterprises in green innovation, and the rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) adds complexity to the process.
Purpose of the article: This study aims to empirically investigate whether China's green credit policy, as a unique environmental regulatory instrument, has led to the "Porter Effect". The study examines the impact of the green credit policy on firms' green innovation in two different periods (2007–2012 and 2012–2020), while also assessing the heterogeneous impact on different types of firms. Particular attention is paid to how the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and fintech has influenced the impact of the policy on corporate green innovation, especially by changing the transmission mechanisms related to operational and agency costs.
Methods: The Causal Forest method is applied to observational data from 1,510 listed companies in China between 2007 and 2020. This approach integrates the Neyman-Rubin framework with classical econometric techniques and machine learning to capture complex causal relationships and analyze the long-term effects of policy interventions over time, overcoming the limitations of dealing with nonexperimental data.
Findings & value added: The role of green credit policy in stimulating green innovation in enterprises is quite limited. However, the application of AI technology appears to play a significant role in amplifying the effects of green credit. The study suggests that while the classic "Porter hypothesis" may not be fully applicable in terms of corporate operating costs and innovation outcomes, the interplay of green credit policy and AI technology does indeed help reduce agency costs.
Downloads
References
Athey, S., & Imbens, G. (2016). Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(27), 7353–7360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510489113
View in Google Scholar
Athey, S., Tibshirani, J., & Wager, S. (2019). Generalized random forests. Annals of Statistics, 47(2), 1148–1178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/18-AOS1709
View in Google Scholar
Bahoo, S., Cucculelli, M., & Qamar, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence and corporate innovation: A review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188, 122264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122264
View in Google Scholar
Carrión-Flores, C. E., Innes, R., & Sam, A. G. (2013). Do voluntary pollution reduction programs (VPRs) spur or deter environmental innovation? Evidence from 33/50. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 66(3), 444–459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2013.05.002
View in Google Scholar
Conrad, K., & Wastl, D. (1995). The impact of environmental regulation on productivity in German industries. Empirical Economics, 20(4), 615–633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01206060
View in Google Scholar
Diamond, D. W. (1984). Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. Review of Economic Studies, 51(3), 393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2297430
View in Google Scholar
Flammer, C. (2021). Corporate green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 499–516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010
View in Google Scholar
Gulen, H., Jens, C., & Page, B. (2020). An application of causal forest in corporate finance: How does financing affect investment? SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3583685
View in Google Scholar
Guo, J. (2019). The effects of environmental regulation on green technology innovation—Evidence of the porter effect in China. Finance & Trade Economics, 03, 147–160.
View in Google Scholar
Hu, Z., Deng, L., Mao, J., & Xie, J. (2023). Heterogeneity in the effect of environmental protection expenditure in China: Causal inference from machine learning. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 59(3), 623–640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2022.2113331
View in Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. B., Peterson, S. R., Portney, P. R., & Stavins, R. N. (1995). Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us? Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1), 132–163.
View in Google Scholar
Johnstone, N., Haščič, I., Poirier, J., Hemar, M., & Michel, C. (2012). Environmental policy stringency and technological innovation: Evidence from survey data and patent counts. Applied Economics, 44(17), 2157–2170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.560110
View in Google Scholar
Knittel, C., & Stolper, S. (2019). Using machine learning to target treatment: The case of household energy use. NBER Working Papers Series, w26531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w26531
View in Google Scholar
Kock, C. J., Santaló, J., & Diestre, L. (2012). Corporate governance and the environment: what type of governance creates greener companies? Corporate governance and the environment. Journal of Management Studies, 49(3), 492–514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00993.x
View in Google Scholar
Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2020). The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1067–1111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz137
View in Google Scholar
Ley, M., Stucki, T., & Woerter, M. (2016). The impact of energy prices on green innovation. Energy Journal, 37(1), 41–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.1.mley
View in Google Scholar
Li, Z., Liao, G., Wang, Z., & Huang, Z. (2018). Green loan and subsidy for promoting clean production innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 421–431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.066
View in Google Scholar
Lu, J., Yan, Y., & Wang, T. X. (2021). The microeconomic effects of green credit policy—From the perspective of technological innovation and resource reallocation. China Industrial Economics, 01, 174–192.
View in Google Scholar
Lundvall, B. Å., & Rikap, C. (2022). China's catching-up in artificial intelligence seen as a co-evolution of corporate and national innovation systems. Research Policy, 51(1), 104395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104395
View in Google Scholar
Luo, G., Guo, J., Yang, F., & Wang, C. (2023). Environmental regulation, green innovation and high-quality development of enterprise: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 418, 138112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138112
View in Google Scholar
Ma, Y., Feng, G.-F., Yin, Z., & Chang, C.-P. (2024). ESG disclosures, green innovation, and greenwashing: All for sustainable development? Sustainable Development. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3210
View in Google Scholar
Ma, Y., Feng, G. F., & Chang, C. P. (2024). The impact of energy security on energy innovation: A non-linear analysis. Applied Economics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2317810
View in Google Scholar
Montmartin, B., & Herrera, M. (2015). Internal and external effects of R&D subsidies and fiscal incentives: Empirical evidence using spatial dynamic panel models. Research Policy, 44(5), 1065–1079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.013
View in Google Scholar
Nie, X., & Wager, S. (2020). Quasi-oracle estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.04912.
View in Google Scholar
Palmer, K., Oates, W. E., & Portney, P. R. (1995). Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.119
View in Google Scholar
Peng, X. Y., Zou, X. Y., Zhao, X. X., & Chang, C. P. (2024). Understanding the behavior of ESG in both OPEC and non‐OPEC countries? The implications for sustainable development reaching. Sustainable Development, 32(3), 1940–1953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2748
View in Google Scholar
Petroni, G., Bigliardi, B., & Galati, F. (2019). Rethinking the porter hypothesis: The underappreciated importance of value appropriation and pollution intensity. Review of Policy Research, 36(1), 121–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12317
View in Google Scholar
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. van der. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
View in Google Scholar
Roth, J., Sant’Anna, P. H., Bilinski, A., & Poe, J. (2023). What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature. Journal of Econometrics, 235(2), 2218–2244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.03.008
View in Google Scholar
Shang, X., & Niu, H. (2023). Does the digital transformation of banks affect green credit?. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104394
View in Google Scholar
Shive, S. A., & Forster, M. M. (2020). Corporate governance and pollution externalities of public and private firms. Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1296–1330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz079
View in Google Scholar
Wager, S., & Athey, S. (2018). Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 113(523), 1228–1242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1319839
View in Google Scholar
Wang, J. Z., Feng, G. F., Yin, Z. J., & Chang, C. P. (2024) Does women's political participation promote green innovation? Global evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3044
View in Google Scholar
Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2021). Research on the green innovation promoted by green credit Policies. Journal of Management World, 06, 173–188.
View in Google Scholar
Weber, T. A., & Neuhoff, K. (2010). Carbon markets and technological innovation. SSRN Electronic Journal, 60(2), 115–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2010.04.004
View in Google Scholar
Wen, H., Lee, C. C., & Zhou, F. (2021). Green credit policy, credit allocation efficiency and upgrade of energy-intensive enterprises. Energy Economics, 94, 105099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105099
View in Google Scholar
Xie, R., Yuan, Y., & Huang, J. (2017). Different types of environmental regulations and heterogeneous influence on “green” productivity: Evidence from China. Ecological Economics, 132, 104–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.019
View in Google Scholar
Xu, J., & Cui, J. B. (2020). Low-carbon cities and firms’ green technological innovation. China Industrial Economics, 12, 178–196.
View in Google Scholar
Yin, H. T., Wen, J., & Chang, C. P. (2023). Going green with artificial intelligence: The path of technological change towards the renewable energy transition. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(4), 1059–1095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.032
View in Google Scholar
Zerbib, O. D. (2019). The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds. Journal of Banking & Finance, 98, 39–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.10.012
View in Google Scholar
Zhang, S., Wu, Z., He, Y., & Hao, Y. (2022). How does the green credit policy affect the technological innovation of enterprises? Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 113, 106236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106236
View in Google Scholar
Zheng, M., Feng, G.-F., & Chang, C.-P.(2023). Is green finance capable of promoting renewable energy technology? Empirical investigation for 64 economies worldwide. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(2), 483–510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.013
View in Google Scholar
Zou, X.-Y., Peng, X.-Y., Zhao, X.-X., Ma, J., & Chang, C.-P. (2023). Does income inequality affect green innovation? A non-linear evidence. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2023.19271
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Oeconomia Copernicana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
