Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Integrating sustainability in the economics curriculum: Challenges and impact on future decision-makers

Abstract

Research background: Scientific evidence has shown the impact of environmental degradation on human well-being, demanding that political and economic decision-makers address the challenge of reversing this process. In this context, the economic education provided to future policymakers and business managers is crucial, because it can accelerate or impede the transition towards sustainability. What is taught in university economic courses, particularly introductory ones, shapes the ideas and the worldview of economic agents, influencing the decisions they will take in their professional activities.

Purpose of the article: The main objective of this paper is to determine how sustainability is addressed in introductory economics courses, where the foundations of the discipline are laid. Specifically, the goal is to uncover what ideas are conveyed about sustainability in these courses, how they are taught, and whether there have been any changes in the last decades.

Methods: Text Mining and Reflexive Thematic Analysis are applied to examine data from university syllabi and the most commonly used economic textbooks through the lens of a deconstruction of the complex concept of sustainability.

Findings & value added: The main contribution of this paper is a proposal for a deconstruction of the complex concept of sustainability that guides the empirical analysis. The results reveal that sustainability is practically absent from introductory economics courses; notably, no progress has been made on ethical issues or in addressing the impact of nature and environmental degradation on human well-being. Moreover, certain conceptions and models that work against the understanding of sustainability are conveyed in the most used textbooks. Although the role of economics discipline in understanding sustainability and in designing and implementing policies for an equitable sustainable transition is key, the teaching of economics offers resistance to change, remaining part of the problem of unsustainability. The integration of sustainability into the university economic courses still represents a major challenge with implications for future decision-makers.

Keywords

sustainability, sustainable development, economics education, education for sustainable development, pro-environmental policies

PDF

References

  1. Abad-Segura, E., & González-Zamar, M.-D. (2021). Sustainable economic development in higher education institutions: A global analysis within the SDGs framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 294, 126133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126133
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Agencia Nacional de Evaluación de la Calidad y Acreditación [ANECA] (2005). Libro blanco. Título de grado en Economía y Empresa. Madrid: Agencia Nacional de Evaluación de la Calidad y Acreditación.
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Anand, S., & Sen, A. (2000). Human development and economic sustainability. World Development, 28(12), 2029–2049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00071-1
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Badea, L., Serban-Oprescu, G. L., Dedu, S., & Piroșcă, G. I. (2020). The impact of education for sustainable development on Romanian economics and business students’ behavior. Sustainability, 12, 8169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198169
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Bäuerle, L. (2022). The power of economics textbooks. Shaping meaning and identity. In J. Maesse, S. Pühringer, T. Rossier, & P. Benz (Eds.). Power and influence of economists: Contributions to the social studies of economics (pp. 53–69). London & New York: Routledge.
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Baumgärtner, S., & Quaas, M. (2010a). Sustainability economics—General versus specific, and conceptual versus practical. Ecological Economics, 69(11), 2056–2059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.018
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Baumgärtner, S., & Quaas, M. (2010b). What is sustainability economics? Ecological Economics, 69(3), 445–450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.019
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Bertossi, A., & Marangon, F. (2022). A literature review on the strategies implemented by higher education institutions from 2010 to 2020 to foster pro-environmental behavior of students. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(3), 522–547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-11-2020-0459
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Bonnett, M. (2002). Education for sustainability as a frame of mind. Environmental Education Research, 8(1), 9–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620120109619
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Bonnett, M. (2017). Environmental consciousness, sustainability, and the character of philosophy of education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36(3), 333–347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-016-9556-x
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Bowles, S. (2008). Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine ‘the moral sentiments’: Evidence from economic experiments. Science, 320(5883), 1605–1609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1152110
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Bowles, S. (2016). The moral economy: Why good incentives are no substitute for good citizens. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Bowles, S., & Carlin, W. (2020). What students learn in economics 101: Time for a change. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(1), 176–214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191585
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Bowles, S., & Halliday, S. D. (2022). Microeconomics: Competition, conflict, and coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf & K. J. Sher (Eds.). APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Brenan, A., & Lo, Y.-S. (2020). Environmental ethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University.
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future. (A/42/427; Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development). New York: United Nations General Assembly document.
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Bunge, M. (1998). Social science under debate: A philosophical perspective. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442680036
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Bureau Van Dijk. (n.d.). Sabi Database. Iberian Balance Sheet Analysis System. Retrieved from https://login.bvdinfo.com/R0/SabiNeo.
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Carlin, W., & Soskice, D. W. (2023). Macroeconomics: Institutions, instability, and inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Carpenter, S. R., & Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Eds.). (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Scenarios: findings of the scenarios working group, millennium ecosystem assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Carpenter, S. R., DeFries, R., Dietz, T., Mooney, H. A., Polasky, S., Reid, W. V., & Scholes, R. J. (2006). Millennium ecosystem assessment: Research needs. Science, 314(5797), 257–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1131946
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Carter, J. R., & Irons, M. D. (1991). Are economists different, and if so, why? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2), 171–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.2.171
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Chakrabarty, D. (2009). The climate of history: Four theses. Critical Inquiry, 35(2), 197–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/596640
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Charmetant, H., Casari, M., & Arvaniti, M. (2024). What do economists teach about climate change? An analysis of introductory economics textbooks. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 110, 102192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2024.102192
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Christensen, J. (2017). The power of economists within the state. Stanford: Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9781503600492.003.0007
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Chuvieco, E., Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., López-Mújica, M., Campo-López, E., Lazo-Vitoria, X. A., Macias-Guarasa, J., Petre-Bujan, A. L., Perdigón-Melón, J. A., Guardiola-Soler, J., & Salado-García, M. J. (2022). Inventory and analysis of environmental sustainability education in the degrees of the University of Alcalá (Spain). Sustainability, 14, 8310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148310
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Collins, R. (1998). The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Common, M., & Stagl, S. (2005). Ecological economics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805547
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Convention on Biological Diversity [CBD] (2022). Convention on biological diversity. Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. CBD/COP/15/2. UN Environment Programme.
    View in Google Scholar
  34. CORE Team (2017). The economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Costanza, R., & Daly, H. E. (1987). Toward an ecological economics. Ecological Modelling, 38(1–2), 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(87)90041-X
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Costanza, R., Cumberland, J., Daly, H., Goodland, R., Norgaard, R. B., Kubiszewski, I., & Franco, C. (2015). An introduction to ecological economics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b17829
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., & van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630), 253–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Braat, L., Kubiszewski, I., Fioramonti, L., Sutton, P., Farber, S., & Grasso, M. (2017). Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosystem Services, 28, 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The anthropocene. Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17–18.
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Dasgupta, P. (2021). The economics of biodiversity: The Dasgupta review: full report. London: HM Treasury.
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Depro, B. (2022). Making introductory economics more relevant: Using personalized connections to introduce environmental economics. International Review of Economics Education, 39, 100230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2021.100230
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Editorial Nature (2022). Are there limits to economic growth? It’s time to call time on a 50-year argument. Nature, 603(7901), 361–361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00723-1
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Feinerer, I., Hornik, K., & Meyer, D. (2008). Text mining infrastructure in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(5), 1–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i05
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Feldman, R., & Sanger, J. (2007). The text mining handbook: Advanced approaches in analyzing unstructured data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546914
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Findler, F., Schönherr, N., Lozano, R., Reider, D., & Martinuzzi, A. (2019). The impacts of higher education institutions on sustainable development: A review and conceptualization. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(1), 23–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2017-0114
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Folke, C., Polasky, S., Rockström, J., Galaz, V., Westley, F., Lamont, M., Scheffer, M., Österblom, H., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Seto, K. C., Weber, E. U., Crona, B. I., Daily, G. C., Dasgupta, P., Gaffney, O., Gordon, L. J., Hoff, H., Levin, S. A., Lubchenco, J. Steffen, W., & Walker, B. H. (2021). Our future in the anthropocene biosphere. Ambio, 50(4), 834–869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01544-8
    View in Google Scholar
  47. Frey, B. S., Pommerehne, W. W., & Gygi, B. (1993). Economics indoctrination or selection? Some empirical results. Journal of Economic Education, 24(3), 271–281. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1183127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.1993.10844799
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Fullbrook, E. (2009). Epistemology. In J. Peil & I. van Staveren (Eds.). Handbook of economics and ethics (pp. 123–129). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848449305.00024
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Fundación Everis (2018). III Ranking Universidad-Empresa Fundación Everis. Encuesta a las empresas españolas sobre la empleabilidad de los recién titulados. Madrid: Fundación Everis.
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Goralnik, L., Nelson, M. P., & Vucetich, J. A. (2014). Sustainability ethics. In D. Rowe (Ed.). Achieving sustainability: Visions, principles, and practices (pp. 319–327). Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan Reference USA.
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Granovetter, M. (2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 33–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330053147958
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Green, T. L. (2012). Introductory economics textbooks: What do they teach about sustainability? International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, 3(2), 189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPEE.2012.049198
    View in Google Scholar
  54. Green, T. L. (2013). Teaching (un)sustainability? University sustainability commitments and student experiences of introductory economics. Ecological Economics, 94, 135–142. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.08.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.08.003
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Green, T. L. (2015). Lecturers’ perspectives on how introductory economic courses address sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16(1), 44–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-03-2013-0020
    View in Google Scholar
  56. Halkos, G., & Managi, S. (2023). New developments in the disciplines of environmental and resource economics. Economic Analysis and Policy, 77, 513–522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.12.008
    View in Google Scholar
  57. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
    View in Google Scholar
  58. Head, M. J., Steffen, W., Fagerlind, D., Waters, C. N., Poirier, C., Syvitski, J., Zalasiewicz, J. A., Barnosky, A. D., Cearreta, A., Jeandel, C., Leinfelder, R., McNeill, J. R., Rose, N. L., Summerhayes, C., Wagreich, M., & Zinke, J. (2022). The great acceleration is real and provides a quantitative basis for the proposed Anthropocene Series/Epoch. Episodes, 45(4), 359–376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2021/021031
    View in Google Scholar
  59. Henckens, M. L. C. M., van Ierland, E. C., Driessen, P. P. J., & Worrell, E. (2016). Mineral resources: Geological scarcity, market price trends, and future generations. Resources Policy, 49, 102–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.04.012
    View in Google Scholar
  60. Herrington, G. (2021). Update to limits to growth: Comparing the World3 model with empirical data. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 25(3), 614–626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13084
    View in Google Scholar
  61. Hickel, J., Kallis, G., Jackson, T., O’Neill, D. W., Schor, J. B., Steinberger, J. K., Victor, P. A., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2022). Degrowth can work—Here’s how science can help. Nature, 612(7940), 400–403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-04412-x
    View in Google Scholar
  62. Hodgson, G. M. (1993). Economics and evolution: Bringing life back into economics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14010
    View in Google Scholar
  63. Hodgson, G. M. (1998). The approach of institutional economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 166–192.
    View in Google Scholar
  64. Holden, E., Linnerud, K., & Banister, D. (2017). The imperatives of sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 25(3), 213–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1647
    View in Google Scholar
  65. Instituto Nacional de Estadística [INE] (n.d.). Encuesta de inserción laboral de titulados universitarios. Resultados. Retrieved from https://www.ine.es/dyn gs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736176991&menu=resultados&idp=1254735976597#!tabs-1254736195727.
    View in Google Scholar
  66. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] (2015). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415416
    View in Google Scholar
  67. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844
    View in Google Scholar
  68. Jaeger, W. K., Irwin, E. G., Fenichel, E. P., Levin, S., & Herziger, A. (2023). Meeting the challenges to economists of pursuing interdisciplinary research on human–natural systems. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 17(1), 43–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/723835
    View in Google Scholar
  69. Jónasson, J. T. (2016). Educational change, inertia and potential futures: Why is it difficult to change the content of education? European Journal of Futures Research, 4(1), 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-016-0087-z
    View in Google Scholar
  70. Jones, C. I. (2019). Paul Romer: Ideas, nonrivalry, and endogenous growth. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 121(3), 859–883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12370
    View in Google Scholar
  71. Kallis, G., Kostakis, V., Lange, S., Muraca, B., Paulson, S., & Schmelzer, M. (2018). Research on degrowth. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43(1), 291–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025941
    View in Google Scholar
  72. Kinol, A., Miller, E., Axtell, H., Hirschfeld, I., Leggett, S., Si, Y., & Stephens, J. C. (2023). Climate justice in higher education: A proposed paradigm shift towards a transformative role for colleges and universities. Climatic Change, 176(2), 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03486-4
    View in Google Scholar
  73. Krausmann, F., Lauk, C., Haas, W., & Wiedenhofer, D. (2018). From resource extraction to outflows of wastes and emissions: The socioeconomic metabolism of the global economy, 1900–2015. Global Environmental Change, 52, 131–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.003
    View in Google Scholar
  74. Krugman, P., & Wells, R. (2020). Essentials of economics. New York: Worth Publishers.
    View in Google Scholar
  75. Krugman, P., Wells, R., & Olney, M. L. (2007). Essentials of economics. New York: Worth Publishers.
    View in Google Scholar
  76. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    View in Google Scholar
  77. Leopold, A. (1949). The land ethic. In A sand county almanac and sketches here and there (pp. 201–226). New York: Oxford University Press.
    View in Google Scholar
  78. Maesse, J. (Ed.). (2022). Power and influence of economists: Contributions to the social studies of economics. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367817084
    View in Google Scholar
  79. Mankiw, N. G. (1998). Principles of economics. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden Press.
    View in Google Scholar
  80. Mankiw, N. G. (2020). Reflections of a textbook author. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(1), 215–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191589
    View in Google Scholar
  81. Mankiw, N. G. (2021). Principles of economics. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning, Inc.
    View in Google Scholar
  82. Marwell, G., & Ames, R. E. (1981). Economists free ride, does anyone else?: Experiments on the provision of public goods, IV. Journal of Public Economics, 15(3), 295–310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(81)90013-X
    View in Google Scholar
  83. Meadows, D. H., Randers, J., & Meadows, D. L. (2004). Limits to growth: The 30-year update. New York: Chelsea Green Publishing.
    View in Google Scholar
  84. Mearman, A. (2009). Realism. In J. Peil & I. van Staveren (Eds.). Handbook of economics and ethics (pp. 433–440). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848449305.00063
    View in Google Scholar
  85. Mearman, A., Guizzo, D., & Berger, S. (2018). Whither political economy? Evaluating the CORE Project as a response to calls for change in economics teaching. Review of Political Economy, 30(2), 241–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2018.1426682
    View in Google Scholar
  86. Meierrieks, D. (2021). Weather shocks, climate change and human health. World Development, 138, 105228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105228
    View in Google Scholar
  87. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Ed.) (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press.
    View in Google Scholar
  88. Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional (2022). EDUCAbase. Retrieved from http://estadisticas.mecd.gob.es/EducaDynPx/educabase/index.htm?type= pcaxis&path=/Universitaria/EUCT/2021/Titulaciones/&file=pcaxis.
    View in Google Scholar
  89. Ministerio de Trabajo y Economía Social (2022). Perfiles de la oferta de empleo 2022. Retrieved from https://www.sepe.es/HomeSepe/que-es-el-sepe/observatorio/ perfiles-de-la-oferta-de-empleo/documentacion-perfiles/ver-documentacion-perfiles.html?perfilType=perfilesCompletos&.
    View in Google Scholar
  90. Ministerio de Universidades (2022). Datos y cifras del Sistema Universitario Español. Publicación 2021-2022. Retrieved from https://www.universidades.gob.es/ publicaciones-e-informes/.
    View in Google Scholar
  91. Ministerio de Universidades (n.d.). Clasificaciones estadísticas universitarias. Retrieved from https://www.universidades.gob.es/clasificaciones-estadisticas-universitarias/.
    View in Google Scholar
  92. Moranta, J., Torres, C., Murray, I., Hidalgo, M., Hinz, H., & Gouraguine, A. (2021). Transcending capitalism growth strategies for biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology, 36(2), e13821. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13821
    View in Google Scholar
  93. Murphy, T. W. (2022). Limits to economic growth. Nature Physics, 18(8), 844–847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01652-6
    View in Google Scholar
  94. Noguera-Méndez, P., & Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2023). Environmental sustainability in economics teaching: Analysing Spanish upper secondary economics textbooks. Environmental Education Research, 29(9), 1221–1238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2069680
    View in Google Scholar
  95. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
    View in Google Scholar
  96. OECD (2020). Beyond growth: Towards a new economic approach. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/33a25ba3-en
    View in Google Scholar
  97. Ogutu, H., El Archi, Y., & Dénes Dávid, L. (2023). Current trends in sustainable organization management: A bibliometric analysis. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(1), 11–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.001
    View in Google Scholar
  98. Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
    View in Google Scholar
  99. Palmer, C., McShane, K., & Sandler, R. (2014). Environmental ethics. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39(1), 419–442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-121112-094434
    View in Google Scholar
  100. Peil, J., & van Staveren, I. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of economics and ethics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848449305
    View in Google Scholar
  101. Polasky, S., Kling, C. L., Levin, S. A., Carpenter, S. R., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R., Heal, G. M., & Lubchenco, J. (2019). Role of economics in analyzing the environment and sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(12), 5233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1901616116
    View in Google Scholar
  102. Pörtner, H.-O., Scholes, R. J., Agard, J., Archer, E., Arneth, A., Bai, X., Barnes, D., Burrows, M., Chan, L., Cheung, W. L. (W.), Diamond, S., Donatti, C., Duarte, C., Eisenhauer, N., Foden, W., Gasalla, M. A., Handa, C., Hickler, T., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Ichii, K., Jacob, U., Insarov, G., Kiessling, W., Leadley, P., Leemans, R., Levin, L., Lim, M., Maharaj, S., Managi, S., Marquet, P. A., McElwee, P., Midgley, G., Oberdorff, T., Obura, D., Osman, E., Pandit, R., Pascual, U., Pires, A. P. F., Popp, A., Reyes-García, V., Sankaran, M., Settele, J., Shin, Y. J., Sintayehu, D. W., Smith, P., Steiner, N., Strassburg, B., Sukumar, R., Trisos, C., Val, A. L., Wu, J., Aldrian, E., Parmesan, C., Pichs-Madruga, R., Roberts, D. C., Rogers, A .D., Díaz, S., Fischer, M., Hashimoto, S., Lavorel, S., Wu, N., & Ngo, H. (2021). Scientific outcome of the IPBES-IPCC co-sponsored workshop on biodiversity and climate change (Version 5). Zenodo.
    View in Google Scholar
  103. Putnam, H. (2002). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    View in Google Scholar
  104. Putnam, H. (2003). For ethics and economics without the dichotomies. Review of Political Economy, 15(3), 395–412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09538250308432
    View in Google Scholar
  105. R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org.
    View in Google Scholar
  106. Rockström, J., Beringer, T., Hole, D., Griscom, B., Mascia, M. B., Folke, C., & Creutzig, F. (2021). We need biosphere stewardship that protects carbon sinks and builds resilience. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(38), e2115218118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2115218118
    View in Google Scholar
  107. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R.W., Fabry, V. J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P. & Foley, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472–475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a
    View in Google Scholar
  108. Rodriguez-Sickert, C. (2009). Homo economicus. In J. Peil & I. van Staveren (Eds.), Handbook of economics and ethics (pp. 223–229). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848449305.00037
    View in Google Scholar
  109. Rodrik, D. (2016). Economics rules: The rights and wrongs of the dismal science. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
    View in Google Scholar
  110. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
    View in Google Scholar
  111. Romanello, M., Di Napoli, C., Drummond, P., Green, C., Kennard, H., Lampard, P., Scamman, D., Arnell, N., Ayeb-Karlsson, S., Ford, L. B., Belesova, K., Bowen, K., Cai, W., Callaghan, M., Campbell-Lendrum, D., Chambers, J., van Daalen, K. R., Dalin, C., Dasandi, N., Dasgupta S., Davies M., Dominguez-Salas P., Dubrow R., Ebi, K. L., Eckelman, M., Ekins, P., Escobar, L. E., Georgeson, L., Graham, H., Gunther, S. H., Hamilton, I., Hang, Y., Hänninen, R., Hartinger, S., He, K., Hess, J. J., Hsu, S. C., Jankin, S., Jamart, L., Jay, O., Kelman, I., Kiesewetter, G., Kinney, P., Kjellstrom, T., Kniveton, D., Lee, J. K. W., Lemke, B., Liu, Y., Liu, Z., Lott, M., Batista, M. L., Lowe, R., MacGuire, F., Sewe, M. O., Martinez-Urtaza, J., Maslin, M., McAllister, L., McGushin, A., McMichael, C., Mi, Z., Milner, J., Minor, K., Minx, J. C., Mohajeri, N., Moradi-Lakeh, M., Morrissey, K., Munzert, S., Murray, K. A., Neville, T., Nilsson, M., Obradovich, N., O'Hare, M. B., Oreszczyn, T., Otto, M., Owfi, F., Pearman, O., Rabbaniha, M., Robinson, E. J. Z., Rocklöv, J., Salas, R. N., Semenza, J. C., Sherman, J. D., Shi, L., Shumake-Guillemot, J., Silbert, G., Sofiev, M., Springmann, M., Stowell, J., Tabatabaei, M., Taylor, J., Triñanes, J., Wagner, F., Wilkinson, P., Winning, M., Yglesias-González, M., Zhang, S., Gong, P., Montgomery, H., & Costello, A. (2022). The 2022 report of the Lancet countdown on health and climate change: Health at the mercy of fossil fuels. Lancet, 400(10363), 1619–1654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01540-9
    View in Google Scholar
  112. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2937632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
    View in Google Scholar
  113. Røpke, I. (2020). Econ 101—In need of a sustainability transition. Ecological Economics, 169, 106515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106515
    View in Google Scholar
  114. Sen, A. (2003). On ethics and economics (Reprinted). Oxford: Blackwell.
    View in Google Scholar
  115. Sepulveda, C. F. (2020). Explaining the demand and supply model with the cost-benefit rule. International Review of Economics Education, 35, 100194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2020.100194
    View in Google Scholar
  116. Silge, J., & Robinson, D. (2017). Text mining with R: A tidy approach. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.
    View in Google Scholar
  117. Soulé, M. E. (1985). What is conservation biology? BioScience, 35(11), 727–734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1310054
    View in Google Scholar
  118. Sovacool, B. K., Kim, J., & Yang, M. (2021). The hidden costs of energy and mobility: A global meta-analysis and research synthesis of electricity and transport externalities. Energy Research & Social Science, 72, 101885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101885
    View in Google Scholar
  119. Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C. A., Folke, C., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Mace, G. M., Persson, L. M., Ramanathan, V., Reyers, B., & Sörlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
    View in Google Scholar
  120. Steffen, W., Sanderson, A., Tyson, P., Jäger, J., Matson, P., Moore, B., Oldfield, F., Richardson, K., Schellnhuber, H. J., Turner, B. L. I., & Wasson, R. J. (2004). Global change and the earth system: A planet under pressure. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/b137870
    View in Google Scholar
  121. Steg, L. (2016). Values, norms, and intrinsic motivation to act proenvironmentally. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41(1), 277–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085947
    View in Google Scholar
  122. Sterling, S. (2013). The sustainable university—Challenge and response. In S. Sterling, L. Maxey, & H. Luna (Eds.). The sustainable university—Progress and prospects (pp. 1–34). London: Routledge/Earthscan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203101780
    View in Google Scholar
  123. Stern, N. (2022). A time for action on climate change and a time for change in economics. Economic Journal, 132(644), 1259–1289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueac005
    View in Google Scholar
  124. Stigler, G. J. (1959). The politics of political economists. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 73(4), 522–532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1884301
    View in Google Scholar
  125. Stigler, G. J. (1983). Nobel Lecture: The process and progress of economics. Journal of Political Economy, 91(4), 529–545. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1831067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261165
    View in Google Scholar
  126. Su, C. W., Liu, F., Stefea, P., & Umar, M. (2023). Does technology innovation help to achieve carbon neutrality? Economic Analysis and Policy, 78, 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.01.010
    View in Google Scholar
  127. United Nations Development Programme [UNDP] (2020). The next frontier: Human development and the Anthropocene. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
    View in Google Scholar
  128. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO] (2005). United Nations decade of education for sustainable development (2005-2014): International implementation scheme. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000148650.
    View in Google Scholar
  129. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO]. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444.
    View in Google Scholar
  130. United Nations General Assembly (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1). Retrieved from https://www.refworld.org/docid/57b6e3e44.html.
    View in Google Scholar
  131. Valente, T. W. (2012). Network interventions. Science, 337(6090), 49–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1217330
    View in Google Scholar
  132. van de Laar, E., & Peil, J. (2009). Positive versus normative economics. In J. Peil & I. van Staveren (Eds.). Handbook of economics and ethics (pp. 374–382). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848449305.00056
    View in Google Scholar
  133. Voulvoulis, N., Giakoumis, T., Hunt, C., Kioupi, V., Petrou, N., Souliotis, I., Vaghela, C., & binti Wan Rosely, W. (2022). Systems thinking as a paradigm shift for sustainability transformation. Global Environmental Change, 75, 102544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102544
    View in Google Scholar
  134. Vucetich, J. A., & Nelson, M. P. (2010). Sustainability: Virtuous or vulgar? BioScience, 60(7), 539–544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.7.9
    View in Google Scholar
  135. Vucetich, J. A., Bruskotter, J. T., & Nelson, M. P. (2015). Evaluating whether nature’s intrinsic value is an axiom of or anathema to conservation: Nature’s intrinsic value. Conservation Biology, 29(2), 321–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12464
    View in Google Scholar
  136. Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the Earth. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.
    View in Google Scholar
  137. Walsh, V. (2009). Fact/value dichotomy. In J. Peil & I. van Staveren (Eds.). Handbook of economics and ethics (pp. 144–151). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848449305.00027
    View in Google Scholar
  138. Wang, J.-Z., Feng, G.-F., Yin, H.-T., & Chang, C.-P. (2023). Toward sustainable development: Does the rising oil price stimulate innovation in climate change mitigation technologies? Economic Analysis and Policy, 79, 569–583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.06.034
    View in Google Scholar
  139. Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780674045231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674045231
    View in Google Scholar
  140. Winter, J., Zhai, J., & Cotton, D.R.E. (2022). Teaching environmental sustainability in China: Opportunities and challenges for business and economics faculty in higher education. Environmental Education Research, 28(2), 318–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.2012560
    View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

51-60 of 375

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.