Barriers to digital services trade: Evaluation of their restrictiveness with application of Brier Score
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3435Keywords:
digital services trade, trade barriers, Brier Score, evaluation index systemAbstract
Research background: The improvement in digital transmission has driven the rapid development of digital services trade; however, it comes with more barriers to it. International comparisons of the restriction levels of digital services trade are crucial for promoting its liberalization, thereby obtaining economic gains. To provide a reliable measurement of barriers to digital services trade, it is necessary to construct a reasonable evaluation index system and ensure the objectivity of the determination of measurement indicator weights.
Purpose of the article: This study aims to develop a novel method for measuring the restrictiveness of barriers to digital services trade, revealing the current barriers to digital services trade in various economies.
Methods: This study establishes an evaluation index system for barriers to digital services trade by using the Brier Score to screen original evaluation indicators. Then, based on the established evaluation index system, the Brier Score is used to hierarchically determine the weights of evaluation indicators. Additionally, it compares the barriers to digital services trade from the total evaluation index and the evaluation index in five policy areas.
Findings & value added: Comparative analyses show that most economies have restrictive policies in digital services trade, and they are mainly implemented through two policy areas: infrastructure and payment system. In these two areas, economies face barriers related to digital infrastructure, discriminatory access to payment settlement methods. We also make methodological contributions by using a novel method to measure the restrictiveness of barriers to digital services trade. To the best of our knowledge, no study has integrated the Brier Score with trade policy analysis. Our method improves the overall trade restriction evaluation capability of the evaluation index system and ensures that the weights reflect the level of trade restrictions on the measurement indicators.
Downloads
References
Banik, A., & Bhaumik, P. K. (2014). Assessing the barriers to trade in services in South Asia. Global Business Review, 15(4), 795–814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150914543239
View in Google Scholar
Borchert, I., Gootiiz, B., Magdeleine, J., Marchetti, J. A., Mattoo, A., Rubio, E., & Shannon, E. (2020). Applied services trade policy: A guide to the services trade policy database and the services trade restrictions index. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 9264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9264
View in Google Scholar
Borchert, I., Gootiiz, B., & Mattoo, A. (2012). Guide to the services trade restrictions database. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 6108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6108
View in Google Scholar
Bottini, N., Marouani, M. A., & Munro, L. (2011). Service sector restrictiveness and economic performance: An estimation for the MENA Region. World Economy, 34(9), 1652–1678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2011.01337.x
View in Google Scholar
Brier, G. W. (1950). Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Review, 78(1), 1–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078<0001:VOFEIT>2.0.CO;2
View in Google Scholar
Carballo, J., Chatruc, M. R., Santa, C. S., & Martincus, C. V. (2022). Online business platforms and international trade. Journal of International Economics, 137, 103599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2022.103599
View in Google Scholar
Di, Y. N., Lu, Y. X., & Razzaq, A. (2025). International differences and dynamic evolution of trade in digitally deliverable services. Technology in Society, 81, 102781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102781
View in Google Scholar
Dihel, N., & Shepherd, B. (2007). Modal estimates of services barriers. OECD Trade Policy Papers, 51.
View in Google Scholar
Estefania-Flores, J., Furceri, D., Hannan, S. A., Ostry, J. D., & Rose, A. K. (2024). A measurement of aggregate trade restrictions and their economic effects. World Bank Economic Review. https://doi.org10.1093/wber/lhae033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhae033
View in Google Scholar
Ferencz, J. (2019). The OECD digital services trade restrictiveness index. OECD Trade Policy Papers, 221.
View in Google Scholar
Ferracane, M. F., Ugarte, S. G., & van der Marel, E. (2025). The Brussels effect in Africa: Is it beneficial for intra-regional trade in digital services? Journal of International Economic Law, 28(1), 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgae059
View in Google Scholar
Ferracane, M. F., & van der Marel, E. (2025). Governing personal data and trade in digital services. Review of International Economics, 33(1), 243–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12735
View in Google Scholar
Fontagé, L., & Mitaritonna, C. (2013). Assessing barriers to trade in the distribution and telecom sectors in emerging countries. World Trade Review, 12(1), 57–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745612000456
View in Google Scholar
Grosso, M. G., Gonzales, F., Miroudot, S., Nordås, H. K., Rouzet, D., & Ueno, A. (2015). Services trade restrictiveness index (STRI): Scoring and weighting methodology. OECD Trade Policy Papers, 177.
View in Google Scholar
Hao, L., Jian, H., & Xu, Y. (2023). The effect of the digital economy on services exports competitiveness and ternary margins. Telecommunications Policy, 47(7), 102596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102596
View in Google Scholar
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009). The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction. New York: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7
View in Google Scholar
Herman, P. R., & Oliver, S. (2023). Trade, policy, and economic development in the digital economy. Journal of Development Economics, 164, 103135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103135
View in Google Scholar
Hoekman, B. M. (1995). Tentative first steps: An assessment of the Uruguay Round agreement on services. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 1455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-1455
View in Google Scholar
IMF, OECD, UNCTAD, & WTO. (2023). Handbook on measuring digital trade. OECD Publishing.
View in Google Scholar
Jiang, L., Liu, S., & Zhang, G. (2022). Digital trade barriers and export performance: Evidence from China. Southern Economic Journal, 88(4), 1401–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12572
View in Google Scholar
Lahiri, K., Monokroussos, G., & Zhao, Y., (2013). The yield spread puzzle and the information content of SPF forecasts. Economics Letters, 118(1), 219–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.10.022
View in Google Scholar
Malodia, S., Mishra, M., Fait, M., Papa, A., & Dezi, L. (2023). To digit or to head? Designing digital transformation journey of SMEs among digital self-efficacy and professional leadership. Journal of Business Research, 157, 113547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113547
View in Google Scholar
Shingal, A. (2023). Mode 4 restrictiveness and services trade. Review of World Economics, 159(3), 757–786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-022-00481-2
View in Google Scholar
Suh, J., & Roh, J. (2023). The effects of digital trade policies on digital trade. World Economy, 46(8), 2383–2407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13407
View in Google Scholar
Taylor, J. W., & Yu, K. M. (2016). Using auto-regressive logit models to forecast the exceedance probability for financial risk management. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A-Statistics in Society, 179(4), 1069–1092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12176
View in Google Scholar
Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodology, 58(1), 267–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x
View in Google Scholar
van der Marel, E., & Ferracane, M. F. (2021). Do data policy restrictions inhibit trade in services? Review of World Economics, 157(4), 727–776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-021-00417-2
View in Google Scholar
Vo, D. H., Warkentin, M., & Tran, N. P. (2025). Examining the effects of national intellectual capital on economic growth: Does digital services trade restrictiveness matter? Journal of Knowledge Management, 29(1), 281–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2023-1288
View in Google Scholar
Wen, H., Chen, W., & Zhou, F. (2023). Does digital service trade boost technological innovation?: International evidence. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 88, 101647. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101647
View in Google Scholar
Wu, D. C. G., Cao, Z., Wen, L., & Song, H. Y. (2021). Scenario forecasting for global tourism. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 45(1), 28–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348020919990
View in Google Scholar
Yang, F., Wang, Y. X., & Whang, U. (2024). Trade restrictions on digital services and the impact on manufacturing exports. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 33(4), 523–550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2023.2195958
View in Google Scholar
Zhang, H. X., Kim H., & Moon, S. (2025). The effects of data restriction policies and institutions on digital financial service and trade. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2025.2467190
View in Google Scholar
Zhu, W., Li, X., Wang, H., & Sun, B. (2022). Digital service trade and income inequality: A panel data analysis for 100 countries. Applied Economics Letters, 30(11), 1457–1461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2022.2061895
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Oeconomia Copernicana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
