?Fettered? and ?unfettered? capitalism in J.A. Schumpeter?s concept of Tax State and economic development ? issues in banking perspective


  • Karol Śledzik University of Gdańsk




Schumpeter, capitalism, Tax State, economic development, banking


Economic development and transformation processes have become much more intense in economic reality in the last years than they have ever been before. At this time a lot of questions were raised about the causes of the actual Global Crisis, future crises, the factors affecting the modern economy, about the essence of contemporary capitalism, demographic problems and overgrown bureaucracy. The most spectacular threat to capitalism, (based on private entrepreneurship) according to Schumpeter, stems from the high, growing and progressive taxation. Schumpeter saw clearly that the financing of public goods and services (requiring taxes, maybe even relatively high) is something other than a clerical control of the economic system that violates the natural economic mechanism. Moreover, Schumpeter says explicitly that an entrepreneur does not have to be one person, he even states that the country (state) itself, or its agenda, can act as an entrepreneur. Therefore, it can be concluded that we may have to deal with ?Tax State?, which is typical for ?fettered capitalism?, and with ?entrepreneurial state?, which is typical for ?unfettered capitalism?. The main goal of this paper is to present two different approaches to the economic development concept: Schumpeter?s ?fettered? and ?unfettered? capitalism in the context of ?Tax State? and interventionism. The Author analyzes presented concept in contemporary issues from the banking perspective. In the paper, the Author used critical analysis as a research method. This allowed to identify gaps in the current state of knowledge and the scientific discussion focused on J.A. Schumpeter?s theoretical concept. Analysis was performed in 2015.


Download data is not yet available.


Acs Z. (2007). Schumpeterian Capitalism? in Capitalist Development: Toward a Synthesis of Capitalist Development and the Economy as a Whole. In Hanush H., Pyka A. (ed.). Elgar Companion to Neo-Schumpeterian Economics. Cheltenham - UK, Northampton -MA, USA: Edward Elgar. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781847207012.
Backhaus, J. G. (1989). Taxation and Entrepreneurship: An Austrian Approach to Public Finance. Journal of Economic Studies, 16(2). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443588910134757
Backhaus J. G. (ed.). (2003). Joseph Alois Schumpeter, Entrepreneurship, Style and Vision. New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Backhaus, J. G. (ed.). (1997). Essays on Social Security and Taxation. Gustav Schmoller and Adolph Wagner Reconsidered. Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag.
Chaloupek, G. (2000). The Cleavage of the Austrian School: Schumpeter and Mises/Hayek on Economic Systems and Economic Policy. Paper presented at the 13. Heilbronn Symposium, Heilbronn, manuscript.
Clemence R. V. (ed.). (2009). Essays on Entrepreneurship, Innovations, Business Cycles and the Evolution of the Capitalism, Joseph A. Schumpeter. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Goldscheid R. (1917). Staatssozialismus oder Staatskapitalismus. Ein finanzsoziologischer Beitrag zur Lösung des Staatsschulden-Problems. Wien: Anzengruber Verlag.
Goldscheid, R. (1926). Staat, öffentlicher Haushalt und Gesellschaft. Wesen und Aufgabe der Finanzwissenschaft vom Standpunkte der Soziologie. Handwörterbuch der Finanzwissenschaft, 1.
Hanusch, H. (ed.). (1988). Evolutionary Economics: Applications of Schumpeter?s Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heertje, A. (1981). Schumpeter?s Model of the Decay of Capitalism. In Frisch, H. (ed.). Schumpeterian Economics. New York: Praeger.
Hickel, R. (ed.). (1976). Rudolf Goldscheid, Joseph Schumpeter: Die Finanzkrise des Steuerstaats, Beiträge zur politischen Ökonomie der Staatsfinanzen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Kingston W. (2014). Schumpeter and the End of Western Capitalism. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s 00191-013-0312-x.
OECD. (ed.). (1981). The Welfare State in Crisis. An account of the Conference on Social Policies in the 1980s, 20-23 October 1981. Paris: OECD.
Schumpeter J. A. (1911). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48082-4_3
Schumpeter J. A. (1918). The Crisis of the Tax State. London, New York: Macmillan.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. 2 Vol. New York: McGraw-Hill. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1522/030021081.
Schumpeter J. A. (1943). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: George Allen and Unwin. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203 202050.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1947). The Creative Response in Economic History. Journal of Economic History, 7(2). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017 /S0022050700054279.
Schumpeter J. A. (1949). English Economists and the State-managed Economy. Journal of Political Economy, 57(5). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1086/256862.
Swedberg R. (1991). Schumpeter. A Biography. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Śledzik K. (2014). Schumpeter?s view on entrepreneur and credit versus contemporary mega-banks problem. In S. Hittmar (Ed.). Young Scientists Revue. Zilona: Faculty of Management Science and Informatics, University of Zilina.
Vecchi N. De. (1995). Entrepreneurs, Institutions and Economic Change. The Economic Thought of J.A. Schumpeter (1905-1925). Brookfield: Edward Elgar Publishing Company.




How to Cite

Śledzik, K. (2016). ?Fettered? and ?unfettered? capitalism in J.A. Schumpeter?s concept of Tax State and economic development ? issues in banking perspective. Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.12775/OeC.2016.002




Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.