‘I heard myself proclam’d:’ the transition in the critical and textual reception of Edgar in King Lear

Authors

  • James Dale Casimir Pulaski Radom University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24136/rsf.2022.002

Keywords:

Shakespeare, Edgar, King Lear, textual scholars, critical reception

Abstract

The publication of Shakespeare's First Folio in 1623 marked the beginning of a period, lasting over three centuries, in which the critical reception of Edgar in King Lear was often unenthusiastic, judging by the opinions of subsequent theatre practitioners and literary critics. There were voices that questioned Edgar's relevance to the plot and considered him a superfluous character. Moreover, Edgar's heteroglossia was increasingly toned down in stage interpretations, removing the complex polyphony of Shakespeare's character by omitting lines given to the character in the Quarto version of the play. Since the mid-twentieth century, however, the critical (and textual) reception of Edgar has changed, as evidenced by the research of textual scholars who seek to preserve the ethical meaning of Edgar in the play. This has resulted in Edgar's text being revisited in stage performances. In addition, recent critics are paying more attention to Edgar's dexterity in the use of language and disguise, which they believe restores the character's role as crucial to the play's plot.

References

Berger Jr., Harry. “Text against Performance: The Gloucester Family Romance,” Shakespeare’s “Rough Magic”: Renaissance Essays in Honor of C.L. Barber, eds. Peter Erickson and Coppélia Khan, Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1985: 210-229.

Bloom, Harold. Shakespeare and the Invention of the Human, New York: Riverhead Books, 1998.

Bloom, Harold ed. Bloom’s Shakespeare Through the Ages: King Lear, Infobase Publishing: New York, 2008

Bradley, A.C. 1904. Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear and Macbeth, London: Macmillan and Co., Reprint 1929.

Bradley, Lynne. “’Why, this is not Lear’: Adaptations before the Twentieth Century,” Adapting King Lear for the Stage, (Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Ltd., 2010), 33-76.

Carroll, William C. “‘The Base Shall Top Th’Legitimate;’ The Bedlam Beggar and the Role of Edgar in King Lear,” Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 38, No.4 (Winter): 426-441.

Cavell, Stanley. Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.

Clare, Robert. “Quarto and Folio: A Case for Conflation,” Lear from Study to Stage: Essays in Criticism, eds. J. Ogden, A.H. Scouten and A.H. Mendison, Madison, USA, and London: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, Associated University Presses, 1997: 79-108.

Clayton, Tom. “‘The injuries that they themselves procure’: Justice poetic and pragmatic, and aspects of the endplay, in King Lear,” King Lear: New Critical Essays, ed. J. Kahn, New York and London: Routledge, 2008: 184-207.

Croall, Jonathan. Performing King Lear: Gielgud to Russell Beale, London, and New York: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 2015.

Dale, James. “Incognitos: Shakespeare’s Uses of Disguise in the Light of New Historicism and Its Legacy.” Diss. University of Warsaw, 2021.

Dowden, Edward. Shakspere: A Critical Study of His Mind and Art, London: Henry S. King & Co., 1875.

Foakes, Reginald A. “Performance and Text: ‘King Lear,’” Medieval & Renaissance Drama in England, Vol. 17, 2005: 86-98.

Frye, Northrop. Northrop Frye on Shakespeare, ed. R. Sandler, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.

Golder, John. Shakespeare for the Age of Reason; the earliest stage adaptations of Jean-François Ducis, 1769-1792, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

Greenblatt, Stephen. “Shakespeare and the Exorcists,” Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England, Los Angeles, USA: University of California Press, 1988: 94-128.

Kirschbaum, Leo. “Banquo and Edgar; character or function?” Essays in Criticism, 1957, Vol. VII: 1-21.

Knowles, Richard. “Two Lears? By Shakespeare?” Lear from Study to Stage: Essays in Criticism, eds. J. Ogden, A.H. Scouten and A.H. Mendison, Madison, USA and London: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, Associated University Presses, 1997: 57-78.

Mack, Maynard. King Lear in Our Time, Berkeley and Los Angeles, USA: University of California Press, 1965.

McClean, Hugh. “Disguise in King Lear: Kent and Edgar,” Shakespeare Quarterly. Vol. 11, No.1 (Winter): 49-54.

Nuttall, Anthony D. Shakespeare The Thinker, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007.

Orwell, George. “Lear, Tolstoy, and the Fool,” The Orwell Reader: Fiction, Essays and Reportage by George Orwell, New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich Inc., 1956: 300-314.

Palfrey, Simon. Poor Tom: Living King Lear, The University of Chicago Press: Chicago and London, 2014.

Parrott, Thomas M. Shakespearean Comedy, New York: Oxford University Press, 1949.

Peck, Russell A. “Edgar's Pilgrimage: High Comedy in King Lear,” Studies in English Literature. 1500-1900, Vol. 7, No. 2, Elizabethan and Jacobean Drama (Spring, 1967): 219-237

Rosenberg, Marvin. The Masks of King Lear, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972.

Salgado, Gamini. Text and Performance: King Lear, Basingstoke: Macmillan Education Ltd, 1984.

Shakespeare, William. King Lear, 1608 (Pied Bull Quarto), ed. W. W. Greg, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1939.

Shakespeare, William. King Lear, Arden Shakespeare Third Edition, ed. R.A. Foakes. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2020.

Tate, Nahum. The History of King Lear. Acted at the Duke’s Theatre. Reviv’d with Alterations, London: Printed for E. Flesher, and are to be sold by R. Bentley, and M. Magnes in Russel Street near Covent Garden, 1681.

Taylor, Gary. “The War in King Lear," Shakespeare Survey, Vol. 33 (1980); 27—34.

Taylor, Gary and Michael Warren. eds., The Division of the Kingdoms: Shakespeare’s Two Versions of King Lear, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.

Urkowitz, Steven. Shakespeare’s Revision of King Lear, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.

Vickers, Sir Brian. The One King Lear, Cambridge, Mass., and London: Harvard University Press, 2016.

Warren, Michael. “Quarto and Folio King Lear and the Interpretation of Albany and Edgar,” Shakespeare, Pattern of Excelling Nature: Shakespearean Criticism in Honor of America’s Bicentennial, eds. D. Bevington, D. and J.L Halio, London: Associated University Presses, 1978: 95-107.

Wells, Stanley ed. The Oxford Shakespeare: The History of King Lear, Oxford; Oxford University Press, 2008.

Williams, Simon. Shakespeare on the German Stage, Volume 1: 1586-1914, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

Wilson Knight, George. The Wheel of Fire, London: Methuen & Co. Ltd., 1930.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-31

How to Cite

Dale, J. (2022). ‘I heard myself proclam’d:’ the transition in the critical and textual reception of Edgar in King Lear. Radomskie Studia Filologiczne. Radom Philological Studies, 1(11), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.24136/rsf.2022.002

Issue

Section

Articles