The use of simulation experimental research in different areas concerning railway traffic control issues

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24136/tren.2025.011

Keywords:

railway traffic control devices, exploitation process, simulation experimental research, simulation model, distributions of times between failures and times of repair

Abstract

The article presents examples of transport applications in which simulation experimental research is of great importance and particularly useful. The first part presents examples of important railway transport areas where computer simulations have been used. In the second part of the study, more reference is made to the study of the exploitation process of railway traffic control devices using a so-called simulation experiment. As railway control systems are complex systems, it is practically impossible to carry out direct studies or carry out diagnostics without disconnecting a component from the complete system. This is when simulation research becomes helpful. In the simulation of the exploitation process, the initially known theoretical cumulative distribution functions of times between failures and times of repair of the objects distinguished in the model of the railway control system and the distributions of the number of their failures were assumed. The exploitation and reliability parameters of these objects were then determined based on real data, using statistical analysis and on the basis of simulations of future exploitation states of this system. A parametric and non-parametric verification of empirical distributions of reliability parameters determined for selected system components was also carried out.

References

Wasiak M., et al. (2019). The use of a supply chain configuration model to assess the reliability of Logistics processes. Maintenance and Reliability, 21(3), 367-374. https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2019.3.2.

Karkula M. (2008). Application of decision tables in discrete event simulation models, Wybrane Zagadnienia Logistyki Stosowanej, Oficyna Wydawnicza TEXT, Kraków, 252-260.

Karkula M. (2014). Selected aspects of simulation modelling of internal transport processes performed at logistics facilities, The Archives of Transport, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.5604/08669546.1146976.

Szkopiński J., Kochan A. (2021). Energy Efficiency and Smooth Running of a Train on the Route While Approaching Another Train. Energies, 14(7593). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14227593

Bosschaart M., et al. (2015). Efficient formalization of railway interlocking data in RailML, Information Systems, 49, 126-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2014.11.007.

Ciszewski T. P., Nowakowski W., Chrzan M. J. (2017). RailTopoModel and RailML – data exchange standards in railway sector. Archives of Transport System Telematics, 10.

Zabłocki W. (2008). Modelowanie stacyjnych systemów sterowania ruchem kolejowym, Prace Naukowe TRANSPORT z 65. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej.

Stawowy M., Rosiński A., Siergiejczyk M., Perlicki K. (2021). Quality and Reliability-Exploitation Modeling of Power Supply Systems. Energies, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092727.

http://symulatory.net.pl/art%2C8%2Csymulator-urzadzen-sterowania-ruchem-kolejowym-pkp-plk-sa (access date: 10/03/2025).

https://www.plk-sa.pl/o-spolce/biuro-prasowe/informacje-prasowe/szczegoly/plk-wprowadza-nowoczesny-symulator-dla-dyzurnych-ruchu-2864 (access date: 17/03/2025).

http://symulatory.net.pl/art,5,symulator-koleje-mazowieckie-km-sp-z-oo (access date: 10/04/2025)

https://www.symulator.isdr.pl/ (access date: 14/04/2025).

Chyba A., Okrzesik P., Puchała M., Puławska S. (2012). Zastosowanie komputerowego symulatora przekaźnikowych urządzeń srk typu E dla potrzeb kształcenia dyżurnych ruchu i możliwości jego rozbudowy. Zeszyty Naukowo-Techniczne SITK RP/O Kraków Nr 3(99).

https://anylogic.help/library-reference-guides/rail-library/index.html (access date: 02/05/2025).

https://www.anylogic.com/resources/case-studies/simulating-disruptions-on-netherlands-railway-operations/ (access date: 02/05/2025).

Borshchev A., Filippov A. (2004). From System Dynamics and Discrete Event to Practical Agent Based Modeling: Reasons, Techniques, Tools. Proceed. of the 22nd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. Oxford. England. 1-23.

Zalewski J., et al. (2003). Safety of computer control systems: challenges and results in software development, Annual Reviews in Control, 27(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1367-5788(03)00004-X.

Karoń G., Żochowska R. (2015). Modelling of expected traffic smoothness in urban transportation systems for ITS solutions, Archives of Transport, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.5604/08669546.1160925.

Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Safari J, Sassani F. (2008). Reliability optimization of series-parallel systems with a choice of redundancy strategies using a genetic algorithm. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93(4), 550-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.02.009.

Haldar, A., Mahadevan, S. (2000). Probability, Reliability, and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design, John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-33119-8.

Jiang, R. (2009). A non-parametric approach for modelling reliability growth of complex repairable systems. Maintenance and Reliability, 3, 78-81.

Kovalenko I.N., Kuzniecov N.Y., Pegg P.A. (1997). Mathematical Theory of Reliability of Time Dependent Systems with Practical Applications, 1nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons. ISBN 978-0471950608.

Girtler J. (2018). Reliability and types of diagnosis in the process of diesel engine operation, Journal of Polish CIMEEAC, 13(1).

Montgomery D.C., Runger G.C. (1999). Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers. 2nd Edition, Wiley. ISBN 978-0471170273.

Collinsa A., Pettyb M., Vernon-Bidoa D., Sherfeya S. (2015). A Call to Arms: Standards for Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 18(3), 12. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.2838.

Hariga, M., Azaiez, N. (2006). Heuristic procedures for the single facility inspection problem with minimal repair and increasing failure rate. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(9), 1081–1088. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602074.

Reuven Y., Rubinstein, Kroese, D.P. (2017). Simulation and the Monte Carlo method. 3rd Edition, Hoboken, United States: John Wiley and Sons. ISBN 978-1118632161. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118631980.

Zhou Y., et al. (2020). Sequential imperfect preventive maintenance model with failure intensity reduction with an application to urban buses. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 198, 965–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106871.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles