The consequences of unconventional monetary policy in euro area in times of monetary easing

Abstract

Research background: In this research paper, an attempt is made to evaluate the impacts of ECB?s unconventional monetary policy which has been applied after Global Financial Crisis. Because of the new economic and monetary conditions, the effectiveness of conventional monetary tools has been questioned.

Purpose of the article: Designed models examine the consequences of unconventional monetary policy for macroeconomic variables, monetary variables and interest rates in the euro area. Particular attention is paid to the response of the price level, represented by HICP, to various monetary policy innovations. Except a shock in credit multiplier and asset purchase programme (APP), also the effectiveness of a conventional monetary tool, such as main refinancing operation (MRO) interest rate, is inspected.

Methods: Use has been made of impulse responses from structural VAR models to analyze a large sample that covers the time horizon of 1999 to 2016. Several econometric tests are performed to provide a profound analysis. The conclusions from baseline models are verified in multiple robustness check models, which are specified under alternative conditions.

Findings & Value added: It has been found that, in the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis, conventional monetary instruments are effective in the short-run. In the long-run, unconventional monetary policy has a greater potential to stabilize the economy than the traditional interest rate transmission channel. The conclusions from the baseline models are verified in multiple robustness check models, which are specified under alternative conditions.

Keywords

unconventional monetary policy, credit multiplier, interest rate, quantitative easing

References

1. Andrade, P., Breckenfelder, J. De Fiore, F., Karadi, P., & Tristan, O. (2016). The ECB´s asset purchase programme: an early assessment. ECB Working paper series, 1956/September 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2839812
   View in Google Scholar
2. Bernanke, B. (2015). Why are interest rates so low, part 4: term premiums. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/ben-bernanke/2015/04/13/why-are-interest-rates-so-low-part-4-term-premiums/ (01.03.2017).
   View in Google Scholar
3. Brainard, L. (2016). The ‘new normal’ and what it means for monetary policy. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Retrieved from https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/brainard20160912a.htm (01.03.2017).
   View in Google Scholar
4. Conti, A. M., Neri, S., & Nobili, A. (2017). Low inflation and monetary policy in the euro area. ECB Working paper series, 2005/January 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2910938
   View in Google Scholar
5. Demertzis, M., & Wolf, G. B. (2016). The effectiveness of The European Central Bank’s asset purchase programme. Bruegel, 2016/10.
   View in Google Scholar
6. Durlauf, S. N., & Blume, L. E. (2010). Monetary economics. Hampshire: Macmilan Publishers. doi: 10.1057/9780230280854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230280854
   View in Google Scholar
7. Enders, W. (2010). Applied econometric time series. West Sussex: Wiley Desktop Edition.
   View in Google Scholar
8. Fratzscher, M., & Duca, M. L., & Straub, E. (2014). ECB unconventional monetary policy actions: market impact, international spillovers and transmission channels. 15th Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference, Washington DC, 2014. November 13-14.
   View in Google Scholar
9. Gujarati, D., & Porter, D. (2009). Basic econometrics. Singapore: McGraw Hill International Edition.
   View in Google Scholar
10. He, L. T. (2017). Emphasis and effectiveness of monetary policy of the Fed: a historical comparative analysis (1871–2013). International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, 10(1). doi: 10.1504/IJMEF.2017.081283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMEF.2017.081283
    View in Google Scholar
11. Hosny, A. S. (2017). Does inflation targeting lower inflation? If yes, then when? International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, 10(3/4). doi: 10.1504/IJMEF.2017.087484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMEF.2017.087484
    View in Google Scholar
12. Joyce, M., & Tong, M., & Wood, R. (2011). The United Kingdom’s quantitative easing policy: design, operation and impact. Bank of England - Quarterly Bulletin, 2011Q3.
    View in Google Scholar
13. Juselius, M., & Borio, C., & Disyatat, P., & Drehmann, M. (2017). Monetary policy, the financial cycle, and ultra-low interest rates. International Journal of Central Banking, 13(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2823454
    View in Google Scholar
14. Kajanová, J. (2011). The competitive advantage in the global labour market. Business, Management and Education, 9(2). doi: 10.3846/bme.2011.11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/bme.2011.11
    View in Google Scholar
15. Meinusch, A., & Tillmann, P. (2017). Quantitative easing and tapering uncertainty: evidence from Twitter. International Journal of Central Banking, 13(4).
    View in Google Scholar
16. Nelson, F. (2002). Direct effects of base money on aggregate demand: theory and evidence. Journal of Monetary Economics, 49(4), 687-708. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00118-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00118-6
    View in Google Scholar
17. Peersman, G. (2011). Macroeconomic effects of unconventional monetary policy in the euro area. ECB Working paper series, 1397/November 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1950039
    View in Google Scholar
18. Praet, P. (2016). The ECB’s monetary policy response to disinflationary pressures. ECB and its Watcher XVII conference. Frankfurt am Main.
    View in Google Scholar
19. Ridhwan, M., de Groot, H., Nijkamp, P., & Rietveld, P. (2010). The impact of monetary policy on economic activity – evidence from meta-analysis. Tinbergen Institution Discussion Paper, TI 2010- 043/3. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1594036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1594036
    View in Google Scholar
20. Rosengren, E. S. (2016). Exploring the economy´s progress and Outlook. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. Retrieved from https://www.bostonfed.org/-/media/Documents/Speeches/PDF/090916/090916text.pdf (03.03.2017).
    View in Google Scholar
21. Sims, C. J., & Stock, J., & Watson, M. (1990). Inference in linear time series models with some unit roots. Econometrica, 58(1). doi: 10.2307/2938337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2938337
    View in Google Scholar
22. Tomann, H., & Stöppel, A. (2016). The ECB´s unconventional monetary policy. Europawissenschaften, Berlin. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59247-3_4
    View in Google Scholar
23. Trichet, J. C. (2012). Unconventional monetary policy measures: principles - conditions - raison d’être. IJCB conference, Washington DC, 2012, March 23-24.
    View in Google Scholar
24. Yardeni, E., Quintana, M. (2017). Global Economic Briefing: Central Bank Balance Sheets. Yardeni Research, 2017.
    View in Google Scholar
25. Yellen, J. (2016). The Federal Reserve`s Monetary Policy Toolkit: Past, Present, and Future. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Jackson Hole conference, Wyoming, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.federalreserve.gov/ newsevents/speech/yellen20160826a.htm (01.03.2017).
    View in Google Scholar
26. Yu, E. (2016). Did Quantitative Easing Work? Federal reserve Bank of Philadelphia Research Department. Philadelphia, 2016. First Quarter 2016. Retrieved from https://www.philadelphiafed.org/-/media/research-and-data/publications /economic-insights/2016/q1/eiq116_did-quantitative_easing_work.pdf?la=en (01.03.2017).
    View in Google Scholar