Vol. 15 No. 1 (2020)

Articles

The effect of changes in the economic structure on entrepreneurial activity in a transition economy: the case of Poland

Published 31-03-2020

Justyna Zygmunt
Opole University of Technology

Abstract

Research background: While entrepreneurship in transition economies is the subject of a growing body of literature, the debate on factors influencing entrepreneurial activity in such economies is still incomplete. This paper extends this debate by focusing on the effect of changes in the economic structure on entrepreneurship in Poland. The findings might be supportive for policymakers in pursuing policy aimed at boosting entrepreneurship in a transition economy.

Purpose of the article: The aim of the paper is to investigate the extent to which changes in the economic structure impact entrepreneurial activity in Poland. The paper contributes to the literature by providing empirical support to the pending research efforts to recognize entrepreneurship dimensions in a transition economy.

Methods: The hypothesis was tested with fixed effects panel regression with robust standard errors. Data were sourced from the Statistics Poland for all Polish NUTS?2 regions for the period 2003?2017. Panel data are balanced and include 3 600 observations.

Findings & Value added: This paper extends previous research on factors affecting entrepre-neurial activity in a transition economy by focusing on the importance of changes in the economic structure for new firm creation. The findings provide evidence of the significant value of the service sector in boosting entrepreneurial activity in Poland. The findings might attract attention of policymakers. Fostering structural change towards smart specialization in services should be regarded when constituting programmes supporting entrepreneurship.

Keywords

structural changes, entrepreneurial activity, transition economy, service sector

PDF

References

  1. Ahunov, M., & Yusupov, N. (2017). Risk attitudes and entrepreneurial motivations: Evidence from transition economies. Economics Letters, 160. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2017.08.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.08.016
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Alonso-Carrera, J. & Raurich, X. (2015). Demand-based structural change and balanced economic growth. Journal of Macroeconomics, 46. doi: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.10.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.10.005
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Bosma, N., & Schutjens, V. (2011). Understanding regional variation in entrepreneurial activity and entrepreneurial attitude in Europe. Annals of Regional Science, 47(3). doi: 10.1007/s00168-010-0375-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-010-0375-7
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Cai, W. (2015). Structural change accounting with labour market distortions. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 57. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2015.05.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2015.05.006
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Ciarli, T., & Valente, M. (2016). The complex interactions between economic growth and market concentration in a model of structural change. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 38. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2016.04.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2016.04.006
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Earle, J. S., & Sakova, Z. (2000). Business start-ups or disguised unemployment? Evidence on the character of self-employment from transition economies. Labour Economics, 7(5). doi: 10.1016/S0927-5371(00)00014-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5371(00)00014-2
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. M. (2010). Entrepreneurship in transition economies; the role of institutions and generational change. UCL SSEES Centre for Comparative Economics. Economics Working Paper 106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1570423
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Fernandes, A. M. (2009). Structure and performance of the service sector in transition economies. Economics of Transition, 17(3). doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0351. 2009.00355.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2009.00355.x
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Fritsch, M., Bublitz, E., Sorgner, A., & Wyrwich, M. (2014). How much of a socialist legacy? The re-emergence of entrepreneurship in the East German transformation to a market economy. Small Business Economics, 43(2). doi: 10.1007/s11187-014-9544-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9544-x
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Fritch, M., & Falck, O. (2007). New business formation by manufacturing over space and time: a multidimensional analysis. Regional Studies, 41(2). doi: 10.1080/00343400600928301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400600928301
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Gajewski, P., & Kutan, A. M. (2018). Determinants and economic effects of new firm creation: evidence from Polish regions. Eastern European Economics, 56(3). doi: 10.1080/00128775.2018.1442226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2018.1442226
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Gries, T., & Naudé, W. (2008). Entrepreneurship and structural economic transformation. Research Paper / UNU-WIDER, 2008.62.
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Gurgul, H., & Lach, Ł. (2015). Key sectors in the post-communist CEE economies: What does the transition data say? Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 48(1). doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2014.12.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2014.12.001
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Kitov, I.O. (2009). Modelling the evolution of real per capita during the transition from a socialist to capitalist economic system. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 4(4).
    View in Google Scholar
  15. McMillan, J., & Woodruff, C. (2002). The central role of entrepreneurs in transition economies. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/089533002760278767
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Neffke, F., Hartog, M., Boschma, R., & Henning, M. (2018). Agents of structural change: the role of firms and entrepreneurs in regional diversification. Economic Geography, 94(1). doi: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1391691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1391691
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Pietrzak, M. B., Balcerzak, A. P., Gajdos, A., & Arendt, Ł.(2017). Entrepreneurial environment at regional level: the case of Polish path towards sustainable socio-economic development, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(2), doi: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.5.2(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2017.5.2(2)
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Raiser, M., Schaffer, M., & Schuchhardt, J. (2004). Benchmarking structural change in transition. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 15(1). doi: 10.1016/S0954-349X(03)00027-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(03)00027-4
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Reynolds, P. D. (2017). When is a firm born? Alternative criteria and consequences. Business Economics, 52. doi: 10.1057/s11369-017-0022-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s11369-017-0022-8
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Reynolds, P., Miller, B., & Maki, W. R. (1995). Explaining regional variation in business births and deaths: U.S. 1976–88. Small Business Economics, 7(5). doi:10.1007/BF01302739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01302739
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Rogalska, E. (2018). Measurement of entrepreneurship conditions in Polish regions. In T. Löster & T. Pavelka (Eds.). Conference Proceedings. The 12th International Days of Statistics and Economics. Prague.
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Smallbone, D., & Welter, F. (2001). The distinctiveness of entrepreneurship in transition economies. Small Business Economics, 16(4), doi: 10.1023/A:1011 159216578.
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Tyszka, T., Cieślik, J., Domurat, A., & Macko, A. (2011). Motivation, self-efficacy, and risk attitudes among entrepreneurs during transition to a market economy. Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(2). doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2011.01. 011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.01.011
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Vu, K. M. (2017). Structural change and economic growth: empirical evidence and policy insights from Asian economies. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 41. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2017.04.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2017.04.002
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Wagner, J., & Sternberg, R. (2004). Start-up activities, individual characteristics, and the regional milieu: Lessons for entrepreneurship support policies from German micro data. Annals of Regional Science, 38(2). doi: 10.1007/s00168-004-0193-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-004-0193-x
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Wennekers, S., Van Stel, A., Thurik, R., & Reynolds, P. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24(3). doi: 10.1007/s11187-005-1994-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-1994-8
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Xiao, J., Boschma, R., & Andersson, M. (2018). Industrial diversification in Europe: the differentiated role of relatedness. Economic Geography, 94(5). doi: 10.1080/00130095.2018.1444989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.1444989
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Zygmunt, A. (2018). Do investments impact on firms’ innovation activities? Evidence from Poland and the Czech Republic. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Business Information Management Association conference (IBIMA). 15-16 November 2018, Seville, Spain. IBIMA.
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Zygmunt, J. (2018). Does level of economic growth matter in spatial diversity in entrepreneurial activity in a transition economy? A case of Poland. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Business Information Management Association conference (IBIMA). 15-16 November 2018, Seville, Spain. IBIMA.
    View in Google Scholar

Similar Articles

1-10 of 303

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.