Vol. 17 No. 4 (2022)

Articles

Forecasting volatility during the outbreak of Russian invasion of Ukraine: application to commodities, stock indices, currencies, and cryptocurrencies

Published 30-12-2022

Piotr Fiszeder
Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun; Prague University of Economics and Business

Marta Małecka
University of Łódź

Abstract

Research background: The Russian invasion on Ukraine of February 24, 2022 sharply raised the volatility in commodity and financial markets. This had the adverse effect on the accuracy of volatility forecasts. The scale of negative effects of war was, however, market-specific and some markets exhibited a strong tendency to return to usual levels in a short time.

Purpose of the article: We study the volatility shocks caused by the war. Our focus is on the markets highly exposed to the effects of this conflict: the stock, currency, cryptocurrency, gold, wheat and crude oil markets. We evaluate the forecasting accuracy of volatility models during the first stage of the war and compare the scale of forecast deterioration among the examined markets. Our long-term purpose is to analyze the methods that have the potential to mitigate the effect of forecast deterioration under such circumstances. We concentrate on the methods designed to deal with outliers and periods of extreme volatility, but, so far, have not been investigated empirically under the conditions of war.

Methods: We use the robust methods of estimation and a modified Range-GARCH model which is based on opening, low, high and closing prices. We compare them with the standard maximum likelihood method of the classic GARCH model. Moreover, we employ the MCS (Model Confidence Set) procedure to create the set of superior models.

Findings & value added: Analyzing the market specificity, we identify both some common patterns and substantial differences among the markets, which is the first comparison of this type relating to the ongoing conflict. In particular, we discover the individual nature of the cryptocurrency markets, where the reaction to the outbreak of the war was very limited and the accuracy of forecasts remained at the similar level before and after the beginning of the war. Our long-term contribution are the findings about suitability of methods that have the potential to handle the extreme volatility but have not been examined empirically under the conditions of war. We reveal that the Range-GARCH model compares favorably with the standard volatility models, even when the latter are evaluated in a robust way. It gives valuable implication for the future research connected with military conflicts, showing that in such period gains from using more market information outweigh the benefits of using robust estimators.

Keywords

volatility models, high-low range, robust estimation, invasion of Ukraine, war

PDF

References

  1. Adekoya, O. B., Oliyide, J. A., Yaya, O. S., & Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2022). Does oil connect differently with prominent assets during war? Analysis of intra-day da-ta during the Russia-Ukraine saga. Resources Policy, 77, 102728. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102728.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102728
  2. Alam, M. K., Mosab, I. T., Mabruk, B., Sanjeev, K., & Suhaib, A. (2022). The im-pacts of the Russia?Ukraine invasion on global markets and commodities: a dynamic connectedness among G7 and BRIC markets. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(8), 352. doi: 10.3390/jrfm15080352.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15080352
  3. Alizadeh, S., Brandt, M., & Diebold, F. X. (2002). Range-based estimation of sto-chastic volatility models. Journal of Finance, 57, 1047?1091. doi: 10.1111 /1540-6261.00454.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00454
  4. Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., & Diebold, F. X. (2007). Roughing it up: including jump components in the measurement, modeling, and forecasting of return volatility. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(4), 701?720. doi: 10.1162/rest .89.4.701.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.4.701
  5. Antonakakis, N., Gupta, R., Kollias, C., & Papadamou, S. (2017). Geopolitical risks and the oil-stock nexus over 1899-2016. Finance Research Letters, 23, 165?173. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2017.07.017.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.07.017
  6. Bauwens, L., & Storti, G. (2009). A component GARCH model with time varying weights. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 13(2), 1. doi: 10.22 02/1558-3708.1512.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1558-3708.1512
  7. Bariviera, A. F., & Merediz-Sol?, I. (2021). Where do we stand in cryptocurrencies economic research? A survey based on hybrid analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35(2), 377?407. doi: 10.1111/joes.12412.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12412
  8. Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalised autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307?327. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
  9. Bollerslev, T. (1987). A conditionally heteroskedastic time series model for specu-lative prices and rates of return. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(3), 542?547. doi: 10.2307/1925546.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1925546
  10. Boubaker, S., Goodell, J. W., Pandey, D. K., & Kumari, V. (2022). Heterogeneous impacts of wars on global equity markets: evidence from the invasion of Ukraine. Finance Research Letters, 48, 102934. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.1029 34.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102934
  11. Boudt, K., Daníelsson, J., & Laurent, S. (2013). Robust forecasting of dynamic conditional correlation GARCH models. International Journal of Forecasting, 29(2), 244?57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2012.06.003.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2012.06.003
  12. Boungou, W., & Yatié, A. (2022). The impact of the Ukraine?Russia war on world stock market returns. Economics Letters, 215, 110516. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet. 2022.110516.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110516
  13. Brandt, M., & Jones, C. (2006). Volatility forecasting with range-based EGARCH models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 24, 470?486. doi: 10.119 8/073500106000000206.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/073500106000000206
  14. Brune, A., Hens, T., Rieger, M. O., & Wang, M. (2015). The war puzzle: contradic-tory effects of international conflicts on stock markets. International Review of Economics, 62(1), 1?21. doi: 10.1007/s12232-014-0215-7.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-014-0215-7
  15. Carnero, M. A., Pe?a, D., & Ruiz, E. (2007). Effects of outliers on the identification and estimation of GARCH models. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 28(4), 471?97. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9892.2006.00519.x.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.2006.00519.x
  16. Carnero, M. A., Pe?a, D., & Ruiz, E. (2012). Estimating GARCH volatility in the presence of outliers. Economics Letters, 114(1), 86?90. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet .2011.09.023.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.09.023
  17. Catalán, B., & Trívez, F. J. (2007). Forecasting volatility in GARCH models with additive outliers. Quantitative Finance, 7(6), 591?96. doi: 10.1080/146976806 01116872.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697680601116872
  18. Charles, A. (2008). Forecasting volatility with outliers in GARCH models. Journal of Forecasting, 27(7), 551?65. doi: 10.1002/for.1065.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/for.1065
  19. Charles, A., & Darné, O. (2005). Outliers and GARCH models in financial data. Economics Letters, 86(3), 347?352. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2004.07.019.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2004.07.019
  20. Charles, A., & Darne, O. (2014). Large shocks in the volatility of the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index: 1928?2013. Journal of Banking and Finance, 43, 188?199. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.03.022.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.03.022
  21. Chen, C. W. S., Gerlach, R., & Lin, E. M. H. (2008). Volatility forecasting using threshold heteroskedastic models of the intra-day range. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 52(6), 2990?3010. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2007.08. 002.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2007.08.002
  22. Chortane, S. G., & Pandey, D. K. (2022). Does the Russia-Ukraine war lead to currency asymmetries? A US dollar tale. Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 26, e00265. doi: 10.1016/j.jeca.2022.e00265.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2022.e00265
  23. Chou, R. Y. (2005). Forecasting financial volatilities with extreme values: the con-ditional autoregressive range (CARR) Model. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 37(3), 561?582. doi: 10.1353/mcb.2005.0027.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/mcb.2005.0027
  24. Chou, R. Y., Chou, H. C., & Liu, N. (2015). Range volatility: a review of models and empirical studies. In C. F. Lee & J. C. Lee (Eds.). Handbook of financial econometrics and statistics (pp. 2029?2050). New York: Springer.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7750-1_74
  25. Choudhry, T. (1997). Stock return volatility and World War II: evidence from GARCH and GARCH-X models. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 2(1), 17?28. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1158(199701)2:1<17::AID-IJFE36>3.0.CO;2-S.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1158(199701)2:1<17::AID-IJFE36>3.0.CO;2-S
  26. Choudhry, T. (2010). World War II events and the Dow Jones Industrial Index. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34(5), 1022?1031. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2 009.11.004.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.11.004
  27. Corbet, S., Lucey, B., Urquhart, A., & Yarovaya, L. (2019). Cryptocurrencies as a financial asset: a systematic analysis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 62, 182?99. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2018.09.003.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2018.09.003
  28. Degiannakis, S., & Livada, A. (2013). Realized volatility or price range: evidence from a discrete simulation of the continuous time diffusion process. Economic Modelling, 30, 212?216. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2012.09.027.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.09.027
  29. Fang, Y., & Shao, Z. (2022). The Russia-Ukraine conflict and volatility risk of commodity markets. Finance Research Letters, 50, 103264. doi: 10.1016/j.frl. 2022.103264.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103264
  30. Fiszeder, P., & Fałdziński, M. (2019). Improving forecasts with the co-range dy-namic conditional correlation model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 108, 103736. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2019.103736.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2019.103736
  31. Fiszeder, P., Fałdziński, M., & Molnár, P. (2019). Range-based DCC models for covariance and Value-at-Risk forecasting. Journal of Empirical Finance, 54, 58?76. doi: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2019.08.004.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2019.08.004
  32. Fiszeder, P., & Perczak, G. (2016). Low and high prices can improve volatility fore-casts during the turmoil period. International Journal of Forecasting, 32(2), 398?410. doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2015.07.003.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2015.07.003
  33. Floros, C., Gkillas, K., Konstantatos, C., & Tsagkanos, A. (2020). Realized measures to explain volatility changes over time. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(6), 125. doi: 10.3390/jrfm13060125.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13060125
  34. Franses, P. H., & Ghijsels, H. (1999). Additive outliers, GARCH and forecasting volatility. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(1), 1?9. doi: 10.1016/S016 9-2070(98)00053-3.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(98)00053-3
  35. Frey, B. S., & Kucher, M. (2000). World War II as reflected on capital markets. Economics Letters, 69, 187?191. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00269-X.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00269-X
  36. Frey, B. S., & Kucher, M. (2001). Wars and markets: how bond values reflect the Second World War. Economica, 68(271), 317?333. doi: 10.1111/1468-0335.0 0249.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0335.00249
  37. Garman, M. B., & Klass, M. J. (1980). On the estimation of security price volatili-ties from historical data. Journal of Business, 53(1), 67?78. doi: 10.1086/29 6072.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/296072
  38. Gkillas, K., Konstantatos, C., & Siriopoulos, C. (2021). Uncertainty due to infec-tious diseases and stock-bond correlation. Econometrics, 9(2), 17. doi: 10.3390/ econometrics9020017.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics9020017
  39. Grane, A., & Veiga, H. (2010). Wavelet-based detection of outliers in financial time series. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 54(11), 2580?2593. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2009.12.010.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2009.12.010
  40. Gregory, A. W., & Reeves, J. J. (2010). Estimation and inference in ARCH models in the presence of outliers. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 8(4), 547?549. doi: 10.1093/jjfinec/nbq028.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbq028
  41. Guidolin, M., & La Ferrara, E. (2010). The economic effects of violent conflict: evidence from asset market reactions. Journal of Peace Research, 47(6), 671?684. doi: 10.1177/0022343310381853.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343310381853
  42. Hanedar, A. Ö., Torun, E., & Hanedar, E. Y. (2015). War-related risks and the ?stanbul Bourse on the eve of the First World War. Borsa Istanbul Review, 15(3), 2015, 205?212. doi: 10.1016/j.bir.2015.05.001.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2015.05.001
  43. Hansen, P., & Lunde, A. (2006). Consistent ranking of volatility models. Journal of Econometrics, 131(1?2), 97?121. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.01.005.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.01.005
  44. Hansen, P., Lunde, A., & Nason, J. M. (2011). The model confidence set. Econometrica, 79, 453?497. doi: 10.3982/ECTA5771.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA5771
  45. Hotta, L. K., & Trucíos, C. (2018). Inference in (M)GARCH models in the presence of additive outliers: specification, estimation, and prediction. In C. Lavor & F. Gomes (Eds.). Advances in mathematics and applications (pp. 179?202). Springer, Cham.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94015-1_8
  46. Hudson, R., & Urquhart, A. (2015). War and stock markets: the effect of World War Two on the British stock market. International Review of Financial Analysis, 40, 166?177. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2015.05.015.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2015.05.015
  47. Kambouroudis, D. S., McMillan, D. G., & Tsakou, K. (2021). Forecasting realized volatility: the role of implied volatility, leverage effect, overnight returns, and volatility of realized volatility. Journal of Futures Markets, 41, 1618?1639. doi: 10.1002/fut.22241.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.22241
  48. Kayal, P., & Rohilla, P. (2021). Bitcoin in the economics and finance literature: a survey. SN Business & Economics, 1, 88. doi: 10.1007/s43546-021-00090-5.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-021-00090-5
  49. Kollias, C., Papadamou, S., & Stagiannis, A. (2010). Armed conflicts and capital markets: the case of the Israeli military offensive in the Gaza Strip. Defence and Peace Economics, 21, 357?365. doi: 10.1080/10242694.2010.491712.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2010.491712
  50. Li, H., & Hong, Y. (2011). Financial volatility forecasting with range-based auto-regressive volatility model. Finance Research Letters, 8(2), 69?76. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2010.12.002.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2010.12.002
  51. Lo, G. D., Marcelin, I., Bass?ne, T., & S?ne, B. (2022). The Russo-Ukrainian war and financial markets: the role of dependence on Russian commodities. Finance Research Letters, 50, 103194. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.103194.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103194
  52. Long, H., Demir, E., Będowska-Sójka, B., Zaremba, A., & Shahzad, S. J. H. (2022). Is geopolitical risk priced in the cross-section of cryptocurrency returns? Fi-nance Research Letters, 49, 103131. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.103131.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103131
  53. Lyócsa, S., & Plíhal, T. (2022). Russia?s ruble during the onset of the Russian inva-sion of Ukraine in early 2022: the role of implied volatility and attention. Fi-nance Research Letters, 48, 102995. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.102995.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102995
  54. Lyócsa, S., Plíhal, T., & Výrost, T. (2021a). FX market volatility modelling: can we use low-frequency data? Finance Research Letters, 40, 101776. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101776.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101776
  55. Lyócsa, S., Todorova, N., & Výrost, T. (2021b). Predicting risk in energy markets: low-frequency data still matter. Applied Energy, 282, 116146. doi: 10.1016/ j.apenergy.2020.116146.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116146
  56. Mancini, L., & Trojani, F. (2011). Robust value at risk prediction. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 9(2), 281?313. doi: 10.1093/jjfinec/nbq035.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbq035
  57. Meulemann, M., Uebele, M., & Wilfling, B. (2014). The restoration of the gold standard after the US Civil War: a volatility analysis. Journal of Financial Stability, 12, 37?46. doi: 10.1016/j.jfs.2013.05.001.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2013.05.001
  58. Mohamad, A. (2022). Safe flight to which haven when Russia invades Ukraine? A 48-hour story. Economics Letters, 216, 110558. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.20 22.110558.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110558
  59. Molnár, P. (2016). High-low range in GARCH models of stock return volatility. Applied Economics, 48(51), 4977?4991. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2016.1170929.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1170929
  60. Muler, N., & Yohai, V. J. (2008). Robust estimates for GARCH models. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 138(10), 2918?40. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2007. 11.003.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2007.11.003
  61. Naimy, V., Montero, J.-M., El Khoury, R., & Maalouf, N. (2020). Market volatility of the three most powerful military countries during their intervention in the Syrian War. Mathematics, 8(5), 834. doi: 10.3390/math8050834.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math8050834
  62. Nelson, D. B., & Cao, C. Q. (1992). Inequality constraints in the univariate GARCH model. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10, 229?235. doi: 10.2307/1391681.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1992.10509902
  63. Park, B. J. (2002). An outlier robust GARCH model and forecasting volatility of exchange rate returns. Journal of Forecasting, 21(5), 381?393. doi: 10.1002/ for.827.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/for.827
  64. Parkinson, M. (1980). The extreme value method for estimating the variance of the rate of return. Journal of Business, 53(1), 61?65. doi: 10.1086/296071.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/296071
  65. Patton, A. J. (2011). Volatility forecast comparison using imperfect volatility prox-ies. Journal of Econometrics, 160(1), 246?256. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.20 10.03.034.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.03.034
  66. Petropoulos, F., Apiletti, D., Assimakopoulos, V., Babai, M. Z., Barrow, D. K., Bergmeir, C., Bessa, R. J., Boylan, J. E., Browell, J., Carnevale, C., Castle, J. L., Cirillo, P., Clements, M. P., Cordeiro, C., Oliveira, F. L. C., de Baets, S, Dokumentov, A., Fiszeder, P., Franses, P. H., Gilliland, M., Gönül, M. S., Goodwin, P., Grossi, L., Grushka-Cockayne, Y., Guidolin, M., Guidolin, M., Gunter, U., Guo, X., Guseo, R., Harvey, N., Hendry, D. F., Hollyman, R., Januschowski, T., Jeon, J., Jose, V. R. R., Kang, Y., Koehler, A. B., Kolassa, S., Kourentzes, N., Leva, S., Li, F., Litsiou, K., Makridakis, S., Martinez, A. B., Meeran, S., Modis, T., Nikolopoulos, K., Önkal, D., Paccagnini, A., Panapakidis, I., Pavía, J. M., Pedio, M., Pedregal, D. J., Pinson, P., Ramos, P., Rapach, D. E., Reade, J. J., Rostami-Tabar, B., Rubaszek, M., Sermpinis, G., Shang, H. L., Spiliotis, E., Syntetos, A. A., Talagala, P. D., Talagala, T. S., Tashman, L., Thomakos, D., Thorarinsdottir, T., Todini, E., Arenas, J. R. T., Wang, X., Winkler, R. L., Yusupova, A., & Ziel, F. (2022). Forecasting: theory and practice. International Journal of Forecasting, 35(3), 836?47. doi: 10.1016 /j.ijforecast.2021.11.001.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.11.001
  67. Reschenhofer, E., Mangat, M. K., & Stark, T. (2020). Volatility forecasts, proxies and loss functions. Journal of Empirical Finance, 59, 133?153. doi: 10.1016/j. jempfin.2020.09.006.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2020.09.006
  68. Rigobon, R., & Sack, B. (2005). The effects of war risk on US financial markets. Journal of Banking and Finance, 29(7), 1769?1789. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2 004.06.040.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.06.040
  69. Sakata, S., & White, H. (1998). High breakdown point conditional dispersion estimation with application to S&P 500 daily returns volatility. Econometrica, 66(3), 529. doi: 10.2307/2998574.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2998574
  70. Schneider, G., & Troeger, V. E. (2006). War and the world economy stock market reactions to international conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(5), 623?645. doi: 10.1177/0022002706290430.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002706290430
  71. Schwert, G. W. (1989). Why does stock market volatility change over time? Journal of Finance, 44, 1115?1153. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1989.tb02647.x.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1989.tb02647.x
  72. Trucíos, C. (2019). Forecasting Bitcoin risk measures: a robust approach. International Journal of Forecasting, 35(3), 836?47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast. 2019.01.003.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.01.003
  73. Trucíos, C., & Hotta, L. K. (2015). Bootstrap prediction in univariate volatility models with leverage effect. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 120, 91?103. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2015.07.001.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2015.07.001
  74. Trucíos, C., Hotta, L. K., & Ruiz, E. (2017). Robust bootstrap forecast densities for GARCH returns and volatilities. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 87(16), 3152?3174. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2017.1359601.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2017.1359601
  75. Umar, Z., Polat, O., Choi, S. Y., & Teplova, T. (2022). The impact of the Russia-Ukraine conflict on the connectedness of financial markets. Finance Research Letters, 48, 102976. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.102976.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102976
  76. Wang, Y., Bouri, E., Fareed, Z., & Dai, Y. (2022). Geopolitical risk and the systemic risk in the commodity markets under the war in Ukraine. Finance Research Letters, 49, 103066. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.103066.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103066
  77. Yousaf, I., Patel, R., & Yarovaya, L. (2022). The reaction of G20+ stock markets to the Russia?Ukraine conflict ?black-swan? event: evidence from event study approach. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 35, 100723. doi: 10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100723.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100723
  78. Zhang, Y., Ma, F., & Liao, Y. (2020). Forecasting global equity market volatilities. International Journal of Forecasting, 36(4), 1454?1475. doi: 10.1016/j.ijforec ast.2020.02.007.
    View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.02.007

Similar Articles

1-10 of 274

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.