Effect of macroeconomic business environment on the development of corporate social responsibility in Baltic Countries and Slovakia

Authors

  • Emilia Krajnakova Alexander Dubcek University of Trencin
  • Valentinas Navickas Kaunas University of Technology
  • Rima Kontautiene Kaunas University of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2018.024

Keywords:

corporate social responsibility, macroeconomic business environment, economic recession, Baltic countries, Slovakia

Abstract

Research background: Fluctuations in economic activity forced companies to change the traditional methods of organization and management and to search for new tools, knowledge, resources and competences in order to strengthen their positions. This has particularly intensified debates on corporate social responsibility (CSR) not only between business people, but also between pieces of research,  industry leaders and government representatives. The ongoing global ecologic crisis quickened discussions about how the alternation of macroeconomic business environment influences the development of CSR.

Purpose of the article: The aim of this paper is to investigate how the changes in macroeconomic business environment influence the development of socially responsible activities in Baltic Countries and Slovakia.

Methods: A statistical analysis of secondary data was used in order to reanalyse the data for the purpose of gaining new insights. The objectives of statistical analysis in this paper were twofold: firstly, to identify the challenges in macroeconomic business environment; secondly, to explore the development of socially responsible activities in different countries. The research period covered the years 2006?2016. The choice of this period is determined by data availability.

Findings & Value added: The authors found that economic conditions may diversely affect the development of different dimensions of CSR. Even in unfavourable macroeconomic conditions companies continue to be involved in socially responsible actions because of long-run CSR benefits. The analysis is useful at an international level because it justified the development of socially responsible businesses in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Slovakia, and has provided an opportunity to assess the tendencies of CSR development during the different period of economic cycle.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alves, I. M. (2009). Green spin everywhere: how greenwashing reveals the limits of the CSR paradigm. Journal of Global Change and Governance, 2(1).
View in Google Scholar

Becherer, R. C., & Helms, M. M. (2014). Green goals in organizations: do small businesses engage in environmentally friendly strategies. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 24(1).
View in Google Scholar

Bernatonyte, D., Vilke, R., & Keizeriene, E. (2009). Economic crisis impact direc-tions concerning corporate social responsibility in Lithuanian SMEs. Economics and Management, 14.
View in Google Scholar

Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684
View in Google Scholar

Chih, H.-L., Chih, H.-H., & Chen, T.-Y. (2010). On the determinants of corporate social responsibility: international evidence on the financial industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1). doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0186-x.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0186-x
View in Google Scholar

Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & Velthoven, B. V. (2005). Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? European Accounting Review, 14(1). doi: 10.1080/0963818042000339617.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0963818042000339617
View in Google Scholar

Dagiliene, L., Leitoniene, S., & Grencikova, A. (2014). Increasing business trans-parency by corporate social reporting: development and problems in Lithuania. Engineering Economics, 25(1). doi: 10.5755/j01.ee.25.1.2356.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.25.1.2356
View in Google Scholar

Dedina, J., & Dedinova, K. (2013). The development of the corporate social re-sponsibility in companies in the Czech and Austria during last decade. Re-trieved from http://www.toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-02-4/papers/ ML13-229.pdf (11.08.2017).
View in Google Scholar

European Commission (2011). Communication from the commission to the Euro-pean Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions: A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for corporate social responsibility. COM (2011): 681 final Brussels, 25.10.2011. Retrieved from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/com/ com _ com (2011)0681_/com _ com (2011)0681_en.pdf, (11.08.2017).
View in Google Scholar

European Commission (2010). Communication from the Commission, Europe 2020: a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM (2010): 2020 final Brussels, 3.3.2010. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF, (11.08.2017).
View in Google Scholar

Eurostat (2017). Statistics database. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat /tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tec00115&plugin=1, (10.12.2017).
View in Google Scholar

Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. Retrieved from http://umich.edu/~thecore/doc/Friedman.pdf, (10.12.2017).
View in Google Scholar

Frolova, I., & Lapina, I. (2015). Integration of CSR principles in quality manage-ment. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 7(2/3). doi: 10.1108/IJQSS-03-2015-0033.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-03-2015-0033
View in Google Scholar

Garcia-Sanchez, I.-M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., & Frias-Aceituno, J. V. (2016). Impact of the institutional macro context on the voluntary disclosure of CSR information. Long Range Planning, 49(1). doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2015.02.004.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2015.02.004
View in Google Scholar

Ghassim, B. (2018). Sustainability-oriented innovation in the minerals industry: an empirical study on the effect of non-geographical proximity dimensions. Sus-tainability, 10(1). doi: 10.3390/su10010282.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010282
View in Google Scholar

Hopkins, M.; Roche, J., & Hopkins, I. (2008). Turbulent times: CRS now needed more than ever before. Retrieved from: http://mhcinternational.com/index.php? option=com_content&view=article&catid=77&id=95, (11.08.2017).
View in Google Scholar

Hys, K., & Hawrysz, L. (2013). CSR in Poland as an important foundation of modern society contemporary social contexts of corporate social responsibility in Poland. Management Study. 1(1).
View in Google Scholar

ISO Survey (2017). Retrieved from: http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink?func= ll&objId=18808772&objAction=browse&viewType=1 (10.12.2017).
View in Google Scholar

Janssen, C., Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2015). Corporate crises in the age of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 58. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor. 2014.11.002.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.11.002
View in Google Scholar

Jove-Llopis, E., & Segarra-Blasco, A. (2018). Eco-efficiency actions and firm growth in European SMEs. Sustainability, 10(1). doi: 10.3390/su10010281.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010281
View in Google Scholar

Kovaliov, R., Subonyte, J., & Simanaviciene, T. (2010). The influence of macroe-conomic environment of business to CSR in Lithuania. Economics and Man-agement, 15.
View in Google Scholar

Kowalska, K. (2016). Network organizations and corporate social responsibility. Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(4). doi: 10.12775/OeC.2016.036.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/OeC.2016.036
View in Google Scholar

Kozubikova, L., Vojtovic, S., Rahman, A., & Smrcka, L. (2016). The role of entre-preneur’s gender, age and firm’s age in autonomy. The case study from the Czech Republic. Economic & Sociology, 9(2).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-2/12
View in Google Scholar

Navickas, V., & Kontautiene, R. (2012). The influence of stakeholder-company relationship on competitiveness of company. Economics and Management, 17(3).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.em.17.3.2111
View in Google Scholar

Navickas, V., & Kontautiene, R. (2013). The initiatives of corporate social respon-sibility as sources of innovations. Business: Theory and Practice, 14(1). doi: 10.3846/btp.2013.03.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2013.03
View in Google Scholar

Navickas, V., & Kontautiene, R. (2013). The interaction between corporate social responsibility and competitiveness during the economic downturn. Economics and Management, 18(1).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.em.18.1.4005
View in Google Scholar

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://www.sharedvalue.org/sites/default/files/resou rce-files/Strategy_and_Society.pdf, (11.08.2018).
View in Google Scholar

Reinhardt, F. L., Stavins, R. N., & Vietor, R. H. K. (2008). Corporate social re-sponsibility through an economic lens. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2). doi: 10.1093/reep/ren008.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/ren008
View in Google Scholar

Smith, A. D. (2010). Growth of corporate social responsibility as a sustainable business strategy in difficult financial times. International Journal of Sustaina-ble Economy, 2(1). doi: 10.1504/IJSE.2010.029941.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSE.2010.029941
View in Google Scholar

Strugatch, W. (2011). Turning values into valuation: can corporate social responsi-bility survive hard times and emerge intact? Journal of Management Develop-ment, 30(1).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711111098352
View in Google Scholar

Szczuka, M. (2015). Social dimension of sustainability in CSR standards. Procedia Manufacturing, 3. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.587.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.587
View in Google Scholar

Vojtovic, S. (2016). Managerial decision making process in the times of economic volatility. In 1st international conference contemporary issues in theory and practice of management location. Czestochawa.
View in Google Scholar

Worthington, I., & Britton, C. (2006). The business environment. London: Prentice Hall.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2018-09-30

How to Cite

Krajnakova, E., Navickas, V., & Kontautiene, R. (2018). Effect of macroeconomic business environment on the development of corporate social responsibility in Baltic Countries and Slovakia. Oeconomia Copernicana, 9(3), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2018.024

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.