COVID-19 and digital deprivation in Poland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2020.017Keywords:
COVID-19, digital deprivation, e-exclusion, GIS methodsAbstract
Research background: The problem of digital deprivation is already known, but the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted its negative consequences. A global change in the way of life, work and socialisation resulting from the epidemic has indicated that a basic level of digital integration is becoming necessary. During the lockdown, people were forced to use ICTs to adapt to a rapidly changing reality. Current experience with coronavirus pandemic shows that the transition to these extraordinary circumstances is not smooth. The inability to rapid conversion to the online world (due to a lack of skills or technical capabilities) significantly reduces professional mobility, hinders access to public services, and in the case of children, exposes them to the risk of remaining outside the remote education system.
Purpose of the article: This research paper is addressing new issues of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on deepening and increasing the severity of e-exclusion. The goal of the paper is to indicate territorial areas in Poland which are particularly vulnerable to digital deprivation due to infrastructural deficiencies.
Methods: Raster data regarding landform, combined with vector data regarding population density and type of buildings as well as the location of BTS stations are used in so-called modelling overland paths (GIS method) to indicate areas vulnerable to the infrastructural digital divide.
Findings & Value added: The research showed that 4% of Poles remain out-side the Internet coverage, and additional ten percent of them are out of the reach of the Internet, allowing efficient remote work or learning. The research indicated that digital 'accessibility gap' is underestimated. E-exclusion has become a pressing issue and requires urgent system solutions, in case of future lockdowns.
Downloads
References
Alfano, V., & Ercolano, S. (2020). The efficacy of lockdown against COVID-19: a cross-country panel analysis. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00596-3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-020-00596-3
View in Google Scholar
Balcerzak, A. P. (2017). Digital economy in Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary. Measurement with TOPSIS based on entropy measure for objective weighting. In T. Loster & T. Pavelka (Eds.). The 11th international days of statistics and economics. Conference proceedings. September 8-10. Prague: Libuse Macakova, Melandrium.
View in Google Scholar
Balcerzak, A. P., & Pietrzak, M. B. (2017a). Digital economy in Visegrad coutnries. Multiple-criteria decision analysis at regional level in the years 2012 and 2015. Journal of Competitiveness, 9(2). doi: 10.7441/joc.2017.02.01.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2017.02.01
View in Google Scholar
Balcerzak, A. P., & Pietrzak, M. B. (2017b). Digital economy in Polish regions. Proposal of measurement via TOPSIS with generalized distance measure GDM. In M. Papież & S. Śmiech (Eds.). The 11th professor Aleksander Zelias international conference on modelling and forecasting of socio-economic phenomena. Conference proceedings. Cracow: Foundation of the Cracow University of Economics.
View in Google Scholar
Bilan, Y., Rubanov, P., Vasylieva, T., & Lyeonov, S. (2019). The influence of industry 4.0 on financial services: determinants of alternative finance development. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(1). doi: 10.17512/pjms.2019 .19.1.06.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.19.1.06
View in Google Scholar
Bruno, G., Esposito, E., Genovese, A., & Gwebu, L.K. (2010). A critical analysis of current indexes for digital divide measurement. Information Society: An Internationa Journal, 27(1). doi: 10.1080/01972243.2010.534364.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2010.534364
View in Google Scholar
Budziewicz-Guźlecka, A., & Drab-Kurowska, A. (2020). Problems of infrastructure markets with particular emphasis on the postal market in the context of digital exclusion. Sustainaibility, 12(11). doi: 10.3390/su12114719.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114719
View in Google Scholar
Cai, G. (2002). A GIS approach to the spatial assessment of telecommunications infrastructure. Networks and Spatial Economics, 2. doi: 10.1023/A:1014515329 951.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014515329951
View in Google Scholar
Chief Inspectorate of Environmental Protection, CORINE Land Cover (CLC 2018).
View in Google Scholar
Copernicus Land Monitoring Service, EU-DEM v1.0. Retrieved formhttps://land.copernicus.eu/imagery-in-situ/eu-dem/eu-dem-v1-0-and-derived-pr oducts/eu-dem-v1.0 (12.06.2020).
View in Google Scholar
de Haas, M., Faber, R., & Hamersma, M. (2020). How COVID-19 and the Dutch' intelligent lockdown' change activities, work and travel behaviour: evidence from longitudinal data in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 6. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100150.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100150
View in Google Scholar
Dingel, J. I., & Neiman, B. (2020). How many jobs can be done at home? Becker Friedman institute. White Paper, 16. Retrieved form https://bfi.uchicago.edu/ working-paper/how-many-jobs-can-bedone-at-home/ (25.06.2020).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w26948
View in Google Scholar
Dubey, S., Biswas, P., Ghosh, R., Chatterjee, S., Dubey, M. J., Chatterjee, S., Lahiri, D., & Lavie, C. J. (2020). Psychosocial impact of COVID-19. Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx. 2020.05.035.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.05.035
View in Google Scholar
Elhai, J. D., Yang, H., McKay, D., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2020). COVID-19 anxiety symptoms associated with problematic smartphone use severity in Chinese adults. Journal of Affective Disorders, 274. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020 .05.08.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.080
View in Google Scholar
Fry, C. (2010). GIS in telecommunications. In P. A. Longley, M. Goodchild, D. J. Maguire & D. W. Rhind. Geographic information systems & science. Wiley.
View in Google Scholar
Gladkova, A., & Ragnedda, M. (2020). Exploring digital inequalities in Russia: an interregional comparative analysis. Online Information Review, 44(4). doi: 10.1108/OIR-04-2019-012.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2019-0121
View in Google Scholar
Goedhart, N. S., Broerse, J. E. W., Kattouw, R., & Dedding, C. (2019). Just having a computer doesn't make sense: the digital divide from the perspective of mothers with a low socio-economic position. New Media and Society, 21(11–12), doi: 10.1177/1461444819846059.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819846059
View in Google Scholar
Gonçalves, A. B. (2010). An extension of GIS-based least-cost path modelling to the location of wide paths. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(7). doi: 10.1080/13658810903401016.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810903401016
View in Google Scholar
GUS (2019). Information society in Poland. Results of statistical surveys in the years 2015–2019. Szczecin. Statistical Office in Szczecin. Centre for Science, Technology, Innovation and Information Society Statistics.
View in Google Scholar
Helsper, E. J. (2017). The social relativity of digital exclusion: applying relative deprivation theory to digital inequalities. Communication Theory, 27(3). doi: 10.1111/comt.12110.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12110
View in Google Scholar
Hidalgo, A., Gabaly, S., Morales-Alonso, G., & Urueña, A. (2020). The digital divide in light of sustainable development: an approach through advanced machine learning techniques. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119754.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119754
View in Google Scholar
Huxhold, O., Hees, E., & Webster, N. J. (2020). Towards bridging the grey digital divide: changes in internet access and its predictors from 2002 to 2014 in Germany. European Journal of Ageing. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/ s10433-020-00552-z.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-020-00552-z
View in Google Scholar
Johansson, S., Gulliksen, J., & Gustavsson, C. (2020). Disability digital divide: the use of the Internet, smartphones, computers and tablets among people with disabilities in Sweden. Universal Access in the Information Society. doi: 10.1007/ s10209-020-00714-x.
View in Google Scholar
Kennedy, M. (2009). Introducing geographic information systems with ArcGIS. New Jersey: Wiley.
View in Google Scholar
Korzeb, Z., & Niedziółka, P. (2020). Resistance of commercial banks to the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic: the case of Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 15(2). doi: 10.24136/eq.2020.010.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2020.010
View in Google Scholar
Kufel, T. (2020). ARIMA-based forecasting of the dynamics of confirmed Covid-19 cases for selected European countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 15(2). doi: 10.24136/eq.2020.009.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2020.009
View in Google Scholar
Liu, C. (2017). International competitiveness and the fourth industrial revolution. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(4). doi: 10.15678/EBER. 2017.050405.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050405
View in Google Scholar
Loktieva, I. (2016). Approaches to empirical analysis of social exclusion: international comparison. Economics and Sociology, 9(2). doi: 10.14254/2071-789X. 2016/9-2/10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-2/10
View in Google Scholar
Moroz, M. (2017). The level of development of the digital economy in Poland and selected European countries: a comparative analysis. Foundations of Management, 9. doi: 10.1515/fman-2017-0014.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fman-2017-0014
View in Google Scholar
Nizamuddin, R., Afidh, P. F., Ardiansyah, Sofyan, H., & Anisah, N. (2020). Spatial analysis for calculating closest distance of operators' location to Base Transceiver Station (BTS) in Banda Aceh city. In IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, 796. The 9th AIC 2019 on Sciences & Engineering (9thAIC-SE) 18-20 September 2019, Banda Aceh.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/796/1/012031
View in Google Scholar
OECD (2001). Information and communication technologies and rural development. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264193079-en.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264193079-en
View in Google Scholar
Office of Electronic Communications. Retrieved from https://bip.uke.gov.pl/ pozwolenia-radiowe/wykaz-pozwolen-radiowych-tresci/stacje-gsm-umts-lte-oraz-cdma,12.html#! (12.06.2020).
View in Google Scholar
Olshansky, S. J., Carnes, B. A., Rogers, R. G., & Smith L. (1998). Emerging infectious diseases: the fifth stage of the epidemiologic transition? World Health Statistics Quarterly, 51(2-3-4).
View in Google Scholar
Ozcan, B. (2018). Information and communications technology (ICT) and international trade: evidence from Turkey. Eurasian Economic Review, 8. doi: 10.100 7/s40822-017-0077-x.
View in Google Scholar
Polat, R. K. (2012). Digital exclusion in Turkey: a policy perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4). doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.002.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.002
View in Google Scholar
Rehman, U., Shahnawaz, M. G., Khan, N. H., Kharshiing, K. D., Khursheed, M., Gupta, K., Kashyap, D., & Uniyal, R. (2020). Depression, anxiety and stress among Indians in times of Covid-19 lockdown. Community Mental Health Journal. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00664-x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-020-00664-x
View in Google Scholar
Reuschke, D., & Felstead, A. (2020). Changing workplace geographies in the COVID-19 crisis. Dialogues in Human Geography, 10(2), doi: 10.1177/20438 20620934249.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820620934249
View in Google Scholar
Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., Schulz, J., Hale, T. M., & Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information Communication and Society, 18(5). doi: 10.1080/1369118 X.2015.1012532.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532
View in Google Scholar
Rokicki, T. (2016). E-commerce market in Poland. Information Systems in Management, 5(4).
View in Google Scholar
Rymarczyk, J. (2020). Technologies, opportunities and challenges of the industrial revolution 4.0: theoretical considerations. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(1). doi: 10.15678/EBER.2020.080110.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080110
View in Google Scholar
Pietrzak, M. B., & Ziemkiewicz, B. (2018). Cluster analysis of digital economy in the old European Union countries. In 36th international conference mathematicalm methods in economics MME 2018 conference proceedings. Prague: MatfyzPress, Publishing House of the Faculty of Mathematics and Physics Charles University.
View in Google Scholar
Pietrzak, M. B., & Ziemkiewicz, B. (2018). Digital economy in the old European Union member states. In T. Loster & T. Pavelka (Eds.). The 11th international days of statistics and economics. Conference proceedings. September 6-8, 2018. Prague: Libuse Macakova, Melandrium.
View in Google Scholar
Pietrzak, M. B., & Ziemkiewicz, B. (2018). Multiple criteria analysis of digital economy in the European Union countries. In M. Reiff & P. Gezik (Eds.). Proceedings of the international scientific conference quantitative methods in economics multiple criteria decision making XIX. Trenčianske Teplice: Letra Edu.
View in Google Scholar
Scheerder, A., van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of internet skills, uses and outcomes: a systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8). doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.07 .007.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007
View in Google Scholar
Seda, F. S., Setyawati, L., Pera, Y. H. T., Febriani, R., & Pebriansyah (2018). Social policies, social exclusion & social well-being in Southeast Asia: a case study of Papua, Indonesia. Economics and Sociology, 11(3). doi: 10.14254/ 2071-789X.2018/11-3/9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-3/9
View in Google Scholar
Song, Z., Song, T., Yang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2019). Spatial-temporal characteristics and determinants of digital divide in China: a multivariate spatial analysis. Sustainability, 11(17). doi: 10.3390/su11174529.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174529
View in Google Scholar
Szarek-Iwaniuk, P., & Senetra, A. (2020). Access to ICT in Poland and the co-creation of urban space in the process of modern social participation in a smart city—a case study. Sustainability, 12(5). doi: 10.3390/su12052136.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052136
View in Google Scholar
Śledziewska, K., & Włoch, R. (2018). (Un)digital Poland: the gap in the digital skills of human capital. In ENTRENOVA conference proceedings. SSRN. Retrieved form https://ssrn.com/abstract=3281924.
View in Google Scholar
Tomczyk, Ł., Wnek-Gozdek, J., Mroz, A., & Wojewodzic, K. (2019). ICT, digital literacy, digital inclusion and media education in Poland. In Ł. Tomczyk & S. S. Oyelere (Eds.). ICT for learning and inclusion in Latin America and Europe. Cracow: Pedagogical University of Cracow. doi: 10.24917/9788395373732.7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24917/9788395373732.7
View in Google Scholar
Tranos, E., Kourtit, K., & Nijkamp, P. (2014). Digital urban network connectivity: global and Chinese internet patterns. Papers in Regional Science, 93(2). doi: 10.1111/pirs.12097.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12097
View in Google Scholar
van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2011). Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media and Society, 13(6). doi: 10.1177/1461444810386774.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810386774
View in Google Scholar
Vasilescu, M. D., Serban, A. C., Dimian, G. C., Aceleanu, M. I., & Picatoste, X. (2020). Digital divide, skills and perceptions on digitalisation in the European Union - towards a smart labour market. PLoS ONE, 15(4). doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0232032.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232032
View in Google Scholar
Venkatesh, V., & Sykes, T. A. (2013). Digital divide initiative success in developing countries: a longitudinal field study in a village in India. Information Systems Research, 24(2), doi: 10.1287/isre.1110.0409.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0409
View in Google Scholar
Walker, D. M., Hefner, J. L., Fareed, N., Huerta, T. R., & McAlearney, A. S. (2020). Exploring the digital divide: age and race disparities in use of an inpatient portal. Telemedicine and E-Health, 26(5). doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0065.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0065
View in Google Scholar
Wamuyu, P. K. (2017). Bridging the digital divide among low income urban communities. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8). doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.08.004.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.08.004
View in Google Scholar
Werenowska, A., & Rzepka, M. (2020). The role of social media in generation Y travel decision-making process (case study in Poland). Information, 11(396), doi: 10.3390/info11080396.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info11080396
View in Google Scholar
Wilson, R., & Hopkins, J. (2019). The changing shape of Scotland's digital divide. European Countryside, 11(4). doi: 10.2478/euco-2019-0031.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2019-0031
View in Google Scholar
Witte, J., & Mannon, S. (2010). The Internet and social inequalities. New York, Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861639
View in Google Scholar
Ye, L., & Yang, H. (2020). From digital divide to social inclusion: a tale of mobile platform empowerment in rural areas. Sustainability, 12(6). doi: 10.3390/su 12062424.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062424
View in Google Scholar
