Annual report inquiry letters, disclosure of key audit matters and audit fees: Evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.038Keywords:
annual report inquiry letter, key audit matters, audit fees, audit qualityAbstract
Research background: Issuing an annual report inquiry letter is a powerful means by which securities exchanges regulate the information of listed companies, which can convey information, reveal risks, and sustain the orderly development of capital markets. However, research on the economic consequences is limited.
Purpose of the article: This study analyses the relationships and mechanisms between annual report inquiry letters, key audit matters (KAMs), and audit fees.
Methods: We collected data from Chinese A-share companies listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges between 2017 and 2022, totalling 9,903 observations. We used Stata to conduct mediation effects and heterogeneity tests on the data. We also conducted further research on the relationship between audit fees and the purchase of audit opinions.
Findings & value added: The results indicate that (1) companies that receive annual report inquiry letters have higher audit fees. Furthermore, (2) companies that receive annual report inquiry letters are more likely to increase the number of disclosed KAMs, leading to higher audit fees. Finally, (3) the above relationship is more significant amongst companies audited by non-Big-Four accounting firms than amongst those audited by Big-Four accounting firms. Further, the increase in audit fees for the sample companies is not due to the purchase of audit opinions and is combined with robustness tests, further validating the conclusions of this study. These findings contribute to research on the economic impact of implementing the annual report inquiry system and new auditing standards, providing empirical evidence for the effectiveness of government oversight of capital markets.
Downloads
References
Alberti, C. T., Bedard, J. C., Bik, O., & Vanstraelen, A. (2022). Audit firm culture: Recent developments and trends in the literature. European Accounting Review, 31(1), 59–109.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2020.1846574
View in Google Scholar
Anton, S. G. (2021). The impact of temperature increase on firm profitability. Empirical evidence from the European energy and gas sectors. Applied Energy, 295, 117051.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117051
View in Google Scholar
Bader, A., Nawaiseh, M. E., & Nawaiseh, H. N. (2019). Does audit quality mediate the relationship between audit firm size and audit fees. African Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 6(4), 279–294.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/AJAAF.2019.105133
View in Google Scholar
Bozanic, Z., Dietrich, J. R., & Johnson, B. A. (2017). SEC comment letters and firm disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 36(5), 337–357.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2017.07.004
View in Google Scholar
Cai, Y., & Li, M. (2022). CEO-CFO tenure consistency and audit fees. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 73, 101779.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101779
View in Google Scholar
Cai, Y., Li, M., Guo, S., & Nan, X. (2023). Former CEO director and audit fees. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 59(4), 1074–1088.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2022.2129965
View in Google Scholar
Calderon, T. G., & Gao, L. (2022). Changes in corporate cybersecurity risk disclosures after SEC comment letters. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 41, 106993.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2022.106993
View in Google Scholar
Camacho-Miñano, M., Muñoz-Izquierdo, N., Pincus, M., & Wellmeyer, P. (2023). Are key audit matter disclosures useful in assessing the financial distress level of a client firm? British Accounting Review. Advance online publication. .
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2023.101200
View in Google Scholar
Cao, F., Zhang, X., & Liu, J. (2023). Comment letter regulation and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 30(3), 569–593.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2021.1993073
View in Google Scholar
Cao, Q., Yang, F., & Liu, M. (2022). Impact of managerial power on regulatory inquiries from stock exchanges: Evidence from the text tone of Chinese listed companies’ annual reports. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 71, 101646.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101646
View in Google Scholar
Cassell, C. A., Dreher, L. M., & Myers, L. A. (2013). Reviewing the SEC’s review process: 10-K comment letters and the cost of remediation. Accounting Review, 88(6), 1875–1908.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50538
View in Google Scholar
Chang, H., Ho, L.C., Liu, Z., & Ouyang, B. (2021). Income smoothing and audit fees. Advances in Accounting, 54, 100547.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2021.100547
View in Google Scholar
Chen, J. Z., Elemes, A., Hope, O.-K., & Yoon, A. S. (2023). Audit-firm profitability: Determinants and implications for audit outcomes. European Accounting Review. Advance online publication.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2023.2169735
View in Google Scholar
Costa, M. D., & Habib, A. (2023). Local creative culture and audit fees. British Accounting Review, 55(2), 101151.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2022.101151
View in Google Scholar
Dao, M., Pham, T., & Xu, H. (2022). Government contracts and audit fees. International Journal of Auditing, 27(1), 1–23.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12298
View in Google Scholar
Duboisée de Ricquebourg, A., & Maroun, W. (2023). How do auditor rotations affect key audit matters? Archival evidence from South African audits. British Accounting Review, 55, 101099.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2022.101099
View in Google Scholar
Duong, H. K., Gotti, G., Stein, M. T., & Chen, A. (2022). Code of ethics quality and audit fees. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 41, 107001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2022.107001
View in Google Scholar
Dusadeedumkoeng, O., Gandía, J. L., & Huguet, D. (2023). Determinants of key audit matters in Thailand. Journal Of Competitiveness, 15(3), 184–206.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2023.03.10
View in Google Scholar
Ebaid, I. E. (2023). Board characteristics and the likelihood of financial statements fraud: Empirical evidence from an emerging market. Future Business Journal, 9, 47.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00218-z
View in Google Scholar
Elmarzouky, M., Hussainey, K., & Abdelfattah, T. (2022). The key audit matters and the audit cost: Does governance matter? International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 31(1), 195–217.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-08-2022-0178
View in Google Scholar
Espahbodi, R., Lin, J., Liu, N., Mock, T. J., & Song, M. (2023). The effect of reporting key audit matters on audit fees and financial reporting quality: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of International Accounting Research, 22(2), 83–102.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/JIAR-2021-045
View in Google Scholar
Ettredge, M., Johnstone, K., Stone, M., & Wang, Q. (2011). The effects of firm size, corporate governance quality, and bad news on disclosure compliance. Review of Accounting Studies, 16(4), 866–889.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-011-9153-8
View in Google Scholar
Firoozi, M., & Magnan, M. (2022). Audit committee members’ proximity to corporate headquarters and audit fees. Managerial Auditing Journal, 37(8), 1062–1090.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-05-2020-2684
View in Google Scholar
Gandía, J. L., & Huguet, D. (2018). Differences in audit pricing between voluntary and mandatory audits. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 31(2), 336–359.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-01-2016-0007
View in Google Scholar
Geiger, M. A., Johnson, B. A., Jones, K. L., & Kumas, A. (2022). Information leakage around SEC comment letters. Management Science, 68(11), 8449–8463.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4259
View in Google Scholar
Gietzmann, M. B., & Pettinicchio, A. K. (2014). External auditor reassessment of client business risk following the issuance of a comment letter by the SEC. European Accounting Review, 23(1), 57–85.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2013.774703
View in Google Scholar
Gietzmann, M., Marra, A., & Pettinicchio, A. (2016). Comment letter frequency and CFO turnover: A dynamic survival analysis. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 31(1), 79–99.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X15579493
View in Google Scholar
Haapamäki, E. E., & Mäki, J. (2023). An analysis of comment letters on a new, stand-alone standard for audits of less complex entities’ financial statements. Journal of Accounting Literature. Advance online publication.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-12-2022-0131
View in Google Scholar
Heese, J., Khan, M., & Ramanna, K. (2017). Is the SEC captured? Evidence from comment-letter reviews. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 64(1), 98–122.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.06.002
View in Google Scholar
Hu, J., Li, X., & Wan, Z. (2023). Corporate corruption and future audit fees: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 19, 100367.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2023.100367
View in Google Scholar
Hu, N., Xu, J., & Xue, S. (2022). Regulatory risk and auditors’ reporting conservatism: Evidence from Chinese comment letters. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 41, 106997.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2022.106997
View in Google Scholar
Hudaib, M., & Haniffa, R. (2009). Exploring auditor independence: An interpretive approach. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(2), 221–246.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570910933951
View in Google Scholar
Hutton, A., Shu, S., & Zheng, X. (2022). Regulatory transparency and the alignment of private and public enforcement: Evidence from the public disclosure of SEC comment letters. Journal of Financial Economics, 145(1), 297–321.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.07.011
View in Google Scholar
Ji, X., Lu, W., & Qu, W. (2018). Internal control risk and audit fees: Evidence from China. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 14(3), 266–287.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2018.07.002
View in Google Scholar
Kong, D., Ji, M., & Liu, S. (2022). Does the mandatory disclosure of audit information affect analysts’ information acquisition? International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102281.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102281
View in Google Scholar
Lennox, C. S., Schmidt, J. J., & Thompson, A. M. (2023). Why are expanded audit reports not informative to investors? Evidence from the United Kingdom. Review of Accounting Studies, 28(2), 497–532.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09650-4
View in Google Scholar
Lento, C., & Yeung, W. H. (2023). Exploring the audit quality and audit fee impacts of joining different types of non-big four accounting networks and associations: Evidence from China. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. Advance online publication.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-10-2022-0359
View in Google Scholar
Li, H. (2017). The benefit of adding key audit matters to the auditing report. In T. Hee & J. Liu (Eds.). Proceedings of the 2017 2nd international conference on education, management science and economics (ICEMSE 2017) (pp. 21–24). Amsterdam: Atlantis Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/icemse-17.2017.6
View in Google Scholar
Li, V., & Luo, Y. (2023). Costs and benefits of auditors' disclosure of critical audit matters: Initial evidence from the Unit ed States. Advances in Accounting, 60, 100641.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2022.100641
View in Google Scholar
Liao, L., Sharma, D., Yang, Y., & Zhao, R. (2023). Adoption and content of key audit matters and stock price crash risk. International Review of Financial Analysis, 88, 102706.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102706
View in Google Scholar
Liu, J. J., & Liu, Y. (2023). Multiple directorships and firm performance: Evidence from independent director effort allocation in Hong Kong. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 79, 102051.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102051
View in Google Scholar
Liu, Z., Liang, H., & Liu, C. (2023). The effects of debt liquidity risk on firms' growth rate. International Journal of Managerial Finance. Advance online publication.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-02-2022-0073
View in Google Scholar
Lu, J., & Qiu, Y. (2023). Does non-punitive regulation diminish stock price crash risk? Journal of Banking & Finance, 148, 106731.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106731
View in Google Scholar
Lu, P., Wang, Y., & Li, B. (2023). Short selling and corporate financial fraud: Empirical evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 89, 1569–1582.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.09.011
View in Google Scholar
Lv, J., Zhang, S., & Zhang, S. (2022). Hometown sentiment: CEO hometown identity and company audit fees. Managerial Auditing Journal, 37(8), 993–1016.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-01-2022-3431
View in Google Scholar
Maçãs Nunes, P., Neves Sequeira, T., & Serrasqueiro, Z. (2007). Firms’ leverage and labour productivity: A quantile approach in Portuguese firms. Applied Economics, 39(14), 1783–1788.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840600707076
View in Google Scholar
Mohammad Rezaei, F., Mohd-Saleh, N., & Ahmed, K. (2018). Audit firm ranking, audit quality and audit fees: Examining conflicting price discrimination views. International Journal of Accounting, 53(4), 295–313.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2018.11.003
View in Google Scholar
Nurjanah, E., & Diyanty, V. (2019). Analysis of the effect of public accounting firm size on audit fee in Indonesia. In I. Trinugroho & E. Lau (Eds.). Business innovation and development in emerging economies (pp. 15–24). Florida: CRC Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429433382-2
View in Google Scholar
Pinto, I., & Morais, A. I. (2019). What matters in disclosures of key audit matters: Evidence from Europe. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 30(2), 145–162.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12095
View in Google Scholar
Santos‐Jaén, J. M., Martín de Almagro-Vázquez, G., & Valls Martínez, M. D. (2023). Is earnings management impacted by audit fees and auditor tenure? An analysis of the big four audit firms in the US market. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(3), 899–934.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.027
View in Google Scholar
Schantl, S. F., & Wagenhofer, A. (2021). Optimal internal control regulation: Standards, penalties, and leniency in enforcement. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 40(3), 106803.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2020.106803
View in Google Scholar
Seebeck, A., & Kaya, D. (2022). The power of words: An empirical analysis of the communicative value of extended auditor reports. European Accounting Review. Advance online publication.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2021.2021097
View in Google Scholar
Sellami, Y. M., & Chérif, I. (2020). Female audit committee directorship and audit fees. Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(3), 398–428.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-12-2018-2121
View in Google Scholar
Sierra-García, L., Gambetta, N., García-Benau, M. A., & Orta-Pérez, M. (2019). Understanding the determinants of the magnitude of entity-level risk and account-level risk key audit matters: The case of the United Kingdom. British Accounting Review, 51(3), 227–240.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.02.004
View in Google Scholar
Simunic, D. A., (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161–190.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2490397
View in Google Scholar
Skomra, J., Alam, P., & Skomra, P. A. (2022). Audit demand and monitoring mechanisms: Evidence from SEC comment letters and short sellers. Managerial Auditing Journal, 37(6), 700–720.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-09-2020-2836
View in Google Scholar
Sun, G., Li, T., Ai, Y., & Li, Q. (2023). Digital finance and corporate financial fraud. International Review of Financial Analysis, 87, 102566.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102566
View in Google Scholar
Suttipun, M. (2021). Impact of key audit matters (KAMs) reporting on audit quality: Evidence from Thailand. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 22(5), 869–882.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-10-2020-0210
View in Google Scholar
Tang, J., & Liu, C. (2022). Financial comment letters, geographic proximity and audit quality. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics. Advance online publication.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2022.2147969
View in Google Scholar
Tian, J., & Sun, H. (2023). Corporate financialization, internal control and financial fraud. Finance Research Letters, 56, 104046.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104046
View in Google Scholar
Wang, J., & Wang, D. (2022). Corporate fraud and accounting firm involvement: Evidence from China. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15, 180.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15040180
View in Google Scholar
Wang, L., & Zhou, Y. (2018). The effect of accounting firms size on audit fees. In E. McAnally, I. Solovjeva, Y. Zhang, R. Green & R. Hou (Eds.). Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on culture, education and economic development of modern society (ICCESE 2018) (pp. 1061–1065). Amsterdam: Atlantis Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/iccese-18.2018.236
View in Google Scholar
Wang, M., Zhang, Y., Dong, Y., Zou, G., & Zhao, W. (2022). Interactive information disclosure and non-penalty regulatory review risk. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 8(1), 149–166.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2022.10.003
View in Google Scholar
Wang, Q., & Zhou, K. (2022). Common ownership and the spillover effect of market reaction: Evidence from stock exchange comment letters. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 73, 101729.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101729
View in Google Scholar
Xie, Y., Ma, W., Ma, Y., Ren, Z., Tong, Z., & Wang, Y. (2023). A counterfactual thinking perspective of moral licensing effect in machine-driven communication: An example of natural language processing chatbot developed based on WeChat API. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 197, 122926.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122926
View in Google Scholar
Xu, L., Huang, Z. J., & Wen, F. (2022). Comment letters and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 59(4), 1387–1421.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-022-01078-4
View in Google Scholar
Xue, B., & O’Sullivan, N. (2023). The determinants of audit fees in the alternative investment market (Aim) in the UK: Evidence on the impact of risk, corporate governance and auditor size. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 50, 100523.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2023.100523
View in Google Scholar
Zhao, Q., Luo, Q., & Tao, Y. (2023). From chaos to compliance: Standards-setting and financial fraud. Finance Research Letters, 55, 103902.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103902
View in Google Scholar
Zhou, H. (2023). Inquiry letter supervision and stock price informativeness-research based on the stock price non-synchronicity. Applied Economics Letters, 30(5), 683–688.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2021.2011097
View in Google Scholar
Zhu, X., Li, X., Zhou, K., & Yu, Y. (2023). The impact of annual reports transparency and comment letters on the cost of debt: Evidence for China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 77, 101942.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.101942
View in Google Scholar
