Determinants of board diversity policy implementation by companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.022Keywords:
corporate governance, board diversity policy, institutional theoryAbstract
Research background: Diversity management is one of the hot topic issues present in current public discussions. Board diversity requirements are quite new for Polish public companies. The companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange have to publish a statement on the company's compliance with the corporate governance recommendations and principles included in ?Best Practice for GPW Listed Companies 2016?. This regulation is based on the 'comply or explain? principle, thus the company may decide whether to comply with every rule included in the code, but decision on not implementing one or more rules should be explained by the company. Some of the recommended rules regard the board (supervisory and management) diversity policy implementation, where diversity refers to such dimensions as gender, education, age and professional experience.
Purpose of the article: This study aims to investigate determinants of board diversity policy implementation by domestic companies listed on the WSE. It also documents explanations provided by companies that do not apply board diversity policy.
Methods: The research sample covers 268 non-financial domestic companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange between 2016 and 30 November 2018. The companies? current reports on company compliance with the corporate governance codes and information issued on companies? websites were analyzed in order to identify those that announced implementation of board diversity policy. This study uses logistic regression analysis to identify the firm-level characteristics that may influence the implementation of board diversity policy.
Findings & value added: This is the first study analyzing the drivers of board diversity policy implementation by Polish companies listed on the WSE. It shows that large companies, companies with larger management boards and companies with women acting as presidents of the supervisory boards are more likely to take actions seeking to achieve management and supervisory board diversity.
Downloads
References
Accounting Act of 29 September 1994 (Journal of Laws, no. 121, item 591 as amended).
View in Google Scholar
Adams, M. (2015). Board diversity: more than a gender issue? Deakin Law Review, 20(1), 123?152. doi: 10.21153/dlr2015vol20no1art497.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2015vol20no1art497
View in Google Scholar
Aguilera, R. V., & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2004). Codes of good governance worldwide: what is the trigger? Organization Studies, 25(3), 415?443. doi: 10.1177/0 17084 0604040669.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604040669
View in Google Scholar
Ahmed, A., Higgs, H., Ng, C., & Delaney, D. A. (2018). Determinants of women representation on corporate boards: evidence from Australia. Accounting Research Journal, 31(3), 26?342. doi: 10.1108/ARJ-11-2015-0133.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-11-2015-0133
View in Google Scholar
Allemand, I., Barbe, O., & Brullebaut, B. (2014). Institutional theory and gender diversity on European boards. Vie & Sciences de l?entreprise, 198(2), 73?92. doi: 10.3917/vse.198.0073.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/vse.198.0073
View in Google Scholar
Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207?221. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2
View in Google Scholar
Best Practice of GPW Listed Companies 2016. Warsaw Stock Exchange. Retrieved from https://www.gpw.pl/pub/GPW/o-nas/DPSN2016_EN.pdf (12.09.2018).
View in Google Scholar
Bohdanowicz, L. (2015). The impact of ownership structure on supervisory board size and diversity: evidence from the Polish two-tier board model. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 1420?1425. doi: 10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00429-3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00429-3
View in Google Scholar
Brazzel, M. (2003). Historical and theoretical roots of diversity management. In D. L. Plummer (Ed.). Handbook of diversity management: beyond awareness to competency based learning. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, Inc.
View in Google Scholar
Cabeza-García, L., Del Brio, E. B., & Rueda, C. (2019). Legal and cultural factors as catalysts for promoting women in the boardroom. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 22(1), 56?67. doi: 10.1016/j.brq.2018.06.004.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2018.06.004
View in Google Scholar
Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33?53. doi: 10.1111/1 540-6288.00034.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6288.00034
View in Google Scholar
Charles A., Redor E., & Zopounidis, E. (2015). The determinants of the existence of a critical mass of women on boards: a discriminant analysis. Economics Bulletin, 35(3), 1809?1819.
View in Google Scholar
Code of Best Practice of WSE Listed Companies (2013). Warsaw Stock Exchange. Retrieved from https://www.gpw.pl/pub/files/PDF/foldery/dobre_praktyki_GP W.pdf (15.03.2018).
View in Google Scholar
De Cleyn, S. H. (2008). Compliance of companies with corporate governance codes: case study on listed Belgian. Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics, 3(1), 1?16. doi: 10.15209/jbsge.v3i1.127.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15209/jbsge.v3i1.127
View in Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited?: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147?160
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
View in Google Scholar
Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups. Text with EEA relevance. (Official Journal of the European Union L330/1).
View in Google Scholar
EC (2012). Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving the gender balance among non-executive directors of companies listed on stock exchanges and related measures. COM(2012) 0614 final. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52012 PC0614 (20.09.2018).
View in Google Scholar
Geiger, S., & Marlin, D. (2012). The relationship between organizational/board characteristics and the extent of female representation on corporate boards. Journal of Managerial Issues, 24(2), 157?172
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v10i3.6854
View in Google Scholar
Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella, A. A. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 941? 952. doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.26279222.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279222
View in Google Scholar
Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: a review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404?1427. doi: 10.1177/014920 6309343469.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309343469
View in Google Scholar
Isidro, H., & Sobral, M. (2015). The effects of women on corporate boards on firm value, financial performance, and ethical and social compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(1), 1?19. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2302-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2302-9
View in Google Scholar
Kang, H. , Cheng, M., & Gray, S. J. (2007). Corporate governance and board composition: diversity and independence of Australian boards. Corporate Governance: an International Review, 15(2), 194?207. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-868 3.2007.005 54.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00554.x
View in Google Scholar
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965?990. doi: 10.1086/226425.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/226425
View in Google Scholar
Klettner, A. (2016). Corporate governance codes and gender diversity: management-based regulation in action. UNSW Law Journal, 39(2), 715?739.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315693644
View in Google Scholar
Koładkiewicz, I. (2017). The quality of explanations for deviation from principles of corporate governance: an introduction. Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 25(3), 34?54. doi: 10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814 .202.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.202
View in Google Scholar
Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V. W., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: the impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145?164. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.02.005.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.02.005
View in Google Scholar
Liu, C. (2018). Are women greener? Corporate gender diversity and environmental violations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 52(C), 118?142. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorp fin.2018.08 .004.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.08.004
View in Google Scholar
Martín-Ugedo, J. F., & Minguez-Vera, A. (2014). Firm performance and women on the board: evidence from the Spanish small and medium size companies. Feminist Economics, 20(3), 136?162. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2014.895404.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2014.895404
View in Google Scholar
Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340?363. doi: 10.1 086/2265 50.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
View in Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
View in Google Scholar
Rao, K. & Tilt, C. (2016) Board composition and corporate social responsibility: the role of diversity, gender, strategy and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), 327?347. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2613-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2613-5
View in Google Scholar
Regulation of the Minister of Finance of 25 May 2016 amending the Regulation on current and periodic information provided by issuers of securities and conditions for recognizing as equivalent information required by the laws of a non-member state (Journal of Laws of 15.06.2016, item 860).
View in Google Scholar
Robinson, G. & Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. Academy of Management Executive, 11(3), 21?31. doi: 10.5465/ame.1997.97 092316 61.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1997.9709231661
View in Google Scholar
Saeed, A., Belghitar, Y., & Yousaf, A. (2016). Firm-level determinants of gender diversity in the boardrooms: evidence from some emerging markets. International Business Review, 25(5), 1076?1088. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016. 01.002.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.01.002
View in Google Scholar
Tagesson, T., & Collin, S. O. Y. (2015). Corporate governance influencing compliance with the Swedish Code of Corporate Governance. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 13(3), 262?277. doi: 10.1057/jdg.2015.15.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2015.15
View in Google Scholar
Ujunwa, A., Nwakoby, I., & Ugbam, C. O. (2012). Corporate board diversity and firm performance: evidence from Nigeria. Corporate Ownership and Control, 9(2 Continued 1), 216?226. doi: 10.22495/cocv9i2c1art6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv9i2c1art6
View in Google Scholar
Yasser, Q. R., Al Mamun, A., & Ahmed, I. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and gender diversity: insights from Asia Pacific. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(3), 210?221. doi: 10.1002/ csr.1400.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1400
View in Google Scholar
Zattoni, A., & Cuomo, F. (2008). Why adopt codes of good governance? A comparison of institutional and efficiency perspectives. Corporate Governance: an International Review, 16(1), 1?15. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00661.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00661.x
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
