Determinants of corruption: a panel data analysis of Visegrad countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.003Keywords:
corruption, control of corruption, determinants, panel data analysis, Visegrad countiresAbstract
Research background: Corruption is a phenomenon that has no borders, thus hindering the proper functioning of the social, economic, and legal systems of a given state. As the rankings assessing the level of corruption in various countries show, transition economies are more vulnerable to corruption than countries that have not undergone changes in the political and economic order. The Visegrad group is an example of such countries. Despite their efforts, these countries? governments have yet to match the evaluation of corruption indices for developed European countries.
Purpose of the article: This study analyses the determinants of corruption in Visegrad countries to identify which determinants are the most impactful and thus should be the focus of Visegrad countries?governments when creating anti-corruption policies.
Methods: Data for the period 1996?2019 from the databases of the World Bank, Transparency International, and the European Central Bank were used for panel data analysis. The study uses a comprehensive set of economic, socio-cultural, and political determinants that can influence corruption. The purpose of this large set of variables is to prevent possible distortion owing to omitted variables.
Findings & value added: The results of the analysis of panel data show the main determinants of corruption in Visegrad countries are economic, political, and socio-cultural (phase of economic development, openness of the economy, size of the public sector, degree of urbanization, and women's share in the labour force). A significant effect was also demonstrated in the case of regulatory quality and public sector wages. The findings can serve as a valuable resource for policymakers to develop government policies in individual countries and to implement effective anti-corruption tools.
Downloads
References
Aidt, T. S. (2009). Corruption, institutions, and economic development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(2), 271?291. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grp012.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grp012
View in Google Scholar
Awan, R. U., Akhtar, T., Rahim, S., Sher, F., & Cheema, A. R. (2018). Governance, corruption and economic growth. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 56(1), 1?20. doi: 10.1006/jcec.2000.1703.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.2000.1703
View in Google Scholar
Baltagi, B.H. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data. Chichester, West Sussex: JW & Sons, England.
View in Google Scholar
Bentzen, J. S. (2012). How bad is corruption? Cross?country evidence of the impact of corruption on economic prosperity. Review of Development Economics, 16(1), 167?184. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9361.2011.00653.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2011.00653.x
View in Google Scholar
Billger, S., & Goel, R. (2009). Do existing corruption levels matter in controlling corruption?: Cross-country quantile regression estimates. Journal of Development Economics, 90(2), 299?305. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.07.006.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.07.006
View in Google Scholar
Bitterhout, S., & Simo-Kengne, B. D. (2020). The effect of corruption on economic growth in the BRICS countries. A panel data analysis. University of Johannesburg, EDWRG Working Paper, 03-2020.
View in Google Scholar
Blagojevič, S., & Damijan, J. P. (2013). The impact of corruption and ownership on the performance of firms in Central and Eastern Europe. Post-Communist Economies, 25(2), 133?158. doi: 10.1080/14631377.2013.787734.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2013.787734
View in Google Scholar
Corrado, G., & Rossetti, F. (2018). Public corruption: a study across regions in Italy. Journal of Policy Modeling, 40(6), 1126?1139. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmo d.2018.01.001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2018.01.001
View in Google Scholar
Davies, A., & Lahiri, K. (1995). A new framework for testing rationality and measuring aggregate shocks using panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 205?227. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01649-K.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01649-K
View in Google Scholar
Deyshappriya, N. P. (2015). Do corruption and peace affect economic growth? Evidences from the cross-country analysis. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 17(2), 135?147. doi: 10.1007/s40847-015-0016-1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-015-0016-1
View in Google Scholar
Elbahnasawy, N., & Revier, Ch.F. (2012). The determinants of corruption: cross-country-panel-data analysis. Developing Economies, 50(4), 311?33. doi: 10.111 1/j.1746-1049.2012.00177.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.2012.00177.x
View in Google Scholar
European Central Bank (2022). Public sector wage. Retrieved from https://sdw.e cb.europa.eu/ (02.03.2022).
View in Google Scholar
Feruni, N., Hysa, E., Panait, M., Radulescu, I. G., & Brezoi, A. (2020). The impact of corruption, economic freedom and urbanization on economic development: Western Balkans versus EU-27. Sustainability, 12(22), 9743. doi: 10.3390/su 12229743.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229743
View in Google Scholar
Fisman, R., & Gatti, R. (2002). Decentralization and corruption: evidence across countries. Journal of Public Economics, 83, 325?345. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727 (00)00158-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00158-4
View in Google Scholar
Ghaniy, N., & Hastiadi, F.F. (2016). Political, social and economics determinants of corruption. University of Indonesia, Working Paper in Economics and Business, V(4/2016).
View in Google Scholar
Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
View in Google Scholar
Holmes, L. (1999). Corruption, weak states and economic rationalism in Central and Eastern Europe. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
View in Google Scholar
Hsiao, C. (2007). Panel data analysis?advantages and challenges. Test, 16(1), 1?22. doi: 10.1007/s11749-007-0046-x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-007-0046-x
View in Google Scholar
Hsiao, C. (2014). Analysis of panel data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139839327
View in Google Scholar
Jaba, E., Robu, I. B., & Balan, C. B. (2017). Panel data analysis applied in financial performance assessment. Romanian Statistical Review, 65(2), 3?20.
View in Google Scholar
Kasik, J. (2013). Corruption as an actual problem of economic environment in the Czech Republic. Actual Problems of Economics, 143(5), 287?291.
View in Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. World Bank Working Paper 5430.
View in Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2006). Governance matters V: aggregate and individual governance indicators for 1996-2005. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4012
View in Google Scholar
Knack, S., & Azfar, O. (2003). Trade intensity, country size and corruption. Economics of Governance, 4(1), 1?18. doi: 10.1007/S101010200051.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s101010200051
View in Google Scholar
Knack, S., & Omar A. (2000). Are larger countries really more corrupt? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2470.
View in Google Scholar
Kotlánová, E., & Kotlán I. (2013). Determinants of corruption: a dynamic panel analysis. In Proceeding of 21st international business information management association confrence on visin 2020. Innovation, development sustainability, and economic growth. Vienna: University of Technology, 660?667.
View in Google Scholar
Krajewska, A., & Makowski, G. (2017). Corruption, anti-corruption and human rights: the case of Poland's integrity systém. Crime Law and Social Change, 68(3), 325?339. doi: 10.1007/s10611-017-9710-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9710-6
View in Google Scholar
Kwong, J. (2015). The political economy of corruption in China. London: Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315699301
View in Google Scholar
Laurent, H. (2021). Corruption and politicians' horizon. Economics of Governance, 22(1), 65?91. doi: 10.1007/s10101-021-00250-1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-021-00250-1
View in Google Scholar
Lederman, D., Loayza, N. V., & Soares, R. R. (2005). Accountability and corruption: political institutions matter. Economics & Politics, 17(1), 1?35. doi: 10.11 11/j.1468-0343.2005.00145.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.2005.00145.x
View in Google Scholar
Lendvorský, M., Mališová, D., Pekár, B., Mikušová Meričková, B., & Štrangfeldová, J. (2021). Legal responsibility for corrupt practices with an impact on the enforcement of political accountability: case study of Slovakia. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration, 29(3), 1395. doi: 0.46585/sp29031395.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46585/sp29031395
View in Google Scholar
Linhartová, V., & Volejníková, J. (2015). Quantifying corruption at a subnational level. Economics and Management, 18(2), 25?39. doi: 10.15240/tul/001/2015-2-003.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2015-2-003
View in Google Scholar
Liptakova, K. (2020). Options for quantitation public sector corruption in Slovakia and in the Czech Republic. Politicke Vedy, 23(1), 81?102. doi: 10.24040/politic kevedy.2020.23.1.81-102.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24040/politickevedy.2020.23.1.81-102
View in Google Scholar
Matei, L., & Matei, A. (2009). Corruption in the public organizations. Towards a model of cost-benefit analysis for the anticorruption strategies. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 27E, 145?171.
View in Google Scholar
Meyer-Sahling, J. H., & Mikkelsen, K. S. (2020). Codes of ethics, disciplinary codes, and the effectiveness of anti-corruption frameworks: evidence from a survey of civil servants in Poland. Review of Public Personnel Administration. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0734371X20949420.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20949420
View in Google Scholar
Meyer, D. F. (2019). A quantitative assessment of the impact of government activities on the economy of Poland. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 6(2), 220?233. doi: 10.15549/jeecar.v6i2.338.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v6i2.338
View in Google Scholar
Merickova, B. M., Bastekova, A., Stejskal, J., & Pekar, B. (2017). Economic, political, social factor of corruption in the Slovak Republic. Nispacee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 10(1), 99?120. doi: 10.1515/nispa-2017-0005.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2017-0005
View in Google Scholar
Moene, K., & S?reide, T. (2016). Corruption control. Crime, Law and Social Change, 66(2), 147?163. doi: 10.1007/s10611-016-9618-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-016-9618-6
View in Google Scholar
Moldogaziev, T. T., & Liu, Ch. (2020). Public sector corruption and perceived government performance in transition. Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions, 34(2), 475?504. doi: 10.1111/gove.12 519.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12519
View in Google Scholar
Montes, G. C., & Paschoal, P. C. (2016). Corruption: what are the effects on government effectiveness? Empirical evidence considering developed and developing countries. Applied Economics Letters, 23(2), 146?150. doi: 10.1080/135048 51.2015.1058900.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2015.1058900
View in Google Scholar
Mustapha, N. (2014). The impact of corruption on GDP per capita. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 1(2), 1?5. doi: 10.15549/jeeca r.v1i2.76.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v1i2.76
View in Google Scholar
Naxera, V. (2020). About the space of corruption opportunities: when, where and how it is created in the Czech Republic. Sociologicky Casopis-Czech Sociological Review, 56(5), 671?673.
View in Google Scholar
Němec, D., Kotlánová, E., Kotlán, I., & Machová, Z. (2021). Corruption, taxation and the impact on the shadow economy. Economies, 9(1), 18. doi: 10.3390/ec onomies9010018.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9010018
View in Google Scholar
Nowak, R. (2001). Corruption and transition economies. Economic analysis division. Bucharest: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
View in Google Scholar
Nye, J. S. (1967). Corruption and political development: a cost-benefit analysis. American Political Science Review, 61(2), 417?427.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1953254
View in Google Scholar
Ochulor, C. L. (2011). Ethical and moral implications of corruption. Canadian Social Science, 7(5), 223?228.
View in Google Scholar
Olken, B.A. (2009). Corruption perceptions vs. corruption reality. Journal of Public Economics, 93(7/8), 950?964. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.03.001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.03.001
View in Google Scholar
Park, H. (2003). Determinants of corruption: a cross-national analysis. Multinational Business Review, 11(2), 29?48. doi: 10.1108/1525383X2003000 10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/1525383X200300010
View in Google Scholar
Picón, C., & Boehm, F. (2019). Do the determinants of corruption differ between countries with different levels of corruption? A cross-country quantile regression analysis. Revista de Economía del Caribe, 23, 88?100. doi: 10.14482/eco ca.23.3604.
View in Google Scholar
Pirvu, D. (2015). Corruption: profile of political companies in Romania. Acta Oeconomica, 65(1), 65?82. doi: 10.1556/032.65.2015.S1.5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/032.65.2015.s1.5
View in Google Scholar
Pirro, A. L. P., & Della Porta, D. (2021). On corruption and state capture: the struggle of anti-corruption activism in Hungary. Europe-Asia Studies, 73(3), 433?450. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2020.1798684.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2020.1798684
View in Google Scholar
Popova, M., & Post, V. (2018). Prosecuting high-level corruption in Eastern Europe. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 51(3), 231?244. doi: 10.1016/j. postcomstud.2018.06.004.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2018.06.004
View in Google Scholar
Senaviratna, N. A. M. R., & Cooray, T. M. J. A. (2019). Diagnosing multicollinearity of logistic regression model. Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 5(2),1?9. doi: 10.9734/ajpas/2019/v5i230132.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ajpas/2019/v5i230132
View in Google Scholar
Serra, D. (2006). Empirical determinants of corruption: a sensitivity analysis. Public Choice, 126(1-2), 225?256. doi: 10.1007/s11127-006-0286-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-0286-4
View in Google Scholar
Sicakova-Beblava, E., & Beblavy, M. (2016). Using government manifestos to analyse the political salience and shape of anti-corruption policies in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Policy Studies, 37(4), 295?313. doi: 10.1080/01442872. 2016.1146247.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2016.1146247
View in Google Scholar
Snegovaya, M. (2020). Voice or exit? Political corruption and voting intentions in Hungary. Democratization, 27(7), 1162?1182. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2020.17 66447.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1766447
View in Google Scholar
Svensson, J. (2005). Eight questions about corruption. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), 19?42. doi: 10.1257/089533005774357860.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005774357860
View in Google Scholar
Sviderskyi, O., & Lubentsov, A. (2020). The impact of corruption on the development of legal and economic systems of state. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 6(1), 125?129. doi: 10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-1-125-129.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-1-125-129
View in Google Scholar
Swamy, A., Knack, S., Lee, Y., & Azfar, O. (2001). Gender and corruption. Journal of Development Economics, 64(1), 25?55. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3878(0 0)00123-1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00123-1
View in Google Scholar
Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption around the world: causes, consequences, scope, and cures. Staff Papers, 45(4), 559?594.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3867585
View in Google Scholar
Transparency International (2022a). Corruption Perceptions Index. Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2021 (8.3.2022).
View in Google Scholar
Transparency International (2022b). Corruption Perceptions Index Report 2021. Retrieved form CPI2021_Report_EN-web.pdf (transparencycdn.org) (28.2. 2022).
View in Google Scholar
Transparency International (2019). What is corruption? Retrieved form https://www.transparency.org/what-is-corruption/#define (20.02. 2022).
View in Google Scholar
Transparency International (2020). The high costs journalists pay when reporting corruption. Retrieved form https://www.transparency.org/en/news/the-high-costs-journalists-pay-when-reporting-on-corruption (15.06. 2021).
View in Google Scholar
Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 399?457. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00092-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00092-4
View in Google Scholar
Williams, A., & Le Billon, P. (Eds.). (2017). Corruption, natural resources and development: from resource curse to political ecology. Edward Elgar Publishing.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785361203
View in Google Scholar
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press.
View in Google Scholar
World Bank (2021). Worldwide Governance Indicators. Retrieved form https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/ (15.06 2021).
View in Google Scholar
World Bank (2022). World Development Indicators. Retrieved form https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indica tors (02.02.2022).
View in Google Scholar
Zhan, J. V. (2017). Do natural resources breed corruption? Evidence from China. Environmental and Resource Economics, 66(2), 237?259. doi: 10.1007/s10 640-015-9947-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9947-4
View in Google Scholar
Zafarullah, H., & Siddiquee, N. A. (2001). Dissecting public sector corruption in Bangladesh: issues and problems of control. Public Organization Review, 1(4), 465?486. Doi: 10.1023/A:1013740000213.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013740000213
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
