Catering to investor sentiment for dividends: contestability or collusion of the largest shareholders?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.015Keywords:
dividend payout, the catering effect of dividends, contestability & collusion of the largest shareholders, investor sentiment for dividendsAbstract
Research background: Dividend payouts have been the subject of scientific research for many years. Although many studies focus on the impact of ownership on dividend payouts, there is still a lack of research on the influence of the contestability and collusion of the largest shareholders on the catering effect of dividends. This research gap motivated us to investigate this issue and determine whether the interactions between large shareholders have an impact on aligning dividends with investor sentiment.
Purpose of the article: The article assesses the impact of the relationship between the largest shareholders (i.e., contestability or collusion) on the adjustment of dividend payouts to investor sentiment. The following research hypothesis has been formulated: If there is contestability between the first and second-largest shareholders, the strength of the catering effect of the dividend is greater than in the case of collusion, both in the years of positive and negative dividend premiums.
Methods: The main research method is a panel regression model (pooled OLS and fixed effects). We use the F test, the Breusch-Pagan test, and the Hausman test. Our research is supplemented with descriptive statistics and the Pearson correlation coefficient. The research sample consists of Polish companies from the electromechanical industry sector listed on the main market of the Warsaw Stock Exchange (WSE) in the years 2009?2020.
Findings & value added: The main findings are as follows: a) if a dividend premium is positive and the second-largest shareholder holds many shares, the strong catering effect of dividends is observed; b) there are only two years of negative premium, which does not allow to conclude that both the catering effect and the impact of interactions between the largest shareholders on dividend payouts do not exist when dividend premium is negative. We propose pioneering research concerning the catering effect in the context of interactions between the largest shareholders. Its long-term theoretical value added is the original and interdisciplinary research combining financial, behavioral and governance aspects. Our research results may be of particular interest to foreign investors looking for new opportunities to invest their capital abroad, also in Poland.
Downloads
References
Agrawal, A. (2021). Impact of elimination of dividend distribution tax on Indian corporate firms amid Covid disruptions. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(9), 1?38. doi: 10.3390/jrfm14090413.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14090413
View in Google Scholar
Aluchna, M., Berent, T., & Kamiński, B. (2019). Dividend payouts and sharehold-er structure: evidence from the Warsaw Stock Exchange. Eastern European Economics, 57(3), 227?250. doi: 10.1080/00128775.2019.1568196.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2019.1568196
View in Google Scholar
Anidjar, L. H. (2019). Toward relative corporate governance regimes: rethinking concentrated ownership structure around the world. Stanford Law & Policy Review, 30(1), 197?261. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3153995.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3153995
View in Google Scholar
Armour, J., Cheffins, B. R., & Skeel, D. A. (2003). Corporate ownership structure and the evolution of bankruptcy law: lessons from the United Kingdom. Vanderbilt Law Review, 55(6), 1699?1785.
View in Google Scholar
Baker, H. K., Dewasiri, N. J., Koralalage, W., & Azeez, A. A. (2019). Dividend policy determinants of Sri Lankan firms: a triangulation approach. Manageri-al Finance, 45(1), 2?20. doi: 10.1108/MF-03-2018-0096.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-03-2018-0096
View in Google Scholar
Baker, H. K., & Jabbouri, I. (2017). How Moroccan institutional investors view dividend policy. Managerial Finance, 43(12), 1332?1347. doi: 10.1108/MF-06-2017-0215.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-06-2017-0215
View in Google Scholar
Baker, H. K., Kapoor, S., & Jabbouri, I. (2018). Institutional perspectives of divi-dend policy in India. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 10(3), 324?342. doi: 10.1108/QRFM-07-2017-0067.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-07-2017-0067
View in Google Scholar
Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2004). A catering theory of dividends. Journal of Finance, 59, 1125?1165. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00658.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00658.x
View in Google Scholar
Becht, M., & Delong, J. B. (2005). Why has there been so little block holding in America? In R. Morck (Eds.). A history of corporate governance around the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 613?666.
View in Google Scholar
Ben-Nasr, H., Boubaker, S., & Rouatbi, W. (2015). Ownership structure, control contestability, and corporate debt maturity. Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, 265?285. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.001.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.001
View in Google Scholar
Bilel, H. (2020). Does entrenchment of managers affect entrepreneurial dividend decision and investor sentiment? Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 40(3), 275?288. doi: 10.1108/APJIE-10-2019-0072.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-10-2019-0072
View in Google Scholar
Bloch, F., & Hege, U. (2003). Multiple shareholders and control contests. SSRN Electronic Journal, 29, 1?34. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2273211.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2273211
View in Google Scholar
Boubaker, S., Manita, R., & Rouatbi, W. (2021). Large shareholders, control con-testability and firm productive efficiency. Annals of Operations Research, 296, 591?614. doi: 10.1007/s10479-019-03402-z.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03402-z
View in Google Scholar
Bradford, W., Chen, C., & Zhu, S. (2013). Cash dividend policy, corporate pyra-mids, and ownership structure: evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 27, 445?464. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2013.01.003.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2013.01.003
View in Google Scholar
Byun, J., Kim, K., Liao, R. C., & Pan, C. (2021). The impact of investor sentiment on catering incentives around the world. Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions & Money, 71, 1?15. doi: 10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101285.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101285
View in Google Scholar
Cao, F, Pengb, S., & Ye, K. (2019). Multiple large shareholders and corporate social responsibility reporting. Emerging Markets Review, 38, 287?309. doi: 10.1016/j.ememar.2019.02.004.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2019.02.004
View in Google Scholar
Cheng, M., Lin, B., Lu, R., & We, M. (2020). Non-controlling large shareholders in emerging markets: evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 63(C), 1?22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.09.010.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.09.010
View in Google Scholar
Eije, H., & Megginson, W. E. (2008). Dividends and share repurchases in the European Union. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(2), 347?374. doi: 10.1016/j. jfineco.2007.11.002.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.11.002
View in Google Scholar
ElBannan, M. A. (2020). Does catering behavior persist? Evidence on dividend sentiment in emerging financial markets. International Review of Economics and Finance, 69, 350?373. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2020.06.016.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.06.016
View in Google Scholar
Ferris, S. P., Sen, N., & Unlu E. (2009). An international analysis of dividend payment behavior. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 36(3), 496?522. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02126.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02126.x
View in Google Scholar
Florackis, C., Kanas, A., & Kostakis, A. (2015). Dividend policy, managerial ownership and debt financing: a non-parametric perspective. European Jour-nal of Operational Research, 241(3), 783?795. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.08.031.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.08.031
View in Google Scholar
Fooladi, M. (2012). Board characteristics and firm performance. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 8(5), 688?694.
View in Google Scholar
Gugler, K., & Yurtoglu, B. B. (2003). Corporate governance and dividend pay-out policy in Germany. European Economic Review, 47(4), 731?758. doi: 10.1016/ S0014-2921(02)00291-X.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00291-X
View in Google Scholar
Gyimah, D., & Gyapong, E. (2021). Managerial entrenchment and payout policy: a catering effect. International Review of Financial Analysis, 73, 1?18. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101600.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101600
View in Google Scholar
Harada, K., & Nguyen, P. (2011). Ownership concentration and dividend policy in Japan. Managerial Finance, 37(4), 362?379. doi:10.1108/03074351111115313.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03074351111115313
View in Google Scholar
Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of panel data. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge Uni-versity Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754203
View in Google Scholar
Jara, M., López-Iturriaga, F., San-Martín, P., & Saona, P. (2019). Corporate gov-ernance in Latin American firms: contestability of control and firm value. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 22(4), 257?274. doi: 10.1016/j.brq.2018.10.005.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2018.10.005
View in Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305?360.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
View in Google Scholar
Jensen, G. R., Solberg, D. P., & Zorn, T. S. (1992). Simultaneous determination of insider ownership, debt and dividend policies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27(2), 247?263. doi: 10.2307/2331370.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2331370
View in Google Scholar
Jentsch, V. (2019). Board composition, ownership structure and firm value: em-pirical evidence from Switzerland. European Business Organization Law Re-view, 20(2), 203?254. doi: 10.1007/s40804-018-00128-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-018-00128-6
View in Google Scholar
Jiang, F, Cai, X., Jiang, Z., & Nofsinger, J. R. (2019). Multiple large shareholders and dividends: evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 57, 1?19. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.101201.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.101201
View in Google Scholar
Jiang, Z., Kim, K. A., Lie, E., & Yang, S. (2013). Share repurchases, catering, and dividend substitution. Journal of Corporate Finance, 21, 36?50. doi: 10.1016/ j.jcorpfin.2013.01.004.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.01.004
View in Google Scholar
Khalfan, T. M., & Wendt, S. (2020). The impact of ownership concentration on payout across Nordic firms. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 56, 1?18. doi: 10.1016/j.mulfin.2020.100640.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2020.100640
View in Google Scholar
Kim, W. S., Kiymaz, H., & Oh, S. (2020). Do country-level legal, corporate gov-ernance, and cultural characteristics influence the relationship between insider ownership and dividend policy? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 64, 1?16. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101457.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101457
View in Google Scholar
Kowerski, M. (2010). The impact of economic sentiment of entrepreneurs and consumers on dividend decisions of capital companies. Regional Barometer, 2(20), 19?34.
View in Google Scholar
Kraiger, N., & Anderson, W. (2019). Characteristics of New Zealand dividend omissions and resumptions. Managerial Finance, 46(1), 40?55. doi: 10.1108/ MF-01-2019-0039.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-01-2019-0039
View in Google Scholar
Leary, M. T., & Michaely, R. (2011). Determinants of dividend smoothing: em-pirical evidence. Review of Financial Studies, 24(10), 3197?3249. doi: 10.1093/ rfs/hhr072.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhr072
View in Google Scholar
Li, W., & Lie, E. (2006). Dividend changes and catering incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 293?308. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.03.005.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.03.005
View in Google Scholar
Lin, S. H., Lai, H. H., & Hsu, A .C. (2018). How does asymmetric information affect catering behavior? Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(11), 2433?2454. doi: 10.1080/1540496X.2018.1458611.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1458611
View in Google Scholar
Lintner, J. (1956). Distribution of income of corporation among dividends, re-tained earnings, and taxes. American Economic Review, 46, 97?113.
View in Google Scholar
López-Iturriaga, F. J., & Santana-Martín, D. J. (2015). Do shareholder coalitions modify the dominant owner?s control? The impact on dividend policy. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(6), 519?533. doi: 10.1111 /corg.12126.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12126
View in Google Scholar
Maury, B., & Pajuste, A. (2004). Multiple controlling shareholders and firm val-ue. Journal of Banking and Finance, 29, 1813?1834. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004 .07.002.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.07.002
View in Google Scholar
Michaely, R., Thaler, R. H., & Womack, K. L. (1995). Price reactions to dividend initiations and omissions: overreaction or drift? Journal of Finance, 50(2), 573?608. doi: 10.2307/2329420.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb04796.x
View in Google Scholar
Moscu, R., Grigorescu, C., &. Prodan, L. (2015). Does ownership structure affect firm performance? Knowledge Horizons ? Economics, 7(3), 194?197.
View in Google Scholar
Neves, E. (2014). Ownership structure and investor?s sentiments for dividends. International Journal of Financial Research, 5(2), 35?58. doi: 10.5430/ijfr.v 5n2p35.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v5n2p35
View in Google Scholar
Pieloch-Babiarz, A. (2020). Managerial ownership and catering to investor senti-ment for dividends: evidence from the electromechanical industry sector on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. Oeconomia Copernicana, 11(3), 467?483. doi: 10.24 136/oc.2020.019.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2020.019
View in Google Scholar
Ramli, N. M. (2009). Large shareholders, payout policy and agency problems in Malaysian companies. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 11(3), 97?112.
View in Google Scholar
Renneboog, L., & Szilagyi, P. G. (2020). How relevant is dividend policy under low shareholder protection? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 64, 1?18. doi: 10.1016/j.intfin.2015.01.006.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2015.01.006
View in Google Scholar
Rossi, F., Boylan, R., & Cebula, J. R. (2018). Financial decisions and ownership structure as control mechanisms of agency problems: evidence from Italy. Corporate Governance, 18(3), 531?563. doi: 10.1108/CG-01-2017-0014.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2017-0014
View in Google Scholar
Safii, A. A., & Asyik, N. F. (2019). The role of blockholders on dividends policy of Indonesian public listed companies. In Proceeding book 7th Asian Academ-ic Society international conference. Indonesian Student Association in Thai-land (PERMITHA), 454-458.
View in Google Scholar
Takmaz, S., Mandaci, P., E., & Durukan, M. B. (2021). The impact of catering incentives on the dividend policy: evidence from Turkish firms. Managerial Finance, 47(7), 897?914. doi: 10.1108/MF-04-2020-0215.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-04-2020-0215
View in Google Scholar
Trabelsi, D., Aziz, S., & Lilti, J. J. (2019). A behavioral perspective on corporate dividend policy: evidence from France. Corporate Governance-The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(1), 102?119. doi: 10.1108/CG-02-2018-0077.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2018-0077
View in Google Scholar
Truong, T., & Heaney, R. (2007). Largest shareholder and dividend policy around the world. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 47(5), 667?687. doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2007.09.002.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2007.09.002
View in Google Scholar
Tsuji, C. (2010). A test of the catering theory of dividends: the case of the Japa-nese electric appliances industry. Journal of Management Research, 2(2), 1?16. doi: 10.5296/jmr.v2i2.371.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v2i2.371
View in Google Scholar
Wrońska-Bukalska, E., & Kaźmierska-Jóźwiak, B. (2017). Signaling hypotheses of share repurchase ? life cycle approach. The case of Polish listed companies. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 12(2), 245?257. doi: 10.24136/eq.v12i2.13.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.v12i2.13
View in Google Scholar
